Addressing pediatric surgical health inequities through quality improvement efforts

Reduction of Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Healthcare Utilization and Socioeconomic Disparities: Longitudinal Benefits of Quality Improvement

BACKGROUND

Disparities in emergency department (ED) utilization after gastrostomy (G-) tube placement were previously demonstrated at our children's hospital. We aimed to reduce postoperative G-tube dislodgements and ED visits with a particular focus on socially vulnerable children.

METHODS

Our improvement team implemented a G-tube care bundle (6/2018-9/2019) targeting caregiver preparedness and standardizing care in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods. Patients who had G tubes placed between 1/2011-8/2022 were categorized to either pre- or post-intervention groups. Primary outcomes were tracked prospectively. National area deprivation index (ADI) was assigned retrospectively and employed to evaluate social risk. Univariate comparisons were made between pre- and post-intervention groups, and between High ADI (≥80) and Low ADI (<80) subgroups in both pre- and post- intervention periods. We used statistical process control methods to further analyze change over time.

RESULTS

396 children were included (188 pre-intervention, 208 post-intervention). The post-intervention cohort demonstrated a lower rate of outpatient dislodgement at 90 days following G-tube placement (21.3 % vs 10.1 %, p = 0.002) and fewer G-tube-related ED visits per G-tube placed within one year of placement (mean 0.8 visits vs 0.6 visits, p = 0.012). Pre-intervention, children from high ADI neighborhoods had significantly greater healthcare utilization compared to those from lower ADI neighborhoods. Post-intervention, previously statistically significant disparities were no longer present. Outpatient G-tube dislodgements within 90 days were particularly mitigated.

CONCLUSIONS

A longstanding quality improvement initiative has led to sustained reductions in overall G-tube-related health care utilization. Care standardization and improvement may mitigate outcome disparities related to socioeconomic advantage.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Comparative Study and Prospective Quality Improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.