High-Dose Levetiracetam for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Review

Levetiracetam versus Phenobarbitone for Management of Neonatal Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review whether levetiracetam is non-inferior to phenobarbitone as the first-choice antiseizure medication (ASM).

METHODS

The authors searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 31, 2023. RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenobarbitone as first-line ASM in neonatal seizures were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed, and the Risk of Bias version 2 tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs enrolling 821 neonates [mostly term, with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)] were included. There was no significant difference in seizure control between levetiracetam and phenobarbitone (10 RCTs, 786 participants; relative risk RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.54; I2- 88%). Neonates in the levetiracetam group had a significantly lower incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.86), respiratory depression (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.66), and depressed sensorium (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.00). Three studies compared neurodevelopmental outcomes; however two of them were cross-over trials where infants received both drugs. Only one RCT enrolled pure cohorts and showed better neurodevelopment in the levetiracetam group at one month of age.

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitation of very-low certainty evidence, the results of this systematic review suggest that levetiracetam may be non-inferior to phenobarbitone for managing neonatal seizures. Considering a better safety profile and marginally better neurodevelopment in the short term, levetiracetam may be considered an initial choice for managing neonatal seizures.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (CRD42023438018).

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from the NEOLEV1 and NEOLEV2 studies

OBJECTIVES

To confirm that levetiracetam (LEV) demonstrates predictable pharmacokinetics(PK) at higher doses and to study the pharmacodynamics(PD) of LEV.

DESIGN

Pharmacokinetic data from the NEOLEV1 and NEOLEV2 trials were analysed using a non-linear mixed effects modelling approach. A post hoc analysis of the effect of LEV on seizure burden was conducted.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Term neonates with electrographically confirmed seizures.

INTERVENTIONS

In NEOLEV1, neonates with seizures persisting following phenobarbital (PHB) received LEV 20 or 40 mg/kg bolus followed by 5 or 10 mg/kg maintenance dose(MD) daily. In NEOLEV2, patients received a 40 mg/kg intravenous LEV load, followed by 10 mg/kg doses 8 hourly. If seizures persisted, a further 20 mg/kg intravenous load was given. If seizures persisted, PHB was given. PK data were collected from 16 NEOLEV1 patients and 33 NEOLEV2 patients. cEEG data from 48 NEOLEV2 patients were analysed to investigate onset of action and seizure burden reduction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) were determined. Covariates that significantly affected LEV disposition were identified.

RESULTS

Primary outcome: The median initial LEV level was 57 µg/mL (range 19-107) after the first loading dose and at least 12 µg/mL at 48 hours in all infants. CL and Vd were estimated to be 0.0538 L/hour and 0.832 L, respectively. A direct relationship between postnatal age and CL was observed. The final population pharmacokinetic(PopPK) model described the observed data well without significant biases. CL and Vd were described as CL (L/hour)=0.0538×(weight in kg/3.34)0.75×(postnatal age in days/5.5) 0.402 and Vd (L)=0.832×(weight in kg/3.34).Seizure burden reduced within 30 min of LEV administration. 28% of patients were completely seizure free after LEV. In an additional 25% of patients, seizure burden reduced by 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

LEV pharmacokinetics remained predictable at higher doses. Very high-dose LEV can now be studied in neonates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01720667.

Sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in electroencephalographic neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital: a multicenter prospective observational study in India

Background

Although levetiracetam and phenytoin are widely used antiseizure medications (ASM) in neonates, their efficacy on seizure freedom is unclear. We evaluated electroencephalographic (EEG) seizure freedom following sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital.

Methods

We recruited neonates born ≥35 weeks and aged <72 h who had continued electrographic seizures despite phenobarbital, from three Indian hospitals, between 20 June 2020 and 31 July 2022. The neonates were treated with intravenous levetiracetam (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, second line) followed by phenytoin (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, third line) if seizures persisted. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom, defined as an absence of seizures on EEG for at least 60 min within 40 min from the start of infusion.

Findings

Of the 206 neonates with continued seizures despite phenobarbital, 152 received levetiracetam with EEG. Of these one EEG was missing, 47 (31.1%) were in status epilepticus, and primary outcome data were available in 145. Seizure freedom occurred in 20 (13.8%; 95% CI 8.6%-20.5%) after levetiracetam; 16 (80.0%) responded to the first dose and 4 (20.0%) to the second dose. Of the 125 neonates with persisting seizures after levetiracetam, 114 received phenytoin under EEG monitoring. Of these, the primary outcome data were available in 104. Seizure freedom occurred in 59 (56.7%; 95% CI 46.7%-66.4%) neonates; 54 (91.5%) responded to the first dose and 5 (8.5%) to the second dose.

Interpretation

With the conventional doses, levetiracetam was associated with immediate EEG seizure cessation in only 14% of phenobarbital unresponsive neonatal seizures. Additional treatment with phenytoin along with levetiracetam attained seizure freedom in further 57%. Safety and efficacy of higher doses of levetiracetam should be evaluated in well-designed randomised controlled trials.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research and Innovation for Global Health Transformation (NIHR200144).

Levetiracetam versus Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although phenobarbital (PB) is commonly used as a first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for neonatal seizures, in 2015 we chose to replace it with levetiracetam (LEV), a third-generation ASM. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of LEV and PB as first-line ASM, considering the years before and after modifying our treatment protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 108 neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed seizures treated with first-line LEV or PB in 2012 to 2020.

RESULTS

First-line ASM was LEV in 33 (31%) and PB in 75 (69%) neonates. The etiology included acute symptomatic seizures in 69% of cases (30% hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, 32% structural vascular, 6% infectious, otherwise metabolic) and neonatal epilepsy in 22% (5% structural due to brain malformation, 17% genetic). Forty-two of 108 (39%) neonates reached seizure freedom following first-line therapy. Treatment response did not vary by first-line ASM among all neonates, those with acute symptomatic seizures, or those with neonatal-onset epilepsy. Treatment response was lowest for neonates with a higher seizure frequency, particularly for those with status epilepticus versus rare seizures (P < 0.001), irrespective of gestational age, etiology, or EEG findings. Adverse events were noted in 22 neonates treated with PB and in only one treated with LEV (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a potential noninferiority and a more acceptable safety profile for LEV, which may thus be a reasonable option as first-line ASM for neonatal seizures in place of PB. Treatment should be initiated as early as possible since higher seizure frequencies predispose to less favorable responses.

Causes of New-Onset Seizures and Their Treatment in Children With Non-CNS Malignancies: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

Seizures occur in up to 13% of children with non-central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, but little is known about their causes and optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Here we sought to determine etiologies and clinical trajectories of new-onset seizures in this patient population.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review over a 10-year period was conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center to identify children with non-CNS malignancies and at least one new-onset seizure. Data were collected on the underlying malignancy, seizure etiology, clinical course, treatments, electroencephalograms, and brain imaging.

RESULTS

New-onset seizures occurred in 56 children (2-year median follow-up), most commonly in the context of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphomas, and sarcomas. In 19 children, the first seizure consisted of status epilepticus. The most common etiologies were cerebrovascular accidents, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and metastasis. Forty-nine patients received anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Withdrawal of ASMs was successful in 19 children with normal initial or follow-up brain imaging but failed in three patients with persistent brain lesions. The remaining children, all of whom except two had structural brain abnormalities, received chronic ASMs and remained seizure free for a median period of 2 years at the last follow-up in survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only are seizures in children with non-CNS cancers often indicative of a serious brain insult, but they can also be challenging in the form of status epilepticus. An urgent diagnostic evaluation is therefore needed to expedite treatment, which should be tailored to the chronicity of the underlying cause.

Levetiracetam Mechanisms of Action: From Molecules to Systems

Epilepsy is a chronic disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used to control seizures. Even though parts of their mechanisms of action are known, there are still components that need to be studied. Therefore, the search for novel drugs, new molecular targets, and a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of existing drugs is still crucial. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an AED that has been shown to be effective in seizure control and is well-tolerable, with a novel mechanism of action through an interaction with the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A). Moreover, LEV has other molecular targets that involve calcium homeostasis, the GABAergic system, and AMPA receptors among others, that might be integrated into a single mechanism of action that could explain the antiepileptogenic, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and antioxidant properties of LEV. This puts it as a possible multitarget drug with clinical applications other than for epilepsy. According to the above, the objective of this work was to carry out a comprehensive and integrative review of LEV in relation to its clinical uses, structural properties, therapeutical targets, and different molecular, genetic, and systemic action mechanisms in order to consider LEV as a candidate for drug repurposing.

Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam vs. Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Neonatal seizures are a common neurological emergency in newborns. Phenobarbital (PB) is the first-line antiepileptic drug (AED). However, PB has some side effects, such as hypotension and respiratory depression, and it can accelerate neuronal apoptosis in the immature brain. Levetiracetam (LEV), a new antiepileptic drug, has been used as a second-line drug for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Compared with PB, LEV has many advantages, including a low incidence of side effects and better neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, there are only a few systematic reviews of LEV for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEV for neonatal seizures and to compare the efficacy, side effects, and neurological outcomes between LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures. Methods: The keywords LEV, PB, and neonatal seizure were searched in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases with a last update in July 2021 to collect high-quality studies. We collected studies studying the efficacy or safety of LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were extracted and outcome measures, including efficacy, side effect rate, neurological score, and mortality rate, were analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Ten articles were finally included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in efficacy between LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures. Compared with PB, the incidence of side effects of LEV was lower. The incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression in the LEV group was significantly lower than that in the PB group. In terms of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, there was no significant difference in the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) scores between LEV and PB. Conclusion: PB is still the first-line AED recommended by the WHO for the treatment of neonatal seizures. The new AEDs LEV may not have better efficacy than PB. At the same time, LEV is associated with better neurodevelopment outcomes and a lower risk of adverse effects. In addition, continuous EEG monitoring should be used to diagnose neonatal seizures to evaluate the severity of the seizures, remission, and drug efficacy. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021279029.