1
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexis Ogdie
- University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Michaud K, Pope J, van de Laar M, Curtis JR, Kannowski C, Mitchell S, Bell J, Workman J, Paik J, Cardoso A, Taylor PC. Systematic Literature Review of Residual Symptoms and an Unmet Need in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 73:1606-1616. [PMID: 32619340 PMCID: PMC8596735 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the nature and burden of residual disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who meet treatment targets. Second, for those who did not meet targets, to evaluate how much is due to patient symptoms. Methods Prospective and retrospective studies were searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library in the English language from January 1, 2008 to April 18, 2018; conference abstracts (from January 2016 to April 2018) and reference lists of relevant studies were also screened. Results Of 8,339 records identified, 55 were included in the review; 53 were unique studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials. Of these, 48 reported on patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) or remission. Studies varied in population, treatment goals, and outcome reporting. The proportions of patients with residual symptoms in these studies varied by the definitions used for LDA or remission and were more often reported in patients with LDA than those in remission. The most commonly reported outcome measures were functional disability (n = 34 studies), tender or swollen joints (n = 18), pain (n = 17), patient global assessment (n = 15), and fatigue (n = 14). However, few studies reported the percentage of patients achieving a specific threshold, which could then be used to easily define the presence of residual symptoms. Conclusion Residual symptoms are present in some patients despite their achieving LDA or remission, highlighting an unmet need, especially with respect to improving pain, fatigue, and function. Standardized reporting in future observational studies would facilitate better understanding of this issue in defined RA populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas
| | - Janet Pope
- University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jim Paik
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Navarro-Millán I, Young SR, Shurbaji S, McDavid C, Cornelius-Schecter A, Johnson B, Cherrington AL, Fraenkel L, Goodman SM, Curtis JR, Venkatachalam S, Safford MM. Barriers and facilitators for screening and treatment of hyperlipidemia among patients with inflammatory arthritis. BMC Rheumatol 2020; 4:26. [PMID: 32514493 PMCID: PMC7265623 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-020-00123-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA), defined as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The frequency of screening and treatment of hyperlipidemia, a modifiable CVD risk factor, is low in these patients. The reasons for low screening and treatment rates in this population are poorly understood. Our objective was to elicit the barriers and facilitators for screening and treatment of hyperlipidemia from the perspective of patients with IA. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups of patients with IA, guided by Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory. We recruited patients with IA aged 40 years and older from a single academic center. Data were analyzed thematically. Results We conducted three focus groups with 17 participants whose mean age was 56 (range 45–81) years; 15 were women. Four themes emerged as barriers: 1) need for more information about arthritis, prognosis, and IA medications prior to discussing additional topics like CVD risk; 2) lack of knowledge about how IA increases CVD risk; 3) lifestyle changes to reduce overall CVD risk rather than medications; and 4) the need to improve doctor-patient communication about IA, medications, and CVD risk. One theme emerged as a facilitator: 5) potential for peer coaches (patients with IA who are trained about concepts of CVD risk and IA) to help overcome barriers to screening and treatment of hyperlipidemia to lower CVD risk. Conclusion Patients with IA identified educational needs about IA, increased CVD risk in IA and the need for improved doctor-patient communication about screening for hyperlipidemia and its treatment. Patients were receptive to working with peer coaches to facilitate achievement of these goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Navarro-Millán
- Weill Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70yth Street - LH -363, New York, NY 10021 USA.,Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70yth Street - LH -363, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Sarah R Young
- Department of Social Work, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY USA
| | - Sally Shurbaji
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Chastity McDavid
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Anna Cornelius-Schecter
- Weill Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70yth Street - LH -363, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Bernadette Johnson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Andrea L Cherrington
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Yale University, New Haven, USA.,Berkshire Health Systems, Pittsfield, MA USA
| | - Susan M Goodman
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70yth Street - LH -363, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | | | - Monika M Safford
- Weill Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70yth Street - LH -363, New York, NY 10021 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cho SK, Sung YK. A paradigm shift in studies based on rheumatoid arthritis clinical registries. Korean J Intern Med 2019; 34:974-981. [PMID: 30759964 PMCID: PMC6718765 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2018.440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical research is the study of aspects of patient health or illness that are closely related to clinical practice. In the late 20th and early 21th century, outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved dramatically due to breakthroughs in new drugs. Patient-reported outcome measures now play a significant role in the drug development process as study endpoints in clinical trials of new therapies, and this has led to increased interest in the patient's perspective, drug safety and treatment outcomes in clinical practice. In accordance with these needs, many prospective cohorts for RA patients and registries of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been actively conducted in the United States and European and Asian countries. A gradual shift is taking place in the major outcomes of clinical research using these prospective cohorts and registries. This article will introduce representative registries for RA in each country set up in the early 2000s and will discuss future perspectives in clinical research on RA patients using such clinical registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Kyung Cho
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence to Yoon-Kyoung Sung, M.D. Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea Tel: +82-2-2290-9250 Fax: +82-2-2298-8231 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Archer R, Hock E, Hamilton J, Stevens J, Essat M, Poku E, Clowes M, Pandor A, Stevenson M. Assessing prognosis and prediction of treatment response in early rheumatoid arthritis: systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-294. [PMID: 30501821 DOI: 10.3310/hta22660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease associated with reduced quality of life and substantial costs. It is unclear which tests and assessment tools allow the best assessment of prognosis in people with early RA and whether or not variables predict the response of patients to different drug treatments. OBJECTIVE To systematically review evidence on the use of selected tests and assessment tools in patients with early RA (1) in the evaluation of a prognosis (review 1) and (2) as predictive markers of treatment response (review 2). DATA SOURCES Electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science Conference Proceedings; searched to September 2016), registers, key websites, hand-searching of reference lists of included studies and key systematic reviews and contact with experts. STUDY SELECTION Review 1 - primary studies on the development, external validation and impact of clinical prediction models for selected outcomes in adult early RA patients. Review 2 - primary studies on the interaction between selected baseline covariates and treatment (conventional and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) on salient outcomes in adult early RA patients. RESULTS Review 1 - 22 model development studies and one combined model development/external validation study reporting 39 clinical prediction models were included. Five external validation studies evaluating eight clinical prediction models for radiographic joint damage were also included. c-statistics from internal validation ranged from 0.63 to 0.87 for radiographic progression (different definitions, six studies) and 0.78 to 0.82 for the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Predictive performance in external validations varied considerably. Three models [(1) Active controlled Study of Patients receiving Infliximab for the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis of Early onset (ASPIRE) C-reactive protein (ASPIRE CRP), (2) ASPIRE erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ASPIRE ESR) and (3) Behandelings Strategie (BeSt)] were externally validated using the same outcome definition in more than one population. Results of the random-effects meta-analysis suggested substantial uncertainty in the expected predictive performance of models in a new sample of patients. Review 2 - 12 studies were identified. Covariates examined included anti-citrullinated protein/peptide anti-body (ACPA) status, smoking status, erosions, rheumatoid factor status, C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, swollen joint count (SJC), body mass index and vascularity of synovium on power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Outcomes examined included erosions/radiographic progression, disease activity, physical function and Disease Activity Score-28 remission. There was statistical evidence to suggest that ACPA status, SJC and PDUS status at baseline may be treatment effect modifiers, but not necessarily that they are prognostic of response for all treatments. Most of the results were subject to considerable uncertainty and were not statistically significant. LIMITATIONS The meta-analysis in review 1 was limited by the availability of only a small number of external validation studies. Studies rarely investigated the interaction between predictors and treatment. SUGGESTED RESEARCH PRIORITIES Collaborative research (including the use of individual participant data) is needed to further develop and externally validate the clinical prediction models. The clinical prediction models should be validated with respect to individual treatments. Future assessments of treatment by covariate interactions should follow good statistical practice. CONCLUSIONS Review 1 - uncertainty remains over the optimal prediction model(s) for use in clinical practice. Review 2 - in general, there was insufficient evidence that the effect of treatment depended on baseline characteristics. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016042402. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Archer
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emma Hock
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Stevens
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Munira Essat
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edith Poku
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark Clowes
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Abdullah Pandor
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matt Stevenson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prognostic Factors for Sustained Remission in a "Real Life" Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 16:405-409. [PMID: 30482509 DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most frequent chronic polyarthritis. The current goal of RA treatment is to achieve clinical remission. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of remission in a cohort of patients from clinical practice, and to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with remission. METHODS A retrospective study was performed on a cohort of RA patients seen at the first consultation at the HUGC Rheumatology Service Dr. Negrín (HUGCDN) between first of January 2000 and thirtieth of April 2014. Sustained remission was defined as DAS28 less than 2.6 in the last two available visits in the medical history. RESULTS A total of 463 patients were consecutively included, most (75%) women, with a mean age at the onset of RA of 50 years and a mean duration of the disease at follow-up of 8 years. 46% of the patients achieved sustained remission. Multiple logistic regression analyses found male sex (P=.031, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.05-2.82), diagnosis in the first year of symptoms (P=.023, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.07-2.69) and the initial DAS28 (P=.035) to be independent predictors for sustained remission. CONCLUSIONS The 46% of the patients with RA followed in the HUGC Dr. Negrín are in persistent remission, being the early diagnosis a modifiable factor predictor of remission. Thus, an objective of the Rheumatology Service should be to improve the diagnostic delay of RA in the health area.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jagpal A, Navarro-Millán I. Cardiovascular co-morbidity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review of risk factors, cardiovascular risk assessment and treatment. BMC Rheumatol 2018; 2:10. [PMID: 30886961 PMCID: PMC6390616 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-018-0014-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is markedly increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis partly due to accelerated atherosclerosis from chronic inflammation. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, diabetes mellitus and physical inactivity are also highly prevalent among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and contribute to the CVD risk. The impact of traditional risk factors on the CVD risk appears to be different in the RA and non-RA population. However, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, body mass index and family history of CVD influence the CVD risk in RA patients the same way they do for the non-RA population. Despite that, screening and treatment of these risk factors is suboptimal among patients with RA. Recent guidelines from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommend aggressive management of traditional risk factors in addition to RA disease activity control to decrease the CVD risk. Several CVD risk calculators are available for clinical use to stratify a patients' risk of developing a CVD event. Most of these calculators do not account for RA as a risk factor; thus, a multiplication factor of 1.5 is recommended to predict the risk more accurately. In order to reduce CVD in the RA population, national guidelines for the prevention of CVD should be applied to manage traditional risk factors in addition to aggressive control of RA disease activity. While current data suggests a protective effect of non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics on cardiovascular events among patients with RA, more data is needed to define this effect more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aprajita Jagpal
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 836 Faculty Office Tower, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
| | - Iris Navarro-Millán
- Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Division of General Internal Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, F-2019, PO Box #331, New York, NY 10065 USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van den Bosch F, Mease PJ, Sieper J, Baeten DL, Xia Y, Chen S, Pangan AL, Song IH. Long-term efficacy and predictors of remission following adalimumab treatment in peripheral spondyloarthritis: 3-year results from ABILITY-2. RMD Open 2018. [PMID: 29531780 PMCID: PMC5845429 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Describe efficacy and safety of 3 years of adalimumab treatment in patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) and identify predictors of remission. Methods Patients with pSpA were randomised to adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo for 12 weeks; a 144-week open-label extension followed (NCT01064856). Remission was assessed by the Peripheral SpA Response Criteria (PSpARC) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS ID). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of remission at 1 and 3 years and sustained remission (≥24 consecutive weeks). Results In 165 patients, ASDAS ID was achieved by 47% at 1 year and 39% at 3 years; 36% and 33% achieved PSpARC remission, respectively. Sustained ASDAS ID and PSpARC remission were achieved by 52% (86/165) and 42% (70/165) of patients, respectively. Achieving ASDAS ID at week 12 significantly predicted 1 year (OR, 8.64 (95% CI 2.97 to 25.14)), 3 year (OR, 36.12 (95% CI 2.29 to 569.08)) and sustained ASDAS ID (OR, 8.01 (95% CI 2.47 to 25.97)); achieving PSpARC remission at week 12 consistently predicted 1 year (OR, 6.47 (95% CI 1.91 to 21.95)), 3 years (OR, 15.66 (95% CI 4.19 to 58.56)) and sustained PSpARC remission (OR, 20.27 (95% CI 5.37 to 76.46)). No baseline variables consistently predicted 1-year or 3-year remission or sustained remission. The safety profile of adalimumab was consistent with observations in other SpA disease indications. Conclusions In patients with pSpA, early response to adalimumab, but not baseline demographics or disease characteristics, was a better predictor of long-term remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philip J Mease
- Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joachim Sieper
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology, and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominique L Baeten
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yinglin Xia
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Su Chen
- Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Aileen L Pangan
- Immunology Clinical Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - In-Ho Song
- Immunology Clinical Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Defining and characterizing sustained remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 37:885-893. [PMID: 29224127 PMCID: PMC5880849 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3923-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to characterize stability and clinical features of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission. Combination therapy with methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) has increased remission rates in RA but optimal regimens to maintain remission are unknown. We describe Study of Etanercept And Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis (SEAM-RA) and data from a run-in period of longitudinal observation. Patients in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission (score ≤ 3.3) receiving etanercept and methotrexate were screened and had to maintain remission over 3 run-in visits/24 weeks before randomization to combination therapy or withdrawal of etanercept or methotrexate. Baseline characteristics were examined for predictive factors for maintaining remission. As of November 2016, 141 patients have enrolled; of these, 64 have been randomized, 34 were ineligible after run-in, and 43 are in run-in period; 70% have completed run-in. Enrolled and randomized patients, respectively, had mean (standard deviation [SD]) disease duration 11.0 (8.6) and 12.6 (9.7) years; mean (SD) duration of etanercept use 4.2 (3.8) and 4.9 (4.2) years; mean (SD) methotrexate dose 15.9 (4.8) and 15.5 (4.9) mg/week; and mean (SD) SDAI scores 1.5 (0.9) and 1.4 (0.8). At enrollment, 73% and 63% were in Boolean remission based on 28 joints and 66/68 joints, respectively. No enrollment characteristic predicted successful completion of run-in. Two-thirds of patients considered to be in remission at enrollment sustained remission through 24 weeks. Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients and those who completed run-in were comparable.
Collapse
|
10
|
van Tuyl LHD, Boers M. Remission — keeping the patient experience front and centre. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017; 13:573-574. [DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
11
|
Hamann P, Holland R, Hyrich K, Pauling JD, Shaddick G, Nightingale A, McHugh N. Factors Associated With Sustained Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients Treated With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69:783-793. [PMID: 27564526 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibody has revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and remission is now a realistic possibility for patients. Despite widespread use of anti-TNFs, predicting which patients are most likely to attain a sustained good response to these treatments remains challenging. Our objective was to undertake a systematic review of the literature to evaluate existing evidence for demographic and clinical factors associated with the achievement of sustained remission in individuals with RA treated with anti-TNF therapy. METHODS Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched along with studies identified from reference lists. Quality of studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. Meta-analysis was undertaken where unadjusted odds ratios were available for the same demographic or clinical factors from at least 3 studies. RESULTS Six studies were identified. Concomitant methotrexate use was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving sustained remission. Greater baseline disease activity, tender joint count, age, disease duration, baseline functional impairment, and female sex were associated with reduced likelihood of achieving sustained remission. CONCLUSION Factors predicting sustained remission are seldom reported. Evidence identified in this review supports current recommendations for methotrexate coprescription and highlights the negative impact of particular clinical and demographic features on the likelihood of achieving optimal response to anti-TNF treatment. Sustained remission is clinically more relevant than point remission in RA. More widespread reporting of sustained remission will help clinicians set realistic expectations on likely long-term treatment efficacy and could be an important tool for identifying patients suitable for dose optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hamann
- University of Bath, Claverton Down, and Royal United Hospitals, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Upper Borough Walls, Bath, UK
| | - Richard Holland
- Royal United Hospitals, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Upper Borough Walls, Bath, UK
| | - Kimme Hyrich
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and University of Manchester Partnership, Manchester, UK
| | - John D Pauling
- University of Bath, Claverton Down, and Royal United Hospitals, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Upper Borough Walls, Bath, UK
| | | | | | - Neil McHugh
- University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Curtis JR, Bykerk VP, Aassi M, Schiff M. Adherence and Persistence with Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. J Rheumatol 2016; 43:1997-2009. [PMID: 27803341 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.151212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is typically suboptimal. Nonadherence has been associated with symptom worsening and increased disability. We systematically reviewed published clinical studies to evaluate methotrexate (MTX) adherence and persistence, factors associated with MTX adherence and persistence, and the effect of MTX nonadherence on clinical outcomes in RA. METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched (inception to February 2016) using relevant keywords. Observational or interventional clinical studies in patients with RA that specifically reported adherence to or persistence with MTX were included. Data were extracted using a predesigned, standardized template that included study design, patient demographics, and relevant outcomes. Main outcomes were MTX adherence and persistence rates in patients with RA treated with MTX and factors associated with MTX adherence and persistence. RESULTS Of 365 references screened, 31 articles met inclusion criteria and another 10 were identified from searching reference lists. Estimates of MTX adherence varied from study to study because of heterogeneity in patient populations, duration of followup, definitions of adherence, and methods of assessment. Rates of MTX persistence ranged from 50% to 94% at 1 year and 25% to 79% at 5 years. No clear trends were identified in factors that influence MTX adherence and persistence. Two studies suggested that MTX adherence was associated with superior clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION MTX adherence and persistence are highly variable in patients with RA. Research is necessary to determine the effect of nonadherence on health outcomes and to identify independent predictors of nonadherence to inform evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey R Curtis
- From the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA; Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. .,J.R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; V.P. Bykerk, MD, Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital; M. Aassi, MD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; M. Schiff, MD, Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
| | - Vivian P Bykerk
- From the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA; Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.,J.R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; V.P. Bykerk, MD, Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital; M. Aassi, MD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; M. Schiff, MD, Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Maher Aassi
- From the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA; Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.,J.R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; V.P. Bykerk, MD, Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital; M. Aassi, MD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; M. Schiff, MD, Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Michael Schiff
- From the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA; Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.,J.R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; V.P. Bykerk, MD, Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital; M. Aassi, MD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; M. Schiff, MD, Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanmartí R, García-Rodríguez S, Álvaro-Gracia JM, Andreu JL, Balsa A, Cáliz R, Fernández-Nebro A, Ferraz-Amaro I, Gómez-Reino JJ, González-Álvaro I, Martín-Mola E, Martínez-Taboada VM, Ortiz AM, Tornero J, Marsal S, Moreno-Muelas JV. 2014 update of the Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 11:279-94. [PMID: 26051464 DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2015.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish recommendations for the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to serve as a reference for all health professionals involved in the care of these patients, and focusing on the role of available synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS Consensual recommendations were agreed on by a panel of 14 experts selected by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER). The available scientific evidence was collected by updating three systematic reviews (SR) used for the EULAR 2013 recommendations. A new SR was added to answer an additional question. The literature review of the scientific evidence was made by the SER reviewer's group. The level of evidence and the degree of recommendation was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine system. A Delphi panel was used to evaluate the level of agreement between panellists (strength of recommendation). RESULTS Thirteen recommendations for the management of adult RA were emitted. The therapeutic objective should be to treat patients in the early phases of the disease with the aim of achieving clinical remission, with methotrexate playing a central role in the therapeutic strategy of RA as the reference synthetic DMARD. Indications for biologic DMARDs were updated and the concept of the optimization of biologicals was introduced. CONCLUSIONS We present the fifth update of the SER recommendations for the management of RA with synthetic and biologic DMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimon Sanmartí
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | - José Luis Andreu
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - Alejandro Balsa
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - Rafael Cáliz
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - Antonio Fernández-Nebro
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Reumatología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España
| | - Iván Ferraz-Amaro
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, España
| | - Juan Jesús Gómez-Reino
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España
| | | | | | | | - Ana M Ortiz
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - Jesús Tornero
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, España
| | - Sara Marsal
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron, Barcelona, España
| | - José Vicente Moreno-Muelas
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron, Barcelona, España; Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
PINCUS THEODORE, CASTREJÓN ISABEL, YAZICI YUSUF. Documenting the Value of Care for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Analogous to Hypertension, Diabetes, and Hyperlipidemia: Is Control of Individual Patient Self-Report Measures of Global Estimate and Physical Function More Valuable Than Laboratory Tests, Radiographs, Indices, or Remission Criteria? J Rheumatol 2013; 40:1469-74. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|