1
|
Maitz CA, Bryan JN. The role of companion animal models in radiopharmaceutical development and translation. Vet Comp Oncol 2024; 22:165-173. [PMID: 38439693 DOI: 10.1111/vco.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Advancements in molecular imaging and drug targeting have created a renaissance in the development of radiopharmaceuticals for therapy and theranostics. While some radiopharmaceuticals, such as Na[131I]I, have been used clinically for decades, new agents are being approved using small-molecules, peptides, and antibodies for targeting. As these agents are being developed, the need to understand dosimetry and biologic effects of the systemically delivered radiotherapy becomes more important, particularly as highly potent radiopharmaceuticals using targeted alpha therapy become clinically utilized. As the processes being targeted become more complex, and the radiobiology of different particulate radiation becomes more diverse, models that better recapitulate human cancer and geometry are necessary. Companion animals develop many of the same types of cancer, carrying many of the same genetic drivers as those seen in people, and the scale and geometry of tumours in dogs more closely mimics those in humans than murine tumour models. Key translational challenges in oncology, such as alterations in tumour microenvironment, hypoxia, heterogeneity, and geometry are addressed by companion animal models. This review paper will provide background on radiopharmaceutical targeting techniques, review the use of radiopharmaceuticals in companion animal oncology, and explore the translational value of treating these patients in terms of dosimetry, treatment outcomes, and normal tissue complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles A Maitz
- Comparative Oncology Radiobiology and Epigenetics Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Bryan
- Comparative Oncology Radiobiology and Epigenetics Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dyer MR, Jing Z, Duncan K, Godbe J, Shokeen M. Advancements in the development of radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear medicine applications in the treatment of bone metastases. Nucl Med Biol 2024; 130-131:108879. [PMID: 38340369 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2024.108879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Bone metastases are a painful and complex condition that overwhelmingly impacts the prognosis and quality of life of cancer patients. Over the years, nuclear medicine has made remarkable progress in the diagnosis and management of bone metastases. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in nuclear medicine for the diagnosis and management of bone metastases. Furthermore, the review explores the role of targeted radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine for bone metastases, focusing on radiolabeled molecules that are designed to selectively target biomarkers associated with bone metastases, including osteocytes, osteoblasts, and metastatic cells. The applications of radionuclide-based therapies, such as strontium-89 (Sr-89) and radium-223 (Ra-223), are also discussed. This review also highlights the potential of theranostic approaches for bone metastases, enabling personalized treatment strategies based on individual patient characteristics. Importantly, the clinical applications and outcomes of nuclear medicine in osseous metastatic disease are discussed. This includes the assessment of treatment response, predictive and prognostic value of imaging biomarkers, and the impact of nuclear medicine on patient management and outcomes. The review identifies current challenges and future perspectives on the role of nuclear medicine in treating bone metastases. It addresses limitations in imaging resolution, radiotracer availability, radiation safety, and the need for standardized protocols. The review concludes by emphasizing the need for further research and advancements in imaging technology, radiopharmaceutical development, and integration of nuclear medicine with other treatment modalities. In summary, advancements in nuclear medicine have significantly improved the diagnosis and management of osseous metastatic disease and future developements in the integration of innovative imaging modalities, targeted radiopharmaceuticals, radionuclide production, theranostic approaches, and advanced image analysis techniques hold great promise in improving patient outcomes and enhancing personalized care for individuals with bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Dyer
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Zhenghan Jing
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kathleen Duncan
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jacqueline Godbe
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Monica Shokeen
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khojasteh E, Dehdashti F, Shokeen M. Molecular imaging of bone metastasis. J Bone Oncol 2023; 40:100477. [PMID: 37193117 PMCID: PMC10182320 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in molecularly targeted modular designs for in vivo imaging applications has thrusted open possibilities of investigating deep molecular interactions non-invasively and dynamically. The shifting landscape of biomarker concentration and cellular interactions throughout pathological progression requires quick adaptation of imaging agents and detection modalities for accurate readouts. The synergy of state of art instrumentation with molecularly targeted molecules is resulting in more precise, accurate and reproducible data sets, which is facilitating investigation of several novel questions. Small molecules, peptides, antibodies and nanoparticles are some of the commonly used molecular targeting vectors that can be applied for imaging as well as therapy. The field of theranostics, which encompasses joint application of therapy and imaging, is successfully leveraging the multifunctional use of these biomolecules [[1], [2]]. Sensitive detection of cancerous lesions and accurate assessment of treatment response has been transformative for patient management. Particularly, since bone metastasis is one of the dominant causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, imaging can be hugely impactful in this patient population. The intent of this review is to highlight the utility of molecular positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in the context of prostate and breast bone metastatic cancer, and multiple myeloma. Furthermore, comparisons are drawn with traditionally utilized bone scans (skeletal scintigraphy). Both these modalities can be synergistic or complementary for assessing lytic- and blastic- bone lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Khojasteh
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Monica Shokeen
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Corresponding author at: Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Juzeniene A, Stenberg VY, Bruland ØS, Revheim ME, Larsen RH. Dual targeting with 224Ra/ 212Pb-conjugates for targeted alpha therapy of disseminated cancers: A conceptual approach. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 9:1051825. [PMID: 36733936 PMCID: PMC9887039 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1051825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastases are the primary cause of death among cancer patients and efficacious new treatments are sorely needed. Targeted alpha-emitting radiopharmaceuticals that are highly cytotoxic may fulfill this critical need. The focus of this paper is to describe and explore a novel technology that may improve the therapeutic effect of targeted alpha therapy by combining two radionuclides from the same decay chain in the same solution. We hypothesize that the dual targeting solution containing bone-seeking 224Ra and cell-directed complexes of progeny 212Pb is a promising approach to treat metastatic cancers with bone and soft tissue lesions as well as skeletal metastases of mixed lytic/osteoblastic nature. A novel liquid 224Ra/212Pb-generator for rapid preparation of a dual targeting solution is described. Cancer cell targeting monoclonal antibodies, their fragments, synthetic proteins or peptides can all be radiolabeled with 212Pb in the 224Ra-solution in transient equilibrium with daughter nuclides. Thus, 224Ra targets stromal elements in sclerotic bone metastases and 212Pb-chelated-conjugate targets tumor cells of metastatic prostate cancer or osteosarcoma. The dual targeting solution may also be explored to treat metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma after manipulation of bone metastases to a more osteoblastic phenotype by the use of bisphosphonates, denosumab, bortezomib or hormone therapy prior to treatment. This may improve targeting of bone-seeking 224Ra and render an augmented radiation dose deposited within metastases. Our preliminary preclinical studies provide conceptual evidence that the dual 224Ra-solution with bone or tumor-targeted delivery of 212Pb has potential to inhibit cancer metastases without significant toxicity. In some settings, the use of a booster dose of purified 212Pb-conjugate alone could be required to elevate the effect of this tumor cell directed component, if needed, e.g., in a fractionated treatment regimen, where the dual targeting solution will act as maintenance treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asta Juzeniene
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vilde Yuli Stenberg
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- ARTBIO AS, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Sverre Bruland
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu M, Huang W, Yang N, Liu Y. Learn from antibody–drug conjugates: consideration in the future construction of peptide-drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Exp Hematol Oncol 2022; 11:93. [DOI: 10.1186/s40164-022-00347-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractCancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide due to high heterogeneity. Although chemotherapy remains the mainstay of cancer therapy, non-selective toxicity and drug resistance of mono-chemotherapy incur broad criticisms. Subsequently, various combination strategies have been developed to improve clinical efficacy, also known as cocktail therapy. However, conventional “cocktail administration” is just passable, due to the potential toxicities to normal tissues and unsatisfactory synergistic effects, especially for the combined drugs with different pharmacokinetic properties. The drug conjugates through coupling the conventional chemotherapeutics to a carrier (such as antibody and peptide) provide an alternative strategy to improve therapeutic efficacy and simultaneously reduce the unspecific toxicities, by virtue of the advantages of highly specific targeting ability and potent killing effect. Although 14 antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved worldwide and more are being investigated in clinical trials so far, several limitations have been disclosed during clinical application. Compared with ADCs, peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) possess several advantages, including easy industrial synthesis, low cost, high tissue penetration and fast clearance. So far, only a handful of PDCs have been approved, highlighting tremendous development potential. Herein, we discuss the progress and pitfalls in the development of ADCs and underline what can learn from ADCs for the better construction of PDCs in the future.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mackay S, Hitefield NL, Oduor IO, Roberts AB, Burch TC, Lance RS, Cunningham TD, Troyer DA, Semmes OJ, Nyalwidhe JO. Site-Specific Intact N-Linked Glycopeptide Characterization of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen from Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells. ACS OMEGA 2022; 7:29714-29727. [PMID: 36061737 PMCID: PMC9435049 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The composition of N-linked glycans that are conjugated to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and their functional significance in prostate cancer progression have not been fully characterized. PSMA was isolated from two metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP and MDAPCa2b, which have different tissue tropism and localization. Isolated PSMA was trypsin-digested, and intact glycopeptides were subjected to LC-HCD-EThcD-MS/MS analysis on a Tribrid Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. Differential qualitative and quantitative analysis of site-specific N-glycopeptides was performed using Byonic and Byologic software. Comparative quantitative analysis demonstrates that multiple glycopeptides at asparagine residues 51, 76, 121, 195, 336, 459, 476, and 638 were in significantly different abundance in the two cell lines (p < 0.05). Biochemical analysis using endoglycosidase treatment and lectin capture confirm the MS and site occupancy data. The data demonstrate the effectiveness of the strategy for comprehensive analysis of PSMA glycopeptides. This approach will form the basis of ongoing experiments to identify site-specific glycan changes in PSMA isolated from disease-stratified clinical samples to uncover targets that may be associated with disease progression and metastatic phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Mackay
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516, United States
| | - Naomi L. Hitefield
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- University
of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United
States
| | - Ian O. Oduor
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| | - Autumn B. Roberts
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| | - Tanya C. Burch
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| | - Raymond S. Lance
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Spokane
Urology, Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
| | - Tina D. Cunningham
- School of
Health Professions, Eastern Virginia Medical
School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| | - Dean A. Troyer
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| | - Oliver J. Semmes
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| | - Julius O. Nyalwidhe
- Leroy
T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
- Department
of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feng Y, Meshaw R, McDougald D, Zhou Z, Zhao XG, Jannetti SA, Reiman RE, Pippen E, Marjoram R, Schaal JL, Vaidyanathan G, Zalutsky MR. Evaluation of an 131I-labeled HER2-specific single domain antibody fragment for the radiopharmaceutical therapy of HER2-expressing cancers. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3020. [PMID: 35194100 PMCID: PMC8864007 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07006-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is an attractive strategy for treatment of disseminated cancers including those overexpressing the HER2 receptor including breast, ovarian and gastroesophageal carcinomas. Single-domain antibody fragments (sdAbs) exemplified by the HER2-targeted VHH_1028 evaluated herein are attractive for RPT because they rapidly accumulate in tumor and clear faster from normal tissues than intact antibodies. In this study, VHH_1028 was labeled using the residualizing prosthetic agent N-succinimidyl 3-guanidinomethyl 5-[131I]iodobenzoate (iso-[131I]SGMIB) and its tissue distribution evaluated in the HER2-expressing SKOV-3 ovarian and BT474 breast carcinoma xenograft models. In head-to-head comparisons to [131I]SGMIB-2Rs15d, a HER2-targeted radiopharmaceutical currently under clinical investigation, iso-[131I]SGMIB-VHH_1028 exhibited significantly higher tumor uptake and significantly lower kidney accumulation. The results demonstrated 2.9 and 6.3 times more favorable tumor-to-kidney radiation dose ratios in the SKOV-3 and BT474 xenograft models, respectively. Iso-[131I]SGMIB-VHH_1028 was prepared using a solid-phase extraction method for purification of the prosthetic agent intermediate Boc2-iso-[131I]SGMIB that reproducibly scaled to therapeutic-level doses and obviated the need for its HPLC purification. Single-dose (SKOV-3) and multiple-dose (BT474) treatment regimens demonstrated that iso-[131I]SGMIB-VHH_1028 was well tolerated and provided significant tumor growth delay and survival prolongation. This study suggests that iso-[131I]SGMIB-VHH_1028 is a promising candidate for RPT of HER2-expressing cancers and further development is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutian Feng
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rebecca Meshaw
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Darryl McDougald
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Cereius Inc, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zhengyuan Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Xiao-Guang Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stephen A Jannetti
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert E Reiman
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael R Zalutsky
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barca C, Griessinger CM, Faust A, Depke D, Essler M, Windhorst AD, Devoogdt N, Brindle KM, Schäfers M, Zinnhardt B, Jacobs AH. Expanding Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 15:13. [PMID: 35056071 PMCID: PMC8780589 DOI: 10.3390/ph15010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioligand theranostics (RT) in oncology use cancer-type specific biomarkers and molecular imaging (MI), including positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and planar scintigraphy, for patient diagnosis, therapy, and personalized management. While the definition of theranostics was initially restricted to a single compound allowing visualization and therapy simultaneously, the concept has been widened with the development of theranostic pairs and the combination of nuclear medicine with different types of cancer therapies. Here, we review the clinical applications of different theranostic radiopharmaceuticals in managing different tumor types (differentiated thyroid, neuroendocrine prostate, and breast cancer) that support the combination of innovative oncological therapies such as gene and cell-based therapies with RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Barca
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (A.F.); (D.D.); (M.S.); (B.Z.)
| | - Christoph M. Griessinger
- Roche Innovation Center, Early Clinical Development Oncology, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Andreas Faust
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (A.F.); (D.D.); (M.S.); (B.Z.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Dominic Depke
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (A.F.); (D.D.); (M.S.); (B.Z.)
| | - Markus Essler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Albert D. Windhorst
- Department Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Nick Devoogdt
- In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussel, Belgium;
| | - Kevin M. Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK;
| | - Michael Schäfers
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (A.F.); (D.D.); (M.S.); (B.Z.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Bastian Zinnhardt
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (A.F.); (D.D.); (M.S.); (B.Z.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
- Biomarkers and Translational Technologies, Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreas H. Jacobs
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (A.F.); (D.D.); (M.S.); (B.Z.)
- Department of Geriatrics and Neurology, Johanniter Hospital, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
- Centre of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|