Factors modulating effective chest compressions in the neonatal period

Development of a diagnostic feedback device to assess neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation chest compression performance

Neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (NCPR) is an important intervention to save the lives of newborns who suffer from cardiac and respiratory arrest. Despite its importance there is a dearth of NCPR research and no commercially available feedback device suitable for use during NCPR. The aim of this study is to develop a diagnostic feedback device in the form of a patch placed on the infant's chest. The diagnostic feedback patch measures both the compression depth and force during NCPR, while giving audio-visual feedback according to current NCPR guidelines. The patch was systematically evaluated by conducting a series of hardware validation tests to assess the depth, force and feedback performance. The average errors in the depth and force were found to be 10.8% and 12.4%, respectively, with maximal errors below 20.7% and 24.1%. These results along with positive outcome of the feedback test suggest that the device is reliable on a hardware level and is suitable for further evaluation in a clinical setting.

Evaluating the influence of ventilation and ventilation-compression synchronization on chest compression force and depth during simulated neonatal resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the influence of ventilation and ventilation-compression synchronization on compression force and sternal displacement during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (NCPR) on an infant manikin.

METHODS

Five Neonatal Resuscitation Program trained clinicians were recruited to perform simulated NCPR on an infant manikin using two-finger (TF) and two-thumb (TT) compression, with synchronous and asynchronous ventilation, as well as without ventilation. The sternal displacement and force were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Synchronous ventilation and compression yielded sternal displacements and forces in the range of 22.8-32.4 mm and 15.0-29.8 N, respectively, while asynchronous ventilation and compression produced depths and forces in the range of 21.2-32.4 mm and 14.0-28.8 N, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilation exerts a significant influence on sternal displacement and force during simulated NCPR, regardless of the compression method used. Ventilation-compression synchronization, however, is only significant during TF compression with lower compression forces measured during synchronous ventilation than in asynchronous ventilation. This occurs for two reasons: (i) the strong influence of ventilation forces on the lower magnitude compression forces produced during TF compression relative to TT compression and (ii) in asynchronous ventilation, compression and ventilation may occur simultaneously, with inflation and deflation providing an opposing force to the applied compression force.

A review of approaches to optimise chest compressions in the resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns

OBJECTIVE

Provision of chest compressions (CCs) and/or medications in the delivery room is associated with poor outcomes. Based on the physiology of perinatal asphyxia, we aimed to provide an overview of current recommendations and explore potential determinants of effective neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): balancing ventilations and CC, CC rate, depth, full chest recoil, CC technique and adrenaline.

DESIGN

A search in the databases MEDLINE (Ovid) and EMBASE until 10 April 2015.

SETTING

Delivery room.

PATIENTS

Asphyxiated newborn infants.

INTERVENTIONS

CCs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Haemodynamics, recovery and survival.

RESULTS

Current evidence is derived from mathematical models, manikin and animal studies, and small case series. No randomised clinical trials examining neonatal CC have been performed. There is no evidence to refute a CC to ventilation (C:V) ratio of 3:1. Raising the intrathoracic pressure, for example, by superimposing a sustained inflation on uninterrupted CC, and a CC rate >120/min may be beneficial. The optimal neonatal CC depth is unknown, but factors influencing depth and consistency include the C:V ratio. Incomplete chest wall recoil can cause less negative intrathoracic pressure between CC and reduced CPR effectiveness. CC should be performed with the two-thumb method over the lower third of the sternum. The optimal dose, route and timing of adrenaline administration remain to be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful CPR requires the delivery of high-quality CC, encompassing optimal (A) C:V ratio (B) rate, (C) depth, (D) chest recoil between CC, (E) technique and (F) adrenaline dosage. More animal studies with high translational value and randomised clinical trials are needed.