Pharmacotherapy for depression and bipolar disorder during lactation: A framework to aid decision making

Simultaneous Quantification of Psychotropic Drugs in Human Plasma and Breast Milk and Its Application in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Peripartum Treatment Optimization

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for several psychotropic drugs, particularly in sensitive situations such as the peripartum period. This study aimed to develop an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of 14 psychotropic drugs in human plasma and 4 in breast milk.

METHODS

The samples were precipitated with methanol containing the stable isotope-labeled analogs. Chromatographic separation was performed using a Phenomenex Luna Omega Polar C18 column. Detection was performed using a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization interface. The method was fully validated in plasma according to the European Guidelines on Bioanalytical Method Validation and partially validated in breast milk by determining the intraday precision and accuracy, linearity, lower limit of quantification, and matrix effect.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients of the calibration curves were greater than 0.99. Coefficients of variation ranged from 3.05% to 14.66% and 0.62%-14.90% for internal standard-normalized matrix effect, 1.4%-14.1% and 2.1%-10.4% for intraday precision, and 3.2%-13.9% and 4.1%-9.6% for interday precision, in plasma and milk, respectively. The relative error in accuracy did not exceed ±15% for any analyte. The method was successfully applied clinically to measure the concentrations of psychotropic drugs in 952 plasma samples, among which 43% of the concentrations were out of the therapeutic range, and 13 breast milk samples, with calculated relative infant doses ranging from 0.32% to 8.18%.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first routine technique validated for the quantification of psychotropic drugs in both plasma and breast milk, allowing for treatment optimization and prevention of adherence issues, including those in breastfeeding patients.

Striking the Balance: Bipolar Disorder in the Perinatal Period

The authors reviewed the literature, published between 2018 and 2023, on treating bipolar disorder in the perinatal period in order to summarize current treatment perspectives. Mood episodes occur during pregnancy and there are high rates of both initial onset and recurrence in the postpartum period. Bipolar disorder itself is associated with higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including gestational hypertension, hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, and small for gestational age infants. A general principle of perinatal treatment includes maintaining psychiatric stability of the pregnant person while reducing medication exposure risk to the fetus. A variety of factors can compromise psychiatric stability, including rapid discontinuation of stabilizing medications, decreased efficacy due to physiologic changes of pregnancy, and exacerbation of underlying psychiatric illness. Psychosocial interventions include optimizing sleep, increasing support, and reducing stress. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends against discontinuing or withholding medications solely due to pregnancy or lactation status. Individualized treatment involves a discussion of the risks of undertreated bipolar disorder weighed against the risks of individual medication choice based on available evidence regarding congenital malformations, adverse neonatal and obstetrical events, and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Valproate is not a first-line treatment due to higher risks. Data are lacking on safety for many newer medications. The authors review current safety data regarding lithium, lamotrigine, and antipsychotics, which are the most commonly used treatments for managing bipolar disorder in the perinatal period. Due to physiologic changes during pregnancy, frequent therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustments are required.

Risperidone-induced respiratory depression in a neonate through breast milk

Risperidone is commonly used in postnatal mothers for depression and psychotic symptoms in spite of little data on its safety profile in neonates. It is reported previously that 6 mg/day can be used in mothers without having any untoward in breastfed neonates. Excretion of risperidone is dependent on the enzyme CYP2D6 whose activity varies as per individual phenotype. Maximum therapeutic levels are achieved at 2 h of administration of the drug. We are reporting a case of preterm breastfed neonate who presented with respiratory depression twice due to risperidone usage in its mother. This is the first reported case where 1 mg/day dosage of risperidone in nursing mother was associated with acute adverse effects such as respiratory depression in her neonate. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Assessment Scale scored to 8 which suggests probable relation between the drug and its reaction in neonates. It underscores cautious use in mothers and close monitoring of neonates when risperidone is prescribed irrespective of dosage.

Breastfeeding, pregnancy, medicines, neurodevelopment, and population databases: the information desert

Background

The pharmacoepidemiology of the long-term benefits and harms of medicines in pregnancy and breastfeeding has received little attention. The impact of maternal medicines on children is increasingly recognised as a source of avoidable harm. The focus of attention has expanded from congenital anomalies to include less visible, but equally important, outcomes, including cognition, neurodevelopmental disorders, educational performance, and childhood ill-health. Breastfeeding, whether as a source of medicine exposure, a mitigator of adverse effects or as an outcome, has been all but ignored in pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance: a significant ‘blind spot’.

Whole-population data on breastfeeding: why we need them

Optimal child development and maternal health necessitate breastfeeding, yet little information exists to guide families regarding the safety of medicine use during lactation. Breastfeeding initiation or success may be altered by medicine use, and breastfeeding may obscure the true relationship between medicine exposure during pregnancy and developmental outcomes. Absent or poorly standardised recording of breastfeeding in most population databases hampers analysis and understanding of the complex relationships between medicine, pregnancy, breastfeeding and infant and maternal health. The purpose of this paper is to present the arguments for breastfeeding to be included alongside medicine use and neurodevelopmental outcomes in whole-population database investigations of the harms and benefits of medicines during pregnancy, the puerperium and postnatal period. We review: 1) the current situation, 2) how these complexities might be accommodated in pharmacoepidemiological models, using antidepressants and antiepileptics as examples; 3) the challenges in obtaining comprehensive data.

Conclusions

The scarcity of whole-population data and the complexities of the inter-relationships between breastfeeding, medicines, co-exposures and infant outcomes are significant barriers to full characterisation of the benefits and harms of medicines during pregnancy and breastfeeding. This makes it difficult to answer the questions: ‘is it safe to breastfeed whilst taking this medicine’, and ‘will this medicine interfere with breastfeeding and/ or infants’ development’?

Perinatal antidepressant use and breastfeeding outcomes: Findings from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressant use is common in the perinatal period, but there are concerns that it can negatively impact on breastfeeding outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of perinatal antidepressant use on breastfeeding initiation and duration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 80 882 mother-infant dyads in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Women were first classified according to self-reported mental disorders and timing of antidepressant use before and/or after gestational week 28 (i.e., early-mid-gestation and/or late-gestation use). We subsequently classified women according to self-reported mental disorders and antidepressant use postpartum and whether antidepressants were continued from late gestation or were new/restarted. Breastfeeding outcomes included breastfeeding initiation as well as predominant or any breastfeeding and abrupt breastfeeding discontinuation until 6 months.

RESULTS

Late-gestation antidepressant use was associated with a reduced likelihood of breastfeeding initiation (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.97) but not predominant (aRR 0.96; 95% CI 0.67-1.39) or any (aRR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93-1.07) breastfeeding at 6 months compared with unexposed women with mental disorders. When examined according to postnatal antidepressant use, no differences in predominant (aRR 0.94; 95% CI 0.60-1.48) or any breastfeeding (aRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.91-1.07) at 6 months were evident among women who continued antidepressant use from late gestation into the postpartum period compared with unexposed women with mental disorders. In contrast, new/restarted antidepressant use postpartum was associated with a reduced likelihood of predominant (aRR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.61) and any (aRR 0.49; 95% CI 0.42-0.56) breastfeeding at 6 months, as well as increased risk of abrupt breastfeeding discontinuation (aRR 2.64; 95% CI 2.07-3.37) compared with the unexposed women with mental disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

A complex relation exists between depression, antidepressant use, and breastfeeding outcomes. Antidepressant use in late pregnancy was associated with a reduced likelihood of breastfeeding initiation but not breastfeeding duration or exclusivity. In contrast, initiating or restarting antidepressants postpartum was associated with poorer breastfeeding outcomes. Overall, women taking antidepressants and women with a mental disorder may benefit from additional education and support to improve breastfeeding rates and promote maternal and infant health and wellbeing.