Incidence of clinical fractures: A 7-year follow-up study in institutionalized adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability

Fractures in people with epilepsy: A nationwide population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the age, gender, and site-specific prevalence of fractures in people with epilepsy (PWE) and matched general population comparators in a nationwide study in North Macedonia between 2015 and 2018.

METHODS

PWE and matched controls were selected through a systematic search of the electronic National Health System (eNHS). We determined the period prevalence (PP) of all site-specific fractures. We also calculated gender and age-specific incidence rate ratios (IRR) for various fractures. Odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RR) were estimated for the number and type of ASM as well as comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

Out of 13 818 prevalent epilepsy cases, 6383 (46.2%) were females, and 7435 (53.8%) were males. 109 PWE out of 1000 had at least one fracture during the study period and ~8 people out of 1000 in the general population. The most frequent sites in terms of PP both in PWE and controls, were fractures of the lower arm, hip and femur, and lower leg. Significant differences in PP for all fracture locations were observed between PWE and controls (P < 0.001). The noticeable differences of ∼100 times higher PP were observed for fractures of the skull and jaw in PWE. IRR of any fracture in PWE was 272.84/10 000 person-years; higher in the older age groups and among people who received >2 ASM. Fracture risk was increased with the use of >2 ASM (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.32-1.84 and RR: RR: 1.32). The presence of comorbidities also increased fractures risk (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.10-1.38).

SIGNIFICANCE

This population-based study depicts a higher fracture prevalence in PWE compared to the general population. A higher number of ASM and the presence of comorbidities increase the risk of fractures and targeted prevention might be needed in those subgroups of PWE.

Comparison of Fractures Among Older Adults Who Are Ambulatory vs Those Who Use Wheelchairs in Sweden

IMPORTANCE

Several diseases and conditions, such as cerebrovascular disease, arthritis, previous fractures, neurological diseases, or amputation, can result in severe immobility justifying wheelchair use for increased mobility. Immobility results in disuse osteoporosis and is considered a risk factor for fracture, although there are no large cohort studies that have investigated fracture risk in patients who use wheelchairs compared with an ambulatory control group.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether immobilized adults who used wheelchairs had a different risk of fracture and injurious falls compared with matched ambulatory controls.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study compared patients who used wheelchairs and controls (propensity score matched 1:1 using 22 variables relating to anthropometrics, general condition, comorbidity, and fall and fracture risk), identified through a national database of adults 65 years or older who underwent a health evaluation (baseline) at Swedish health care facilities. Patients were followed up from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, and data analysis was performed between June 1 and 30, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incident fracture, injurious falls without fracture, and deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 55 442 adults using wheelchairs were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 83.2 [8.3] years; 60.5% women). Those who used wheelchairs and the 55 442 matched controls were followed up for a median of 2.0 (IQR, 0.5-3.2) and 2.3 (IQR, 0.8-3.6) years, respectively. Patients who used wheelchairs had a lower risk of any fracture (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.41-0.44]), major osteoporotic fracture (HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.31-0.33]), and hip fracture (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.28-0.32]) compared with the ambulatory controls, associations that were only marginally affected by multivariable (same as the matching variables) adjustment. The risk of fall injury was lower among those who used wheelchairs than among ambulatory controls (unadjusted HR for Cox proportional hazards models, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.47-0.50]) and remained highly similar after adjustments. Patients who used wheelchairs had a significantly increased risk of death (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.33-1.36]) compared with controls. Association between wheelchair use and fracture outcomes and injurious falls, calculated using a Fine and Gray model with death as a competing risk, was similar to associations obtained using Cox proportional hazards regression for all fracture outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this retrospective cohort study of older adults, wheelchair use was associated with a lower risk of fracture than observed in ambulatory controls. These findings suggest that immobility associated with wheelchair use should not be considered a risk factor for fracture.