[The role of the family doctor in the palliative care of chronic and terminally ill patients]

[Palliative Care Needs in Primary Health Care: Characteristics of Patients with Advanced Cancer and Dementia]

INTRODUCTION

The increase in life expectancy brought a higher prevalence of chronic diseases, with an emphasis on those who reached advanced stages and required palliative care. We aimed to characterize patients diagnosed with advanced neoplasms and/or dementia accompanied in primary health care and to test the sensitivity of two tools for identifying patients with palliative needs.

METHODS

We recruited three voluntary family physicians who provided data relative to 623 patients with active codification for neoplasm and/or dementia on the MIM@UF platform. We defined 'patient with palliative needs' as any patient with this codification in advanced stadium and made their clinical and sociodemographic characterization. Assuming the existence of advanced-stage disease as the gold standard, we calculated and compared the sensitivities of each of the tools under study: the surprise question, the question 'do you think this patient has palliative needs?' and an instrument that corresponded to identification by at least one of the questions.

RESULTS

Among the analyzed data, there were 559 (89.7%) active codifications of neoplasm and 64 (10.3%) of dementia; the prevalence of advanced neoplasm and dementia was 1.0% in the studied sample. The subgroup of patients with advanced dementia showed female sex predominance, an older age, and less access to health care. In both subgroups there was a scarcity of data related to education and income, and we observed polypharmacotherapy and multimorbidity. The sensitivity of the surprise question was 33.3% for neoplasia and 69.3% for dementia; of the new tool 50.0% for neoplasia and 92.3% for dementia; and, when used together, 55.6% for neoplasia and 92.3% for dementia.

CONCLUSION

Our results help characterize two subpopulations of patients in need of palliative care and advance with a possible tool for their identification, to be confirmed in a representative sample.

Evaluation of changes in pharmacist behaviors following a systematic education program on palliative care in cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Attitudes, experience, and knowledge of healthcare professionals guide the care they provide and are particularly important factors affecting the quality of palliative care. Palliative care education for pharmacists is crucial for improving quality of care and effective participation on the palliative care team.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

We previously developed and reported a systematic and multifaceted pharmacist education program for cancer-related palliative care. We compared 12 behavioral changes immediately (August 2017) and two years after (October 2019) participation in this systematic education program (SEP) to evaluate if participants were performing pharmaceutical management appropriately and to assure that behaviors had not deteriorated.

FINDINGS

Of 88 participants in the SEP, 36 responded to the survey (response rate 40.9%). There was no significant difference in the behavioral change items of pharmacists immediately after participating in the SEP (2017) and two years later (2019) (4.47 vs. 4.58, P = .47).

SUMMARY

We confirmed that behavioral changes developed by the SEP were maintained over a significant time. This indicates that knowledge was firmly established in the participants such that they could continue utilizing it long after participating in the SEP. Our study showed that participating in this SEP not only enabled participants to acquire knowledge regarding palliative medicine but also led to continued behavioral changes based on this knowledge.