HDR Prostate Brachytherapy

Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy: A 9-year update

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is an accepted treatment for localized prostate cancer, but the optimal dose and fractionation schedule remain unknown. We report on the efficacy of a randomized Phase II trial comparing HDR monotherapy delivered as 27 Gy in 2 fractions vs. 19 Gy in 1 fraction with a median follow-up of 9 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Enrolled patients had low or intermediate-risk disease, <60 cc prostate volume and no androgen deprivation use. Patients were randomized to 27 Gy in 2 fractions delivered one week apart vs a single fraction of 19 Gy.

RESULTS

170 patients were randomized: median age 65 years, median follow-up 107 months and median baseline PSA 6.35 ng/ml. NCCN risk categories comprised low (19 %), favourable (51 %), and unfavourable intermediate risk (30 %). The median PSA at 8 years was 0.08 ng/ml in the 2-fraction arm vs. 0.89 ng/ml in the single-fraction arm. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 8 years was 11.2 % in the 2-fraction arm vs. 35.9 % in the single-fraction arm (p < 0.001). The incidence of distant failure at 8 years was 3.8 % in the 2-fraction arm and 2.5 % in the single-fraction arm (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR monotherapy delivered in two fractions of 13.5 Gy demonstrated a persistent cancer control rate at 8 years and was well-tolerated. Single-fraction monotherapy yielded poor oncologic control and is not recommended. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimal HDR monotherapy strategies for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Brachyterapy: The radiation oncologist opinion

The role of the radiation oncologist in the management of patients affected by prostate cancer is increasingly considered thanks to important technological innovations that have marked the radiotherapeutic approach in its three main fields: external beam radiotherapy (EB-RT), brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy, I-RT), and metabolic radiotherapy (M-RT) through the use of new radiopharmaceuticals. Regarding the modern brachytherapy, the introduction of intensity-modulated techniques (IM-IRT), thanks to the implementation of HDR remote-after loading machines, and image-guided techniques (IG-IRT), has led to advantages in optimizing dose distribution after implantation with the possibility of modulating the dose according to the intraprostatic dominant lesions, limiting the dose to the surrounding tissues with improvement in local control and a significant reduction in side effects. I-RT today represents a safe, scientifically established, effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients affected by prostate cancer. Like most special techniques, in order to obtain the best results, it must be performed in centers with a high volume of activity and consolidated experience with an interdisciplinary approach.

Robust stochastic optimization of needle configurations for robotic HDR prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Ideally, inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy (BT) should include the pose of the needles which define the trajectory of the source. This would be particularly interesting when considering the additional freedom and accuracy in needle pose which robotic needle placement enables. However, needle insertion typically leads to tissue deformation, resulting in uncertainty regarding the actual pose of the needles with respect to the tissue.

PURPOSE

To efficiently address uncertainty during inverse planning for HDR BT in order to robustly optimize the pose of the needles before insertion, that is, to facilitate path planning for robotic needle placement.

METHODS

We use a form of stochastic linear programming to model the inverse treatment planning problem. To account for uncertainty, we consider random tissue displacements at the needle tip to simulate tissue deformation. Conventionally for stochastic linear programming, each simulated deformation is reflected by an addition to the linear programming problem which increases problem size and computational complexity substantially and leads to impractical runtime. We propose two efficient approaches for stochastic linear programming. First, we consider averaging dose coefficients to reduce the problem size. Second, we study weighting of the slack variables of an adjusted linear problem to approximate the full stochastic linear program. We compare different approaches to optimize the needle configurations and evaluate their robustness with respect to different amounts of tissue deformation.

RESULTS

Our results illustrate that stochastic planning can improve the robustness of the treatment with respect to deformation. The proposed approaches approximating stochastic linear programming better conform to the tissue deformation compared to conventional linear programming. They show good correlation with the plans computed after deformation while reducing the runtime by two orders of magnitude compared to the complete stochastic linear program. Robust optimization of needle configurations takes on average 59.42 s. Skew needle configurations lead to mean coverage improvements compared to parallel needles from 0.39 to 2.94 percentage points, when 8 mm tissue deformation is considered. Considering tissue deformations from 4  to 10 mm during planning with weighted stochastic optimization and skew needles generally results in improved mean coverage from 1.77 to 4.21 percentage points.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that efficient stochastic optimization allows selecting needle configurations which are more robust with respect to potentially negative effects of target deformation and displacement on the achievable prescription dose coverage. The approach facilitates robust path planning for robotic needle placement.

Six-probe scintillator dosimeter for treatment verification in HDR-brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is gaining interest for treatment delivery verification in HDR-brachytherapy. Time resolved methods, including source tracking, have the ability both to detect treatment errors in real time and to minimize experimental uncertainties. Multiprobe IVD architectures holds promise for simultaneous dose determinations at the targeted tumor and surrounding healthy tissues while enhancing measurement accuracy. However, most of the multiprobe dosimeters developed so far either suffer from compactness issues or rely on complex data post-treatment.

PURPOSE

We introduce a novel concept of a compact multiprobe scintillator detector and demonstrate its applicability in HDR-brachytherapy. Our fabricated seven-fiber probing system is sufficiently narrow to be inserted in a brachytherapy needle or in a catheter.

METHODS

Our multiprobe detection system results from the parallel implementation of six miniaturized inorganic Gd2 O2 S:Tb scintillator detectors at the end of a bundle of seven fibers, one fiber is kept bare to assess the stem effect. The resulting system, which is narrower than 320 microns, is tested with a MicroSelectron 9.14 Ci Ir-192 HDR afterloader, in a water phantom. The detection signals from all six probes are simultaneously read with a sCMOS camera (at a rate of 0.06 s). The camera is coupled to a chromatic filter to cancel Cerenkov signal induced within the fibers upon exposure. By implementing an aperiodic array of six scintillating cells along the bundle axis, we first determine the range of inter-probe spacings leading to optimal source tracking accuracy (first tracking method). Then, three different source tracking algorithms involving all the scintillating probes are tested and compared. In each of these four methods, dwell positions are assessed from dose measurements and compared to the treatment plan. Dwell time is also determined and compared to the treatment plan.

RESULTS

The optimum inter-probe spacing for an accurate source tracking ranges from 15 to 35 mm. The optimum detection algorithm consists of adding the readout signals from all detector probes. In that case, the error to the planned dwell positions is of 0.01 ± 0.14 mm and 0.02 ± 0.29 mm at spacings between the source and detector axes of 5.5 and 40 mm, respectively. Using this approach, the average deviations to the expected dwell time are of- 0.006 ± 0.009 $-0.006\,\pm \,0.009$ s and- 0.008 ± 0.058 $-0.008\, \pm 0.058$ s, at spacings between source and probe axes of 5.5 and 20 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our six-probe Gd2 O2 S:Tb dosimeter coupled to a sCMOS camera can perform time-resolved treatment verification in HDR brachytherapy. This detection system of high spatial and temporal resolutions (0.25 mm and 0.06 s, respectively) provides a precise information on the treatment delivery via a dwell time and position verification of unmatched accuracy.

Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection

BACKGROUND

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is commonly used to treat prostate cancer. Existing HDR planning systems solve the dwell time problem for predetermined catheters and a single energy source.

PURPOSE

Additional degrees of freedom can be obtained by relaxing the catheters' pre-designation and introducing more source types, and may have a dosimetric benefit, particularly in improving conformality to spare the urethra. This study presents a novel analytical approach to solving the corresponding HDR planning problem.

METHODS

The catheter and dual-energy source selection problem was formulated as a constrained optimization problem with a non-convex group sparsity regularization. The optimization problem was solved using the fast-iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (FISTA). Two isotopes were considered. The dose rates for the HDR 4140 Ytterbium (Yb-169) source and the Elekta Iridium (Ir-192) HDR Flexisource were modeled according to the TG-43U1 formalism and benchmarked accordingly. Twenty-two retrospective HDR prostate brachytherapy patients treated with Ir-192 were considered. An Ir-192 only (IRO), Yb-169 only (YBO), and dual-source (DS) plan with optimized catheter location was created for each patient with N catheters, where N is the number of catheters used in the clinically delivered plans. The DS plans jointly optimized Yb-169 and Ir-192 dwell times. All plans and the clinical plans were normalized to deliver a 15 Gy prescription (Rx) dose to 95% of the clinical treatment volume (CTV) and evaluated for the CTV D90%, V150%, and V200%, urethra D0.1cc and D1cc, bladder V75%, and rectum V75%. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for each structure.

RESULTS

The DS plans ubiquitously selected Ir-192 as the only treatment source. IRO outperformed YBO in organ at risk (OARs) OAR sparing, reducing the urethra D0.1cc and D1cc by 0.98% (p = 2.22 ∗ 10 - 9 $p\ = \ 2.22*{10^{ - 9}}$ ) and 1.09% (p = 1.22 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 1.22*{10^{ - 10}}$ ) of the Rx dose, respectively, and reducing the bladder and rectum V75% by 0.09 (p = 0.0023 $p\ = \ 0.0023$ ) and 0.13 cubic centimeters (cc) (p = 0.033 $p\ = \ 0.033$ ), respectively. The YBO plans delivered a more homogenous dose to the CTV, with a smaller V150% and V200% by 3.20 (p = 4.67 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 4.67*{10^{ - 10}}$ ) and 1.91 cc (p = 5.79 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 5.79*{10^{ - 10}}$ ), respectively, and a lower CTV D90% by 0.49% (p = 0.0056 $p\ = \ 0.0056$ ) of the prescription dose. The IRO plans reduce the urethral D1cc by 2.82% (p = 1.38 ∗ 10 - 4 $p\ = \ 1.38*{10^{ - 4}}$ ) of the Rx dose compared to the clinical plans, at the cost of increased bladder and rectal V75% by 0.57 (p = 0.0022 $p\ = \ 0.0022$ ) and 0.21 cc (p = 0.019 $p\ = \ 0.019$ ), respectively, and increased CTV V150% by a mean of 1.46 cc (p = 0.010 $p\ = \ 0.010$ ) and CTV D90% by an average of 1.40% of the Rx dose (p = 8.80 ∗ 10 - 8 $p\ = \ 8.80*{10^{ - 8}}$ ). While these differences are statistically significant, the clinical differences between the plans are minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed analytical HDR planning algorithm integrates catheter and isotope selection with dwell time optimization for varying clinical goals, including urethra sparing. The planning method can guide HDR implants and identify promising isotopes for specific HDR clinical goals, such as target conformality or OAR sparing.

Being certain about uncertainties: a robust evaluation method for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including the combination of uncertainties

In high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy the combined effect of uncertainties cause a range of possible dose distributions deviating from the nominal plan, and which are not considered during treatment plan evaluation. This could lead to dosimetric misses for critical structures and overdosing of organs at risk. A robust evaluation method to assess the combination of uncertainties during plan evaluation is presented and demonstrated on one HDR prostate ultrasound treatment plan retrospectively. A range of uncertainty scenarios are simulated by changing six parameters in the nominal plan and calculating the corresponding dose distribution. Two methods are employed to change the parameters, a probabilistic approach using random number sampling to evaluate the likelihood of variation in dose distributions, and a combination of the most extreme possible values to access the worst-case dosimetric outcomes. One thousand probabilistic scenarios were run on the single treatment plan with 43.2% of scenarios passing seven of the eight clinical objectives. The prostate D90 had a standard deviation of 4.4%, with the worst case decreasing the dose by up to 27.2%. The urethra D10 was up to 29.3% higher than planned in the worst case. All DVH metrics in the probabilistic scenarios were found to be within acceptable clinical constraints for the plan under statistical tests for significance. The clinical significance of the results from the robust evaluation method presented on any individual treatment plan needs to be compared in the context of a historical data set that contains patient outcomes with robustness analysis data to ascertain a baseline acceptance.

Safety and efficacy associated with single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (SFHDR) for localized prostate cancer has been tried in clinical trials, relevant medical evidence is currently lacking. It is necessary to systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of SFHDR.

METHODS

Comprehensive and systematic searches for eligible studies were performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoints included safety and efficacy, represented by toxic effects and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), respectively. The proportion rates were used as the effect measure for each study and were presented with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and related 95% prediction interval (PI). Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator (REML) and the Hartung-Knapp method were used in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, including 1440 patients. The median age of patients was 66.9 years old (62-73 years old) and the median follow-up was 47.5 months (12-75 months). The estimates of cumulative occurrence for severe gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxic effects were 0.1% (95% CI 0-0.2%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0-1.2%), and for grade 2 toxic effects were 1.6% (95% CI 0.1-4.7%) and 17.1% (95% CI 5.4-33.5%), respectively. The estimate of 3‑year bRFS was 87.5% (95% CI 84.4-90.3%) and 71.0% (95% CI 63.0-78.3%) for 5‑year bRFS. The pooled bRFS rates for low-risk patients were 99.0% (95% CI 85.2-100.0%) at 3 years and 80.9% (95% CI 75.4-85.9%) at 5 years, and the risk group was found to be statistically correlated with bRFS (3-year bRFS, P < 0.01; 5‑year bRFS, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

SFHDR is associated with favorable tolerability and suboptimal clinical benefit in patients with localized prostate cancer. Ongoing and planned high-quality prospective studies are necessary to verify its safety and efficacy.

Treatment verification in high dose rate brachytherapy using a realistic 3D printed head phantom and an imaging panel

PURPOSE

Even though High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy has good treatment outcomes in different treatment sites, treatment verification is far from widely implemented because of a lack of easily available solutions. Previously it has been shown that an imaging panel (IP) near the patient can be used to determine treatment parameters such as the dwell time and source positions in a single material pelvic phantom. In this study we will use a heterogeneous head phantom to test this IP approach, and simulate common treatment errors to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the error-detecting capabilities of the IP.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A heterogeneous head-phantom consisting of soft tissue and bone equivalent materials was 3D-printed to simulate a base of tongue treatment. An High Dose Rate treatment plan with 3 different catheters was used to simulate a treatment delivery, using dwell times ranging from 0.3 s to 4 s and inter-dwell distances of 2 mm. The IP was used to measure dwell times, positions and detect simulated errors. Measured dwell times and positions were used to calculate the delivered dose.

RESULTS

Dwell times could be determined within 0.1 s. Source positions were measured with submillimeter accuracy in the plane of the IP, and average distance accuracy of 1.7 mm in three dimensions. All simulated treatment errors (catheter swap, catheter shift, afterloader errors) were detected. Dose calculations show slightly different distributions with the measured dwell positions and dwell times (gamma pass rate for 1 mm/1% of 96.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using an IP, it was possible to verify the treatment in a realistic heterogeneous phantom and detect certain treatment errors.

Outcomes following brachytherapy boost for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective bicenter study by the SFRO brachytherapy group

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy dose escalation improves biochemical control in intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy boost was shown to further improve biochemical control compared to radiotherapy alone in three randomized trials. The SFRO brachytherapy group sought to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of BT-boost for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer in real life, and to determine prognostic factors for efficacy and toxicity.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective study was conducted, including all patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BB), from 2006 until December 2019 at two centers. Patient characteristics, initial disease, treatment and follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

709 patients from two centers were analyzed given a short follow-up in the other centers. Out of those, 277 were intermediate risk (170 favorable and 107 unfavorable) and 432 were high risk. The median EBRT and HDR-BB doses were 46 Gy (35-50) and 14 Gy (10-20). After a median follow-up of 62 months, biochemical control at 5 years was 87.5 % for the overall population, 91 % and 85 % for intermediate- and high-risk cancers, respectively. At 5 years, biochemical and clinical relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival and local control rates were 83 %, 90 % and 97 % respectively. 5-years overall survival was 94 %. Late grade 2 or higher GU or GI toxicity was found in 36 patients (5 %) and 9 patients (1.3 %).

CONCLUSION

This bicenter analysis shows the efficacy and tolerability of HDR-BB as a complement to external radiotherapy. Further improvements such as combination with new hormonal agents or new brachytherapy-radiotherapy fractionation regimens are warranted to improve further the outcomes and therapeutic ratio.

Serum Paraoxonase-1 Activity in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Brachytherapy as a Measure of Irradiation Efficacy

We investigated changes in the activity of antioxidant paraoxonase-1 (PON1) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing radiotherapy (RT), as well as the relationship of the PON1 activity with the degree of PCa advancement. We included 84 men with PCa. Blood samples were obtained before irradiation and after the completion of RT. The control group was composed of 60 healthy men. There was no significant difference in the PON1 activity between the control group and patients pre-radiotherapy. Irradiation was associated with a significant decrease in the PON1 activity; thus, it could be a measure of the efficacy of RT. No significant correlations between the PON1 activity and Gleason score, prostate volume, BMI (body mass index), or adipose tissue thickness were found. However, there was a positive correlation between the PON1 activity and the PSA concentration in the group of PCa patients.

Characterization of a miniaturized scintillator detector for time-resolved treatment monitoring in HDR-brachytherapy

Purpose.HDR brachytherapy combines steep dose gradients in space and time, thereby requiring detectors of high spatial and temporal resolution to perform accurate treatment monitoring. We demonstrate a miniaturized fiber-integrated scintillator detector (MSD) of unmatched compactness which fulfills these conditions.Methods.The MSD consists of a 0.28 mm large and 0.43 mm long detection cell (Gd₂O₂S:Tb) coupled to a 110 micron outer diameter silica optical fiber. The fiber probe is tested in a phantom using a MicroSelectron 9.1 Ci Ir-192 HDR afterloader. The detection signal is acquired at a rate of 0.08 s with a standard sCMOS camera coupled to a chromatic filter (to cancel spurious Cerenkov signal). The dwell position and time monitoring are analyzed over prostate treatment sequences with dwell times spanning from 0.1 to 11 s. The dose rate at the probe position is both evaluated from a direct measurement and by reconstruction from the measured dwell position using the AAPM TG-43 formalism.Results.A total number of 1384 dwell positions are analyzed. In average, the measured dwell positions differ by 0.023 ± 0.077 mm from planned values over a 6-54 mm source-probe distance range. The standard deviation of the measured dwell positions is below 0.8 mm. 94% of the 966 dwell positions occurring at a source-probe inter-catheter spacing below 20 mm are successfully identified, with a 100% detection rate for dwell times exceeding 0.5 s. The average deviation to the planned dwell times is of 0.005 ± 0.060 s. The instant dose retrieval from dwell position monitoring leads to a relative mismatch to planned values of 0.14% ± 0.7%.Conclusion.A miniaturized Gd2O₂S:Tb detector coupled to a standard sCMOS camera can be used for time-resolved treatment monitoring in HDR Brachytherapy.

Raman spectroscopy and supervised learning as a potential tool to identify high-dose-rate-brachytherapy induced biochemical profiles of prostate cancer

High-dose-rate-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is an increasingly attractive alternative to external beam radiation-therapy for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer. Despite this, no bio-marker based method currently exists to monitor treatment response, and the changes which take place at the biochemical level in hypo-fractionated HDR-BT remain poorly understood. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the capability of Raman spectroscopy (RS) combined with principal component analysis (PCA) and random-forest classification (RF) to identify radiation response profiles after a single dose of 13.5 Gy in a cohort of nine patients. We here demonstrate, as a proof-of-concept, how RS-PCA-RF could be utilised as an effective tool in radiation response monitoring, specifically assessing the importance of low variance PCs in complex sample sets. As RS provides information on the biochemical composition of tissue samples, this technique could provide insight into the changes which take place on the biochemical level, as result of HDR-BT treatment.

Implementation of High-Dose-Rate, CT-Based Prostate Brachytherapy in an Academic Teaching Hospital and Residency Training Program

Introduction

Prostate brachytherapy provides the most durable local control for prostate adenocarcinoma among all radiation treatment options. However, likely due to decreased trainee familiarity with the technique and resource intensity, it has seen a decline in utilization. Here we outline our experience with starting a high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy program within a residency training program and present our outcome data.

Methods

Patients were identified and screened using clinical data and volume study for candidacy for brachytherapy implantation. Eligible candidates were implanted and subsequently had radiation planning and delivery in our clinic. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on our outcomes and dosimetry data and presented in tabular form.

Results

Seventeen patients were treated for a total of 18 implants (one monotherapy). No implant was aborted. No acute urinary retention requiring catheterization or chronic urethral stricture occurred. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was 94% at a median follow-up of 28.5 months (range 8.2-50 months); the one failure occurred in a very high-risk patient at 37 months following treatment. Dosimetrically, prostate coverage, urethra sparing, and rectum sparing aims were met. Volumetric bladder aims were also met; however, the max point dose to the bladder neck was above the guideline.

Conclusion

Our department successfully implemented an HDR prostate brachytherapy program. Treatments were effective and there was no grade 3 toxicity to report.

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: What's the best in 2021

Radiotherapy is highly involved in the management of prostate cancer. Its features and potential applications experienced a radical evolution over last decades, as they are associated to the continuous evolution of available technology and current oncological innovations. Some application of radiotherapy like brachytherapy have been recently enriched by innovative features and multidisciplinary dedications. In this report we aim to put some questions regarding the following issues regarding multiple aspects of modern application of radiation oncology: the current application of radiation oncology; the modern role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for both the management of primary lesions and for lymph-nodal recurrence; the management of the oligometastatic presentations; the role of brachytherapy; the aid played by the application of the organ at risk spacer (spacer OAR), fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking systems and on-line Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), and the role of the new opportunity represented by radiomic analysis.

Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: How Far Can We Go?

Following adoption of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as a standard for localised prostate cancer, ultrahypofractioned radiotherapy delivered in five to seven fractions is rapidly being embraced by clinical practice and international guidelines. However, the question remains: how low can we go? Can radiotherapy for prostate cancer be delivered in fewer than five fractions? The current review summarises the evidence that radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer can be safely and effectively delivered in fewer than five fractions using high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also discuss important lessons learned from the single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy experience.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Toxicity After Definitive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Among Veterans With Prostate Cancer

Purpose

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for prostate cancer. There is limited research, however, investigating toxicity outcomes with HDRBT treatment among veterans. The objective of this study is to assess the impact on health-related quality of life (hrQOL) and physician-graded toxicities associated with HDRBT as monotherapy among veterans treated at Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital in Hines, Illinois.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2019, 74 veterans with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDRBT as monotherapy with 27 Gy in 2 fractions, delivered over 2 implants. Veteran-reported hrQOL in the genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual domains was assessed using the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Mixed linear effect models were used to assess differences in the hrQOL scores at follow-up compared with baseline scores. Statistically significant differences in hrQOL scores from baseline were further assessed for clinical significance, using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) evaluations.

Results

Median follow-up was 18 months. Veterans reported declines in GU, GI, and sexual hrQOL scores immediately after treatment, with the IPSS and EPIC-26 hrQOL scores all displaying significant decrease from baseline over time. The majority of the declines in hrQOL scores met criteria for MCID. These hrQOL scores trended toward a return to baseline, with the EPIC-26 urinary obstruction score returning to baseline at the 18-month follow-up assessment and the EPIC-26 bowel score returning to baseline at the 12-month follow-up. The IPSS, urinary incontinence, and sexual scores did not return to baseline at 18 months. The grade 2 maximum physician-graded GU, GI, and sexual toxicity rates were 65%, 5%, and 53%, respectively. There was 1 incidence of grade 3 GU toxicity but no grade 3 GI or sexual toxicity.

Conclusions

HDRBT as monotherapy is a well-tolerated treatment option for veterans with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with favorable veteran-reported and physician-graded toxicities. Veterans should be educated about HDRBT as an option when counseled regarding treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Multipurpose ultrasound-based prostate phantom for use in interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

While brachytherapy is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer, there has been a noticeable decline in its use. Training opportunity for prostate brachytherapy has been in steady decline, with some residents receiving little to no hands-on training. This work was developed to design a training environment that uses a phantom-based simulator to teach the process of TRUS-based prostate brachytherapy METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prostate phantom was fabricated from a representative prostate patient TRUS scan. Three materials were used: gelatin powder, graphite powder, and water. The prostate was developed using 9% gelatin and 0.3% graphite per 100 ml water. Five radiation oncologists were asked to qualitatively score the phantom according to image quality, haptic feedback, needle insertion quality, and its compatibility with operative tools. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was estimated using different concentrations of graphite. The elasticity of the phantom was evaluated based on ultrasound elastography measurements RESULTS: The prostate phantom had an average CNR of 3.94 ± 1.09 compared to real prostate images with a CNR of 2 ± 1.8. The average Young's modulus was computed to be 58.03 ± 6.24 kPa compared to real prostate tissue (58.8 ± 8.2 kPa). Oncologists ranked the phantom as "very good" for overall quality of the phantom. They reported that needle insertion quality was "very good" during a simulated brachytherapy procedure.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a 3D printing prostate phantom to be used for training purposes during prostate brachytherapy. The phantom has been evaluated for image quality and elasticity. The reconstructed phantom could be used as an anthropomorphic surrogate to train residents on prostate brachytherapy procedures.

A review of dosimetric impact of implementation of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for HDR brachytherapy

To obtain dose distributions more physically representative to the patient anatomy in brachytherapy, calculation algorithms that can account for heterogeneity are required. The current standard AAPM Task Group No 43 (TG-43) dose calculation formalism has some clinically relevant dosimetric limitations. Lack of tissue heterogeneity and scattered dose corrections are the major weaknesses of the TG-43 formalism and could lead to systematic dose errors in target volumes and organs at risk. Over the last decade, model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have been clinically offered as complementary algorithms beyond the TG43 formalism for high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment planning. These algorithms provide enhanced dose calculation accuracy by using the information in the patient's computed tomography images, which allows modeling the patient's geometry, material compositions, and the treatment applicator. Several researchers have investigated the implementation of MBDCAs in HDR brachytherapy for dose optimization, but moving toward using them as primary algorithms for dose calculations is still lagging. Therefore, an overview of up-to-date research is needed to familiarize clinicians with the current status of the MBDCAs for different cancers in HDR brachytherapy. In this paper, we review the MBDCAs for HDR brachytherapy from a dosimetric perspective. Treatment sites covered include breast, gynecological, lung, head and neck, esophagus, liver, prostate, and skin cancers. Moreover, we discuss the current status of implementation of MBDCAs and the challenges.

Adverse events of after-loading high dose rate brachytherapy reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

PURPOSE

To provide an assessment of safety regarding high-dose-rate after-loading brachytherapy (HDR-BT) based on adverse events reported to the OpenFDA, an open access database maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

METHODS

OpenFDA was queried for HDR-BT events between 1993 and 2019. A brachytherapist categorized adverse events (AEs) based on disease site, applicator, manufacturer, event type, dosimetry impact, and outcomes. Important findings are summarized.

RESULTS

372 AEs were reported between 1993 and 2019, with a downwards trend after 2014. Nearly half of AEs (48.9%) were caused by a device malfunction, and 27.4% resulted in patient injury. Breast (49.2%) and Gyn (23.7%) were the most common disease sites of AEs. Applicator breaks cause the majority of AEs (64.2%) and breast balloon implants were the most common applicator to malfunction (38.7%). User error contributed to only 16.7% of events. 11.0% of events required repair of the afterloader. There were no reported staff injuries or patient deaths from an AE, however 24.7% of patients received resultant incorrect radiation dose, 16.4% required additional procedures to rectify the AE, and 3.0% resulted in unintended radiation to staff.

CONCLUSION

The OpenFDA database has shown a decreasing trend in AEs since 2014 for HDR-BT. Most AEs are not caused by user error and do not cause patient injury or incorrect radiation dose. Investigation into methods to prevent failures and improve applicators such as the breast balloon could improve safety. These results support the continued use of HDR-BT as a safe treatment modality for cancer.

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Prostate Radiation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present urologists with guidance on how to approach and manage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who have undergone radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are few studies that specifically examine treatment approaches for LUTS in patients who have undergone prostate cancer RT. LUTS after prostate RT are unique when compared to de novo LUTS. Understanding these distinctions is important for urologists' practice as well as patients' quality of life. Discussion of the risks and management of post-RT LUTS should be included in the shared decision-making process when counseling patients on various treatment options for prostate cancer. Further studies evaluating treatments for storage and voiding symptoms after RT are needed to help guide future care.

Brachytherapy treatment verification using gamma radiation from the internal treatment source combined with an imaging panel-a phantom study

Brachytherapy has an excellent clinical outcome for different treatment sites. However,in vivotreatment verification is not performed in the majority of hospitals due to the lack of proper monitoring systems. This study investigates the use of an imaging panel (IP) and the photons emitted by a high dose rate (HDR)¹⁹²Ir source to track source motion and obtain some information related to the patient anatomy. The feasibility of this approach was studied by monitoring the treatment delivery to a 3D printed phantom that mimicks a prostate patient. A 3D printed phantom was designed with a template for needle insertion, a cavity ('rectum') to insert an ultrasound probe, and lateral cavities used to place tissue-equivalent materials. CT images were acquired to create HDR¹⁹²Ir treatment plans with a range of dwell times, interdwell distances and needle arrangements. Treatment delivery was verified with an IP placed at several positions around the phantom using radiopaque markers on the outer surface to register acquired IP images with the planning CT. All dwell positions were identified using acquisition times ≤0.11 s (frame rates ≥ 9 fps). Interdwell distances and dwell positions (in relation to the IP) were verified with accuracy better than 0.1 cm. Radiopaque markers were visible in the acquired images and could be used for registration with CT images. Uncertainties for image registration (IP and planning CT) between 0.1 and 0.4 cm. The IP is sensitive to tissue-mimicking insert composition and showed phantom boundaries that could be used to improve treatment verification. The IP provided sufficient time and spatial resolution for real-time source tracking and allows for the registration of the planning CT and IP images. The results obtained in this study indicate that several treatment errors could be detected including swapped catheters, incorrect dwell times and dwell positions.

HDR brachytherapy boost using MR-only workflow for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: 8-year results of a pilot study

PURPOSE

To report 8-year clinical outcome with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) boost using MRI-only workflow for intermediate (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PC) patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-two patients were treated with 46-60 Gy of 3D conformal radiotherapy preceded and/or followed by a single dose of 8-10 Gy MRI-guided HDRBT. Interventions were performed in a 0.35 T MRI scanner. Trajectory planning, navigation, contouring, catheter reconstruction, and dose calculation were exclusively based on MRI images. Biochemical relapse-free- (BRFS), local relapse-free- (LRFS), distant metastasis-free- (DMFS), cancer-specific-(CCS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Late morbidity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) combined with RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) scale for urinary toxicity and rectal urgency (RU) determined by Yeoh.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 107 (range: 19-143) months. The 8-year actuarial rates of BRFS, LRFS, DMFS, CSS and OS were 85.7%, 97%, 97.6%, and 77.6%, respectively. There were no Gr.3 GI side effects. The 8-year actuarial rate of Gr.2 proctitis was 4%. The 8-year cumulative incidence of Gr.3 GU side effects was 8%, including two urinary stenoses (5%) and one cystitis (3%). EPIC urinary and bowel scores did not change significantly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-only HDR-BT boost with moderate dose escalation provides excellent 8-year disease control with a favorable toxicity profile for IRPC and HRPC patients. Our results support the clinical importance of MRI across the BT workflow.

HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The effectiveness and safety of high dose brachytherapy as monotherapy (HDR-BRT-M) in prostate cancer is limited to retrospective studies. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and toxicity after HDR-BRT-M in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective, prospective, or randomized clinical trials were identified on electronical databases through June 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if there is a relationship between moderator variables and bRFS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 3534 patients treated were included. The cumulative size of the bRFS at 5 years was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.61). The five-year bRFS for low, intermediate, and high risk was 97.5% (95% CI 96-98%), 93.5% (95% CI 91-96%), and 91% (95% CI 88-93%), respectively. The total biological effective dose (BED) (p = 0.02), the BED per fraction (p = 0.001), androgen deprivation therapy usage (p = 0.04), and the number of fractions of HDR-BRT-M (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with bRFS rate. The rate of late Grade 2/3 or > genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 22.4% (95% CI 9-35,2%)/1.4% (95% CI 0.8-2.1%) and 2.7% (95% CI 0-6.8%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.1%-0.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BRT-M is safe with excellent rates of bRFS for all risk groups. The total BED, the BED per fraction, and number of fractions were the key factors associated with the biochemical control. These data can be useful to choose the size and number of BRT fractionation.

Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: Late toxicity and patient reported outcomes from a randomized phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long-term toxicity of high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer is not well defined. We report late toxicity and health related quality of life (HRQOL) changes from a randomized phase II clinical trial of two different fractionation schemes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had NCCN low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. 170 patients were randomized to receive either a single 19 Gy or two-fractions of 13.5 Gy one week apart. Toxicity was measured using Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0, and HRQOL was measured using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 63 months. The 5-year cumulative incidence of Grade 2 or higher genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was 62% and 12% in the single-fraction arm, and 47% and 9% in the two-fraction arm, respectively. Grade 3 GU toxicity was only seen in the single fraction arm with a cumulative incidence of 2%. The 5-year prevalence of Grade 2 GU toxicity was 29% and 21%, in the single- and two-fraction arms, respectively, with Grade 2 GI toxicity of 1% and 2%. Beyond the first year, no significant differences in mean urinary HRQOL were seen compared to baseline in the two-fraction arm, in contrast to the single-fraction arm where a decline in urinary HRQOL was seen at 4 and 5 years. Sexual HRQOL was significantly reduced in both treatment arms at all timepoints, with no changes in the bowel domain.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR monotherapy is well tolerated with minimal impact on HRQOL.

Ablative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy

Simple Summary

Radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer. Over the years, various radiation delivery modalities have contributed to the increased precision of radiation, employing radiobiological insights to shorten the overall treatment time with hypofractionation, while improving oncological control without increasing toxicities. Here, we discuss and compare two ablative radiation modalities, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT), in terms of oncological control, dose/fractionation and toxicities in men with localized prostate cancer. This review will highlight the levels of evidence available to support either modality as a monotherapy, will summarize safety and efficacy, help clinicians gain a deeper understanding of the safety and efficacy profiles of these two modalities, and highlight ongoing research efforts to address many unanswered questions regarding ablative prostate radiation.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous solid organ malignancy among men worldwide. Radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment option that has historically been delivered in the form of small daily doses of radiation over the span of multiple weeks. PCa appears to have a unique sensitivity to higher doses of radiation per fraction, rendering it susceptible to abbreviated forms of treatment. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) are both modern radiation modalities that allow the precise delivery of ablative doses of radiation to the prostate while maximally sparing sensitive surrounding normal structures. In this review, we highlight the evidence regarding the radiobiology, oncological outcomes, toxicity and dose/fractionation schemes of SBRT and HDRBT monotherapy in men with low-and intermediate-risk PCa.

Randomised trial of external-beam radiotherapy alone or with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Mature 12-year results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A randomised phase-III trial compared external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone with EBRT combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BTb) in localised prostate adenocarcinoma. Previous analysis, at median follow up of 85 months, demonstrated improved relapse free survival (RFS) with EBRT + HDR-BTb. This data has now been updated with a median follow up of 131 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 1997 to August 2005, patients were assigned either to EBRT alone delivering 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or EBRT followed by a temporary high-dose-rate implant delivering 2 × 8·5 Gy over 24 h. The primary endpoint was RFS defined by a PSA rise ≥2.0 µg/l above nadir, clinical progression or death. Actuarial survival rates and Hazard Ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's Proportional Hazard Model, respectively. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), urinary and bowel toxicity.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients received EBRT alone and 110 EBRT + HDR-BTb. Median time to relapse was 137 months in the HDR-BTb arm compared to 82 months for EBRT alone (p = 0·01). A 27% risk of recurrence with EBRT alone was observed (p = 0·001), resulting in a 21% improvement in RFS at 12 years with EBRT + HDR-BTb. In multivariate analysis treatment arm, risk category and no androgen deprivation therapy were significant covariates for risk of relapse. Differences in overall survival were not significant.

CONCLUSION

At 12 years there remains a significant improvement in RFS after EBRT + HDR-BTb; both treatments were equitoxic for severe late urinary and bowel events and urethral strictures.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer - 5-year efficacy results

BACKGROUND

The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as the primary treatment modality in clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) is emerging. The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term results of PCa patients treated with SBRT.

METHODS

This non-selected, real-life patient cohort included 213 patients with localized PCa treated with a robotic SBRT device during 2012-2015.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 64 months (range, 10-85 months), and all risk-groups were represented as 47 (22.1%), 56 (26.3%) and 110 (51.6%) patients were classified into D'Amico risk stratification of low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered to 64.3% of the patients. At cut-off, the biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was 100, 87.5 and 80.0% for patients at low, intermediate and high-risk (p = 0.004), and 92.5, 84.2 and 66.7% for patients with Gleason score ≤ 6, 7 and ≥ 8, respectively (p = 0.001). The actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 97.9, 96.4 and 88.6% in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively, and at the cut-off, the disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of the whole cohort was high (99.1%), as only two high-risk patients died due to PCa.

CONCLUSION

Our present results of SBRT delivered with CyberKnife produced excellent long-term bRFS, OS and DSS outcomes among patients with localized PCa. We conclude that SBRT provides an efficient and convenient treatment option for patients with localized PCa, irrespective of the risk-group.

Building a High-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Program With Real-Time Ultrasound-Based Planning: Initial Safety, Quality, and Outcome Results

Purpose

Growing evidence supports the efficacy and safety of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a boost or monotherapy in prostate cancer treatment. We initiated a new HDR prostate brachytherapy practice in April 2014. Here, we report the learning experiences, short-term safety, quality, and outcome.

Methods and Materials

From April 2014 to December 2017, 164 men were treated with HDR brachytherapy with curative intent. Twenty-eight men (17.1%) underwent HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy, receiving 25 to 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Men treated with HDR brachytherapy as a boost received 19 to 21 Gy in 2 fractions. Fifty-two men (31.7%) had high-risk disease. HDR procedure times, dosimetry, and response were recorded and analyzed. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were recorded according to the toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Results

Mean HDR procedure times decreased yearly from 179 minutes in 2014 to 115 minutes in 2017. Median follow-up was 18.6 months (range, 3-55 months). At last review, 79% of patients reported returning to baseline GU status, and 100% of patients noted no change in GI status from their baseline. Four patients experienced acute urinary retention. Treatment planning target volume (PTV) was defined as prostate with margins. Dosimetrically, 97.5% of all HDR implants had PTV D90 ≥100%, 81.5% had PTV V100 ≥95%, 73.6% had maximal urethral doses ≤120%, and 77.5% had rectal 1 mL dose ≤70% (all but one ≤10.8 Gy). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 98.7% (95% confidence interval, 91.4%-99.8%), and disease-free survival was 96.2% (95% confidence interval, 89.5%-98.7%).

Conclusions

The low incidence of GU and GI complications in our cohort demonstrates that a HDR brachytherapy program can be successfully developed as a treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer.

External Validation of a Predictive Model of Urethral Strictures for Prostate Patients Treated With HDR Brachytherapy Boost

Purpose: For prostate cancer treatment, comparable or superior biochemical control was reported when using External-Beam-Radiotherapy (EBRT) with High-Dose-Rate-Brachytherapy (HDRB)-boost, compared to dose-escalation with EBRT alone. The conformal doses produced by HDRB could allow further beneficial prostate dose-escalation, but increase in dose is limited by normal tissue toxicity. Previous works showed correlation between urethral dose and incidence of urinary toxicity, but there is a lack of established guidelines on the dose constraints to this organ. This work aimed at fitting a Normal-Tissue-Complication-Probability model to urethral stricture data collected at one institution and validating it with an external cohort, looking at neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation as dose-modifying factor.

Materials and Methods: Clinical and dosimetric data of 258 patients, with a toxicity rate of 12.8%, treated at a single institution with a variety of prescription doses, were collected to fit the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman (LKB) model using the maximum likelihood method. Due to the different fractionations, doses were converted into 2 Gy-equivalent doses (α/β = 5 Gy), and urethral stricture was used as an end-point. For validation, an external cohort of 187 patients treated as part of the TROG (Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group) 03.04 RADAR trial with a toxicity rate of 8.7%, was used. The goodness of fit was assessed using calibration plots. The effect of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation (AD) was analyzed separating patients who had received it prior to treatment from those who did not receive it.

Results: The obtained LKB parameters were TD50 = 116.7 Gy and m = 0.23; n was fixed to 0.3, based on numerical optimization of the likelihood. The calibration plot showed a good agreement between the observed toxicity and the probability predicted by the model, confirmed by bootstrapping. For the external validation, the calibration plot showed that the observed toxicity obtained with the RADAR patients was well-represented by the fitted LKB model parameters. When patients were stratified by the use of AD TD50 decreased when AD was not present.

Conclusions: Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model parameters were fitted to the risk of urethral stricture and externally validated with an independent cohort, to provide guidance on urethral tolerance doses for patients treated with a HDRB boost. For patients that did not receive AD, model fitting provided a lower TD50 suggesting a protective effect on urethra toxicity.