Robotic repair of pediatric hernias: Current techniques and practices

Collaborative Implementation of Robotic Surgery Into an Academic Pediatric Surgery Practice

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery continues to drive evolution in minimally invasive surgery. Due to the confined operative fields encountered, pediatric surgeons may uniquely benefit from the precise control offered by robotic technologies compared to open and laparoscopic techniques. We describe a unique collaborative implementation of robotic surgery into an academic pediatric surgery practice through adult robotic surgeon partnership. We compare robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) outcomes, hypothesizing that RC will be equivalent to LC in key quality outcomes.

METHODS

We evaluate 14 mo of systems development and training, and 24 mo of collaborative operative experience evoking a purposeful tiered case progression, establishing core robotic competencies, prior to advancing operative complexity. Univariate analyses compared LC versus RC.

RESULTS

36 robotic operations were performed in children aged 8-18 y, in a tiered progression from 24 cholecystectomies to 2 ileocecectomies, 2 paraesophageal hernia repairs, 1 anterior rectopexy, 1 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 1 Heller myotomy, 1 choledochal cyst resection with roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, 1 median arcuate ligament release, and 1 thoracic esophageal duplication cyst resection. For LC and RC, there were no significant differences in procedure duration, discharge opioids, hospital readmission, or rates of surgical site infection or bile duct injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery has potential to significantly enhance pediatric surgery. RC appears equivalent to LC but presents multiple additional theoretical benefits in pediatric patients. Our pilot program experience supports the feasibility and safety of pediatric robotic surgery. We emphasize the importance of a stepwise progression in operative difficulty and collaboration with adult robotic surgery experts.

Umbilical double-port laparoscopy combined with extraperitoneal water injection for the treatment of giant inguinal hernias in infants and young children

OBJECTIVE

Exploration of the efficacy of treating large indirect inguinal hernias in infants and young children using umbilical double-port laparoscopy combined with extraperitoneal water injection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 165 cases of primary unilateral large indirect inguinal hernias in infants and young children treated at our hospital from May 2018 to May 2023. Among them, 90 cases underwent umbilical double-port laparoscopic surgery combined with extraperitoneal water injection and high ligation of the hernia sac (Double-Port Group), and another 75 cases underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac (Three-Port Group). The two groups were compared in terms of operation time, postoperative pain scores at 24 hours, hospital stay, incision complications, and recurrence within one year after surgery.

RESULTS

Both groups successfully completed the surgery without any intraoperative complications. The pain score at 24 hours postoperatively was lower in the Double-Port Group compared to the Three-Port Group, and there was no statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay, and incision complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both groups were followed up for one year postoperatively; the Three-Port Group had one recurrence that was cured after further treatment, while there were no recurrences in the Double-Port Group.

CONCLUSION

Umbilical double-port laparoscopy combined with extraperitoneal water injection for the treatment of large indirect inguinal hernias in infants and young children has the advantages of being safe and reliable, with concealed and aesthetic incisions, and rapid recovery.

Framework for pediatric robotic surgery program development

Pediatric robotic surgery has seen increasing implementation for its many benefits over the past two decades. As more pediatric surgeons gain exposure to robotic surgery, the interest in utilizing this technology is growing. However, there are no guidelines or existing framework for developing pediatric general surgery robotic programs. Programmatic development can be challenging, requiring institutional support, a minimum 12-month multistep process in partnership with the robot manufacturer, and organization of a local dedicated team. A cornerstone to all program building is collaboration and communication with key stakeholders who are committed to establishing a robotic surgery program. In this manuscript, we detail numerous best practices for implementation, followed by three variations of programmatic development, each drawing lessons from one of three practice settings: (i) A children's hospital in a large medical center associated with an adult hospital, (ii) a free-standing children's hospital, and (iii) a community-based practice. We aim for this article to provide a framework that can serve as a guide for those beginning this process, consolidating the key resources and strategies used to develop a robust pediatric robotic surgery program.