Reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (Tw-NDDI-E)

Feasibility of psychological screening in a tertiary epilepsy clinic

OBJECTIVE

People with epilepsy (PWE) have a high prevalence of developing depression and anxiety. The objective is to determine the feasibility of brief screening tools to screen for depression and anxiety in epilepsy, and the predictive factors.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study in the neurology clinic in a tertiary teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur. The screening tools used were the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and the General Anxiety Disorder Form (GAD-7).

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-five patients were recruited in this study, and 50.8% of them were male, predominantly Chinese (46.7%), with a mean age of seizure onset of 21.8 ± 16.1 years. The majority had focal seizures (75.0%), and 41.9% had seizure remission. There were 15.5% who scored ≥15 in the NDDI-E, and 17.0% had moderate or severe anxiety (scored ≥10 in the GAD-7). In a regression model to predict the NDDI-E score, the age of seizure onset recorded a higher beta value (β = -0.265, p =< 0.001), followed by the duration of epilepsy (β = -0.213, p =< 0.001), use of levetiracetam (LEV) (β = 0.147, p = 0.002), clonazepam (CLZ) (β = 0.127, p = 0.011), and lamotrigine (LTG) (β = 0.125, p = 0.011), number of current antiseizure medications (β = -0.124, p = 0.049), seizure remission for ≥1 year (β = -0.108, p = 0.011), and female (β = 0.082, p = 0.049). For the GAD-7 score, the predictors included current age (β = -0.152, p = 0.001), the use of LEV (β = 0.122, p = 0.011), Indian ethnicity (β = 0.114, p = 0.006), and the use of carbamazepine (β = -0.090, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of simple psychological screening using self-administered questionnaires was feasible in a busy tertiary epilepsy clinic.

Reliability and validation of the Chinese version of the epilepsy surgery satisfaction questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity the Chinese version of 19-item Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (C-ESSQ-19) in Chinese mainland patients.

METHODS

Patients with epilepsy who had epilepsy surgery in our hospital one year earlier were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by using Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity. Discriminant validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients participated in our study, consisting of 59 females and 73 males. The C-ESSQ-19 yielded a median summary score of 86.5 (IQR=72.7-98.0). The Cronbach's alpha of the four domains of the C-ESSQ-19 ranged from 0.746 to 0.973. The test-retest reliability evaluated by ICC were good to excellent, ranging from 0.71 to 0.90 (P < 0.001). The C-ESSQ-19 demonstrated excellent construct validity, as indicated by the satisfactory goodness-of-fit of the data (SRMR = 0.046; CFI = 1.000). It exhibited acceptable discriminant validity for differentiating between patients excised or not (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.59-0.86) and self-rated severity of epilepsy (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67-0.86), but poor discriminant validity for other factors, such as being seizure-free or not (AUC = 0.66, CI = 0.56-0.75), depressed or not (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.54-0.79), and self-rated disability related to seizures (AUC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.50-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

The C-ESSQ-19 has proven to be a reliable and valid self-rated questionnaire for assessing the satisfaction of Chinese mainland epilepsy patients with surgery.

Psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version of the NDDI-E in persons with epilepsy and suicidal ideation

BACKGROUND

Suicidality and depression are associated with worse epilepsy outcomes, but their screening in routine clinical practice remains insufficient and may improve with the validation of brief and accessible psychometric tools. We explored the psychometric properties of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) in the Lithuanian population, which has one of the highest suicide rates globally.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional anonymous survey among adult outpatients visiting a tertiary epilepsy clinic in Vilnius, Lithuania. People with epilepsy (PWE) provided demographic and clinical information and completed the Geriatric depression scale (GDS), the Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and the Generalized anxiety scale-7 (GAD-7). Suicidal ideation was defined as a non-zero score on the suicide item of the BDI and clinically relevant levels of depression - as a total BDI score of >16. Psychometric properties of the NDDI-E were evaluated by measuring its internal consistency, dimensionality, correlation with other depression scales, and by conducting receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of suicidal ideation and symptoms of depression.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 246 PWE (average age 39.9 ± 16.3 years, 101 [41.1%] male), of them 31 (12.6%) and 41 (19.5% of those who completed the BDI) were identified with suicidal ideation or significant symptoms of depression, respectively. On average, PWE scored 10.4 ± 4.2 points on the NDDI-E. The instrument had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.863, n = 235), item-item and item-total correlation (>0.30). In factor analysis, its items comprised a single factor distinct from the GAD-7. The NDDI-E strongly correlated with other depression scales (r = 0.657 [GDS, n = 201], r = 0.657 [BDI, n = 201], r = 0.623 [HADS-D, n = 231], p < 0.001 for all). The NDDI-E had good diagnostic properties in discerning suicidal ideation (AUC = 0.858, 95%CI = 0.791-0.925). The isolated suicide item of the NDDI-E had acceptable properties in detecting suicidal ideation (AUC = 0.821, 95%CI = 0.724-0.918) as well.

CONCLUSION

The Lithuanian NDDI-E was shown to have good psychometric properties comparable to other versions of this scale. The NDDI-E is endorsed as a short and accessible instrument for estimating suicidal ideation among Lithuanian PWE.

Validation of the Taiwanese version of the Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (Tw-ESSQ-19)

OBJECTIVE

Satisfaction with epilepsy surgery in Mandarin-speaking countries remains unknown. We aimed to validate in our Taiwanese patients an existing instrument to measure patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery, the 19-item Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (ESSQ-19).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with epilepsy who received epilepsy surgery one year earlier in Taipei Veterans General Hospital were recruited and provided clinical and demographic data. The Mandarin version of the ESSQ-19 for the Taiwanese population and eight other questionnaires were completed to assess construct validity. To evaluate the validity and reliability of the tool, the data were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and internal consistency analysis.

RESULTS

The study involved 120 patients (70 F/50 M, median age 35 years [IQR = 28-41]). The mean summary score (±SD) of the Tw-ESSQ-19 was 82.5 ± 14.5. The mean scores of the four domains were 90.3 ± 15.4 (surgical complications), 83.2 ± 16.7 (seizure control), 80.1 ± 17.3 (recovery from surgery), and 76.6 ± 18.3 (psychosocial functioning). The questionnaire was shown to have good construct validity with satisfactory goodness-of-fit of the data (standardized root mean square residual = 0.0492; comparative fit index = 0.946). It also demonstrated good discriminant validity (being seizure free [AUC 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.89], endorsing depression [AUC 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.91], self-rating epilepsy as disabling [AUC 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.84], and self-rating epilepsy as severe [AUC 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.93]), high internal consistency in four domains (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.96), and no significant floor/ceiling effects of the summary score.

SIGNIFICANCE

The Mandarin version of the ESSQ-19 adapted for the Taiwanese population is a reliable and valid self-reported questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery.

Reliability and validity of the traditional Chinese version of the GAD-7 in Taiwanese patients with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is the second most common psychiatric comorbidity of epilepsy. GAD has a negative impact on seizure control, and it is underrecognized. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) questionnaire is useful for screening GAD in patients with epilepsy (PWE). This study aimed to validate the traditional Chinese version of the GAD-7 for Taiwanese patients by obtaining data on adult PWE from our hospital.

METHOD

PWE were recruited from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital from April 2017 to January 2020. The mood disorder module of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used for the psychiatric assessment. The traditional Chinese version of the GAD-7 and the Beck Anxiety Inventory were included as self-rated psychiatric evaluation. To investigate the psychometric properties, internal consistency, external validation, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to assess the utility of the Taiwanese version of the GAD-7.

RESULTS

We recruited 109 patients in the present study. Seventeen patients (15.9%) had GAD according to the MINI. The mean GAD-7 score was 10.28 ± 10.68. All the GAD-7 items were significantly and positively associated with the corrected overall GAD-7 score (Cronbach's alpha = 0.928, p < 0.0001). The cut-off point for the GAD-7 in ROC curve analysis was 7. The patients with GAD were more likely to be female and single.

CONCLUSION

The traditional Chinese version of the GAD-7 is a reliable and valid self-report questionnaire for detecting GAD in Taiwanese PWE.

Inclusion of currently diagnosed or treated individuals in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: a meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021

OBJECTIVES

Screening is done to improve health outcomes by identifying and effectively treating individuals with unrecognized conditions. Depression screening has been proposed to identify previously unrecognized depression cases. Including individuals already diagnosed or treated for depression in screening test accuracy studies could exaggerate accuracy and the yield of new cases from screening. The present study investigated (1) the proportion of depression screening tool accuracy primary studies published in 2018-2021 that excluded individuals with a confirmed depression diagnosis or who were already undergoing treatment; and (2) whether this has improved since the last review of studies published in 2013-2015, which found that five of 89 (5.6%) primary studies appropriately excluded such individuals.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from January 1, 2018 through May 21, 2021 for primary studies on depression screening tool accuracy.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 106 (17.0%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 11.0% to 25.3%) primary studies excluded currently diagnosed or treated individuals. This was 11.4% (95% CI, 2.8% to 20.0%) greater than in similar studies published in 2013-2015.

CONCLUSION

There has been an improvement since 2015, but the proportion of studies that exclude individuals already known to have depression remains low. This may bias research findings intended to inform clinical practice.