Onconephrology and Thrombotic Microangiopathy: Looking Beyond the Horizon

New guidelines and therapeutic updates for the management of lupus nephritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a devastating condition, striking young patients often in their prime reproductive years. Lupus nephritis is a common and serious complication occurring in roughly 50% of SLE cases, indicating a high likelihood of disease progression, morbidity, and mortality. As the early trials of steroid therapy, and later cyclophosphamide (CYC), therapeutic changes had been stagnant. Then came the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the 2000s. After the Aspreva Lupus Management Study, there had been a dearth of trials showing positive therapy results. Since 2020, new studies have emerged for lupus nephritis involving the use of anti-BLYS agents, novel calcineurin inhibitors, CD20 blockade, and antiinterferon agents. Nephrology and rheumatology society guidelines in the United States and across the world are still catching up.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although therapeutic guidelines are being developed, updates that have come through have focused on improved diagnostic and monitoring guidelines. One theme is the recommendation of increasingly tight proteinuria control and firmer guidelines for the rapid induction of remission. The reality of multitarget therapy and the expectation of rapid induction for a more complete remission are being widely recognized.

SUMMARY

The need for more complete and more rapid induction and control of lupus nephritis is undisputed according to the evidence and guidelines, and the medications to achieve this are growing at a rate not seen over the prior two decades. What remains is a stepwise approach to recognize how to best optimize therapy. Based on available evidence, an algorithm for induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis used by the University of California Irvine Lupus Nephritis clinic, is recommended.

Onconephrology: mitigation of renal injury in chemotherapy administration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Onconephrology was first coined as a name for the intersection of cancer medicine and nephrology in the early 2010s. It was recognized then that beyond and understanding of kidney physiology, a new generation of nephrologists skilled in both molecular biology and precision medicine were needed to deal with the challenges of emerging cancer therapies. Stem cell transplants, biologic agents, adjuvants blocking basic cellular signaling pathways, immunotherapy were found to promote novel anticancer outcomes, but also to pose new risks to the kidneys. The field rapidly overlapped with emerging expertise in vascular glomerular disease, glomerular disease, and the same biologic agents now applied to auto immune systemic and kidney diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many categories of chemotherapeutic agents have been discovered to have adverse renal side effects. In this review, we address classic chemotherapeutic nephrotoxicity and oncologic clinical situations leading to acute kidney injury. We also review the frontiers of nephrotoxicity reported with cell cycle inhibitors, diverse classes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, anticancer vaccines, and thrombotic microangiopathies triggered by malignancy and chemotherapy. The aim will be to focus on published strategies to mitigate nephrotoxicity.

SUMMARY

As onconephrology expands into its own field, it gives birth to new subdisciplines. An understanding that patient populations want the benefits of chemotherapy without the renal (and other) systemic toxicities is emerging. A need to develop a new class of molecular and genetic experts in onconephrology to mitigate nephrotoxicity from chemotherapy is apparent and urgent.

Thrombotic microangiopathy - the importance of a multidisciplinary approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) Team. This goal will be accomplished through review of the complement system, discuss various causes of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA), and aspects of their diagnosis and management. In so doing, readers will gain an appreciation for the complexity of this family of disorders and realize the benefit of a dedicated multidisciplinary TMA Team.

RECENT FINDINGS

TMA causes derive from multiple specialty areas, are difficult to timely recognize, pose complex challenges, and require multidisciplinary management. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated TMA (TA-TMA) and TA-TMA related multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (TA-TMA MODS) are areas of burgeoning research; use of complement testing and eculizumab precision-dosing has been found to better suppress complement activity in TA-TMA than standard eculizumab dosing. Newer tests are available to risk-stratify obstetric patients at risk for severe pre-eclampsia, whose features resemble those of TA-TMA MODS. Numerous disorders may produce TMA-like findings, and a systematic approach aids in their identification. TMA Teams elevate institutional awareness of increasingly recognized TMAs, will help expedite diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and create pathways to future TMA-related research and facilitate access to clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Establishment of a TMA-Team is valuable in developing the necessary institutional expertise needed to promptly recognize and appropriately manage patients with TMA.