Anti-CD74 antibodies in spondyloarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Utility of polygenic risk scores to aid in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases

Rheumatic diseases (RDs) are characterized by autoimmunity and autoinflammation and are recognized as complex due to the interplay of multiple genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors in their pathogenesis. The rapid advancement of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has enabled the identification of numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with RD susceptibility. Based on these SNPs, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have emerged as promising tools for quantifying genetic risk in this disease group. This chapter reviews the current status of PRSs in assessing the risk of RDs and discusses their potential to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of these complex diseases through their ability to discriminate among different RDs. PRSs demonstrate a high discriminatory capacity for various RDs and show potential clinical utility. As GWASs continue to evolve, PRSs are expected to enable more precise risk stratification by integrating genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, thereby refining individual risk predictions and advancing disease management strategies.

Anti-CD74 IgA antibodies show diagnostic potential for axial spondyloarthritis but are not associated with microscopic gut inflammation

OBJECTIVES

Gut inflammation commonly occurs in axial SpA (axSpA), and is linked to disease activity and outcome. Given the role of IgA in mucosal immunity, we explored the association between anti-CD74 IgA antibodies, gut inflammation and axSpA.

METHODS

Anti-CD74 IgA was measured by ELISA in serum samples of axSpA patients, fulfilling the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria. A group of fibromyalgia (FM) and RA patients served as non-inflammatory and inflammatory controls. Newly diagnosed axSpA patients underwent ileocolonoscopy; mucosal biopsies were histopathologically assessed as normal, acute or chronically inflamed. Optimal anti-CD74 IgA cut-off values were determined with a receiver operating characteristics curve.

RESULTS

axSpA patients (n = 281) showed higher anti-CD74 IgA levels [mean (s.d.) 18.8 (12.4) U/ml] compared with 100 FM patients [10.9 (5.0) U/ml, P < 0.001] and 34 RA patients [13.7 (9.6) U/ml, P = 0.02]. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for diagnosis (axSpA vs FM) was 0.70, providing a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 87% (cut-off 15 U/ml). Antibody concentrations were not significantly different between axSpA patients with (n = 40) and without (n = 69) gut inflammation (P = 0.83), yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.51. Anti-CD74 IgA levels were not associated with degree of bone marrow oedema on MRI of the sacroiliac joints, CRP or any other disease-specific feature such as the use of NSAIDs or biological treatment.

CONCLUSION

Serum anti-CD74 IgA is a potentially useful diagnostic biomarker for axSpA. However, antibody levels do not correlate with any phenotypical feature, including microscopic gut inflammation, suggesting this to be a disease-specific rather than an inflammatory marker.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and IgA anti CD74 antibodies in Indian patients with enthesitis-related arthritis category of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pleiotropic cytokine and has been implicated in pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). CD 74 is the receptor for MIF and IgA antiCD74 autoantibodies have been described from different parts of the world in patients with AS. As enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) is a form of juvenile spondyloarthropathy, we studied the serum and synovial fluid levels of MIF in ERA and looked for the IgA antiCD74 antibodies in patients with ERA in our population. Patients with JIA (ILAR classification) were studied. Serum MIF levels were measured by ELISA in 101 patients of ERA (synovial fluid also where available) and compared to 28 patients of other categories of JIA, 25 patients each of ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and 38 healthy controls. In addition, association of MIF with disease activity was assessed. Ig A antiCD74 antibodies were measured in sera of ERA, AS and healthy controls. Median serum MIF levels were higher in ERA [2.50 (1.20-4.85) ng/ml] than in healthy controls [0.28 (0.16-0.48); p < 0.0001] and patients with RA [1.13 (0.44-2.45); p < 0.01] MIF levels in ERA were comparable to other categories of JIA [2.63 (1.70-4.05)] and patients with AS [3.62 (0.52-6.51)]. Synovial fluid MIF levels were higher than serum levels (p < 0.01). Serum MIF level had an association with the JSpADA score (r = 0.29, p < 0.01). Serum MIF levels had no association with presence of inflammatory markers, enthesitis, inflammatory back pain or sacroiliitis. IgA AntiCD74 antibody was positive only in 3/88 (3.41%) of ERA patients and was not detected in any patients of AS or healthy controls. Patients with ERA have high MIF levels that show modest correlation with disease activity. Higher synovial fluid MIF levels suggest that it may play a role in synovitis seen in ERA. IgA antiCD74 antibodies are rarely seen in ERA.

A glance into the future of diagnosis and treatment of spondyloarthritis

The last two decades have seen major developments in the field of spondyloarthritis (SpA), but there are still important unmet needs to address. In the future, we envisage important advances in the diagnosis and treatment of SpA. In the diagnosis of SpA, the use of online and social media tools will increase awareness of the disease and facilitate the referral of patients to rheumatology clinics. In addition, more specific diagnostic tests will be available, especially advanced imaging methods and new biomarkers. This will allow most patients to be diagnosed at an early stage of the disease. In the treatment of SpA, an increasing number of novel treatment targets can be expected, most of which will be directed against intracellular enzymes. We hope to see more strategy trials shaping treatment pathways in SpA and accommodating principals of precision medicine. Approved treatment options will be available for both axial and peripheral SpA. We also hope to intervene not only at the inflammation level but also at the level of underlying immunological processes that might be associated with a higher probability of long-standing remission if not a cure. Finally, artificial intelligence techniques will allow for the analysis of large-scale data to answer relevant research questions for the diagnosis and management of patients with SpA.

Cellular and molecular diversity in spondyloarthritis

The spondyloarthritides are a cluster of inflammatory rheumatic diseases characterized by different diagnostic entities with heterogeneous phenotypes. The current classification system groups spondyloarthritis patients in two main categories, axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis, providing a framework wherein the clinical picture guides the treatment. However, the heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations of the pathologies, even when residing in the same group, highlights the importance of analyzing the smallest features of each entity to understand how different cellular subsets evolve, what the underlying mechanisms are and what biological markers can be identified and validated to evaluate the stage of disease and the corresponding efficacy of treatments. In this review, we will focus mostly on axial spondyloarthritis, report current knowledge concerning the cellular populations involved in its pathophysiology, and their molecular diversity. We will discuss the implications of such a diversity, and their meaning in terms of patients' stratification.

Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis and low back pain: a comprehensive review

The spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) (including both non-radiographic and radiographic AxSpA), also known as ankylosing spondylitis AS, has achieved growing recognition. With the development of treatments not only effective in controlling disease activity but also in slowing radiographic progression, and given the cost and risk profiles of these novel treatments and the limitations of current clinical criteria, imaging and peripheral blood biomarkers (C-reactive protein, HLA-B27 testing), the need for better biomarkers has never been greater. The purpose of this review is to present up-to-date information on the biomarkers for the diagnosis for assessing disease diagnosis, activity, treatment response, and radiographic progression of AxSpA, and entails multiple search strings used to identify articles of interest published in PubMed and the Cochrane database up to May 1, 2021. We present the current status of research in serologic biomarkers such as cytokines, adipokines, matrix metalloproteinases, calprotectin, CD74, antibodies, bone turnover markers, and circulating protein fragments of cartilage and connective tissue degradation and other biomarkers. Despite a great deal of work, most serologic results have been disappointing and to date none perform better than CRP. Recent promising preliminary data for some has been published, but require further confirmation. Transcriptomic biomarkers such as micro-RNAs and genetic biomarkers also show promise to assist in diagnosis and possibly for radiographic severity, including a recently developed panel of genetic risk markers used in a polygenic risk score instrument in AS diagnosis. These need further confirmation and application in AS as well as in nr-AxSpA.