Consensus-based guidelines for Video EEG monitoring in the pre-surgical evaluation of children with epilepsy in the UK

Guidelines for Specialized Epilepsy Centers: Executive Summary of the Report of the National Association of Epilepsy Centers Guideline Panel

The National Association of Epilepsy Centers first published the guidelines for epilepsy centers in 1990, which were last updated in 2010. Since that update, epilepsy care and the science of guideline development have advanced significantly, including the importance of incorporating a diversity of stakeholder perspectives such as those of patients and their caregivers. Currently, despite extensive published data examining the efficacy of treatments and diagnostic testing for epilepsy, there remain significant gaps in data identifying the essential services needed for a comprehensive epilepsy center and the optimal manner for their delivery. The trustworthy consensus-based statements (TCBS) process produces unbiased, scientifically valid guidelines through a transparent process that incorporates available evidence and expert opinion. A systematic literature search returned 5937 relevant studies from which 197 articles were retained for data extraction. A panel of 41 stakeholders with diverse expertise evaluated this evidence and drafted recommendations following the TCBS process. The panel reached consensus on 52 recommendations covering services provided by specialized epilepsy centers in both the inpatient and outpatient settings in major topic areas including epilepsy monitoring unit care, surgery, neuroimaging, neuropsychology, genetics, and outpatient care. Recommendations were informed by the evidence review and reflect the consensus of a broad panel of expert opinions.

Routine and sleep EEG: Minimum recording standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and the International League Against Epilepsy

This article provides recommendations on the minimum standards for recording routine ("standard") and sleep electroencephalography (EEG). The joint working group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed the standards according to the methodology suggested for epilepsy-related clinical practice guidelines by the Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group. We reviewed the published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of evidence for sleep induction methods was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method. A tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in technical and methodological studies. Where high-quality published evidence was lacking, we used modified Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. The GRADE system was used to formulate the recommendations. The quality of evidence was low or moderate. We formulated 16 consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards for recording routine and sleep EEG. The recommendations comprise the following aspects: indications, technical standards, recording duration, sleep induction, and provocative methods.

Routine and sleep EEG: Minimum recording standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and the International League Against Epilepsy

This article provides recommendations on the minimum standards for recording routine ("standard") and sleep electroencephalography (EEG). The joint working group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed the standards according to the methodology suggested for epilepsy-related clinical practice guidelines by the Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group. We reviewed the published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of evidence for sleep induction methods was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method. A tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in technical and methodological studies. Where high-quality published evidence was lacking, we used modified Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. The GRADE system was used to formulate the recommendations. The quality of evidence was low or moderate. We formulated 16 consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards for recording routine and sleep EEG. The recommendations comprise the following aspects: indications, technical standards, recording duration, sleep induction, and provocative methods.

Seizure outcome determinants in children after surgery for single unilateral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Role of preoperative ictal and interictal electroencephalography

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an ictal electroencephalographic (EEG) recording as part of presurgical evaluation of children with a demarcated single unilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion is indispensable for surgical decision-making, we investigated the relationship of interictal/ictal EEG and seizure semiology with seizure-free outcome.

METHODS

Data were obtained retrospectively from consecutive patients (≤18 years old) undergoing epilepsy surgery with a single unilateral MRI lesion at our institution over a 6-year period. Video-telemetry EEG (VT-EEG) was classified as concordant or nonconcordant/noninformative in relation to the MRI lesion location. The odds of seizure-free outcome associated with nonconcordant versus concordant for semiology, interictal EEG, and ictal EEG were compared separately. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to correct for confounding variables.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 26 months (interquartile range = 17-37.5), 73 (69%) of 117 children enrolled were seizure-free. Histopathological diagnoses included low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors, n = 46 (39%); focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), n = 33 (28%); mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), n = 23 (20%); polymicrogyria, n = 3 (3%); and nondiagnostic findings/gliosis, n = 12 (10%). The odds of seizure freedom were lower with a nonconcordant interictal EEG (odds ratio [OR] = .227, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .079-.646, p = .006) and nonconcordant ictal EEG (OR = .359, 95% CI = .15-.878, p = .035). In the multivariate logistic regression model, factors predicting lower odds for seizure-free outcome were developmental delay/intellectual disability and higher number of antiseizure medications tried, with a nonsignificant trend for "nonconcordant interictal EEG." In the combined subgroup of patients with FCD and tumors (n = 79), there was no significant relationship of VT-EEG factors and seizure outcomes, whereas in children with MTS and acquired lesions (n = 25), a nonconcordant EEG was associated with poorer seizure outcomes (p = .003).

SIGNIFICANCE

An ictal EEG may not be mandatory for presurgical evaluation, particularly when a well-defined single unilateral MRI lesion has been identified and the interictal EEG is concordant.

Protocols for multimodal polygraphy for cardiorespiratory monitoring in the epilepsy monitoring unit. Part I: Clinical acquisition

Multimodal polygraphy including cardiorespiratory monitoring in the Epilepsy Monitoring is becoming increasingly important. In addition to simultaneous recording of video and EEG, the combination of these techniques not only improves seizure detection, it enhances patient safety and provides information on autonomic clinical symptoms, which may be contributory to localization of seizure foci. However, there are currently no consensus guidelines, nor adequate information on devices available for multimodal polygraphy for cardiorespiratory monitoring in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. Our purpose here is to provide protocols and information on devices for such monitoring. Suggested parameters include respiratory inductance plethysmography (thoraco-abdominal belts for respiratory rate), pulse oximetry and four-lead electrocardiography. Detailed knowledge of devices, their operability and acquisition optimization enables accurate interpretation of signal and differentiation of abnormalities from artifacts. Multimodal polygraphy brings new opportunities for identification of peri-ictal cardiorespiratory abnormalities, and may identify high SUDEP risk individuals.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the international league against epilepsy and international federation of clinical neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events (see Table S1). For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and establish its clinical utility.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events. For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and to establish its clinical utility.

Current practices in epilepsy monitoring units (EMU) in India

AIM

As an initial step to develop guidelines for epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) appropriate for developing countries, we inquired the existing practices in EMUs in India.

METHODS

After checking for the content and face validity as well for clarity, we sent a 52-item online non-anonymized questionnaire to all the 52 EMUs in India.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 51 of the 52 EMUs (98% response rate). The majority of the EMUs are located in major cities and 51% are located in non-governmental corporate hospitals. There are total of 122 prolonged video-EEG monitoring (PVEM) beds in India and 70% EMUs have ≤2 beds. Approximately two-thirds of the EMUs have defined protocols for pre-procedure consent and risk assessment, management of seizure clusters and status epilepticus, continuous observation of patients, and peri‑ictal testing. Only one-third of the EMUs have protocols for management of post-ictal psychosis, anti-suffocation pillows, and protected environment within bathrooms. The waiting period for PVEM is more (49.9 ± 101 vs. 4.9 ± 10.9 days; p = 0.04) and mean cost for 3-day PVEM is less (INR 8311 ± 9021 vs. 30,371 ± 17,563; p <0.0001) in public as compared to private hospitals. There was a negative correlation between cost of PVEM and the waiting period (r=-0.386; p = 0.01). Safety practices are similar in public and private hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Although practices in EMUs in India vary widely, they are comparable to those in developed countries. India has severe shortage of EMUs and long waiting lists for affordable PVEM.

Classification of complications of epilepsy surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures: A proposed protocol and feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

In epilepsy surgery, which aims to treat seizures and thereby to improve the lives of persons with drug-resistant epilepsy, the chances of attaining seizure relief must be carefully weighed against the risks of complications and expected adverse events. The interpretation of data regarding complications of epilepsy surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures is hampered by a lack of uniform definitions and method of data collection.

METHODS

Based on a review of previous definitions and classifications of complications, we developed a proposal for a new classification. This proposal was then subject to revisions after expert opinion within E-pilepsy, an EU-funded European pilot network of reference centers in refractory epilepsy and epilepsy surgery, later incorporated into the ERN (European Reference Network) EpiCARE. This version was discussed with recognized experts, and a final protocol was agreed to after further revision. The final protocol was evaluated in practical use over 1 year in three of the participating centers. One hundred seventy-four consecutive procedures were included with 35 reported complications.

RESULTS

This report presents a multidimensional classification of complications in epilepsy surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures, where complications are characterized in terms of their immediate effects, resulting permanent symptoms, and consequences on activities of daily living.

SIGNIFICANCE

We propose that the protocol will be helpful in the work to promote safety in epilepsy surgery and for future studies designed to identify risk factors for complications. Further work is needed to address the reporting of outcomes as regards neuropsychological function, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

A systematic literature review of recommendations for referral to specialty care for patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

In epilepsy, patients who receive appropriate care receive treatment that differs substantially from those that do not. Given the need for a more detailed assessment of the role of specialty referral in the care of patients with epilepsy, this systematic literature review identified epilepsy care guidelines and recommendations that specifically address when and why people with epilepsy should be referred to specialty care.

METHODS

This study identified recent (in the last 10 years) publications that made best-practice recommendations for referring people with epilepsy to a neurologist or epileptologist. We searched six databases in December 2018: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Web of Science, CINAHL (Ebsco), Scopus (Elsevier). Search terms included "Epilepsy" OR "Seizures," "Guideline" OR "Practice Parameter," and "Referral."

RESULTS

The 15 full-text articles identified included formal guidelines, summaries of these guidelines, or professional commentary that builds upon existing guidelines. Most of these publications came from the U.K and its National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Overall, the included recommendations for referral varied considerably both for new-onset and refractory epilepsy. Although these recommendations were not consistent, it is reasonable to refer patients following the failure of 2 anti-seizure medication (ASM) trials.

SIGNIFICANCE

Guidelines and informal recommendations are not consistent regarding best practices for specialty care referral for patients with epilepsy. These guidelines and recommendations should consider the context of care in real-world settings and suggest pragmatic approaches that optimize seizure control and functioning.

Management and results of epilepsy surgery associated with acyclovir prophylaxis in four pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy due to herpetic encephalitis and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSE) is the most common cause of sporadic viral encephalitis in children and is responsible for epilepsy in approximately half of patients. In addition to medical treatment, epilepsy surgery may be offered to drug-resistant patients but carries a high risk of relapse of herpetic encephalitis. We are reporting our series of patients operated on between 2000 and 2019 with the systematic administration of acyclovir (ACV).

RESULTS

Four pediatric patients aged 4.5-12.8 years with drug-resistant epilepsy post-HSE underwent a tailored focal resection following invasive recordings (three patients) and a complete callosotomy (one patient). The total number of the surgical procedures for the four patients was eight, and a systematic administration of ACV as a prophylactic treatment of herpetic encephalitis relapse was done at each step. No patients had a relapse and the ACV was well-tolerated in all the cases. Following surgery two patients are seizure free, the patient who underwent callosotomy is Engel 3 and the fourth patient, in whom a large epileptic zone has contraindicated a second surgery, is Engel 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series demonstrated the dramatic efficacy of systematic ACV prophylaxis during all cranial surgeries. Moreover, our results on epilepsy, together with those of the literature, encourage more consideration regarding epilepsy surgery in this specific etiology. All types of surgical procedures (curative or palliative) can be offered to the patients, but in the case of focal surgery, due to the poor anatomical limits, invasive recordings are highly recommended.

From international guidelines to real-world practice consensus on investigations and management of status epilepticus in adults: A modified Delphi approach

OBJECTIVE

To establish a consensus which is practical and ready-to-use on investigations (ISE) and for management of status epilepticus (MSE) in adults using a modified Delphi approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 4-round modified Delphi approach was used. First and second rounds were conducted using Google® survey with structured statements and 6-point Likert scale response. Threshold agreement was set to ≥80%. Third round was a face-to-face meeting aimed to facilitate the development of approach algorithms for ISE and MSE. Fourth round was a final review asking participants to rate the algorithms post completion.

RESULTS

The panel consisted of 8 board-certified epileptologists along with 6 neurologists from main regional hospitals across Thailand. Thirty-seven statements for ISE and 68 statements for MSE were used for the Round I survey, 17/37 (45.9%) and 49/68 (72.1%) reached threshold agreement (≥80%). The average absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficients for ISE and MSE were 0.82 (95% CI 0.71, 0.89) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.73, 0.87), respectively; indicating good extent of consensus among participants. Upon Round II, further 10/18 (55.6%) for ISE and 10/19 (52.6%) for MSE reached agreement. In Round III, face-to-face point-by-point discussion was performed to generate approach algorithms. All (100%) provided positive responses with the algorithms post completion in Round IV.

CONCLUSION

A practical and ready-to-use consensus using modified Delphi approach on ISE and MSE was developed in a Thai regional hospital context. In real practice, this approach is more suitable and feasible for a localized setting when compared with totally adopting international guidelines.

Epilepsy monitoring units can be safe places; a prospective study in a large cohort

OBJECTIVE

No international guideline is available for minimum safety measures at epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs), although recommendations for preferred practices exist. These are mostly based on expert opinion, without evidence of effectiveness. We do not apply all of these preferred practices at our EMU setting. We audited adverse events and diagnostic utility at our EMU over one year.

METHODS

From May 2018 to May 2019, we prospectively collected data concerning adverse events and diagnostic utility of all EMU admissions (noninvasive video-electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings); during these admissions, individuals can be ambulant within their EMU room.

RESULTS

There were 1062 admissions comprising 1518 EMU days. In 2% of the admissions, a complication occurred, mostly a fall without injury (n = 6). In almost half of the falls, this was from the bed. Complications occurred most often during admissions for presurgical evaluation. Antiseizure medication (ASM) was tapered in 86% of presurgical cases, but no serious injury occurred, and occurring seizures were effectively treated with intranasal midazolam if needed.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall adverse event rate was low. Falls are the most common adverse event comparable with previously published fall rates at other EMUs where people are restricted to their bed. We showed that restricted ambulation at a well-monitored EMU is not necessary and possibly unwanted. No serious injury due to tapering of ASM occurred, and intranasal midazolam was shown to be effective as acute seizure treatment.