1
|
Winter Y, Abou Dargham R, Patiño Tobón S, Groppa S, Fuest S. Cenobamate as an Early Adjunctive Treatment in Drug-Resistant Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational Cohort Study. CNS Drugs 2024:10.1007/s40263-024-01109-9. [PMID: 39096467 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01109-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cenobamate (CNB) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. Data on its use in early therapy lines are not yet available, and clinicians frequently consider CNB to be a later ASM drug choice. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CNB as an early adjunctive treatment in drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. METHODS The study population were patients with drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures who were initiated with CNB after they did not respond to two or three lifetime ASMs, including all prior and concomitant ASMs. These patients were matched (1:2) by sex, age, and seizure frequency to controls who were initiated with any ASM other than CNB. All participants participated in the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We evaluated the retention rate after 12 months of CNB and after each new adjunctive ASM in the control group. In addition, seizure freedom and the response rate (reduction of seizure frequency by ≥ 50% from baseline) after 12 months were estimated. RESULTS We included 231 patients aged 44.4 ± 15.8 years. Of these, 33.3% (n = 77) were on CNB, 19.0% (n = 44) on valproate (VPA), 17.3% (n = 40) on lacosamide (LCS), 16.4% (n = 38) on levetiracetam (LEV), and 13.9% (n = 32) on topiramate (TPM). The highest retention rate after 12 months since the beginning of the early adjunctive therapy was observed on CNB (92.0%), compared with LCS (80.0%), LEV (73.3%), VPA (68.2%), or TPM (62.5%) (p < 0.05). Seizure freedom and response rate were also the best on CNB (19.5% and 71.4%, respectively) compared with other ASMs (8.3% and 52.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). No significant differences in adverse events between CNB and other ASMs were observed. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides evidence that CNB is an effective ASM with a good safety profile in the early therapy lines of drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. This data should support medical decision making in the management of patients with refractory epilepsy. CLINICAL TRIAL ID NCT05267405.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaroslav Winter
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Raya Abou Dargham
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Susana Patiño Tobón
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sven Fuest
- Department of Neurology, Hephata Klinik, Schwalmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steinhoff BJ, Georgiou D, Intravooth T. The cenobamate KORK study-A prospective monocenter observational study investigating cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in refractory epilepsy, with comparisons to historical cohorts treated with add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:1502-1514. [PMID: 38861254 PMCID: PMC11296107 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Europe, cenobamate has been approved for use as an adjunctive therapy in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE) with focal-onset seizures (FOS) who have not responded satisfactorily to treatment with at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Pivotal trials and real-world observational studies have demonstrated a high efficacy of cenobamate, even in very difficult-to-treat epilepsies. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of add-on cenobamate in adult PWE who were prospectively monitored. We compared these results with those previously obtained for add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam therapy. METHODS Patients were enrolled from the CENKORK study, which is a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, monocenter cohort study of adult PWE experiencing FOS. The titration of cenobamate was performed according to the guidelines outlined in the summary of product characteristics. The primary outcome measure was the retention rate at 6 months and 1 year. In addition, we assessed seizure-free rates, the proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% seizure reduction, adverse events, and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. These outcome measures were compared with historical controls treated with adjunctive lacosamide, perampanel, or brivaracetam at our center. RESULTS Between June 2021 and 2022, 172 PWE with ongoing FOS were included. 22 cases were lost to follow-up, leaving 150 cases for the 1-year assessment. The retention rates at 6 months and 1 year were 88.7% and 80%, respectively. Seizure freedom was achieved in 14% of patients at both the 6-month and 1-year marks, while the ≥50% responder rates were 50% and 61%, respectively. The 6-month retention rate was significantly higher in cenobamate than in other ASMs (p < 0.001 for each comparator). Adverse events were significantly more common with perampanel (p < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE Add-on cenobamate proved to be particularly efficacious compared to our experience with other recently introduced ASMs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This observational study was carried out in 172 adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy who were treated with adjunctive cenobamate. After 1 year, the data of 150 patients could be analyzed. Seizure freedom, in the preceding 3 months, was achieved in 14%. The rate of PWE continuing cenobamate was 80%. In our hands, cenobamate showed promising efficacy and tolerability even when compared to other recently introduced antiseizure medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J. Steinhoff
- Kork Epilepsy CenterKehl‐KorkGermany
- Medical FacultyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lattanzi S, Ranzato F, Di Bonaventura C, Bonanni P, Gambardella A, Tartara E, Assenza G, Procaccini M, Falsetto N, Villano V, Camattari G, Ori A, Di Gennaro G. Effectiveness and Safety of Adjunctive Cenobamate in People with Focal-Onset Epilepsy: Evidence from the First Interim Analysis of the BLESS Study. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:1203-1217. [PMID: 38850402 PMCID: PMC11263269 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00634-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite new anti-seizure medications (ASMs) being introduced into clinical practice, about one-third of people with epilepsy do not reach seizure control. Cenobamate is a novel tetrazole-derived carbamate compound with a dual mechanism of action. In randomized controlled trials, adjunctive cenobamate reduced the frequency of focal seizures in people with uncontrolled epilepsy. Studies performed in real-world settings are useful to complement this evidence and better characterize the drug profile. METHODS The Italian BLESS ("Cenobamate in Adults With Focal-Onset Seizures") study is an observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy in the context of real-world clinical practice. The study is ongoing and conducted at 50 centers in Italy. This first interim analysis includes participants enrolled until June 2023 and with 12-week outcome data available. RESULTS Forty participants with a median age of 36.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 26.0-47.5) years were included. The median monthly seizure frequency at baseline was 6.0 (IQR 2.5-17.3) seizures and 31 (77.5%) participants had failed four or more ASMs before cenobamate. At 12 weeks from starting cenobamate, the median reduction in monthly seizure frequency was 52.8% (IQR 27.1-80.3%); 22 (55.0%) participants had a ≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency and six (15.0%) reached seizure freedom. The median number of concomitant ASMs decreased from 3 (IQR 2-3) at baseline to 2 (IQR 2-3) at 12 weeks and the proportion of patients treated with > 2 concomitant ASMs decreased from 52.5% to 40.0%. Seven (17.5%) patients reported a total of 12 adverse events, 11 of which were considered adverse drug reactions to cenobamate. CONCLUSION In adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, the treatment with adjunctive cenobamate was well tolerated and was associated with improved seizure control and a reduction of the burden of concomitant ASMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05859854 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Federica Ranzato
- Regional Adult Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Scientific Institute, Conegliano, TV, Italy
| | | | - Elena Tartara
- Epilepsy Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, ERN EpiCare Full Member, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Assenza
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lauxmann S, Heuer D, Heckelmann J, Fischer FP, Schreiber M, Schriewer E, Widman G, Weber Y, Lerche H, Alber M, Schuh-Hofer S, Wolking S. Cenobamate: real-world data from a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurol 2024:10.1007/s00415-024-12510-1. [PMID: 38954033 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12510-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the effects of adjunctive cenobamate and concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) on weight from two double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 studies (YKP3089C013 [C013] and YKP3089C017 [C017]) and their open-label extensions (OLEs) and from a long-term, open-label phase 3 safety study, YKP3089C021 (C021). BACKGROUND Cenobamate is an ASM approved in the US and EU for treatment of focal seizures in adults. Some ASMs are associated with weight gain (e.g., valproate, gabapentin, pregabalin), which can negatively affect patient health. DESIGN/METHODS Patients with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of 1-3 ASMs were enrolled in each study. In C013, cenobamate was titrated to a target dose of 200 mg/day (max OLE dose 400 mg/day). In C017, patients were randomized to cenobamate 100, 200, or 400 mg/day (max OLE dose 400 mg/day). In C021, cenobamate was titrated to a target dose of 200 mg/day (max dose 400 mg/day). Median weight changes at 1 and 2 years from baseline were analyzed post hoc. RESULTS Analyses included 39, 206, and 1054 patients from C013, C017 (dose groups combined), and C021, respectively. Median weight changes from baseline ranged from -0.2 to -0.9 kg at 1 year and from -1.0 to +1.0 kg at 2 years. Some numerical reductions in weight were noted in patients who discontinued valproate by 1 (-13.0 kg, C013, n=1) or 2 years (-24.5 kg, C017, n=2) and in patients who discontinued gabapentin by 1 (-7.1 kg, C017, n=2) or 2 years (-7.0 kg, C017, n=2). Otherwise, median weight changes from baseline for patients receiving concomitant valproate, gabapentin, or pregabalin ranged from -3.1 to +2.6 kg at 1 year and from -1.6 to +2.7 kg at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive cenobamate was not associated with clinically significant changes in weight from baseline in patients treated for 1 and 2 years, including those receiving concomitant valproate, gabapentin, or pregabalin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Lauxmann
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - David Heuer
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jan Heckelmann
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Florian P Fischer
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Melanie Schreiber
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Schriewer
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Guido Widman
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Yvonne Weber
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Holger Lerche
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Michael Alber
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, University Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sigrid Schuh-Hofer
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Wolking
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steinhoff BJ, Ben-Menachem E, Klein P, Peltola J, Schmitz B, Thomas RH, Villanueva V. Therapeutic strategies during cenobamate treatment initiation: Delphi panel recommendations. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2024; 17:17562864241256733. [PMID: 38883228 PMCID: PMC11179501 DOI: 10.1177/17562864241256733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The goal of epilepsy treatment is seizure freedom, typically with antiseizure medication (ASM). If patients fail to attain seizure control despite two trials of appropriately chosen ASMs at adequate doses, they are classified as having drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Adverse events (AEs) commonly occur in people with DRE because they are typically on ⩾2 ASMs, increasing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Early emerging AEs may impact adherence, decrease quality of life, and delay achieving optimal treatment dosages. Cenobamate is an oral ASM with a long half-life which has proven to be highly effective in clinical trials. An international Delphi panel of expert epileptologists experienced in the clinical use of cenobamate and other ASMs was convened to develop consensus best practices for managing patients during and after cenobamate titration, with consideration for its known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, to allow patients to reach the most appropriate cenobamate dose while limiting tolerability issues. The modified Delphi process included one open-ended questionnaire and one virtual face-to-face meeting. Participants agreed that cenobamate can be prescribed for most patients experiencing focal-onset seizures. Patients initiating cenobamate therapy should have access to healthcare professionals as needed and their treatment response should be evaluated at the 100-mg dose. Patients with intellectual disabilities may need additional support to navigate the titration period. Proactive down-titration or withdrawal of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) is recommended when concomitant ASM regimens include ⩾2 SCBs. When applicable, maintaining a concomitant clobazam dose at ~5-10 mg may be beneficial. Patients taking oral contraceptives, newer oral anticoagulants, or HIV antiretroviral medications should be monitored for potential interactions. Because clinical evidence informing treatment decisions is limited, guidance regarding dose adjustments of non-ASM drugs was not developed beyond specific recommendations presented in the Summary of Product Characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J Steinhoff
- Department for Adults, Kork Epilepsy Center, Landstrasse 1, Kehl-Kork 77694, Germany
- Clinic for Neurology and Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elinor Ben-Menachem
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pavel Klein
- Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jukka Peltola
- Department of Neurology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Bettina Schmitz
- Department of Neurology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Center for Epilepsy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rhys H Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Member of ERN Epicare, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carreño M, Gil‐Nagel A, Serratosa JM, Toledo M, Rodriguez‐Uranga JJ, Villanueva V. Spanish consensus on the management of concomitant antiseizure medications when using cenobamate in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:1051-1058. [PMID: 38573131 PMCID: PMC11145622 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) associated with high rates of seizure freedom and acceptable tolerability in patients with focal seizures. To achieve the optimal cenobamate dose for maximal potential effectiveness while avoiding or minimizing drug-related adverse events (AEs), the administration of cenobamate with other ASMs must be managed through concomitant ASM load reduction. A panel of Spanish epilepsy experts aimed to provide a Spanish consensus on how to adjust the dose of concomitant ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to improve the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS A three-stage modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken, including six Spanish epileptologists with extensive experience using cenobamate. Based on current literature and their own expert opinion, the expert panel reached a consensus on when and how to adjust the dosage of concomitant ASMs during cenobamate titration. RESULTS The expert panel agreed that tailored titration and close follow-up are required to achieve the best efficacy and tolerability when initiating cenobamate in patients receiving concomitant ASMs. When concomitant clobazam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and sodium channel blockers are taken at high dosages, or when the patient is receiving two or more sodium channel blockers, dosages should be proactively lowered during the cenobamate titration period. Other concomitant ASMs should be reduced only if the patient reports a moderate/severe AE at any stage of the titration period. SIGNIFICANCE Cenobamate is an effective ASM with a dose-dependent effect. To maximize effectiveness while maintaining the best tolerability profile, co-medication management is needed. The recommendations included herein provide practical guidance for proactive and reactive management of co-medication in cenobamate-treated patients with DRE and a high drug load. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Patients with epilepsy may continue to have seizures even after treatment with several different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Cenobamate is an ASM that can reduce seizures in these patients. In this study, six Spanish experts in epilepsy discussed the best way to use cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy. They provide practical guidance on when and how the dose of other ASMs might be adjusted to reduce side effects and optimize the use of cenobamate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mar Carreño
- Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Epilepsy UnitBarcelonaSpain
| | - Antonio Gil‐Nagel
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy ProgramRuber International HospitalMadridSpain
| | - José M. Serratosa
- Department of NeurologyHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
| | - Manuel Toledo
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Epilepsy UnitBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Refractory Epilepsy UnitValenciaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steinhoff BJ, Georgiou D, Dietmann D, Intravooth T. Cenobamate Plasma Levels in Patients with Epilepsy: Correlation with Efficacy and Tolerability? J Clin Med 2024; 13:2757. [PMID: 38792299 PMCID: PMC11122064 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Cenobamate is approved by the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of adult patients with epilepsy (PWEs) with ongoing focal-onset seizures despite appropriate treatment with at least two established antiseizure medications. Pivotal trials and post-marketing real-world observational studies suggest high efficacy with unusually high seizure-free rates. The authors sought to investigate the plasma levels of cenobamate under steady-state conditions in seizure-free versus non-responding PWEs, and in PWEs who experienced adverse events versus those who did not. Methods: Blood samples were collected from adult PWEs who were treated with adjunct cenobamate under steady-state conditions. Daily doses, concomitant medications, efficacy, and tolerability were assessed. The plasma cenobamate levels of seizure-free versus non-responding PWEs and between PWEs with and those without clinical adverse events were compared. Results: Samples from 101 PWEs were included. Thirty-six PWEs were seizure-free and 65 were non-responders. In 31 PWEs, adverse events were apparent, whereas in the remaining 70, no tolerability issues were reported. A linear correlation was found between the daily doses (range: 100 mg-400 mg) and the plasma levels (3.8 mg/L-54.6 mg/L). Neither the daily doses nor the plasma levels differed significantly between the investigated subgroups. The main reason for this result was that the individual therapeutic ranges varied widely: seizure freedom and adverse effects were observed alongside low doses and plasma levels in some PWEs. Conversely, there were examples of PWEs who did not respond or who reported no tolerability issues at high doses or plasma levels. Conclusions: To evaluate the individual therapeutic range and to better understand the influence of other drugs in cases where concomitant medications are used, the therapeutic drug monitoring of cenobamate may be useful. A general therapeutic range cannot be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J. Steinhoff
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
- Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Dimitra Georgiou
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
| | - Daniel Dietmann
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
| | - Tassanai Intravooth
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen S, Fang W, Zhao L, Xu H. Safety assessment of cenobamate: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1369384. [PMID: 38560357 PMCID: PMC10978795 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1369384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to analyze adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with cenobamate from the FAERS database, covering the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2023. Methods Data related to cenobamate-associated ADEs from the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2023 were collected. After standardizing the data, various signal quantification techniques, including ROR, MHRA, BCPNN, and MGPS, were employed for analysis. Results Among 2535 ADE reports where cenobamate was the primary suspected drug, 94 adverse reactions involving 11 different System Organ Class (SOC) categories were identified through the application of four signal quantification techniques. More specifically, neurological disorders and injuries resultant from complications are frequent adverse reactions associated with cenobamate. Conclusion Our research findings align with established results, affirming the favorable safety profile of cenobamate. Effective prevention of adverse reactions induced by cenobamate can be achieved through the establishment of efficient blood concentration monitoring and dose adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shihao Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wenqiang Fang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Linqian Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Huiqin Xu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pietrafusa N, Falcicchio G, Russo E, Lattanzi S, Goffredo B, Simeoli R, Cairoli S, Corsetti T, Roberti R, De Tommaso M, Vigevano F, La Neve A, Specchio N. Cenobamate as add-on therapy for drug resistant epilepsies: effectiveness, drug to drug interactions and neuropsychological impact. What have we learned from real word evidence? Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1239152. [PMID: 38186643 PMCID: PMC10768012 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1239152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Cenobamate (CNB) is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved in 2021 in Europe for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults who were not adequately controlled with at least two previous ASMs. Methods: seizure outcome, treatment-emergent adverse events, neuropsychological profile, and blood levels of CNB and concomitant ASM were analyzed in a real world setting in two different Italian epilepsy centers in the context of CNB early access program. All patients performed a general cognitive evaluation, while 32 patients underwent the administration of a battery of neuropsychological tests at baseline and 6 months after CNB treatment. We performed CNB quantification in plasma in 31 patients at different doses in the range of 100-400 mg/day (65 measures). Results: we enrolled 54 patients with a median age of 27.9 years. The mean follow-up was 10.7 months. Most (91%) completed the efficacy analysis. At last follow-up visit, a 69.5% median seizure reduction was registered. Thirty-two patients (59.2%) had a ≥50% reduction of seizures that was ≥75% in 20 (42.0%) cases, whilst 10 (20.2%) patients were seizure-free. The most common adverse events were somnolence (53.1%), dizziness (28.1%) and diplopia (12.5%). The correlation between CNB dose and plasma concentration, revealed a significant linear correlation (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001), and there was a significant difference in mean plasma concentration/dose administered ratio (C/D ratio) between patients taking or not at least one inducer (0.10 ± 0.04 [(μg/mL)/(mg/day)]; n = 47 vs. 0.13 ± 0.05 [(μg/mL)/(mg/day)]; n = 18, p = 0.04). CNB dose was inversely correlated (r = -0.31, p = 0.02) to the C/D ratio of Carbamazepine blood levels. and positively correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001) with an increased plasma concentration of the active Clobazam metabolite N-desmethylclobazam. General Anxiety Disorder-7 showed a significant improvement of score from baseline evaluation of 6.82 to follow-up 6 months evaluation of 4.53 (p = 0.03). Conclusion: In this real-world study, we registered a clinically meaningful reduction in seizure frequency after CNB administration in most patients along with a good tolerability profile. CNB treatment is correlate to a reduction in symptom severity of anxiety score. Plasma levels measurements confirm that CNB acts both as "victim" and as "perpetrator" of drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Pietrafusa
- Clinical and Experimental Neurology, Full Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Falcicchio
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Emilio Russo
- Science of Health Department, University Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Bianca Goffredo
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Drug Biology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Simeoli
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Drug Biology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Cairoli
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Drug Biology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Corsetti
- Hospital Pharmacy Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Roberti
- Science of Health Department, University Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Marina De Tommaso
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Federico Vigevano
- Head of Neurological Sciences and Rehabilitation Medicine Scientific Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela La Neve
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola Specchio
- Clinical and Experimental Neurology, Full Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|