Explanatory factors of quality of life in psychogenic non-epileptic seizure

Psychoeducation interventions for people with non-epileptic seizures: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and other psychological approaches have a growing evidence base for treating Non-Epileptic Seizures (NES). However, communication about the diagnosis can be difficult for clinicians and is not always well received. It is thought that Psychoeducation about NES may improve engagement with treatment such as CBT and may contribute to reductions in the frequency of seizures and improvements in health related quality of life. However, psychoeducational components of treatment are often not evaluated in isolation meaning the specific benefit to patients is not currently well understood.

AIMS

The researchers aimed to examine the outcomes associated with psychoeducational interventions and the content of these programmes for NES.

METHOD

A scoping review was undertaken across four databases with seventeen eligible studies identified which were charted to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Findings revealed that components and modalities of interventions varied as did methods of evaluating the interventions. A number of different outcome measures were used and not all studies reported the significance of findings. Results across studies were inconsistent; however, there was a general trend across the studies of symptom reduction and improvement in mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings illustrate that psychoeducation has potential benefits as an intervention in its own right. However, it may be best placed as a second step in a stepped care model, between initial diagnosis and further psychological treatment. The present literature needs replication and more robust studies for more certain conclusions to be drawn.

Prospective multicenter cohort study of possible psychogenic nonepileptic seizure cases-Results at 1-year follow-up examinations

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to examine clinical and demographic feature differences according to the diagnostic level of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and then clarify whether prognosis may also differ accordingly.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-two consecutive patients strongly suspected of having PNES attacks were invited to participate, of whom 52 did not consent or contact was lost. At the 1-year follow-up examination, PNES diagnosis was reconsidered in nine patients. In 96 patients, the diagnostic level remained the same (P-group), with that in 43 considered to be clinically established (CE-group) and in 42 documented (D-group). The Qolie-10 and NDDI-E questionnaires were examined at both the study entry and the follow-up examination.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis of quality of life (QoL) score (n = 173; R²  = 0.374; F = 7.349; P < 0.001) revealed NDDI-E score (t = -6.402; P < 0.001), age of PNES onset (t = -3.026; P = 0.003), and ethnic minority status (t = 3.068; P = 0.003) as significant contributors. At entry, the P-group showed the lowest PNES attack frequency (P < 0.000), the lowest rate of antiseizure, antidepressant, and antipsychotic medication (P < 0.000; P = 0.031; P = 0.013, respectively), and the lowest proportion of psychosis (P = 0.046). At follow-up, PNES attack frequency (P < 0.000), number of admittances to emergency room (P < 0.000), and scores for QoL (P < 0.000) as well as depression (P = 0.004) were found to be significantly improved together with other collateral indicators, such as rate of antiseizure medication prescription (P = 0.001) and psychiatric symptoms (P = 0.03). Multiple regression analysis of a sample limited to patients with intellectual disability (ID) (n = 44; R²  = 0.366; F = 4.493; P = 0.002) revealed continued psychotherapy at follow-up (t = 2.610, P = 0.013) and successful reduction in antiseizure medication (t = 2.868; P = 0.007) as positively related with improved QoL.

SIGNIFICANCE

Clinical and the socio-psychological constellation of possible, clinically established, and documented PNES were found to differ greatly. Unexpectedly, significant effects of the continuous psychotherapeutic intervention were confirmed in PNES patients with ID.

Dissociation and its biological and clinical associations in functional neurological disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported elevated rates of dissociative symptoms and comorbid dissociative disorders in functional neurological disorder (FND); however, a comprehensive review is lacking.

AIMS

To systematically review the severity of dissociative symptoms and prevalence of comorbid dissociative disorders in FND and summarise their biological and clinical associations.

METHOD

We searched Embase, PsycInfo and MEDLINE up to June 2021, combining terms for FND and dissociation. Studies were eligible if reporting dissociative symptom scores or rates of comorbid dissociative disorder in FND samples. Risk of bias was appraised using modified Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. The findings were synthesised qualitatively and dissociative symptom scores were included in a meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020173263).

RESULTS

Seventy-five studies were eligible (FND n = 3940; control n = 3073), most commonly prospective case-control studies (k = 54). Dissociative disorders were frequently comorbid in FND. Psychoform dissociation was elevated in FND compared with healthy (g = 0.90, 95% CI 0.66-1.14, I² = 70%) and neurological controls (g = 0.56, 95% CI 0.19-0.92, I² = 67%). Greater psychoform dissociation was observed in FND samples with seizure symptoms versus healthy controls (g = 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.22, I² = 42%) and FND samples with motor symptoms (g = 0.40, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.00, I² = 54%). Somatoform dissociation was elevated in FND versus healthy controls (g = 1.80, 95% CI 1.25-2.34, I² = 75%). Dissociation in FND was associated with more severe functional symptoms, worse quality of life and brain alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the potential clinical utility of assessing patients with FND for dissociative symptomatology. However, fewer studies investigated FND samples with motor symptoms and heterogeneity between studies and risk of bias were high. Rigorous investigation of the prevalence, features and mechanistic relevance of dissociation in FND is needed.

Quality of Life in Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) pose a serious threat to quality of life (QOL) in patients who battle the disorder. As psychological treatment options have progressed, improvement in QOL has become a more common desired outcome. Despite its relevance in PNES research and treatment, QOL has not been defined in the PNES population. Rodgers' Evolutionary Method of concept analysis was used to analyze 47 articles and clarify the concept of QOL in PNES. QOL in PNES is subjective, multidimensional, associated with symptoms, and dynamic in nature. This conceptualization of QOL in PNES may be useful in future PNES research and treatment.

Quality of life for patients with psychogenic nonepilepsy seizures in comparison with age- and gender-matched patients with epilepsy - Cross-sectional study

AIMS

Patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), and age- and gender-matched patients with epilepsy (PWE) who utilized an out-patient service were compared regarding quality of life (QoL) and self-reported symptoms of depression. Additionally, the impact of miscellaneous clinical variables including symptoms of depression on QoL in patients with PNES and PWE in real-world settings was assessed.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adult patients who had a diagnosis of definite or documented PNES based on LaFrance's criteria (PNES group, n = 62), or of epilepsy based on results of clinical and EEG procedures (Epilepsy group, n = 61) were enrolled. To assess QoL and evaluate depression, the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-10 (QOLIE-10) and Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), respectively, were administered.

RESULTS

Comparisons between the groups revealed a shorter duration of illness and fewer number of attacks in patients with PNES as compared to the Epilepsy group (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0003, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups revealed by the QOLIE-10 (p = 0.141), while the patients with PNES tended to have higher NDDI-E scores (p = 0.068). Multiple regression analysis of QOLIE-10 results in the PNES group revealed that NDDI-E score was the sole significant contributor (β = -0.425 p = 0.001). In contrast, NDDI-E score as well as attack frequency had a significant impact on QOLIE-10 results in the Epilepsy group (β = -0.283 p = 0.026; β = -0.272 p = 0.031, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In PWE and patients with PNES who utilized an out-patient service, QoL did not differ significantly between those groups. For treating PNES, psychosocial factors may be a more appropriate indicator of therapeutic goal than attack frequency.

Functional seizures are not less important than epilepsy

•

People with functional seizures often suffer from psychiatric comorbidities.

•

People with FS report detrimental effects on social aspects of their lives.

•

FS are associated with a considerable direct and indirect economic burden.

•

FS have increased rates of mortality compared to healthy controls.

Functional seizures (FS) are frequently encountered in neurology clinics, often affect young adults, and have significant negative impacts on many aspects of a person’s life. In the current narrative review, we searched the literature regarding some of the consequences of FS (i.e., psychiatric comorbidities, social consequences, costs that are associated with the condition, cognitive impairment in patients with FS, the quality of life of the people with FS, and the increased risk of mortality that is associated with FS). Evidence shows that FS have significant negative consequences, comparable in their magnitude to those affecting patients with epilepsy. The clinical and scientific communities should take steps to address these consequences through clinical care and research that prioritizes, facilitates, and expedites evidence-based diagnosis and treatment for FS.

Working toward the ideal situation: A pragmatic Epi-Psy approach for the diagnosis and treatment of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Medical international guidelines recommend regular psychiatric consultations for patients with epilepsy, in order to detect comorbidities. However, there is a lack of guidance about PNES that constitute both a differential diagnosis and a comorbidity of epilepsy. While waiting for the ideal collaboration between neurologists and psychiatrists, we develop a pragmatic approach. Wrong diagnosis between epilepsy and Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is frequent and may lead to iatrogenic consequences for patients. To limit the risk of misdiagnosis, psychiatrists and neurologists should collaborate and be more trained about epilepsy, PNES, and their comorbidities. We illustrate the aim of this collaboration through the case of a patient, initially diagnosed with epilepsy, then with PNES only and finally with comorbid epilepsy and PNES. The correct final diagnosis would not have been performed without the collaboration of psychiatrists and neurologists, trained in "Epi-Psy" approach.