Protecting the brain of the micropreemie

Lateral kangaroo position for thermal stability of extremely preterm: Non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Kangaroo care (KC) is an evidence-based best practice that can prevent major health complications in preterm infants. However, there is a lack of evidence on the feasibility and safety of placing extremely preterm infants under 28 weeks gestational age in KC position.

AIM

To compare thermal stability 60 min after the first KC session in the lateral versus prone position in extremely preterm infants under 28 weeks gestational age.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a single-centre, randomized, non-inferiority, parallel clinical trial. The patients were extremely preterm infants during their first 5 days of life. Infants in the intervention group received KC in the lateral position while those in the control group received KC in the prone position. All infants receiving KC were inside their polyethylene bags but maintained skin-to-skin contact. The primary outcome was the axillary temperature of the infants, and the secondary outcome was the development of intraventricular haemorrhage.

RESULTS

Seventy infants were randomized (35 per group). The mean gestational age was 26 +1(1+1) in both groups. In the first KC session, the infant temperature at 60 minutes was 36.79°C (0.43) in lateral KC position, and 36.78°C (0.38) in prone KC position (p = .022). In lateral KC position, 7.69% (2) of the children who, according to the cranial ultrasound performed before the first session, had no haemorrhage presented with intraventricular haemorrhage after the first session. In prone KC position, new haemorrhages appeared after the first session in 29.17% (7) (p = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral KC position is an alternative to the conventional prone KC position and maintains normothermia in infants under 28 weeks gestational age.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Extremely preterm infants are candidates for KC. Lateral KC position is an evidence-based best practice that can be applied to preterm infants under 28 weeks GA. This evidence is particularly useful in performing umbilical catheterization on these patients.

Application of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Framework to the NICU

BACKGROUND

Infants and families requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) care often experience significant stress and trauma during the earliest period of the infant's life, leading to increased risks for poorer infant and family outcomes. There is a need for frameworks to guide clinical care and research that account for the complex interactions of generational stress, pain, toxic stress, parental separation, and lifelong health and developmental outcomes for infants and families.

PURPOSE

Apply the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) framework in the context of the NICU as a usable structure to guide clinical practice and research focused on infant neurodevelopment outcomes and parental attachment.

METHODS

An overview of ACEs is provided along with a detailed discussion of risk at each level of the ACEs pyramid in the context of the NICU. Supportive and protective factors to help mitigate the risk of the ACEs in the NICU are detailed.

RESULTS

NICU hospitalization may be considered the first ACE, or potentially an additional ACE, resulting in an increased risk for poorer health outcomes. The promotion of safe, stable, and nurturing relationships and implementation of trauma-informed care and individualized developmental care potentially counter the negative impacts of stress in the NICU.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Nurses can help balance the negative and positive stimulation of the NICU through activities such as facilitated tucking, skin-to-skin care, mother's milk, and active participation of parents in infant care. Future research can consider using the ACEs framework to explain cumulative risk for adverse health and well-being in the context of NICU care.