Invasive evaluation in children (SEEG vs subdural grids)

Advanced approaches in Pediatric Epilepsy surgery

While recent technological advancements are reshaping the landscape of surgical epilepsy management, the established techniques of resective and disconnective surgeries guided by electrographic monitoring remain the workhorse interventions for the management of refractory seizures and have the highest likelihood of achieving complete seizure resolution. Here we discuss examples of recent developments in surgical approaches and techniques for resective and disconnective surgeries with discussion of their indications and potential advantages.

Feasibility and safety of stereoelectroencephalography in young children

PURPOSE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a diagnostic surgery that implants electrodes to identify areas of epileptic onset in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). SEEG is effective in identifying the epileptic zone; however, placement of electrodes in very young children has been considered contraindicated due to skull thinness. The goal of this study was to evaluate if SEEG is safe and accurate in young children with thin skulls.

METHODS

Four children under the age of two years old with DRE underwent SEEG to locate the region of seizure onset. Presurgical planning and placement of electrodes were performed using ROSA One Brain. Preoperative electrode plans were merged with postoperative CT scans to determine accuracy. Euclidean distance between the planned and actual trajectories was calculated using a 3D coordinate system at both the entry and target points for each electrode.

RESULTS

Sixty-three electrodes were placed among four patients. Mean skull thickness at electrode entry sites was 2.34 mm. The mean difference between the planned and actual entry points was 1.12 mm, and the mean difference between the planned and actual target points was 1.73 mm. No significant correlation was observed between planned and actual target points and skull thickness (Pearson R =  - 0.170). No perioperative or postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SEEG can be safe and accurate in children under two years of age despite thin skulls. SEEG should be considered for young children with DRE, and age and skull thickness are not definite contraindications to the surgery.

Learn how to interpret and use intracranial EEG findings

Epilepsy surgery is the therapy of choice for many patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Recognizing and describing ictal and interictal patterns with intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings is important in order to most efficiently leverage advantages of this technique to accurately delineate the seizure-onset zone before undergoing surgery. In this seminar in epileptology, we address learning objective "1.4.11 Recognize and describe ictal and interictal patterns with intracranial recordings" of the International League against Epilepsy curriculum for epileptologists. We will review principal considerations of the implantation planning, summarize the literature for the most relevant ictal and interictal EEG patterns within and beyond the Berger frequency spectrum, review invasive stimulation for seizure and functional mapping, discuss caveats in the interpretation of intracranial EEG findings, provide an overview on special considerations in children and in subdural grids/strips, and review available quantitative/signal analysis approaches. To be as practically oriented as possible, we will provide a mini atlas of the most frequent EEG patterns, highlight pearls for its not infrequently challenging interpretation, and conclude with two illustrative case examples. This article shall serve as a useful learning resource for trainees in clinical neurophysiology/epileptology by providing a basic understanding on the concepts of invasive intracranial EEG.

Safety, Accuracy, and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Stereo Electroencephalography in Children of Different Ages

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Aimed to investigate the safety, accuracy, and efficacy of stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) in children of various ages, with particular emphasis on those younger than 3 years. There is limited guidance regarding whether SEEG can conducted on very young children.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between July 2018 and August 2022. It involved 88 patients who underwent 99 robot-assisted SEEG procedures at our center. The patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their age at the time of the robot-assisted SEEG procedures: group 1 (3 years and younger, n = 28), group 2 (age 3-6 years, n = 27), and group 3 (older than 6 years, n = 44). Clinical data, SEEG demographics, complications, and seizure outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 675 electrodes were implanted, with an average of 6.82 ± 3.47 (2.00-16.00) electrodes per patient (P = .052). The average target point error for the 675 electrodes was 1.93 ± 1.11 mm, and the average entry point error was 1.30 ± 0.97 mm (P = .536 and P = .549, respectively). The overall percentage of complications was 6.06% (P = .879). No severe or long-term neurologic impairment was observed. Of the total 99 procedures included in this study, 78 were admitted for epilepsy surgery for the first time, while 9 patients were treated twice and 1 patient was treated 3 times. There were 21 radiofrequency thermocoagulation and 78 second-stage resective procedures performed after SEEG. There was no statistically significant difference in Engel class I outcomes among the patients who underwent SEEG in the 3 age groups (P = .621).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted SEEG were demonstrated to be safe, accurate, and efficient across different age groups of children. This technique is suitable for children younger than 3 years who have indications for SEEG placement.

Frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency: methodology, results, complications and stereotactic application accuracy in pediatric hypothalamic hamartomas

Objective

We aimed to investigate the methodology, results, complications and stereotactic application accuracy of electrode implantation and its explanatory variables in stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-RFTC) for pediatric hypothalamic hamartoma.

Methods

Children with hypothalamic hamartoma who underwent robot-assisted SEEG-RFTC between December 2017 and November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The methodology, seizure outcome, complications, in vivo accuracy of electrode implantation and its explanatory variables were analyzed.

Results

A total of 161 electrodes were implanted in 28 patients with 30 surgeries. Nine electrodes not following the planned trajectories due to intraoperative replanning were excluded, and the entry point and target point errors of 152 electrodes were statistically analyzed. The median entry point error was 0.87 mm (interquartile range, 0.50-1.41 mm), and the median target point error was 2.74 mm (interquartile range, 2.01-3.63 mm). Multifactor analysis showed that whether the electrode was bent (b = 2.16, p < 0.001), the length of the intracranial electrode (b = 0.02, p = 0.049), and the entry point error (b = 0.337, p = 0.017) had statistically significant effects on the target error. During follow-up (mean duration 31 months), 27 of 30 (90%) procedures were seizure-free. The implantation-related complication rate was 2.6% (4/152), and the major complication rate in all procedures was 6.7% (2/30).

Conclusion

Robot-assisted SEEG-RFTC is a safe, effective and accurate procedure for pediatric hypothalamic hamartoma. Explanatory variables significantly associated with the target point localization error at multivariate analysis include whether the intracranial electrode is bent, the intracranial electrode length and the entry point error.

Successful stereoelectroencephalography re-evaluation in epilepsy patients after failed initial subdural grid evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy surgery success is dependent on accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone. Despite the use of invasive EEG using subdural grids and strips, surgical failures can occur. In this series, we explore the utility of a second evaluation with stereoelectroencephalography in patients whose initial invasive evaluation with subdural grid electrodes was unsuccessful in localizing seizure origin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent subdural grid evaluation (SDE) at our center and identified patients who underwent a re-evaluation with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).

RESULTS

We identified three patients who had both subdural and SEEG electrodes in the region of the identified epileptogenic zone in whom the initial SDE evaluation failed to make the patients seizure-free. Two of these patients underwent a second resection and became seizure-free.

SIGNIFICANCE

Stereoelectroencephalography can be useful in the re-evaluation and re-operation of patients who previously had surgical failure using SDE.

Trans-Interhemispheric Stereoelectroencephalography Depth Electrode Placement for Mesial Frontal Lobe Explorations in Medically Refractory Epilepsy: A Technical Note and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an established and safe methodology for extra-operative invasive monitoring in patients with medical refractory epilepsy. SEEG has several advantages such as the ability to record deep cortical structures, mapping the epileptogenic zone in a three-dimensional manner, and analyze bihemispheric regions without the need for bilateral craniotomies. In patients with bilateral hemispheric hypotheses, especially the mesial surface of frontal lobes, bilateral lead placement is compulsory to further define and localize the epileptogenic zone. In this particular cohort of patients, bilateral monitoring may be accomplished from a single entry point using trans-interhemispheric placement of the electrodes. The use of trans-interhemispheric monitoring offers several advantages including sparing the need for additional leads.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that, given the lack of the falx as a limiting structure in the ventral and mesial frontal lobe regions, trans-interhemispheric SEEG placement is feasible and a potential benefit for the SEEG method.

METHODS

We report on 6 patients who underwent bilateral monitoring using trans-interhemispheric SEEG lead placement and discuss the operative technique.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent trans-interhemispheric monitoring, with a median of 3 leads per patient (19 total). Trajectory error was minimal (<0.3 mm), and operating room time was comparable with that in previous reports. All leads were placed without adverse events, mislocalization, electrode hemorrhages, or any other complications. All patients had successful localization of the epileptogenic zone.

CONCLUSION

Trans-interhemispheric SEEG to monitor the mesial wall of frontal lobe regions is technically feasible. No adverse events were observed, suggesting a favorable safety profile.

Stereoelectroencephalography before 2 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a widely used technique for localizing seizure onset zones prior to resection. However, its use has traditionally been avoided in children under 2 years of age because of concerns regarding pin fixation in the immature skull, intraoperative and postoperative electrode bolt security, and stereotactic registration accuracy. In this retrospective study, the authors describe their experience using SEEG in patients younger than 2 years of age, with a focus on the procedure’s safety, feasibility, and accuracy as well as surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children under 2 years of age who had undergone SEEG while at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia between November 2017 and July 2021 was performed. Data on clinical characteristics, surgical procedure, imaging results, electrode accuracy measurements, and postoperative outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Five patients younger than 2 years of age underwent SEEG during the study period (median age 20 months, range 17–23 months). The mean age at seizure onset was 9 months. Developmental delay was present in all patients, and epilepsy-associated genetic diagnoses included tuberous sclerosis (n = 1), KAT6B (n = 1), and NPRL3 (n = 1). Cortical lesions included tubers from tuberous sclerosis (n = 1), mesial temporal sclerosis (n = 1), and cortical dysplasia (n = 3). The mean number of placed electrodes was 11 (range 6–20 electrodes). Bilateral electrodes were placed in 1 patient. Seizure onset zones were identified in all cases. There were no SEEG-related complications, including skull fracture, electrode misplacement, hemorrhage, infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, electrode pullout, neurological deficit, or death. The mean target point error for all electrodes was 1.0 mm. All patients proceeded to resective surgery, with a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 8–53 months). All patients attained a favorable epilepsy outcome, including Engel class IA (n = 2), IC (n = 1), ID (n = 1), and IIA (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG can be safely, accurately, and effectively utilized in children under age 2 with good postoperative outcomes using standard SEEG equipment. With minimal modification, this procedure is feasible in those with immature skulls and guides the epilepsy team’s decision-making for early and optimal treatment of refractory epilepsy through effective localization of seizure onset zones.

Subdural electrodes versus stereoelectroencephalography for pediatric epileptogenic zone localization: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the relative safety and effectiveness of invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes (SDEs) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 176 patients who underwent invasive monitoring evaluations at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh between January 2000 and September 2021. To examine differences between SDE and sEEG groups, independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables were performed. A p value < 0.1 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 134 patients (76%) in the SDE group and 42 (24%) in the sEEG group. There was a difference in the proportion with complications (17.9% in the SDE group vs 7.1% in the sEEG group, p = 0.09) and resection (75.4% SDE vs 21.4% sEEG, p < 0.01) between SDE and sEEG patients. However, there was no observable difference in the rates of postresection seizure freedom at 1-year clinical follow-up (60.2% SDE vs 75.0% sEEG, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings reveal a difference in rates of surgical complications and resection between SDEs and sEEG. Larger prospective, multi-institutional pediatric comparative effectiveness studies may further explore these associations.

A hierarchical anatomical framework and workflow for organizing stereotactic encephalography in epilepsy

Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly utilized method for invasive monitoring in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Yet, the lack of standardization for labeling electrodes hinders communication among clinicians. A rational clustering of contacts based on anatomy rather than arbitrary physical leads may help clinical neurophysiologists interpret seizure networks. We identified SEEG electrodes on post‐implant CTs and registered them to preoperative MRIs segmented according to an anatomical atlas. Individual contacts were automatically assigned to anatomical areas independent of lead. These contacts were then organized using a hierarchical anatomical schema for display and interpretation. Bipolar‐referenced signal cross‐correlations were used to compare the similarity of grouped signals within a conventional montage versus this anatomical montage. As a result, we developed a hierarchical organization for SEEG contacts using well‐accepted, free software that is based solely on their post‐implant anatomical location. When applied to three example SEEG cases for epilepsy, clusters of contacts that were anatomically related collapsed into standardized groups. Qualitatively, seizure events organized using this framework were better visually clustered compared to conventional schemes. Quantitatively, signals grouped by anatomical region were more similar to each other than electrode‐based groups as measured by Pearson correlation. Further, we uploaded visualizations of SEEG reconstructions into the electronic medical record, rendering them durably useful given the interpretable electrode labels. In conclusion, we demonstrate a standardized, anatomically grounded approach to the organization of SEEG neuroimaging and electrophysiology data that may enable improved communication among and across surgical epilepsy teams and promote a clearer view of individual seizure networks.

Epidural grid, a new methodology of invasive intracranial EEG monitoring: A technical note and experience of a single center

INTRODUCTION

Subdural grid monitoring (SDG) has the advantage to provide continuous coverage over a larger area of cortex, direct visualization of electrode location and functional mapping. However, SDG can cause direct irritation of the cortex or postoperative headaches due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Epidural grid monitoring (EDG) without opening the dura is thought to reduce the possibility of these complications. We report our experience with EDG.

METHODS

We described our surgical technique of EDG in invasive intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) monitoring. A retrospective review of 30 patients who underwent grid placement of iEEG between March 2019 and December 2020 was performed to compare SDG and EDG.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients, 10 patients underwent SDG and 20 patients underwent EDG. There was no difference in age between SDG and EDG groups (p = 0.13). Also, there was no difference in the number of grid electrodes, craniotomy size, number of electrodes per craniotomy area and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.32, 0.84, 0.58 and 0.40). However, the maximum number of electrodes that have been undermined from the bone margin was much higher in SDG group (SDG 4.6 ± 2.2 vs. EDG 2.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.001). The demand for postoperative analgesics was significantly lower in EDG group (SDG 13.4 ± 9.1 vs. EDG 4.1 ± 4.3; p = 0.012); and the demand for postoperative antiemetics also tended to be low (SDG 4.6 ± 3.6 vs. EDG 1.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in craniotomy and electrode insertion between the two groups; however, the EDG group showed less postoperative headache and nausea. Though not in direct contact with the cortex, the quality of the electrophysiological signal received through the electrode in EDG is comparable to that of the SDG. The EDG enables to detect the onset of seizure and delineate the epileptogenic zone sufficiently. Moreover, functional mapping is possible with EDG. Therefore, EDG has the sufficient potential to replace SDG for monitoring of the lateral surface of brain.

Virtual reality-based 3-dimensional localization of stereotactic EEG (SEEG) depth electrodes and related brain anatomy in pediatric epilepsy surgery

INTRODUCTION

The increasing use of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in the USA and the need for three-dimensional (3D) appreciation of complex spatial relationships between implanted stereotactic EEG depth electrodes and surrounding brain and cerebral vasculature are a challenge to clinicians who are used to two-dimensional (2D) appreciation of cortical anatomy having been traditionally trained on 2D radiologic imaging. Virtual reality and its 3D renderings have grown increasingly common in the multifaceted practice of neurosurgery. However, there exists a paucity in the literature regarding this emerging technology in its utilization of epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

An IRB-approved, single-center retrospective study identifying all SEEG pediatric patients in which virtual reality was applied was observed.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients identified who underwent an SEEG procedure, 43.5% (20/46) had a 3D rendering (3DR) of their SEEG depth electrodes. All 3DRs were used during patient-family education and discussion among the Epilepsy multidisciplinary team meetings, while 35% (7/20) were used during neuronavigation in surgery. Three successful representative cases of its application were presented.

DISCUSSION

Our institution's experience regarding virtual reality in the 3D representation of SEEG depth electrodes and the application to pre-surgical planning, patient-family education, multidisciplinary communication, and intraoperative neuronavigation demonstrate its applicability in comprehensive epilepsy patient care.

Global and intertuberal epileptic networks in tuberous sclerosis based on stereoelectroencephalographic (sEEG) findings: a quantitative EEG analysis in pediatric subjects and surgical implications

OBJECTIVE

Recent evidence favors a network concept in tuberous sclerosis (TSC) with seizure generation and propagation related to changes in global and regional connectivity between multiple, anatomically distant tubers. Direct exploration of network dynamics in TSC has been made possible through intracranial sampling with stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG). The objective of this study is to define epileptic networks in TSC using quantitative analysis of sEEG recordings. We also discuss the impact of the definition of these epileptic networks on surgical decision-making.

METHODS

Intracranial sEEG recordings were obtained from four pediatric patients who presented with medically refractory epilepsy secondary to TSC and subjected to quantitative signal analysis methods. Cortical connectivity was quantified by calculating pairwise coherence between all contacts and constructing an association matrix. The global coherence, defined as the ratio of the largest eigenvalue to the sum of all the eigenvalues, was calculated for each frequency band (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma). Spatial distribution of the connectivity was identified by plotting the leading principal component (product of the largest eigenvalue and its corresponding eigenvector).

RESULTS

Four pediatric subjects with TSC underwent invasive intracranial monitoring with sEEG, comprising 31 depth electrodes and 250 contacts, for localization of the epileptogenic focus and guidance of subsequent surgical intervention. Quantitative connectivity analysis revealed a change in global coherence during the ictal period in the beta/low gamma (14-30 Hz) and high gamma (31-80 Hz) bands. Our results corroborate findings from existing literature, which implicate higher frequencies as a driver of synchrony and desynchrony.

CONCLUSIONS

Coordinated high-frequency activity in the beta/low gamma and high gamma bands among spatially distant sEEG define the ictal period in TSC. This time-dependent change in global coherence demonstrates evidence for intra-tuberal and inter-tuberal connectivity in TSC. This observation has surgical implications. It suggests that targeting multiple tubers has a higher chance of seizure control as there is a higher chance of disrupting the epileptic network. The use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) allowed us to target multiple disparately located tubers in a minimally invasive manner with good seizure control outcomes.

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in young children: technical challenges and considerations

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is frequently employed to localize epileptogenic zones in patients with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE). Its methodology is well described in adults, but less so in children. Given the limited information available on pediatric applications, the objective is to describe the unique technical challenges and considerations of sEEG in the pediatric population. In this report, we describe our institutional experience with the technical aspects of robot-assisted sEEG in an exclusively pediatric epilepsy surgery unit, focusing on pre-, intra-, and post-operative nuances that are particular to the pediatric population. The pediatric population presents several unique challenges in sEEG, including reduced skull thickness relative to adults, incomplete neurologic development, and often special behavioral considerations. Pre-operative selection of putative epileptogenic zones requires careful multidisciplinary decision-making. Intraoperative attention to nuances in positioning, clamp selection, registration, and electrode placement are necessary. Activity considerations and electrode migration and removal are key post-operative considerations. Robot-assisted sEEG is a valuable tool in the armamentarium of techniques to characterize MRE. However, special considerations must be given to the pediatric population to optimize safety and efficacy.

The role of stereo-electroencephalography to localize the epileptogenic zone in children with nonlesional brain magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and outcome predictive factors in pediatric epilepsy patients evaluated with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG).

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients who underwent SEEG implantation at the Pediatric Epilepsy Center in New York Presbyterian Hospital between June 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled for retrospective chart review. Postoperative seizure outcomes were evaluated in patients with at least 12-months follow up. Meta-analysis was conducted via electronic literature search of data reported from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate significant surgical outcome predictors for SEEG evaluation in the pediatric population.

RESULTS

In the current case series of 25 postsurgical patients with long-term follow up, 16 patients (64.0%) were seizure free. An additional 7 patients (28.0%) showed significant seizure improvement and 2 patients (8.0%) showed no change in seizure activity. Patients with nonlesional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) achieved seizure freedom in 50% (5/10) of cases. By comparison, 73% (11/15) of patients with lesional MRI achieved seizure freedom. Out of 12 studies, 158 pediatric patients were identified for inclusion in a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of SEEG. Seizure freedom was reported 54.4% (n = 86/158) of patients at last follow up. Among patients with nonlesional MRI, 45% (n = 24) achieved seizure freedom compared with patients with lesional MRI findings (61.2%, n:= 60) (p = 0.02). The risk for seizure recurrence was 2.15 times higher [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.37, p = 0.033] in patients diagnosed with nonlesional focal epilepsy compared to those with lesional epilepsy [ 1.49 (95% CI 1.06-2.114, p = 0.021].

CONCLUSION

Evaluation by SEEG implantation in pediatric epilepsy is effective in localizing the epileptogenic zone with favorable outcome. Presence of a non-lesional brain MRI was associated with lower chances of seizure freedom. Further research is warranted to improve the efficacy of SEEG in localizing the epileptogenic zone in pediatric patients with non-lesional brain MRI.

Stereoelectroencephalography in the very young: Case report

•

To the best of our knowledge this is the youngest reported patient implanted with SEEG.

•

Accurate and safe SEEG surgery may be feasible in patients as young as 17 months-old.

•

Robotic SEEG with standard tools may be effectively used in this very young population.

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly popular invasive monitoring approach to epilepsy surgery in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. The technique allows a three-dimensional definition of the epileptogenic zones (EZ) in the brain. It has been shown to be safe and effective in adults and older children but has been used sparingly in children less than two years old due to concerns about pin fixation in thin bone, registration accuracy, and bolt security. As such, most current series of pediatric invasive EEG explorations do not include young participants, and, when they do, SEEG is often not utilized for these patients. Recent national survey data further suggests SEEG is infrequently utilized in very young patients. We present a novel case of SEEG used to localize the EZ in a 17-month-old patient with thin cranial bone, an open fontanelle, and severe drug-resistant epilepsy due to tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), with excellent accuracy, surgical results, and seizure remission.

Surgical evaluation in children <3 years of age with drug-resistant epilepsy: Patient characteristics, diagnostic utilization, and potential for treatment delays

OBJECTIVE

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) occurs at higher rates in children <3 years old. Epilepsy surgery is effective, but rarely utilized in young children despite developmental benefits of early seizure freedom. The present study aims to identify unique patient characteristics and evaluation strategies in children <3 years old who undergo epilepsy surgery evaluation as a means to assess contributors and potential solutions to health care disparities in this group.

METHODS

The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy Surgery Database, a multicentered, cross-sectional collaboration of 21 US pediatric epilepsy centers, collects prospective data on children <18 years of age referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, diagnostic utilization, and surgical treatment between children <3 years old and those older undergoing initial presurgical evaluation. We evaluated patient characteristics leading to delayed referral (>1 year) after DRE diagnosis in the very young.

RESULTS

The cohort included 437 children, of whom 71 (16%) were <3 years of age at referral. Children evaluated before the age of 3 years more commonly had abnormal neurological examinations (p = .002) and daily seizures (p = .001). At least one ancillary test was used in 44% of evaluations. Fifty-nine percent were seizure-free following surgery (n = 34), with 35% undergoing limited focal resections. Children with delayed referrals more often had focal aware (p < .001) seizures and recommendation for palliative surgeries (p < .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

There are relatively few studies of epilepsy surgery in the very young. Surgery is effective, but may be disproportionally offered to those with severe presentations. Relatively low utilization of ancillary testing may contribute to reduced surgical therapy for those without evident lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Despite this, a sizeable portion of patients have favorable outcome after focal epilepsy surgery resections.

Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in pediatric epilepsy: Utility in children with and without prior epilepsy surgery failure

BACKGROUND

When noninvasive modalities fail to adequately localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in children with medically refractory epilepsy, invasive interrogation with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) or subdural electrodes may be required. Our center utilizes SEEG for invasive monitoring in a carefully selected population of children, many of whom have seizures despite a prior surgical resection. We describe the cohort of patients who underwent SEEG in the first 5 years of its employment in our institution, almost half of which had a history of a failed epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of the first 44 consecutive children who underwent SEEG at Nicklaus Children's Hospital (Miami, Florida), a large, level 4 epilepsy referral center. Patient demographic, clinical, radiographic, and electrophysiological information was collected prospectively. Student's t-test was used for sampling of means and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for evaluation of variance beyond 2 means; chi-square test of independence was used to assess the relationship between categorical variables.

RESULTS

There were 44 patients in this cohort, of whom 17 (38.6 %) were male. The mean age of seizure onset was 6.2 years. Twenty-one patients (47.7 %) had previously failed an epilepsy surgery. Patients with a history of prior epilepsy surgery failure were older at SEEG implantation (17.6 vs. 13.7 years; p = 0.043), were more likely to have SEEG for identification of resection margins (9 vs. 4; p = 0.034), and had fewer electrodes placed (5.9 vs. 7.5; p = 0.016). No difference was seen in complication rates between groups with only 3/297 electrodes placed associated with complications, all of which were minor. Post-SEEG, 29 (65.9 %) patients underwent focal resection, 7 patients had VNS insertion, 3 underwent RNS placement, and 5 had no further intervention. The majority of patients that underwent resection in both groups experienced an improvement in seizures (Engel class I-III), reported by 13/15 (86.7 %) in those naive to surgery and 10/14 (71.4 %) in those with prior surgical failure. Seizure-freedom was much lower in those with prior epilepsy surgery, seen in only 4/14 (28.6 %) versus 8/15 (53.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Our data supports current literature on SEEG as a safe and effective method of electrophysiological evaluation in children naive to surgery and adds that it is a safe technique in children with a history of failed epilepsy surgery. There was no difference in complication rates, which were <1 % in both groups. A favorable outcome was seen in the majority of patients in both groups; the seizure freedom rate, however, was much lower in those with prior epilepsy surgery.

Comparison of subdural grid and stereoelectroencephalography in a cohort of pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare adverse events and outcomes between stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrode (SDE) implantation in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 108 patients who underwent intracranial monitoring with SEEG or SDE implantation at Children's Hospital Colorado between January 2011 and June 2019.

RESULTS

There were 47 patients who underwent 53 SEEG implantations and 61 patients who underwent 64 SDE implantations, with an average age of 12.45 years (range: 1.22-19.96 years). Post-implantation imaging was performed in all SEEG implantations and 42 SDE implantations. 38 % and 88 % of SEEG and SDE implantations, respectively, had a hemorrhage of any kind (p < 0.01). Clinically significant hemorrhages did not differ between the two groups, though one death was reported in the SEEG group. No patient undergoing SEEG implantation received blood products compared to 20 % of SDE patients (p < 0.01). The rate of infection in SEEG patients was 4% compared to 33 % for SDE patients (p = 0.01). Resection was completed in 60 % of SEEG patients versus 93 % for SDE patients (p < 0.01). Rate of seizure response was not significantly different between the two groups, with 81 % and 71 % of SEEG and SDE patients, respectively, reaching Engel class I or II at 12 months (p = 0.76).

SIGNIFICANCE

In pediatric patients at a single institution, SEEG is associated with less adverse effects overall yet similar rates of seizure freedom compared to SDE implantation. This includes significantly lower rates of asymptomatic hemorrhage, infection and need for blood transfusion associated with SEEG monitoring. There was no statistical difference in clinically significant hemorrhages between the two groups, although rare in both.

Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography for Refractory Epilepsy: Technique and Nuances

Background

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has become an integral part of epilepsy surgery, often used in the localization of the epileptogenic zone. It is an essential modality not only in the evaluation of nonlesional but also lesional drug refractory epilepsy, especially in the presence of anatomo-electro-clinical discordance.

Objective

To describe our technique and the operative nuances involved in the performance of robotic SEEG placement.

Methods

A 28-year lady with seizure onset at the age of 15 years presented with two types of seizures: one was associated with an aura of chest discomfort, palpitations along with oral and bilateral automatisms. There was associated speech and behavioral arrest along with ictal urinary incontinence. The other type has head turning to the right with secondary generalization lasting up to 1 min.

Results

Multimodality investigations showed bilateral temporal origin of seizures. SEEG evaluation revealed left amygdala and anterior temporal neocortical (ATL) origin of seizures. The patient underwent left ATL and amygdalectomy. Histopathology revealed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD type Ib). The patient became seizure free (ILAE Class 1) at 1-year follow up.

Conclusion

Robotic-guided SEEG is a safe and accurate method of evaluating complex MRI negative epilepsy.

The UK experience of stereoelectroencephalography in children: An analysis of factors predicting the identification of a seizure-onset zone and subsequent seizure freedom

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is being used more frequently in the pre-surgical evaluation of children with focal epilepsy. It has been shown to be safe in children, but there are no multicenter studies assessing the rates and factors associated with the identification of a putative seizure-onset zone (SOZ) and subsequent seizure freedom following SEEG-guided epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of all children undergoing SEEG at six of seven UK Children's Epilepsy Surgery Service centers from 2014 to 2019. Demographics, noninvasive evaluation, SEEG, and operative factors were analyzed to identify variables associated with the identification of a putative SOZ and subsequent seizure freedom following SEEG-guided epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five patients underwent 139 SEEG explorations using a total of 1767 electrodes. A putative SOZ was identified in 117 patients (85.7%); odds of successfully finding an SOZ were 6.4 times greater for non-motor seizures compared to motor seizures (p = 0.02) and 3.6 times more if four or more seizures were recorded during SEEG (p = 0.03). Of 100 patients undergoing surgical treatment, 47 (47.0%) had an Engel class I outcome at a median follow-up of 1.3 years; the only factor associated with outcome was indication for SEEG (p = 0.03); an indication of "recurrence following surgery/treatment" had a 5.9 times lower odds of achieving seizure freedom (p = 0.002) compared to the "lesion negative" cohort, whereas other indications ("lesion positive, define extent," "lesion positive, discordant noninvasive investigations" and "multiple lesions") were not statistically significantly different.

SIGNIFICANCE

This large nationally representative cohort illustrates that SEEG-guided surgery can still achieve high rates of seizure freedom. Seizure semiology and the number of seizures recorded during SEEG are important factors in the identification of a putative SOZ, and the indication for SEEG is an important factor in postoperative outcomes.

Focal polymicrogyria in children: Contribution of invasive explorations and epileptogenicity mapping in the surgical decision

OBJECTIVE

Report of the contribution of invasive EEG (iEEG) and epileptogenicity mappings (EM) in a pediatric cohort of patients with epilepsy associated with focal polymicrogyria (PMG) and candidates for resective surgery.

METHOD

Retrospective pediatric case series of patients presenting focal PMG-related refractory epilepsy undergoing an invasive exploration (iEEG) at Fondation Rothschild Hospital. We reviewed clinical data, structural MRI, and visual analysis of iEEG recordings. Moreover, time-frequency analysis of SEEG signals with a neuroimaging approach (epileptogenicity maps) was used to support visual analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2019, eight patients were selected. Five patients were explored with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) only, one patient with subdural exploration (SDE) only and two patients first underwent SEEG and then SDE. The mean age at seizure onset was 40.3 months (range 3-120), and the mean age for the iEEG 10.8 years (range 7-15). The epileptogenic zone (EZ) appeared concordant to the PMG lesion in only one case, was larger in three cases, smaller in two cases and different in one case. Four cases were selected for tailored resective surgery and one for total callosotomy. Two patients remained seizure-free at their last follow-up (mean 32.6 months, range 7-98). Epileptogenicity mapping (EM) refined the qualitative analysis, showing in four patients an EZ larger than visually defined.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first pediatric study to analyze the value of iEEG and EM as well as operability in focal PMG-related refractory epilepsy. The results illustrate the complexity of this pathology with variable concordance between the EZ and the lesion and mixed response to surgery.

Electrical Stimulation Mapping of Brain Function: A Comparison of Subdural Electrodes and Stereo-EEG

Despite technological and interpretative advances, the non-invasive modalities used for pre-surgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), fail to generate a concordant anatomo-electroclinical hypothesis for the location of the seizure onset zone in many patients. This requires chronic monitoring with intracranial electroencephalography (EEG), which facilitates better localization of the seizure onset zone, and allows evaluation of the functional significance of cortical regions-of-interest by electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). There are two principal modalities for intracranial EEG, namely subdural electrodes and stereotactic depth electrodes (stereo-EEG). Although ESM is considered the gold standard for functional mapping with subdural electrodes, there have been concerns about its utility with stereo-EEG. This is mainly because subdural electrodes allow contiguous sampling of the dorsolateral convexity of cerebral hemispheres, and permit delineation of the extent of eloquent functional areas on the cortical surface. Stereo-EEG, while having relatively sparse sampling on the cortical surface, offers the ability to access the depth of sulci, mesial and basal surfaces of cerebral hemispheres, and deep structures such as the insula, which are largely inaccessible to subdural electrodes. As stereo-EEG is increasingly the preferred modality for intracranial monitoring, we find it opportune to summarize the literature for ESM with stereo-EEG in this narrative review. Emerging evidence shows that ESM for defining functional neuroanatomy is feasible with stereo-EEG, but probably requires a different approach for interpretation and clinical decision making compared to ESM with subdural electrodes. We have also compared ESM with stereo-EEG and subdural electrodes, for current thresholds required to evoke desired functional responses vs. unwanted after-discharges. In this regard, there is preliminary evidence that ESM with stereo-EEG may be safer than ESM with subdural grids. Finally, we have highlighted important unanswered clinical and scientific questions for ESM with stereo-EEG in the hope to encourage future research and collaborative efforts.

Contemporaneous evaluation of patient experience, surgical strategy, and seizure outcomes in patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography or subdural electrode monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial electrographic localization of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) can guide surgical approaches for medically refractory epilepsy patients, especially when the presurgical workup is discordant or functional cortical mapping is required. Minimally invasive stereotactic placement of depth electrodes, stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), has garnered increasing use, but limited data exist to evaluate its postoperative outcomes in the context of the contemporaneous availability of both SEEG and subdural electrode (SDE) monitoring. We aimed to assess the patient experience, surgical intervention, and seizure outcomes associated with these two epileptic focus mapping techniques during a period of rapid adoption of neuromodulatory and ablative epilepsy treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 66 consecutive adult intracranial electrode monitoring cases at our institution between 2014 and 2017. Monitoring was performed with either SEEG (n = 47) or SDEs (n = 19).

RESULTS

Both groups had high rates of SOZ identification (SEEG 91.5%, SDE 88.2%, P = .69). The majority of patients achieved Engel class I (SEEG 29.3%, SDE 35.3%) or II outcomes (SEEG 31.7%, SDE 29.4%) after epilepsy surgery, with no significant difference between groups (P = .79). SEEG patients reported lower median pain scores (P = .03) and required less narcotic pain medication (median = 94.5 vs 594.6 milligram morphine equivalents, P = .0003). Both groups had low rates of symptomatic hemorrhage (SEEG 0%, SDE 5.3%, P = .11). On multivariate logistic regression, undergoing resection or ablation (vs responsive neurostimulation/vagus nerve stimulation) was the only significant independent predictor of a favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio = 25.4, 95% confidence interval = 3.48-185.7, P = .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although both SEEG and SDE monitoring result in favorable seizure control, SEEG has the advantage of superior pain control, decreased narcotic usage, and lack of routine need for intensive care unit stay. Despite a heterogenous collection of epileptic semiologies, seizure outcome was associated with the therapeutic surgical modality and not the intracranial monitoring technique. The potential for an improved postoperative experience makes SEEG a promising method for intracranial electrode monitoring.

Utility of invasive electroencephalography in children 3 years old and younger with refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Early surgical intervention for pediatric refractory epilepsy is increasingly advocated as surgery has become safer and data have demonstrated improved outcomes with early seizure control. There is concern that the risks associated with staged invasive electroencephalography (EEG) in very young children outweigh the potential benefits. Here, the authors present a cohort of children with refractory epilepsy who were referred for invasive monitoring, and they evaluate the role and safety of staged invasive EEG in those 3 years old and younger.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of children 3 years and younger with epilepsy, who had been managed surgically at two institutions between 2001 and 2015. A cohort of pediatric patients older than 3 years of age was used for comparison. Demographics, seizure etiology, surgical management, surgical complications, and adverse events were recorded. Statistical analysis was completed using Stata version 13. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients (45 patients aged ≤ 3 [47.9%]) and 208 procedures were included for analysis. Eighty-six procedures (41.3%) were performed in children younger than 3 years versus 122 in the older cohort (58.7%). Forty-two patients underwent grid placement (14 patients aged ≤ 3 [33.3%]); 3 of them developed complications associated with the implant (3/42 [7.14%]), none of whom were among the younger cohort. Across all procedures, 11 complications occurred in the younger cohort versus 5 in the older patients (11/86 [12.8%] vs 5/122 [4.1%], p = 0.032). Two adverse events occurred in the younger group versus 1 in the older group (2/86 [2.32%] vs 1/122 [0.82%], p = 0.571). Following grid placement, 13/14 younger patients underwent guided resections compared to 20/28 older patients (92.9% vs 71.4%, p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

While overall complication rates were higher in the younger cohort, subdural grid placement was not associated with an increased risk of surgical complications in that population. Invasive electrocorticography informs management in very young children with refractory, localization-related epilepsy and should therefore be used when clinically indicated.

Epilepsy surgery in children: what the radiologist needs to know

This review updates the radiologist on current epilepsy surgery practice in children, with a specific focus on the role of imaging in pre-surgical work-up, current and novel surgical techniques, expected post-surgical imaging appearances and important post-operative complications. A comprehensive review of the current and emerging international practices in paediatric epilepsy surgical planning and post-operative imaging is provided with details on case-based radiological findings. A detailed discussion of the pathophysiology and imaging features of different epileptogenic lesions will not be discussed as this is not the objective of this paper. Epilepsy surgery can be an effective method to control seizures in certain children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Early surgery in selected appropriate cases can lead to improved cognitive and developmental outcome. Advances in neurosurgical techniques, imaging and neuroanaesthesia have driven a parallel expansion in the array of epilepsy conditions which are potentially treatable with surgery. The range of surgical options is now wide, including minimally invasive ablative procedures for small lesions such as hypothalamic hamartomata, resections for focal lesions like hippocampal sclerosis and complex disconnective surgeries for multilobar conditions like Sturge Weber Syndrome and diffuse cortical malformations. An awareness of the surgical thinking when planning epilepsy surgery in children, and the practical knowledge of the operative steps involved will promote more accurate radiology reporting of the post-operative scan.

Postoperative outcomes following pediatric intracranial electrode monitoring: A case for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)

BACKGROUND

For patients with medically refractory epilepsy, intracranial electrode monitoring can help identify epileptogenic foci. Despite the increasing utilization of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), the relative risks or benefits associated with the technique when compared with the traditional subdural electrode monitoring (SDE) remain unclear, especially in the pediatric population. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of pediatric patients who received intracranial monitoring with SEEG or SDE (grids and strips).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 38 consecutive pediatric intracranial electrode monitoring cases performed at our institution from 2014 to 2017. Medical/surgical history and operative/postoperative records were reviewed. We also compared direct inpatient hospital costs associated with the two procedures.

RESULTS

Stereoelectroencephalography and SDE cohorts both showed high likelihood of identifying epileptogenic zones (SEEG: 90.9%, SDE: 87.5%). Compared with SDE, SEEG patients had a significantly shorter operative time (118.7 versus 233.4 min, P < .001) and length of stay (6.2 versus 12.3 days, P < .001), including days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU; 1.4 versus 5.4 days, P < .001). Stereoelectroencephalography patients tended to report lower pain scores and used significantly less narcotic pain medications (54.2 versus 197.3 mg morphine equivalents, P = .005). No complications were observed. Stereoelectroencephalography and SDE cohorts had comparable inpatient hospital costs (P = .47).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with subdural electrode placement, SEEG results in a similarly favorable clinical outcome, but with reduced operative time, decreased narcotic usage, and superior pain control without requiring significantly higher costs. The potential for an improved postoperative intracranial electrode monitoring experience makes SEEG especially suitable for pediatric patients.

Epilepsy Surgery in 2019 : A Time to Change

Epilepsy has been known to humankind since antiquity. The surgical treatment of epilepsy began in the early days of neurosurgery and has developed greatly. Many surgical procedures have stood the test of time. However, clinicians treating epilepsy patients are now witnessing a huge tide of change. In 2017, the classification system for seizure and epilepsy types was revised nearly 36 years after the previous scheme was released. The actual difference between these systems may not be large, but there have been many conceptual changes, and clinicians must bid farewell to old terminology. Paradigms in drug discovery are changing, and novel antiseizure drugs have been introduced for clinical use. In particular, drugs that target genetic changes harbor greater therapeutic potential than previous screening-based compounds. The concept of focal epilepsy has been challenged, and now epilepsy is regarded as a network disorder. With this novel concept, stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is becoming increasingly popular for the evaluation of dysfunctioning neuronal networks. Minimally invasive ablative therapies using SEEG electrodes and neuromodulatory therapies such as deep brain stimulation and vagus nerve stimulation are widely applied to remedy dysfunctional epilepsy networks. The use of responsive neurostimulation is currently off-label in children with intractable epilepsy.