Human Clinical Trials in Lupus Nephritis

Treatment Outcomes of Proliferative vs. Non-proliferative Adult Lupus Nephritis: A 10-Year Follow-Up

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic disease with clinically heterogeneous outcomes. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common complication of SLE. LN impacts clinical SLE outcomes both directly, in the form of target organ damage, and indirectly, through the adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapy.

Patients & methods

The study included 402 SLE cases with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis who were under follow-up for the past 13 years at Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Egypt. We studied the differences in outcome among various LN classes and between 275 proliferative cases and 102 non-proliferative cases.

Results

Class IV was the main LN class in our series with renal survival of 60% at 10 years. The major induction regimen after the first biopsy was cyclophosphamide. Mycophenolate mofetil was the main induction and adjunctive regimen after the second biopsy. The mean follow-up period was 6.7 + 5.2 years. Higher serum creatinine, proteinuria, activity, and chronicity indices were noted in proliferative LN. Patients suffering from proliferative lesions received higher immunosuppression and demonstrated higher morbidity than those with non-proliferative lesions. Remission was higher among the non-proliferative compared to the proliferative group.

Conclusions

Serum creatinine, proteinuria, and LN class were the most relevant prognostic factors for renal survival among Egyptian LN patients.

Intravenous cyclophosphamide combined with steroids in pediatric onset severe lupus nephritis

Background

Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) has been used to treat severe lupus nephritis (LN) for many years. Because of the wide variety of manifestations of the condition and the long-term nature of the disease, outcomes vary widely.

Objective

To evaluate and compare the immediate and long-term results of IVCY in pediatric onset severe LN and between patients with normal and abnormal initial renal function.

Methods

Patients aged <18 years who attended the Department of Pediatrics, Prince of Songkla University, diagnosed with severe LN, and who were given a 36-month IVCY course, were included. Comparison of overall survival between the two groups was assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

Results

108 patients with a mean age of 12.6 ± 2.7 years were studied, with a mean follow-up time of 5.7 ± 4.3 years. 48 patients completed the IVCY course. 36 patients had abnormal renal function and 72 patients had normal renal function at the start of therapy. Both groups responded well initially to treatment; proteinuria reduced to normal levels after 1 and 2 treatments in the normal and abnormal groups, respectively, while creatinine clearance returned to normal levels after 8 treatments in the abnormal group. Overall survival was not different between the two groups; however, the abnormal renal function group had a higher crude mortality rate than the normal group (13/36 vs 10/72, p value = 0.02). At the time of analysis, some patients who had completed their IVCY course still required other therapy to control their disease activity.

Conclusion

Three years of IVCY treatment provided similar outcomes in both normal and abnormal renal function groups. Immediate outcomes were favorable but long-term remission was not promising.

Lupus nephritis: maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis--do we now have a plan?

Lupus nephritis (LN) increases the morbidity and mortality of patients with SLE. This review compares the randomized, controlled trials that examined various maintenance regimens available to treat LN. Currently, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are the most popular therapeutic agents used for long-term maintenance of LN. Long-term maintenance with MMF is recommended as the first choice after achieving remission with cyclophosphamide or MMF induction. MMF is effective in consolidating remission and preventing relapse and CKD in patients of diverse races and ethnicities. Long-term maintenance with AZA is the recommended second choice, especially when patients develop intolerance of or contraindications to MMF. Azathioprine is particularly effective in consolidating remission and preventing relapse and CKD in patients who receive an induction regimen of cyclophosphamide. To date, there are no data on how rapidly maintenance therapies can be withdrawn; however, it is recommended that the immunosuppressive therapy be maintained indefinitely, unless it is contraindicated, in patients at high risk for progression to CKD.

Lupus nephritis: an overview of recent findings

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most serious complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) since it is the major predictor of poor prognosis. In susceptible individuals suffering of SLE, in situ formation and deposit of immune complexes (ICs) from apoptotic bodies occur in the kidneys as a result of an amplified epitope immunological response. IC glomerular deposits generate release of proinflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules causing inflammation. This leads to monocytes and polymorphonuclear cells chemotaxis. Subsequent release of proteases generates endothelial injury and mesangial proliferation. Presence of ICs promotes adaptive immune response and causes dendritic cells to release type I interferon. This induces maturation and activation of infiltrating T cells, and amplification of Th2, Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes. Each of them, amplify B cells and activates macrophages to release more proinflammatory molecules, generating effector cells that cannot be modulated promoting kidney epithelial proliferation and fibrosis. Herein immunopathological findings of LN are reviewed.

Recent advances in the treatment of lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis is a common complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The concept of two phases of therapy for lupus nephritis, such as an induction phase and a maintenance phase, is widely accepted. Since the renal involvement in SLE is heterogeneous, the treatment of lupus nephritis is governed by its pathological type and ranges from nonspecific measures, such as maintenance of adequate blood pressure control and blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, to the use of immunosuppressive agents. Cyclophosphamide (CYC) in combination with prednisone has been the standard method of treatment of the proliferative forms of lupus nephritis. However, the high rates of progression to end-stage renal disease coupled with the adverse effects of CYC and prednisone have led to an intensive search for more effective and less toxic therapies for lupus nephritis. We review the options available for the treatment of proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis and summarize the results of recently published clinical trials that add new perspectives to the management of kidney disease in SLE.

Development and testing of a decision board to help clinicians present treatment options to lupus nephritis patients in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

Decision boards (DBs) help clinicians present options and include patients in the decision-making process. Our objective was to describe the steps to develop a DB to support shared decision making and assess reliability and construct validity.

METHODS

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) scenarios were designed with the support of experts for disease severity, potential side effects, and outcomes. The DB comprised clinical information, 2 different treatment options (oral and intravenous), a description of the potential to control SLE within 5 years, and a list of potential side effects. Patients selected what they thought would be the 3 worst side effects and were informed of the probability that these would occur. We presented the DB to 172 patients who were asked to select and justify 1 treatment option. Reliability was assessed by kappa statistics. Construct validity was tested by an a priori hypothesis, analyzing the correlation between treatment decision and side effects selected, self-assessment score, educational level, and clinical aspects.

RESULTS

Patients favored oral medication, and side effects most often listed were iatrogenic cancer (44.2%), hair loss (21.6%), and severe infection (19.1%). Justifications were risk (48.9%), practicality (36.6%), effectiveness (12.2%), and risk-benefit tradeoff (2.3%). Reliability was similar to that found in the test phase (kappa = 0.689, P < 0.001). Validity was tested by prediction of treatment decision based on the undesirable side effects selected (P = 0.047). DB content was clear and easy for all patients to understand (P = 0.05). Immunosuppressive drugs influenced patient decisions (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

DB is a reliable and valid instrument to assess SLE patient preference.

Renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus with emphasis on classification of lupus glomerulonephritis: advances and implications

CONTEXT

Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease with protean clinical and pathologic manifestations involving almost all organs in the body. There is a high incidence of renal involvement during the course of the disease, with varied renal pathologic lesions and diverse clinical features. A renal biopsy examined by routine light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy contributes toward diagnosis, prognostic information, and appropriate management.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To review the clinical and various pathologic features of renal lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. (2) To introduce the International Society of Nephrology and Renal Pathology Society Classification of Lupus Glomerulonephritis.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review, illustrations with original artwork, and tabulation of clinical and pathologic data of cases obtained from the authors' renal biopsy files examined during the last 8 years were used.

CONCLUSIONS

The International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society-sponsored Classification of Lupus Glomerulonephritis proposes standardized definitions of the various pathologic findings, describes clinically relevant lesions, incorporates prognostic parameters, and recommends a uniform way of reporting the renal biopsy findings. Lupus glomerulonephritis is divided into 6 classes primarily based on the morphologic lesions, extent and severity of the involvement, immune complex deposition, and activity and chronicity. Special emphasis is laid on describing qualitative as well as quantitative morphologic data and to include the accompanying tubulointerstitial disease and different vascular lesions, which have prognostic and therapeutic significance. This classification is intended to facilitate a higher degree of reproducibility, resulting in better patient care and more effective future clinical and translational research. Renal biopsy findings in systemic lupus erythematosus add new and independent parameters of prognostic significance to established clinical and genetic factors.