Parent reported health related quality of life (HRQoL) and behaviour in young people with epilepsy before and two years after epilepsy surgery

Behavioral health screening in pediatric epilepsy: Which measures commonly used in the United States are 'good enough'?

PURPOSE

To improve evidence-based implementation of behavioral health screening measures in pediatric epilepsy care, guidance is needed in the selection and interpretation of evidence-based screening measures. Therefore, the goals of this project were to (1) evaluate the clinical utility and psychometric properties of screening instruments frequently used in the United States (US) for anxiety, depression, and behavior problems in youth with epilepsy (YWE), and (2) provide guidance around selection and interpretation of these behavioral health screening measures.

METHOD

The critique was conducted in three phases: (1) identification of articles based on search criteria; (2) full review of articles for eligibility assessment; (3) evaluation of screening measures and organization into Tiers. Nine behavioral health measures frequently used to screen for anxiety, depression, and disruptive behaviors in the US were selected for evaluation. PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, and APA databases were searched using the following search terms: [target area] + [screening measure] + epilepsy + children [youth], [adolescents]. Inclusion/exclusion criteria for articles were as follows: (1) focused on YWE, (2) written in English, and (3) conducted in the US. Once articles were selected, Hunsley and Mash's criteria were used to evaluate and categorize the screening measures' psychometric properties, which have clear relevance to clinical practice. Measures were also classified into three tiers by the level of validation according to established evidence-based criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-one unique papers were identified through the literature search and assessed as eligible. Evaluation of screening measures revealed only two psychometrically sound measures that met criteria for Tier 1, the NDDI-E-Y and the Pediatric NeuroQoL-Depression, both depression screening measures. Several additional depression screening measures met criteria for Tier 2 (CDI-2, BASC-2-Depression Scale, and CBCL Withdrawn/Depressed Scale). Anxiety screening measures have not been validated in pediatric epilepsy and thus only met the criteria for Tier 2 (BASC-2 Anxiety Scale, CBCL DSM-IV Oriented Anxiety Problems Scale, MASC). Similarly for disruptive behaviors, two measures met Tier 2 criteria (BASC-2 Externalizing Problems Index, CBCL Externalizing Problems Index).

CONCLUSION

Strides have been made in the validation of behavioral health screening measures for YWE; however, continued research in this area is necessary to validate existing psychometrically sound measures and to develop and evaluate epilepsy-specific measures in the pediatric epilepsy population.

Quantifying and Reporting Outcomes in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Several instruments and outcomes measures have been reported in pediatric patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize, evaluate, and quantify outcome metrics for the surgical treatment of pediatric epilepsy that address seizure frequency, neuropsychological, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines to identify publications between 2010 and June 2021 from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews that report clinical outcomes in pediatric epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

Eighty-one papers were included for review. Overall, rates of post-operative seizure frequency were the most common metric reported (n= 78 studies, 96%). Among the seizure frequency metrics, the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale (n= 48 studies, 59%) was most commonly reported. Neuropsychological outcomes, performed in 32 studies (40%) were assessed using 36 different named metrics. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) outcomes were performed in 16 studies (20%) using 13 different metrics. Forty-six studies (57%) reported postoperative changes in anti-epileptic drug (AED) regimen and time-to-event analysis was performed in 15 (19%) studies. Only 13 outcomes metrics (1/5 seizure frequency, 6/13 HRQL, 6/36 neuropsychological) have been validated for use in pediatric patients with epilepsy and only 13 have been assessed through reliability studies (4/5 seizure frequency, 6/13 HRQL, and 3/36 neuropsychological). Of the 81 included studies, 17 (21%) used at least one validated metric.

SIGNIFICANCE

Outcome variable metrics in pediatric epilepsy surgery are highly variable. While nearly all studies report seizure frequency, there is considerable variation in reporting. HRQL and neuropsychological outcomes are less frequently and much more heterogeneously reported. Reliable and validated outcomes metrics should be used to increase standardization and accuracy of reporting outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing epilepsy surgery.

Smaller Knife, Fewer Seizures? Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Techniques in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Children with drug-resistant epilepsy are at high risk for developmental delay, increased mortality, psychiatric comorbidities, and requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Despite the advent of new and effective pharmacologic therapies, about one in 5 children will develop drug-resistant epilepsy, and most of these children continue to have seizures despite trials of other medication. Epilepsy surgery is often a safe and effective option which may offer seizure freedom or at least a significant reduction in seizure burden in many children. However, despite published evidence of safety and efficacy, epilepsy surgery remains underutilized in the pediatric population. Patient and family fears about the risks of surgery may contribute to this gap. Less invasive surgical techniques may be more palatable to children with epilepsy and their caregivers. In this review, we present recent advances in minimally invasive techniques for the surgical treatment of epilepsy as well as intriguing possibilities for the future. We describe the indications for, benefits of, and limits to minimally-invasive techniques including Stereo-encephalography, laser interstitial thermal ablation, deep brain stimulation, focused ultrasound, stereo-encephalography-guided radiofrequency ablation, endoscopic disconnections, and responsive neurostimulation.

Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life Among Survivors of Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review

This study aimed to determine if the current health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tools created for survivors of testicular cancer are collecting the highest quality of data via a two-step methodological critique of both the seminal studies that produced a survivor of testicular cancer HRQoL tool (Phase 1) and the actual tool itself (Phase 2). It is the goal of this current article to present and discuss Phase 1.

A systematic review aimed to assess the methodological quality of studies conducted to create instruments used to measure survivors of testicular cancer HRQoL. Five reviewers independently assessed each study with the 20-item Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Inter-rater agreement and Fleiss’ kappa was also assessed to ensure consistency in reported scores. Assessments for the EORTC QLQ-TC 26 and CAYA-T studies were low (AXIS 52.5%; IRA 95%; κ = 0.779) and fair (AXIS 65%; IRA 80%; κ = 0.599), respectively. Critical appraisal of the scales included issues within the three core AXIS domains. Primary concerns related to sampling methodology and the lack of a qualitative component of their core conceptual development phase.

Both reviewed seminal studies have significant methodological concerns that question the tools’ quality. Next steps include extensive appraisal of the psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ TC-26 and the CAYA-T to complete the comprehensive review. Accurate and reliable data are necessary to understand survivor of testicular cancer HRQoL and assist in building the bridge of communication between health care professionals and survivors to help to improve patient outcomes.

'In the best case seizure-free' - Parental hopes and worries before and satisfaction after their child's epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of parental hopes and worries before and subsequent experiences two years after their child had undergone epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

The parents of 107 children and young people who underwent epilepsy surgery at a single center completed surveys focusing on hopes and concerns before surgery and subsequent experiences at two-year follow-up. Responses were analyzed by thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Before surgery, parental hopes focus on not only seizure freedom or reduction but also potential improvements in child development and emotional-behavioral functioning. Worries before surgery include not only potential injury or loss of skills but also a concern that the surgical procedure would not lead to an improvement in the child's seizures. The vast majority of parents experienced positive aspects at the two-year follow-up including seizure freedom or reduction but also perceived improvements in behavior, development, and sleep. This suggests that for many, expectations for the surgery were met. A small number of parents reported negative effects of surgery including loss of skills, worsening/lack of improvement in seizure frequency, or negative impact on development.

SIGNIFICANCE

For the majority of parents whose children undergo surgery, expectations are met, and fears are not realized. Knowledge of parental hopes and worries before surgery as well as experiences after the operation is useful for improving pre- and postsurgical counseling.