Antibody clustering helps refine lupus prognosis

The Role of Anti-mCRP Autoantibodies in Lupus Nephritis

Background

Lupus nephritis is characterized by multiple autoantibodies production. However, there are few autoantibodies associated with disease activity and prognosis. CRP exists in at least two conformationally distinct forms: native pentameric C-reactive protein (pCRP) and modified/monomeric CRP (mCRP). Autoantibodies against mCRP are prevalent in sera of patients with lupus nephritis and are reported to be pathogenic.

Summary

The levels of serum anti-mCRP autoantibodies are associated with clinical disease activity, tubulointerstitial lesions, treatment response, and prognosis in patients with lupus nephritis. The key epitope of mCRP was amino acid 35-47. Furthermore, emerging evidence indicated that anti-mCRP autoantibodies could participate in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis by forming in situ immune complexes or interfering with the biological functions of mCRP, such as binding to complement C1q and factor H.

Key Messages

Here, we review the recent advances in the prevalence, clinical-pathological associations, and potential pathogenesis of anti-mCRP autoantibodies in lupus nephritis, which may provide a promising novel therapeutic strategy for lupus nephritis.

The promise of precision medicine in rheumatology

Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) exhibit extensive heterogeneity in clinical presentation, disease course, and treatment response. Therefore, precision medicine - whereby treatment is tailored according to the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of an individual patient at a specific time - represents the 'holy grail' in SARD clinical care. Current strategies include treat-to-target therapies and autoantibody testing for patient stratification; however, these are far from optimal. Recent innovations in high-throughput 'omic' technologies are now enabling comprehensive profiling at multiple levels, helping to identify subgroups of patients who may taper off potentially toxic medications or better respond to current molecular targeted therapies. Such advances may help to optimize outcomes and identify new pathways for treatment, but there are many challenges along the path towards clinical translation. In this Review, we discuss recent efforts to dissect cellular and molecular heterogeneity across multiple SARDs and future directions for implementing stratification approaches for SARD treatment in the clinic.

A Review of Anti-C Reactive Protein Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype autoimmune disease, is characterized by the production of a plethora of autoantibodies with various roles in the development of disease-related tissue damage. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase reactant with a pentameric structure. Under acidic or alkaline conditions, or when urea levels are high and/or calcium levels are low, the pentamer (pCRP) dissociates irreversibly into monomeric CRP (mCRP) and exposes new epitopes (neo-CRP). Importantly, anti-mCRP (but not anti-pCRP) antibodies have been described in patients with SLE, their prevalence varying from 4% to 78% in different cohorts. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between autoantibodies directed against CRP (anti-CRP) and disease activity as well as their association with lupus nephritis (LN), frequently reporting discrepant findings. The main objective of the present review is to describe the role of anti-mCRP antibodies in SLE according to the currently available data.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: The search for the ideal biomarker

During the last decades, there has been an increased interest in the discovery and validation of biomarkers that reliably reflect specific aspects of lupus. Although many biomarkers have been developed, few of them have been validated and used in clinical practice, but with unsatisfactory performances. Thus, there is still a need to rigorously validate many of these novel promising biomarkers in large-scale longitudinal studies and also identify better biomarkers not only for lupus diagnosis but also for monitoring and predicting upcoming flares and response to treatment. Besides serological biomarkers, urinary and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers have emerged for assessing both renal and central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus, respectively. Also, novel omics techniques help us to understand the molecular basis of the disease and also allow the identification of novel biomarkers which may be potentially useful for guiding new therapeutic targets.

Adults with systemic lupus exhibit distinct molecular phenotypes in a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The clinical and pathologic diversity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) hinders diagnosis, management, and treatment development. This study addresses heterogeneity in SLE through comprehensive molecular phenotyping and machine learning clustering.

METHODS

Adult SLE patients (n = 198) provided plasma, serum, and RNA. Disease activity was scored by modified SELENA-SLEDAI. Twenty-nine co-expression module scores were calculated from microarray gene-expression data. Plasma soluble mediators (n = 23) and autoantibodies (n = 13) were assessed by multiplex bead-based assays and ELISAs. Patient clusters were identified by machine learning combining K-means clustering and random forest analysis of co-expression module scores and soluble mediators.

FINDINGS

SLEDAI scores correlated with interferon, plasma cell, and select cell cycle modules, and with circulating IFN-α, IP10, and IL-1α levels. Co-expression modules and soluble mediators differentiated seven clusters of SLE patients with unique molecular phenotypes. Inflammation and interferon modules were elevated in Clusters 1 (moderately) and 4 (strongly), with decreased T cell modules in Cluster 4. Monocyte, neutrophil, plasmablast, B cell, and T cell modules distinguished the remaining clusters. Active clinical features were similar across clusters. Clinical SLEDAI trended highest in Clusters 3 and 4, though Cluster 3 lacked strong interferon and inflammation signatures. Renal activity was more frequent in Cluster 4, and rare in Clusters 2, 5, and 7. Serology findings were lowest in Clusters 2 and 5. Musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous activity were common in all clusters.

INTERPRETATION

Molecular profiles distinguish SLE subsets that are not apparent from clinical information. Prospective longitudinal studies of these profiles may help improve prognostic evaluation, clinical trial design, and precision medicine approaches.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health.

Prognostic value of anti-CRP antibodies in lupus nephritis in long-term follow-up

Background

Autoantibodies against monomeric C-reactive protein (anti-CRP-Ab) observed in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) were suggested to be associated with active LN and a poor response to therapy during short-term follow-up.

The aim of this study was to confirm this finding and to investigate the prognostic value of anti-CRP-Ab in patients with LN during long-term follow-up.

Methods

Sera of 57 SLE patients (47 women, 10 men) with biopsy proven LN and 122 healthy individuals were analyzed for the presence of anti-CRP-Ab by in-house ELISA.

Anti-CRP-Ab levels were studied in relation to routine laboratory tests, urine analysis, levels of C3, C4, other immunological markers and the overall disease activity as assessed by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI).

The prognostic value of anti-CRP-Ab was tested in a subgroup of 29 newly diagnosed LN patients (median follow-up 5.9 years). Response to therapy at various time points was assessed with respect to baseline anti-CRP-Ab levels. At least partial response in the first/second year of treatment was considered as a “favorable outcome”, while non-response, renal flare or end stage renal disease were considered as “unfavorable outcome”.

Results

Anti-CRP-Ab were only detected in patients with active renal disease and their levels correlated with SLEDAI (r_s = 0.165, p = 0.002). The time to response was shorter in patients being anti-CRP-Ab negative at baseline compared to anti-CRP-Ab positive patients, p = 0.037. In the second year of therapy, baseline anti-CRP-Ab positivity was a significant predictor of “unfavorable outcome” (OR [95 % CI] = 15.6 [1.2-771]; p = 0.021). The predictive value of “baseline anti-CRP positivity” further increased when combined with “non-response to therapy in the first year”. Baseline anti-CRP-Ab positivity was not a predictor of “unfavorable outcome” at the end of follow-up, (OR [95 % CI] = 5.5 [0.6-71.1], p = 0.169).

Conclusions

Baseline serum levels of anti-CRP-Ab seem to be a strong risk factor for a composite outcome of non-response, renal flare or end stage renal disease after two years of standard treatment of LN. The response to therapy seems to be delayed in anti-CRP-Ab positive patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0879-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Autoantibodies to C-reactive protein in incomplete lupus and systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Anti-C-reactive protein (CRP) antibodies have been described in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated the potential of the anti-CRP antibody as a marker for disease activity in SLE patients and as a predictor of progression to SLE in patients with incomplete lupus.

METHODS

Immunoglobulin G anti-CRP antibody levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Patients with incomplete lupus exhibited clinical and immunologic characteristics different from those in SLE patients: no serositis and alopecia, more common oral ulcers and arthritis, lower disease activity index, lower positivity for antinuclear and anti-double-strand DNA antibodies, and higher complement levels. Anti-CRP antibody levels were higher in SLE patients (35.6 [35.1] AU) than in patients with incomplete lupus (23.1 [25.8] AU, P = 0.016) and normal controls (21.0 [14.3] AU, P < 0.001). Anti-CRP antibody was significantly higher in SLE patients with arthritis and correlated with disease activity markers, including antichromatin antibody. However, no difference in anti-CRP antibody levels was observed between patients with incomplete lupus that progressed to SLE and those whose did not.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that anti-CRP antibodies can neither be used as biomarkers in SLE nor predict SLE progression in patients with incomplete lupus.

Anti-dsDNA and Antichromatin Antibody Isotypes in Serologically Active Clinically Quiescent Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are clinically quiescent despite serologic activity. Since studies suggest that antichromatin antibodies are more sensitive than anti-dsDNA antibodies in detecting active SLE, and that immunoglobulin (Ig) G, in particular complement-fixing subclasses, may be more pathogenic than IgM, we investigated the levels of anti-dsDNA and antichromatin isotypes in SACQ patients as compared to non-SACQ patients with SLE.

METHODS

Levels of IgM, IgA, IgG, and IgG1-4 antichromatin and anti-dsDNA were measured by ELISA. SACQ was defined as ≥ 2 years with the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) at 2 or 4 from serologic activity, during which patients could be taking antimalarials, but not corticosteroids or immunosuppressives. Unselected non-SACQ patients with SLE were used as comparators. SACQ patient serum samples were further stratified based on subsequent development of flare, defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K ≥ 1 and/or treatment initiation. Nonparametric statistics were used, and generalized estimating equations were applied to account for multiple samples in the same patient.

RESULTS

SACQ patients' complement-fixing antichromatin and anti-dsDNA IgG subclasses were significantly higher than those of non-SACQ patients. When the sample drawn latest in a SACQ period was analyzed, there was no difference between antichromatin or anti-dsDNA isotype or IgG subclass levels between patients who flared and those who remained SACQ, nor were consistent trends seen when samples were examined during SACQ and flare in the same patient.

CONCLUSION

The SACQ phenotype does not arise from a lack of pathogenic anti-dsDNA and/or antichromatin autoantibodies. Neither increases in antichromatin nor anti-dsDNA isotype or IgG subclass levels were predictive of or coincident with flare in SACQ patients.

Activation of rheumatoid factor-specific B cells is antigen dependent and occurs preferentially outside of germinal centers in the lupus-prone NZM2410 mouse model

AM14 rheumatoid factor (RF) B cells in the MRL/lpr mice are activated by dual BCR and TLR7/9 ligation and differentiate into plasmablasts via an extrafollicular (EF) route. It was not known whether this mechanism of activation of RF B cells applied to other lupus-prone mouse models. We investigated the mechanisms by which RF B cells break tolerance in the NZM2410-derived B6.Sle1.Sle2.Sle3 (TC) strain in comparison with C57BL/6 (B6) controls, each expressing the AM14 H chain transgene in the presence or absence of the IgG2a(a) autoantigen. The TC, but not B6, genetic background promotes the differentiation of RF B cells into Ab-forming cells (AFCs) in the presence of the autoantigen. Activated RF B cells preferentially differentiated into plasmablasts in EF zones. Contrary to the MRL/lpr strain, TC RF B cells were also located within germinal centers, but only the formation of EF foci was positively correlated with the production of RF AFCs. Immunization of young TC.AM14 H chain transgenic mice with IgG2a(a) anti-chromatin immune complexes (ICs) activated RF B cells in a BCR- and TLR9-dependent manner. However, these IC immunizations did not result in the production of RF AFCs. These results show that RF B cells break tolerance with the same general mechanisms in the TC and the MRL/lpr lupus-prone genetic backgrounds, namely the dual activation of the BCR and TLR9 pathways. There are also distinct differences, such as the presence of RF B cells in GCs and the requirement of chronic IgG2a(a) anti-chromatin ICs for full differentiation of RF AFCs.

Clinical perspectives on lupus genetics: advances and opportunities

In recent years, genome-wide association studies have led to an expansion in the identification of regions containing confirmed genetic risk variants within complex human diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Many of the strongest SLE genetic associations can be divided into groups based on their potential roles in different processes implicated in lupus pathogenesis, including ubiquitination, DNA degradation, innate immunity, cellular immunity, lymphocyte development, and antigen presentation. Recent advances have also shown several genetic associations with SLE subphenotypes and subcriteria. Many areas for further exploration remain to move lupus genetic studies toward clinically informative end points.

Contributions of B cells to lupus pathogenesis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies. This review summarizes first the results obtained in the mouse that have revealed how B cell tolerance is breached in SLE. We then review the B cell subsets, in addition to the autoAb producing cells, which contribute to SLE pathogenesis, focusing on marginal zone B cells, B-1 cells and regulatory B cells. Finally, we review the interactions between B cells and other immune cells that have been implicated in SLE, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, neutrophils and T cells.

A regulatory role for CD72 expression on B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

B regulatory cells and their regulatory products/markers, such us semaphorin 3A (sema3A) and its receptor NP-1, FcγIIB, IL-10, and others, act at the very base of self-tolerance, maintenance, and prevention of autoimmune disease development.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to assess the involvement of CD72, a regulatory receptor on B cells, in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In addition, the potential of soluble sema3A in enhancing the expression of CD72 on B cells of SLE patients was investigated.

RESULTS

CD72 expression on activated B cells of SLE patients was significantly lower than that of normal controls. This lower expression of CD72 in SLE patients correlated inversely with SLE disease activity and was associated with lupus nephritis, the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies, and low levels of complement. Co-culture of purified B cells from healthy controls with condition-media containing recombinant sema3A resulted in significant enhancement of CD72. Similar enhancement of CD72 on activated B cells from SLE patients, though significant, was still lower than in normal individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower expression of CD72 on activated B cells from SLE patients correlates with SLE disease activity, lupus nephritis, the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies, and low levels of complement. The improvement of CD72 expression following the addition of soluble semaphorin 3A suggests that CD72 may be useful as a biomarker to be followed during the treatment of SLE.

Is there any correlation between high sensitive CRP and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus?

The role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as an inflammatory marker is still controversial. Recently, more sensitive methods, such as high sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) have been used to detect micro-inflammation. The role of hs-CRP in lupus flare has not been documented well. We conducted this study to examine the correlation between hs-CRP serum concentrations and disease activity in lupus. Ninety-two SLE patients and 49 healthy controls contributed to our study. Most confounding factors influencing the hs-CRP values were excluded. Disease activity was estimated using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2K). hs-CRP values were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Serum values of hs-CRP were significantly higher (p < 0.001, z = 3.29) in patients compared with healthy controls. The cutoff point for hs-CRP between patients and controls was 0.93 mg/L (Youden's Index = 0.39). There was no correlation between hs-CRP serum levels and disease activity. Furthermore, hs-CRP values did not correlate with any of the laboratory parameters, except for C3 (p = 0.003, r(s)  = -0.2) and C4 (p = 0.02, r(s) = -0.1). Although hs-CRP serum levels were significantly higher in lupus patients compared with healthy controls, it seems that this marker is not a good indicator for disease activity.

Antinuclear antibody status and risk of death in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVES

The association between the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and mortality has been rarely reported. The present study explored the value of ANA as a predictor of overall survival in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Patients younger than 20 years who underwent ANA testing in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) from 2000 to 2008 were enrolled in this study. Mortality was ascertained by using the National Death Registry of Taiwan. Positive ANA titres were categorized as low (1:40 to 1:80), medium (1:160 to 1:320), and high (≥ 1:640).

RESULTS

A total of 13 345 subjects (6579 males, 6766 females) were enrolled during the 9-year study period. The overall prevalence of low, medium, and high ANA titres was 20.8% (n = 2774), 6.0% (n = 804), and 2.5% (n = 338), respectively. During 45,140 person-years of follow-up, 146 deaths were identified and the crude mortality rates were 3.8 and 3.0 per 1000 person-years for subjects with positive and negative ANA test results, respectively (p = 0.130). Compared with ANA-negative subjects, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality among those with a high ANA titre was 5.18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.13-8.57]. A low-to-medium ANA titre was not associated with increased mortality. Among the 18 deaths in individuals with a high ANA titre, 14 were due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In comparison, five out of 34 deaths among those with low-to-medium titres of ANA and none of those with negative ANA were related to SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents with high ANA titres should receive greater attention and monitoring to prevent unfavourable outcomes because they have a higher mortality risk than those with negative ANA results.

Serum levels of autoantibodies against C-reactive protein correlate with renal disease activity and response to therapy in lupus nephritis

Introduction

Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) seldom reflect disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We have previously shown that autoantibodies against neo-epitopes of CRP often occur in SLE, but that this does not explain the modest CRP response seen in flares. However, we have repeatedly found that anti-CRP levels parallel lupus disease activity, with highest levels in patients with renal involvement; thus, we aimed to study anti-CRP in a material of well-characterized lupus nephritis patients.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients with lupus nephritis were included. Treatment with corticosteroids combined with cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab was started after baseline kidney biopsy. A second biopsy was taken after ≥ 6 months. Serum creatinine, cystatin C, complement, anti-dsDNA, anti-CRP and urinalysis were done on both occasions. Biopsies were evaluated regarding World Health Organisation (WHO) class and indices of activity and chronicity. Renal disease activity was estimated using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index.

Results

At baseline, 34/38 patients had renal BILAG-A; 4/38 had BILAG-B. Baseline biopsies showed WHO class III (n = 8), IV (n = 19), III to IV/V (n = 3) or V (n = 8) nephritis. Seventeen out of 38 patients were anti-CRP-positive at baseline, and six at follow-up. Overall, anti-CRP levels had dropped at follow-up (P < 0.0001) and anti-CRP levels correlated with renal BILAG (r = 0.29, P = 0.012). A positive anti-CRP test at baseline was superior to anti-dsDNA and C1q in predicting poor response to therapy as judged by renal BILAG. Baseline anti-CRP levels correlated with renal biopsy activity (r = 0.33, P = 0.045), but not with chronicity index. Anti-CRP levels were positively correlated with anti-dsDNA (fluorescence-enhanced immunoassay: r = 0.63, P = 0.0003; Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence microscopy test: r = 0.44, P < 0.0001), and inversely with C3 (r = 0.35, P = 0.007) and C4 (r = 0.29, P = 0.02), but not with C1q (r = 0.14, P = 0.24). No associations with urinary components, creatinine, cystatin C or the glomerular filtration rate were found.

Conclusions

In the present study, we demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between anti-CRP levels and histopathological activity in lupus nephritis, whereas a baseline positive anti-CRP test predicted poor response to therapy. Our data also confirm previous findings of associations between anti-CRP and disease activity. This indicates that anti-CRP could be helpful to assess disease activity and response to therapy in SLE nephritis, and highlights the hypothesis of a pathogenetic role for anti-CRP antibodies in lupus nephritis.