The nature, frequency and value of stimulation induced seizures during extraoperative cortical stimulation for functional mapping

Combined value of interictal markers and stimulated seizures to estimate the seizure onset zone in stereoelectroencephalography

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to investigate the potential of interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) findings and electrically stimulated seizures during stereo-EEG (SEEG) as surrogate markers for the spontaneous seizure onset zone (spSOZ). We hypothesized that combining the localizing information of these markers would allow clinically meaningful estimation of the spSOZ.

METHODS

We included all patients (n = 63) who underwent SEEG between January 2013 and March 2020 at Helsinki University Hospital and had spontaneous seizures during the recording. We scored spikes, gamma activity, and background abnormality on each channel visually during a 12-h epoch containing waking state and sleep. Based on semiology, we classified stimulated seizures as typical or atypical/unclassifiable and estimated the stimulated SOZ (stimSOZ) for typical seizures. To assess which markers increased the odds of channel inclusion in the spSOZ, we fitted mixed effects logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A combined regression model including the stimSOZ and interictal markers scored during sleep performed better in estimating which channels were part of the spSOZ than models based on stimSOZ (p < .001) or interictal markers (p < .001) alone. Of the individual markers, the effect sizes were greatest for inclusion of a channel in the stimSOZ (odds ratio [OR] = 60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 37-97, p < .001) and for continuous (OR = 25, 95% CI = 12-55, p < .001) and subcontinuous (OR = 36, 95% CI = 21-64, p < .001) interictal spiking. At the individual level, the model's accuracy to predict spSOZ inclusion varied markedly (median accuracy = 85.7, range = 54.4-100), which was not explained by etiology (p > .05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared to either marker alone, combining visually rated interictal SEEG markers and stimulated seizures improved prediction of which SEEG channels belonged to the spSOZ. Inclusion in the stimSOZ and continuous or subcontinuous spikes increased the odds of spSOZ inclusion the most. Future studies should investigate whether suboptimal sampling of the true epileptogenic zone can explain the model's poor performance in certain patients.

Associated factors with stimulation induced seizures and the relevance with surgical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the associated factors with stimulation-induced seizures (SIS) and the relevant factors in predicting surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 80 consecutive epilepsy patients explored by stereo-electroencephalography with routine electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). If seizures induced by ESM, patients were classified as SIS-positive (SIS-P); otherwise, SIS-negative (SIS-N). Patients received radical surgery were further classified as favorable (Engel I) and unfavorable (Engel II-IV) groups.

RESULTS

Of the 80 patients included, we identified 44 (55.0%) and 36(45.0%) patients in the SIS-P and SIS-N groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the seizure onset pattern (SOP) of preceding repetitive epileptiform discharges following LVFA (PRED→LVFA) (OR 3.319, 95% CI 1.200-9.183, P = 0.021) and pathology of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II (OR 3.943, 95% CI 1.093-14.226, P = 0.036) were independent factors influencing whether the electrical stimulation can induce a seizure. Among the patients received radical surgery, there were 55 and 15 patients in the favorable and unfavorable groups separately. Multivariate analysis revealed that the SOP of PRED→LVFA induced seizures by stimulation (OR 11.409, 95% CI 1.182-110.161, P = 0.035) and bilateral implantation (OR 0.048, 95% CI 0.005-0.497, P = 0.011) were independent factors affecting surgical outcomes. The previous epilepsy surgery had a trend to be a negative factor with SIS (OR 0.156, 95% CI 0.028-0.880, P = 0.035) and surgical outcomes (OR 0.253, 95% CI 0.053-1.219, P = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

ESM is a highly valuable method for localizing the seizure onset zone. The SOP of PRED→LVFA and FCD type II were associated with elicitation of SIS by ESM, whereas a previous epilepsy surgery showed a negative association. Furthermore, the SOP of PRED→LVFA together with SIS in the same patient predicted favorable surgical outcomes, whereas bilateral electrode implantation predicted unfavorable outcomes.

Stimulation induced aura during subdural recording: A useful predictor of postoperative outcome in refractory epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) is a routine procedure commonly conducted in intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring in refractory epilepsy and associated with postoperative outcome in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) exploration. To better understand this effective method, this study aimed to examine the role of ECS in subdural recording.

METHODS

The ECS results of 144 consecutive patients who were monitored via subdural electrodes and received epilepsy surgery were retrospectively collected. The occurrence of stimulation induced aura (SIA) and seizure (SIS) and their distributions as well as their associations with postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among all 144 patients, 47.2% (68/144) achieved Engel class I recovery with a mean follow-up of 6.6±2.2 years (2.0-9.8 years). The percentages of patients who showed SIA and SIS were 16.0% (23/144) and 43.8% (63/144), respectively. Our data indicated that 30.4% (42/138) of SIS occurred in frontal lobe, which was significantly higher than the 7.7% (10/130) occurred in temporal lobe and the 8.5% (11/129) in parieto-occipital region (p<0.001). Meanwhile, no such distribution difference was discovered in SIA (p=0.229). Univariate and multifactorial analyses showed that SIA was the only independent predictor for postoperative outcome and patients with SIA were 4.8 times more likely to achieve seizure-free (95% CI 1.557-14.789, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that SIS sites are more likely to be located in the frontal lobe and SIA independently predicts optimal postoperative outcome in subdural recording.

Electrical Stimulation-Induced Seizures and Breathing Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of New Insights Into the Epileptogenic and Symptomatogenic Zones

Objective: Electrical stimulation (ES) potentially delineates epileptogenic cortex through induction of typical seizures. Although frequently employed, its value for epilepsy surgery remains controversial. Similarly, ES is used to identify symptomatogenic zones, but with greater success and a long-standing evidence base. Recent work points to new seizure symptoms such as ictal central apnea (ICA) that may enhance presurgical hypotheses. The aims of this review are 2-fold: to determine the value of ES-induced seizures (ESIS) in epilepsy surgery and to analyze current evidence on ICA as a new surrogate of symptomatogenic cortex.

Methods: Three databases were searched for ESIS. Investigators independently selected studies according to pre-specified criteria. Studies reporting postoperative outcome in patients with ESIS were included in a meta-analysis. For ES-induced apnea, a thorough search was performed and reference list searching was employed.

Results: Of 6,314 articles identified for ESIS, 25 were considered eligible to be reviewed in full text. Fourteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis (1,069 patients); six studies were included in the meta-analysis (530 patients). The meta-analysis showed that favorable outcome is associated with ESIS prior to surgery (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.332–3.08). In addition, the overall estimation of the occurrence of favorable outcome among cases with ESIS is 68.13% (95% CI: 56.62–78.7). On the other hand, recent studies have shown that stimulation of exclusively mesial temporal lobe structures elicits central apnea and represents symptomatogenic anatomic substrates of ICA. This is in variance with traditional teaching that mesial temporal ES is non-symptomatogenic.

Conclusions: ES is a tool highly likely to aid in the delineation of the epileptogenic zone, since ESIS is associated with favorable postoperative outcomes (Engel I). There is an urgent need for prospective evaluation of this technique, including effective stimulation parameters and surgical outcomes, that will provide knowledge base for practice. In addition, ES-induced apnea studies suggest that ICA, especially when it is the first or only clinical sign, is an important semiological feature in localizing the symptomatogenic zone to mesial temporal lobe structures, which must be considered in SEEG explorations where this is planned, and in surgical resection strategies.