Peripheral sterile corneal infiltrate in two brothers after photorefractive keratectomy

Wessely corneal ring phenomenon: An unsolved pathophysiological dilemma

The cornea is a densely innervated, avascular tissue showing exceptional inflammatory and immune responses. The cornea is a site of lymphangiogenic and angiogenic privilege devoid of blood and lymphatic vessels that limits the entry of inflammatory cells from the adjacent and highly immunoreactive conjunctiva. Immunological and anatomical differences between the central and peripheral cornea are also necessary to sustain passive immune privilege. The lower density of antigen-presenting cells in the central cornea and the 5:1 peripheral-to-central corneal ratio of C1 are 2 main features conferring passive immune privilege. C1 activates the complement system by antigen-antibody complexes more effectively in the peripheral cornea and, thus, protects the central corneas' transparency from immune-driven and inflammatory reactions. Wessely rings, also known as corneal immune rings, are non-infectious ring-shaped stromal infiltrates usually formed in the peripheral cornea. They result from a hypersensitivity reaction to foreign antigens, including those of microorganism origin. Thus, they are thought to be composed of inflammatory cells and antigen-antibody complexes. Corneal immune rings have been associated with various infectious and non-infectious causes, including foreign bodies, contact lens wear, refractive procedures, and drugs. We describe the anatomical and immunologic basis underlying Wessely ring formation, its causes, clinical presentation, and management.

Visual outcomes of sterile corneal infiltrates after photorefractive keratectomy

Purpose:

Sterile infiltrates following laser refractive surgery is an uncommon complication. This study was undertaken to analyze the visual outcomes of sterile infiltrates following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods:

This retrospective study included 14 eyes that developed sterile infiltrates following PRK out of a total of 6280 eyes that underwent PRK between 2014 and 2017. Medical records of these patients, including patient demographics, characteristics of the infiltrate, presenting visual acuity, and treatment outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results:

The incidence of sterile corneal infiltrates post-PRK in our study was 0.22% (14/6280). The mean age of the patients was 27.42 ± 4.87 years. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at presentation was 0.49 ± 0.13 log MAR units. The mean size of the infiltrate was 3.22 ± 2.85 mm². All cases were successfully managed medically with topical steroids. The mean UCVA and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last follow-up visit were 0.08 ± 0.08 and 0.05 ± 0.07 log MAR units, respectively. The mean time taken for resolution of the infiltrate was 8.91 ± 4.57 days.

Conclusion:

Sterile infiltrates following PRK can be effectively treated with aggressive topical steroids. The outcome is generally favorable and does not require surgical intervention if treatment is instituted early.

Hypersensitivity reactions after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction: a case report of corneal infiltrates

BACKGROUND

Femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery is generally considered safe and effective; however, this procedure is rarely associated with severe allergic reactions. We reported a rare case of hypersensitivity reactions which caused bilateral peripheral corneal infiltrates after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule (SMILE) surgery in a man with a history of fruits allergy.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we report the case of a young man who developed white, ring-shaped bilateral peripheral infiltrates that appeared 1 day after an uneventful SMILE surgery. The overlying corneal epithelium was intact; the infiltrate was negative for bacterial culture, but high titers of immunoglobulin E was demonstrated in the blood. Symptomatically, a clinical diagnosis of sterile corneal infiltrates was made, and the patient was treated with topical and systemic steroids. The infiltrates were immunogenic in origin, which may be caused by the contact lenses used for suction duration in surgery. It resolved without corneal scarring in the subsequent months following steroid treatment. The patient's visual acuity improved.

CONCLUSIONS

When patients with a history of allergy who aim to perform corneal refractive surgery, surgeons must consider possible hypersensitivity reactions after treatment. More studies are needed to clarify the relationship between contact glass used in femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery and IgE mediated hypersensitivity reactions.