1
|
Abdel-Latif M, Youness RA. Why natural killer cells in triple negative breast cancer? World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:464-476. [PMID: 32821652 PMCID: PMC7407924 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i7.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The triple-negative subtype of breast cancer (TNBC) has the bleakest prognosis, owing to its lack of either hormone receptor as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Henceforth, immunotherapy has emerged as the front-runner for TNBC treatment, which avoids potentially damaging chemotherapeutics. However, despite its documented association with aggressive side effects and developed resistance, immune checkpoint blockade continues to dominate the TNBC immunotherapy scene. These immune checkpoint blockade drawbacks necessitate the exploration of other immunotherapeutic methods that would expand options for TNBC patients. One such method is the exploitation and recruitment of natural killer cells, which by harnessing the innate rather than adaptive immune system could potentially circumvent the downsides of immune checkpoint blockade. In this review, the authors will elucidate the advantageousness of natural killer cell-based immuno-oncology in TNBC as well as demonstrate the need to more extensively research such therapies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Abdel-Latif
- Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, German University in Cairo, Cairo 11835, Egypt
| | - Rana Ahmed Youness
- Pharmaceutical Biology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, German University in Cairo, Cairo 11835, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allard B, Aspeslagh S, Garaud S, Dupont FA, Solinas C, Kok M, Routy B, Sotiriou C, Stagg J, Buisseret L. Immuno-oncology-101: overview of major concepts and translational perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol 2018; 52:1-11. [PMID: 29428479 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy is demonstrating impressive clinical benefit in different malignancies and clinical oncologists are increasingly turning their attention to immune-oncology. It is now well recognized that innate and adaptive immune cells infiltrating tumors are associated with clinical outcomes and responses to treatments, and can be harnessed to patients' benefit. Considerable advances have also been made in understanding how cancers escape from immune attack. Targeting of immunological escape processes regulated by the expression of immune checkpoint receptors and ligands and the down-modulation of tumor antigen presentation is the basis of immuno-oncology treatments. Despite recent achievements, there remain a number of unresolved issues in order to successfully implement cancer immunotherapy in many cancers. Importantly, clinical biomarkers are still needed for better optimization of emerging combination immunotherapies and better treatment tailoring. In this review, we summarize the function of innate and adaptive immune cells in anti-tumor immunity and the general mechanisms exploited by tumor cells to escape and inhibit immune responses as well as therapeutic strategies developed to overcome these mechanisms and discuss emerging biomarkers in immuno-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Allard
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Montreal Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - S Aspeslagh
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Garaud
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F A Dupont
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J-C Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Solinas
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Routy
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Montreal Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - C Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J-C Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Stagg
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Montreal Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - L Buisseret
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J-C Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|