1
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Chung C, Fuller D, Tanadini-Lang S, Jaffray DA. The Future of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:135-144. [PMID: 38105088 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) is a relatively new technology that has already shown outcomes benefits but that has not yet reached its clinical potential. The improved soft-tissue contrast provided with MR, coupled with the immediacy of image acquisition with respect to the treatment, enables expansion of on-table adaptive protocols, currently at a cost of increased treatment complexity, use of human resources, and longer treatment slot times, which translate to decreased throughput. Many approaches are being investigated to meet these challenges, including the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to accelerate and automate much of the workflow and improved technology that parallelizes workflow tasks, as well as improvements in image acquisition speed and quality. This article summarizes limitations of current available integrated MRIgRT systems and gives an outlook about scientific developments to further expand the use of MRIgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland..
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dave Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A Jaffray
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaffray DA, Knaul F, Baumann M, Gospodarowicz M. Harnessing progress in radiotherapy for global cancer control. NATURE CANCER 2023; 4:1228-1238. [PMID: 37749355 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
The pace of technological innovation over the past three decades has transformed the field of radiotherapy into one of the most technologically intense disciplines in medicine. However, the global barriers to access this highly effective treatment are complex and extend beyond technological limitations. Here, we review the technological advancement and current status of radiotherapy and discuss the efforts of the global radiation oncology community to formulate a more integrative 'diagonal approach' in which the agendas of science-driven advances in individual outcomes and the sociotechnological task of global cancer control can be aligned to bring the benefit of this proven therapy to patients with cancer everywhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Jaffray
- Departments of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Felicia Knaul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hormuth DA, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Chad Quarles C, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 187:114367. [PMID: 35654212 PMCID: PMC11165420 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has become a fourth pillar in the treatment of brain tumors and, when combined with radiation therapy, may improve patient outcomes and reduce the neurotoxicity. As with other combination therapies, the identification of a treatment schedule that maximizes the synergistic effect of radiation- and immune-therapy is a fundamental challenge. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling is one promising approach to systematically investigate therapeutic combinations to maximize positive outcomes within a rigorous framework. However, successful clinical translation of model-generated combinations of treatment requires patient-specific data to allow the models to be meaningfully initialized and parameterized. Quantitative imaging techniques have emerged as a promising source of high quality, spatially and temporally resolved data for the development and validation of mathematical models. In this review, we will present approaches to personalize mechanism-based modeling frameworks with patient data, and then discuss how these techniques could be leveraged to improve brain cancer outcomes through patient-specific modeling and optimization of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Maguy Farhat
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Chase Christenson
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Brandon Curl
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coolens C, Gwilliam MN, Alcaide-Leon P, de Freitas Faria IM, Ynoe de Moraes F. Transformational Role of Medical Imaging in (Radiation) Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112557. [PMID: 34070984 PMCID: PMC8197089 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Onboard, imaging techniques have brought about a huge transformation in the ability to deliver targeted radiation therapies. Each generation of these technologies enables us to better visualize where to deliver lethal doses of radiation and thus allows the shrinking of necessary geometric margins leading to reduced toxicities. Alongside improvements in treatment delivery, advances in medical imaging have also allowed us to better define the volumes we wish to target. The development of imaging techniques that can capture aspects of the tumor’s biology before, during and after therapy is transforming how treatment can be delivered. Technological changes have further made these biological imaging techniques available in real-time providing the opportunity to monitor a patient’s response to treatment closely and often before any volume changes are visible on conventional radiological images. Here we discuss the development of robust quantitative imaging biomarkers and how they can personalize therapy towards meaningful clinical endpoints. Abstract Onboard, real-time, imaging techniques, from the original megavoltage planar imaging devices, to the emerging combined MRI-Linear Accelerators, have brought a huge transformation in the ability to deliver targeted radiation therapies. Each generation of these technologies enables lethal doses of radiation to be delivered to target volumes with progressively more accuracy and thus allows shrinking of necessary geometric margins, leading to reduced toxicities. Alongside these improvements in treatment delivery, advances in medical imaging, e.g., PET, and MRI, have also allowed target volumes themselves to be better defined. The development of functional and molecular imaging is now driving a conceptually larger step transformation to both better understand the cancer target and disease to be treated, as well as how tumors respond to treatment. A biological description of the tumor microenvironment is now accepted as an essential component of how to personalize and adapt treatment. This applies not only to radiation oncology but extends widely in cancer management from surgical oncology planning and interventional radiology, to evaluation of targeted drug delivery efficacy in medical oncology/immunotherapy. Here, we will discuss the role and requirements of functional and metabolic imaging techniques in the context of brain tumors and metastases to reliably provide multi-parametric imaging biomarkers of the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Coolens
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre & University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada
- TECHNA Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Matt N. Gwilliam
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre & University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada;
| | - Paula Alcaide-Leon
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada;
| | | | - Fabio Ynoe de Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shirvani SM, Huntzinger CJ, Melcher T, Olcott PD, Voronenko Y, Bartlett-Roberto J, Mazin S. Biology-guided radiotherapy: redefining the role of radiotherapy in metastatic cancer. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200873. [PMID: 33112685 PMCID: PMC7774706 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The emerging biological understanding of metastatic cancer and proof-of-concept clinical trials suggest that debulking all gross disease holds great promise for improving patient outcomes. However, ablation of multiple targets with conventional external beam radiotherapy systems is burdensome, which limits investigation and utilization of complete metastatic ablation in the majority of patients with advanced disease. To overcome this logistical hurdle, technical innovation is necessary. Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) is a new external beam radiotherapy delivery modality combining positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with a 6 MV linear accelerator. The key innovation is continuous response of the linear accelerator to outgoing tumor PET emissions with beamlets of radiotherapy at subsecond latency. This allows the deposited dose to track tumors in real time. Multiple new hardware and algorithmic advances further facilitate this low-latency feedback process. By transforming tumors into their own fiducials after intravenous injection of a radiotracer, BgRT has the potential to enable complete metastatic ablation in a manner efficient for a single patient and scalable to entire populations with metastatic disease. Future trends may further enhance the utility of BgRT in the clinic as this technology dovetails with other innovations in radiotherapy, including novel dose painting and fractionation schemes, radiomics, and new radiotracers.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang L, Karimzadeh M, Welch M, McIntosh C, Wang B. Analytics methods and tools for integration of biomedical data in medicine. Artif Intell Med 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821259-2.00007-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
7
|
Kurz C, Buizza G, Landry G, Kamp F, Rabe M, Paganelli C, Baroni G, Reiner M, Keall PJ, van den Berg CAT, Riboldi M. Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:93. [PMID: 32370788 PMCID: PMC7201982 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01524-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for guidance in external beam radiotherapy has faced significant research and development efforts in recent years. The current availability of linear accelerators with an embedded MRI unit, providing volumetric imaging at excellent soft tissue contrast, is expected to provide novel possibilities in the implementation of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) protocols. This study reviews open medical physics issues in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) implementation, with a focus on current approaches and on the potential for innovation in IGART.Daily imaging in MRgRT provides the ability to visualize the static anatomy, to capture internal tumor motion and to extract quantitative image features for treatment verification and monitoring. Those capabilities enable the use of treatment adaptation, with potential benefits in terms of personalized medicine. The use of online MRI requires dedicated efforts to perform accurate dose measurements and calculations, due to the presence of magnetic fields. Likewise, MRgRT requires dedicated quality assurance (QA) protocols for safe clinical implementation.Reaction to anatomical changes in MRgRT, as visualized on daily images, demands for treatment adaptation concepts, with stringent requirements in terms of fast and accurate validation before the treatment fraction can be delivered. This entails specific challenges in terms of treatment workflow optimization, QA, and verification of the expected delivered dose while the patient is in treatment position. Those challenges require specialized medical physics developments towards the aim of fully exploiting MRI capabilities. Conversely, the use of MRgRT allows for higher confidence in tumor targeting and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing.The systematic use of MRgRT brings the possibility of leveraging IGART methods for the optimization of tumor targeting and quantitative treatment verification. Although several challenges exist, the intrinsic benefits of MRgRT will provide a deeper understanding of dose delivery effects on an individual basis, with the potential for further treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Giulia Buizza
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy
- Bioengineering Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Privata Campeggi 53, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul J Keall
- ACRF Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Cornelis A T van den Berg
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lu L, Chen Y, Shen C, Lian J, Das S, Marks L, Lin W, Zhu T. Initial assessment of 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) towards quantitative brain imaging for radiation therapy. Med Phys 2019; 47:1199-1214. [PMID: 31834641 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) provides quantitative T1/T2 maps, enabling applications in clinical radiotherapy such as large-scale, multi-center clinical trials for longitudinal assessment of therapy response. We evaluated the feasibility of a quantitative three-dimensional-MRF (3D-MRF) towards its radiotherapy applications of primary brain tumors. METHODS A fast whole-brain 3D-MRF sequence initially developed for diagnostic radiology was optimized using flexible body coils, which is the typical MR imaging setup for radiotherapy treatment planning and for MR imaging (MRI)-guided treatment delivery. Optimization criteria included the accuracy and the precision of T1/T2 quantifications of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solutions, compared to those from the 3D-MRF using a 32-channel head coil. The accuracy of T1/T2 quantifications from the optimized MRF was first examined in healthy volunteers with two different coil setups. The intra- and inter-scanner variations of image intensity from the optimized sequence were quantified by longitudinal scans of the PVP solutions on two 3T scanners. Using a 3D-printed MRI geometry phantom, susceptibility-induced distortion with the optimized 3D-MRF was quantified as the Dice coefficient of phantom contours, compared to those from CT images. By introducing intentional head motion during 10% of the scan, the robustness of the optimized 3D-MRF towards motion was evaluated through visual inspection of motion artifacts and through quantitative analysis of image sharpness in brain MRF maps. RESULTS The optimized sequence acquired whole-brain T1, T2 and proton density maps and with a resolution of 1.2 × 1.2 × 3 mm3 in 10 min, similar to the total acquisition time of 3D T1- and T2-weighted images of the same resolution. In vivo T1 and T2 values of the white and gray matter were consistent with literature. The intra- and inter-scanner variability of the intensity-normalized MRF T1 was 1.0% ± 0.7% and 2.3% ± 1.0% respectively, in contrast to 5.3% ± 3.8% and 3.2% ± 1.6% from the normalized T1-weighted MRI. Repeatability and reproducibility of MRF T1 were independent of intensity normalization. Both phantom and human data demonstrated that the optimized 3D-MRF is more robust to subject motion and artifacts from subject-specific susceptibility difference. Compared to CT contours, the Dice coefficient of phantom contours from 3D-MRF was 0.93, improved from 0.87 from the T1-weighted MRI. CONCLUSION Compared to conventional MRI, the optimized 3D-MRF demonstrated improved repeatability across time points and reproducibility across scanners for better tissue quantification, as well as improved robustness to subject-specific susceptibility and motion artifacts under a typical MR imaging setup for radiotherapy. More importantly, quantitative MRF T1/T2 measurements lead to promising potentials towards longitudinal quantitative assessment of treatment response for better adaptive therapy and for large-scale, multi-center clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jun Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shiva Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Weili Lin
- Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
As deformable image registration makes its way into the clinical routine, the summation of doses from fractionated treatment regimens to evaluate cumulative doses to targets and healthy tissues is also becoming a frequently utilized tool in the context of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Accounting for daily geometric changes using deformable image registration and dose accumulation potentially enables a better understanding of dose-volume-effect relationships, with the goal of translation of this knowledge to personalization of treatment, to further enhance treatment outcomes. Treatment adaptation involving image deformation requires patient-specific quality assurance of the image registration and dose accumulation processes, to ensure that uncertainties in the 3D dose distributions are identified and appreciated from a clinical relevance perspective. While much research has been devoted to identifying and managing the uncertainties associated with deformable image registration and dose accumulation approaches, there are still many unanswered questions. Here, we provide a review of current deformable image registration and dose accumulation techniques, and related clinical application. We also discuss salient issues that need to be deliberated when applying deformable algorithms for dose mapping and accumulation in the context of adaptive radiotherapy and response assessment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Svistoun I, Driscoll B, Coolens C. Accuracy and Performance of Functional Parameter Estimation Using a Novel Numerical Optimization Approach for GPU-Based Kinetic Compartmental Modeling. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 5:209-219. [PMID: 30854459 PMCID: PMC6403032 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative kinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) data are dependent on signal measurement quality and choice of pharmacokinetic model. However, the fundamental optimization analysis method is equally important and its impact on pharmacokinetic parameters has been mostly overlooked. We examine the effects of those choices on accuracy and performance of parameter estimation using both computer processing unit and graphical processing unit (GPU) numerical optimization implementations and evaluate the improvements offered by a novel optimization approach. A test framework was developed where experimentally derived population-average arterial input function and randomly sampled parameter sets {Ktrans, Kep, Vb, τ} were used to generate known tissue curves. Five numerical optimization algorithms were evaluated: sequential quadratic programming, downhill simplex (Nelder–Mead), pattern search, simulated annealing, and differential evolution. This was combined with various objective function implementation details: delay approximation, discretization and varying sampling rates. Then, impact of noise and CPU/GPU implementation was tested for speed and accuracy. Finally, the optimal method was compared to conventional implementation as applied to clinical DCE computed tomography. Nelder–Mead, differential evolution and sequential quadratic programming produced good results on clean and noisy input data outperforming simulated annealing and pattern search in terms of speed and accuracy in the respective order of 10−8%, 10−7%, and ×10−6%). A novel approach for DCE numerical optimization (infinite impulse response with fractional delay approximation) was implemented on GPU for speed increase of at least 2 orders of magnitude. Applied to clinical data, the magnitude of overall parameter error was <10%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Svistoun
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brandon Driscoll
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and IBBME, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and.,TECHNA Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Press RH, Shu HKG, Shim H, Mountz JM, Kurland BF, Wahl RL, Jones EF, Hylton NM, Gerstner ER, Nordstrom RJ, Henderson L, Kurdziel KA, Vikram B, Jacobs MA, Holdhoff M, Taylor E, Jaffray DA, Schwartz LH, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE, Linden HM, Lambin P, Dilling TJ, Rubin DL, Hadjiiski L, Buatti JM. The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1219-1235. [PMID: 29966725 PMCID: PMC6348006 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Modern radiation therapy is delivered with great precision, in part by relying on high-resolution multidimensional anatomic imaging to define targets in space and time. The development of quantitative imaging (QI) modalities capable of monitoring biologic parameters could provide deeper insight into tumor biology and facilitate more personalized clinical decision-making. The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) was established by the National Cancer Institute to advance and validate these QI modalities in the context of oncology clinical trials. In particular, the QIN has significant interest in the application of QI to widen the therapeutic window of radiation therapy. QI modalities have great promise in radiation oncology and will help address significant clinical needs, including finer prognostication, more specific target delineation, reduction of normal tissue toxicity, identification of radioresistant disease, and clearer interpretation of treatment response. Patient-specific QI is being incorporated into radiation treatment design in ways such as dose escalation and adaptive replanning, with the intent of improving outcomes while lessening treatment morbidities. This review discusses the current vision of the QIN, current areas of investigation, and how the QIN hopes to enhance the integration of QI into the practice of radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H. Press
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hui-Kuo G. Shu
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - James M. Mountz
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Ella F. Jones
- Dept. of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- Dept. of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elizabeth R. Gerstner
- Dept. of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lori Henderson
- Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program/Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael A. Jacobs
- Dept. of Radiology and Radiological Science, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD
| | - Edward Taylor
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - David A. Jaffray
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - David A. Mankoff
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Philippe Lambin
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas J. Dilling
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - John M. Buatti
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
How Advances in Imaging Will Affect Precision Radiation Oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:292-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
13
|
Belli ML, Mori M, Broggi S, Cattaneo GM, Bettinardi V, Dell'Oca I, Fallanca F, Passoni P, Vanoli EG, Calandrino R, Di Muzio N, Picchio M, Fiorino C. Quantifying the robustness of [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT radiomic features with respect to tumor delineation in head and neck and pancreatic cancer patients. Phys Med 2018; 49:105-111. [PMID: 29866335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the robustness of PET radiomic features (RF) against tumour delineation uncertainty in two clinically relevant situations. METHODS Twenty-five head-and-neck (HN) and 25 pancreatic cancer patients previously treated with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-based planning optimization were considered. Seven FDG-based contours were delineated for tumour (T) and positive lymph nodes (N, for HN patients only) following manual (2 observers), semi-automatic (based on SUV maximum gradient: PET_Edge) and automatic (40%, 50%, 60%, 70% SUV_max thresholds) methods. Seventy-three RF (14 of first order and 59 of higher order) were extracted using the CGITA software (v.1.4). The impact of delineation on volume agreement and RF was assessed by DICE and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC). RESULTS A large disagreement between manual and SUV_max method was found for thresholds ≥50%. Inter-observer variability showed median DICE values between 0.81 (HN-T) and 0.73 (pancreas). Volumes defined by PET_Edge were better consistent with the manual ones compared to SUV40%. Regarding RF, 19%/19%/47% of the features showed ICC < 0.80 between observers for HN-N/HN-T/pancreas, mostly in the Voxel-alignment matrix and in the intensity-size zone matrix families. RFs with ICC < 0.80 against manual delineation (taking the worst value) increased to 44%/36%/61% for PET_Edge and to 69%/53%/75% for SUV40%. CONCLUSIONS About 80%/50% of 72 RF were consistent between observers for HN/pancreas patients. PET_edge was sufficiently robust against manual delineation while SUV40% showed a worse performance. This result suggests the possibility to replace manual with semi-automatic delineation of HN and pancreas tumours in studies including PET radiomic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina Mori
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Sara Broggi
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Italo Dell'Oca
- Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Passoni
- Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Focal therapy for prostate cancer: the technical challenges. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:383-389. [PMID: 28951759 PMCID: PMC5611463 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.69809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Focal therapy for prostate cancer has been proposed as an alternative treatment to whole gland therapy, offering the opportunity for tumor dose escalation and/or reduced toxicity. Brachytherapy, either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate, provides an ideal approach, offering both precision in dose delivery and opportunity for a highly conformal, non-uniform dose distribution. Whilst multiple consensus documents have published clinical guidelines for patient selection, there are insufficient data to provide clear guidelines on target volume delineation, treatment planning margins, treatment planning approaches, and many other technical issues that should be considered before implementing a focal brachytherapy program. Without consensus guidelines, there is the potential for a diversity of practices to develop, leading to challenges in interpreting outcome data from multiple centers. This article provides an overview of the technical considerations for the implementation of a clinical service, and discusses related topics that should be considered in the design of clinical trials to ensure precise and accurate methods are applied for focal brachytherapy treatments.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sun Y, Reynolds H, Wraith D, Williams S, Finnegan ME, Mitchell C, Murphy D, Ebert MA, Haworth A. Predicting prostate tumour location from multiparametric MRI using Gaussian kernel support vector machines: a preliminary study. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE 2017; 40:39-49. [PMID: 28120144 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-016-0515-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The performance of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was investigated to predict prostate tumour location using multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) data. The purpose was to obtain information of prostate tumour location for the implementation of bio-focused radiotherapy. In vivo mpMRI data were collected from 16 patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Sequences included T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging. In vivo mpMRI was registered with 'ground truth' histology, using ex vivo MRI as an intermediate registration step to improve accuracy. Prostate contours were delineated by a radiation oncologist and tumours were annotated on histology by a pathologist. Five patients with minimal imaging artefacts were selected for this study. A Gaussian kernel SVM was trained and tested on different patient data subsets. Parameters were optimised using leave-oneout cross validation. Signal intensities of mpMRI were used as features and histology annotations as true labels. Prediction accuracy, as well as area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, were used to assess performance. Results demonstrated the prediction accuracy ranged from 70.4 to 87.1% and AUC of ROC ranged from 0.81 to 0.94. Additional investigations showed the apparent diffusion coefficient map from diffusion weighted imaging was the most important imaging modality for predicting tumour location. Future work will incorporate additional patient data into the framework to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the model, and will be extended to incorporate predictions of biological characteristics of the tumour which will be used in bio-focused radiotherapy optimisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Sun
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Hayley Reynolds
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Darren Wraith
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary E Finnegan
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Mitchell
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Declan Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Physics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|