What do we know about non-epileptic seizures in adults with intellectual disability: A narrative review

Medical and psychiatric comorbidities, somatic and cognitive symptoms, injuries and medical procedure history in patients with functional seizures from a public and a private hospital

PURPOSE

Patients with functional seizures (FS), otherwise known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), from different socioeconomic backgrounds may differ, however, this remains a gap in current literature. Comorbidities can play both a precipitating and a perpetuating role in FS and are important in the planning of individual treatment for this condition. With this study, we aimed to describe and compare the reported medical and psychiatric comorbidities, injuries, somatic and cognitive symptoms, and medical procedures among patients with FS from a private and a public epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) in Cape Town, South Africa.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study. We collected data on the comorbidity and medical procedure histories, as well as symptoms and clinical signs reported by patients with video-electroencephalographically (video-EEG) confirmed FS without comorbid epilepsy. We used digital patient records starting with the earliest available digital record for each hospital until the year 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were included in the study (N = 372). Public hospital patients had higher odds of reporting intellectual disability (aOR=15.58, 95% CI [1.80, 134.95]), circulatory system disease (aOR=2.63, 95% CI [1.02, 6.78]) and gait disturbance (aOR=8.52, 95% CI [1.96, 37.08]) compared to patients with FS attending the private hospital. They did, however, have fewer odds of reporting a history of an infectious or parasitic disease (aOR=0.31, 95% CI [0.11, 0.87]), respiratory system disease (aOR=0.23, 95% CI [0.06, 0.82]), or medical procedures in the past (aOR=0.32, 95% CI [0.16, 0.63]).

CONCLUSION

The study presents prevalence and comparative data on the medical profiles of patients with FS from different socioeconomic backgrounds which may inform future considerations in FS diagnosis and treatment.

Using Semiology to Classify Epileptic Seizures vs Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: A Meta-analysis

Background and objectives:

Misdiagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and epileptic seizures (ES) is common. In the absence of the diagnostic gold standard (video EEG), clinicians rely on semiology and clinical assessment. However, questions regarding the diagnostic accuracy of different signs remain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of semiology in PNES and ES.

Methods:

We systematically searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Medline for original research publications published before 8 February 2021 with no restriction on search dates to identify studies that compared semiology in ES and PNES in epilepsy monitoring units. Non-English publications, review articles, studies reporting on only PNES or ES and studies limited to patients with developmental delay were excluded. Study characteristics and proportions of ‘event groups’ and ‘patient groups’ demonstrating signs were extracted from each article. Bivariate analysis was conducted, and data were pooled in a random effects model for meta-analysis. The I2 statistic was calculated to assess statistical heterogeneity. The QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to assess risk of bias in included studies. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated. A PLR > 10 or an NLR < 0.1 has a large impact on the post-test probability of a diagnosis (ES or PNES) whereas a PLR between 5-10 or an NLR between 0.1- 0.2 has a moderate impact on the post-test probability of a diagnosis (ES or PNES).

Results:

The meta-analysis included 14 studies comprising of 800 patients with ES and 452 patients with PNES. For PNES, ictal eye closure (PLR 40.5 95%CI: 16.2-101.3; I2 = 0, from three studies) and asynchronous limb movements (PLR 10.2; 95%CI: 2.8-37.7; I2 = 0, from three studies) reached a PLR threshold > 5. No single sign reached a PLR threshold >5 for ES.

Conclusions:

While all signs require interpretation in the overall clinical context, the presence of ictal eye closure and asynchronous limb movements are reliable discriminative signs for PNES.

Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder in Williams Syndrome: Case Series and Review of Relevant Literature

BACKGROUND

Williams syndrome (WS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with several medical and psychiatric comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical presentation and treatment course of functional neurological symptom disorder (FNSD) in 3 adult patients with WS.

METHODS

This report describes the clinical presentation and long-term follow-up of 3 individuals with WS and FNSD who experienced a range of clinical presentations and responses to treatment. The literature on the clinical assessment and treatment of FNSD as it applies to patients with neurodevelopmental disorders is reviewed.

RESULTS

FNSD treatment strategies used in the general population were successfully adapted for these 3 patients. Literature on the diagnosis and treatment of FNSD in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

FNSD may be more common in individuals with WS than previously appreciated, and future studies describing the prevalence, clinical presentation, risk factors, and treatment of FNSD in WS are needed.