Pain and pain management in hospitalized patients before and after an intervention

Surgical Patients' Evaluation of Pain Management Quality and Surgical Nurses' Pain-Related Knowledge and Attitudes

PURPOSE

The present study was aimed at investigating the quality of pain management evaluated by inpatients in surgical clinics, and pain-related knowledge and attitudes of nurses working in surgical clinics, surgical units, or emergency services.

METHODS

The study was conducted as a descriptive and cross-sectional study. The study data were collected from inpatients in surgical clinics (N = 306), and from nurses working in surgical clinics, surgical units, or emergency services (N = 57) between January 2020 and September 2020. The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) and Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (NKASRP) were the tools used for data collection.

RESULTS

The mean scores the participants obtained from the severity of worst pain, pain relief, and satisfaction with pain treatment components of the APS-POQ-R were 6.14 ± 2.59, 59.28 ± 22.26, and 8.99 ± 1.62, respectively. There were significant differences between many components of the APS-POQ-R in terms of such variables as age, sex, undergoing previous surgery, presence of pain before surgery, surgery performed, and type of anesthesia (p < .05). The mean score the participants obtained from the NKASRP was 15.35 ± 3.87.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that the patients' pain was relieved moderately, that they were very highly satisfied with pain treatment, and that the nurses' pain-related knowledge and attitude levels were below the moderate level.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Nurses should support patients whose in-bed activities were prevented due to pain, involve them in pain treatment decisions, advise them about pain treatment options, and encourage them to use nonpharmacological methods.

Knowledge translation strategies to support the sustainability of evidence-based interventions in healthcare: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Knowledge translation (KT) strategies are widely used to facilitate the implementation of EBIs into healthcare practices. However, it is unknown what and how KT strategies are used to facilitate the sustainability of EBIs in institutional healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aimed to consolidate the current evidence on (i) what and how KT strategies are being used for the sustainability of EBIs in institutional healthcare settings; (ii) the reported KT strategy outcomes (e.g., acceptability) for EBI sustainability, and (iii) the reported EBI sustainability outcomes (e.g., EBI activities or component of the intervention continue).

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of five electronic databases. We included studies describing the use of specific KT strategies to facilitate the sustainability of EBIs (more than 1-year post-implementation). We coded KT strategies using the clustered ERIC taxonomy and AIMD framework, we coded KT strategy outcomes using Tierney et al.'s measures, and EBI sustainability outcomes using Scheirer and Dearing's and Lennox's taxonomy. We conducted descriptive numerical summaries and a narrative synthesis to analyze the results.

RESULTS

The search identified 3776 studies for review. Following the screening, 25 studies (reported in 27 papers due to two companion reports) met the final inclusion criteria. Most studies used multi-component KT strategies for EBI sustainability (n = 24). The most common ERIC KT strategy clusters were to train and educate stakeholders (n = 38) and develop stakeholder interrelationships (n = 34). Education was the most widely used KT strategy (n = 17). Many studies (n = 11) did not clearly report whether they used different or the same KT strategies between EBI implementation and sustainability. Seven studies adapted KT strategies from implementation to sustainability efforts. Only two studies reported using a new KT strategy for EBI sustainability. The most reported KT strategy outcomes were acceptability (n = 10), sustainability (n = 5); and adoption (n = 4). The most commonly measured EBI sustainability outcome was the continuation of EBI activities or components (n = 23), followed by continued benefits for patients, staff, and stakeholders (n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review provides insight into a conceptual problem where initial EBI implementation and sustainability are considered as two discrete time periods. Our findings show we need to consider EBI implementation and sustainability as a continuum and design and select KT strategies with this in mind. Our review has emphasized areas that require further research (e.g., KT strategy adaptation for EBI sustainability). To advance understanding of how to employ KT strategies for EBI sustainability, we recommend clearly reporting the dose, frequency, adaptations, fidelity, and cost of KT strategies. Advancing our understanding in this area would facilitate better design, selection, tailored, and adapted use of KT strategies for EBI sustainability, thereby contributing to improved patient, provider, and health system outcomes.

Do we really know if they are in pain? A cross-sectional study in hospitalised adult patients in Spain

AIMS

To describe the prevalence and characteristics of pain in adult hospitalised patients, as well as to analyse the concordance between patient-reported and recorded pain and its impact on analgesic management.

DESIGN

A cross sectional study.

METHODS

The study was performed on a sample of 611 patients, from October to December 2017. Data were obtained from patient interviews, review of medical and nursing records and review of electronic prescribing.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pain at the time of the interview was 36.7%. The median VAS score was 4. 90% of the patients had their pain assessed within the last 24 h; however, concordance between patient-reported pain and recorded pain in the nursing record was slight.

CONCLUSION

Pain is still often documented inadequately. Despite the wide use of analgesics, half of the patients with moderate to severe pain do not have adequate pain management. A systematic assessment and recording of pain promotes appropriate analgesic prescription.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

The findings of our study provide insight into the main gaps in the correct management of pain in hospitalised patients. A systematic assessment and recording of the pain suffered by the patient facilitates its control and allows a better management of the analgesic prescription by the physician. This information could help hospital managers to develop training programmes on pain assessment and on the importance of doctor-nurse collaboration to improve pain management, increasing the quality of care and reducing hospital costs.

REPORTING METHOD

The study has adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines, according to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Documentation for Assessing Pain in Postoperative Pain Management Pre- and Post-intervention

PURPOSE

Although Norwegian law requires the documentation of patients' care processes, including pain assessment, research has shown that the quality of postoperative documentation for assessing pain does not meet an acceptable standard and requires improvement. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an educational intervention can increase nurses' documentation of postoperative pain assessments, alter patients' opioid consumption, and ensure that patients have at least one documented Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≤3 at rest before being discharged. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the nurses' education and experience influenced their pain assessments.

DESIGN

An observational study with a pre-post intervention.

METHODS

The study following a pre-post design involved documenting pain assessments of 304 patients undergoing cancer surgeries in a postoperative unit at the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital. In an educational intervention, two 45-minutes teaching sessions within two weeks, addressed validated pain assessment tools and the documentation of pain assessment. Descriptive frequency analysis and partial correlation with Pearson's r - value were used, with P < .05 indicating significance.

FINDINGS

Postintervention, pain assessments in general increased significantly from a mean of two times per patient to three times. Overall, the use of assessment tool Critical -Care Pain Observation Tool increased from 6.1% to 25.8%, opioid consumption increased in mean from 3.34 to 4.79 in milligram and the documentation at discharge increased from 81.4% to 91.4%. The documentation of nurses with more than 10 years' experience in the unit especially improved from 17.5% to 31.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational intervention and reminders about basic systematic pain assessment and the evaluation of pain measures improved nurses' documentation of postoperative pain management and documentation at discharge. The findings underscore the importance of regularly ensuring the quality of patients' treatment by systematically documenting nurses' clinical tasks and the outcome of patients' care.

How Hospital Patients Experience Pain the Previous 24 Hours-A Prevalence Assessment of Pain in Five Hospitals in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Previous studies show that pain is common among hospital inpatients.

AIM

This study measures the prevalence of pain and the impact of pain on sleep in patients admitted to five hospitals in Sweden.

METHODS

The patients were admitted to a surgical or a medical ward. They answered on a self-reported questionnaire about their average pain intensity and how much their pain interfered with their sleep the previous 24 hours, on a 010 numerical rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

Of the 500 patients, 308 experienced pain (62%), (NRS ≥ 3) and 111 (22%) rated their pain as NRS ≥ 7. We found no difference between surgical and medical specialty regarding pain prevalence. The results suggest that roughly the same proportion of patients with pain also experienced poor sleep due to pain265 patients (53%) reported pain interference on sleep, NRS ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study shows that there is still an unacceptable high pain prevalence in inpatients and that patients experience pain as negatively impacting their sleep. Future pain care is likely to include a more comprehensive implementation strategy for the dissemination of knowledge, especially related to the complex context of today's healthcare system. That is, the possibility that anchoring new knowledge also benefits the patient is probably associated with optimization of the structural context. Future research should take this question further by examining how the organizational structure should be optimized for the dissemination of knowledge in healthcare professionals about pain and pain interference with sleep.

Pain Management Program in Cardiology: A Template for Application of Normalization Process Theory and Social Marketing to Implement a Change in Practice Quality Improvement

Quality improvement plays a major role in healthcare, and numerous approaches have been developed to implement changes. However, the reasons for success or failure of the methods applied often remains obscure. Normalization process theory, recently developed in sociology, provides a flexible framework upon which to construct quality improvement. We sought to determine if examination of a successful quality improvement project, using normalization process theory and social marketing, provided insight into implementation. We performed a retrospective analysis of the steps taken to implement a pain management program in an electrophysiology clinic. We mapped these steps, and the corresponding social marketing tools used, to elements of normalization process theory. The combination of mapping implementation steps and marketing approaches to the theory provided insight into the quality-improvement process. Specifically, examination of the steps in the context of normalization process theory highlighted barriers to implementation at individual, group, and organizational levels. Importantly, the mapping also highlighted how facilitators were able to overcome the barriers with marketing techniques. Furthermore, integration with social marketing revealed how promotion of tangibility of benefits aided communication and how process co-creation between stakeholders enhanced value. Our implementation of a pain-management program was successful in a challenging environment composed of several stakeholder groups with entrenched initial positions. Therefore, we propose that the behavior change elements of normalization process theory combined with social marketing provide a flexible framework to initiate quality improvement.

The pain in the Emergency Department: Choosing and treating wisely before and during the COVID-19 era

Pain is a frequent reason for referral to the Emergency Department (ED). Adequate management of pain is a moral and ethical imperative. If not correctly treated, acute pain can cause physical and psychological complications, and become chronic with severe consequences such as anxiety, depression, and social isolation. As consequence, emergency clinicians should treat pain as soon as possible, avoiding delays even in case of acute abdominal pain. Pain management is particularly complex in the elderly and emergency clinicians should always consider AGS Beers criteria ® to avoid inappropriate medications, severe side-effects, and drug-drug interactions. Pain is also a common cause of delirium in older patients. The SARS CoV-2 infection not only can cause acute pain, but also exacerbate chronic pain, particularly in the elderly, who are at high risk to be infected. Looking at all this evidence, emergency clinicians should treat pain with different strategies according to their experience and cultural background, making the right choice for each patient. This work is a critical review of the pain management in the ED, with a particular attention on the effects of COVID-19 in the EDs. We conducted a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Medline from 2000 to 2020, using the keywords of “pain”, “emergency”, “COVID19”, “elderly”, “palliative care”, “ketamine”, “dexmedetomidine”, and “post-traumatic stress disorder”. The aim of this review is to help emergency clinicians to correctly manage pain in the ED with a new point of view regarding the pain management in COVID-19 patients.

Pain control and related factors in hospitalized patients

Pain is a common health problem for hospitalized patients. It is necessary to understand the factors that affect patients' pain to provide individual and complete pain management. This study explored the severity and incidence of pain in hospitalized patients on the admission day, during the hospitalization, and the discharge day, and explored the predictive factors that affect the patient's pain on the discharge day.This was a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records of 73,814 hospitalized patients from January 2016 to April 2018. The number of pain assessments was 471,339.The incidence of pain on the discharge day of patients was significantly higher than that on the admission day. The factors that affect and predict the pain of patients on discharge day include the degree of pain on the day of admission, emotional distress on the day of discharge, disease category, gender, age, and length of stay in hospital. It shows that the higher the degree of pain on the day of admission, the higher the degree of emotional distress on the day of discharge, female patients, younger patients, longer hospitalization days, and surgical and gynecological patients have significantly higher pain levels on the day of discharge (P < .05).This study found that the incidence of pain on the discharge day of patients was 46.5%. Previous pain level, disease category, emotional distress, gender, age, and length of hospital stay were important factors affecting patient pain on the discharge day. The influencing factors of patient pain should be fully assessed to provide individual and complete pain management, and improve patient quality of life after discharge.

Educational interventions to improve medical students’ knowledge of acute pain management: a randomized study

It has been consistently documented that the treatment of acute pain is inadequate. Education of medical students is an obvious strategy to improve this. We therefore conducted a study in which 217 medical students were randomized into one of three groups: a control group (no intervention) and two intervention groups (education with e-learning alone or e-learning combined with simulation-based training). We hypothesized that the combined intervention would be superior to no intervention and e-learning alone. All students completed the same multiple choice questionnaire twice with an interval of approximately 1 week. During this 1-week interval, students in the two intervention groups completed either an 45-min interactive case-based e-learning program, or the e-learning program and a simulation-based training. We showed that the theoretical knowledge about treatment of acute pain increased in both intervention groups but students who received the combined intervention felt more confident in the future handling of patients.

Implementation and maintenance of a pain management quality assurance program at intensive care units: 360 degree feedback of physicians, nurses and patients

Background

Pain management quality assurance programs (PMQP) have been successfully implemented in numerous hospitals across Europe. We aimed to evaluate the medium-term sustainability of a PMQP implemented at intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods

Two surveys, the first in 2012, immediately after introduction of the PMQP, and the second in 2015, were carried out amongst patients, physicians and nurses. Demographic parameters of all participants were assessed. Patients were asked after their pain levels during ICU stay. Staff members answered a questionnaire regarding familiarity with standards and processes of PMQP and self-perception of their knowledge as well as contentment with interdisciplinary communication.

Results

In total (2012/2015), 267 (125/142) patients, 113 (65/48) physicians and 510 (264/246) members of the nursing staff participated. Minimum and maximum pain levels of patients did not differ between both surveys. Patients’ tolerance of pain 24 hours before the survey was better (p = 0.023), and vomiting occurred less often (p = 0.037) in 2015. Physicians’ and nurses’ contentment with the own knowledge about pharmacological pain treatment had increased from 2012 to 2015 (p = 0.002 and 0.004). Satisfaction with communication between nurses and physicians was better in 2015 (p<0.001 and p = 0.002). Familiarity with PMQP standards and processes remained stable in both collectives.

Conclusion

The implementation of our PMQP achieved a high standard of care, guarantying a high patient and staff member satisfaction. Continuous education, ongoing training, regular updates and implementation of feedback-loops ensure continuity, in some parameters even an increase in knowledge and competencies. This is mirrored in high patient and staff member satisfaction.

Educational Intervention Effect on Pain Management Quality in Emergency Department; a Clinical Audit

Introduction

Pain is a frequent complaint of patients who are referred to the emergency department (ED), which is ignored or mismanaged and, almost always, approached in terms of determining the cause of pain instead of pain management. Pain management is a challenging issue in the ED.

Objective

This study was conducted to determine the effect of emergency resident's education about pain assessment and pain-relief drugs in the improvement in pain management.

Method

A clinical audit was carried out during the year 2015 in the ED of Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran. All patients over 16-year-old who had been complaining of pain or another complaint that included pain were eligible. Data were collected using a preformed checklist. One senior emergency medicine resident was responsible for filling the checklist. In the first phase, patients were enrolled into the study and were divided into two groups according to whether they had or did not have a pain management order. In the second phase, the first- and second-year emergency medicine residents were trained during the various classes that they were required to attend, through a workshop conducted by experienced professors, and based on existing valid guidelines. In the third phase, patients were enrolled into the study, and the same checklists were completed.

Results

A total of 803 patients (401 before training and 402 after) were assessed. The mean age of the patients before and after training of the residents was 59.19 ± 44.45 and 40.24 ± 19.40 years, respectively. The demographic characteristics of patients were not significantly different before and after the training period (p > 0.05). The most common cause of pain was soft tissue injury, both before (36.3%) and after training (34.3%). The most frequent drug that was administered for pain control was morphine, both before (62.5%) and after (41.4%) training. Although the number of patients with moderate pain intensity was higher during the after-training period, pain control quality was described to be better in this group and success rate of pain control was significantly increased after training (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Findings from the present study showed that there was a significant deficiency in pain management of the admitted patients, and the most common reason for this was the physician's fear of the drug's side effects. However, significant progress was seen after the training regarding pain management process in ED.

Effectiveness of the Concurrent Intravenous Injection of Dexamethasone and Metoclopramide for Pain Management in Patients with Primary Headaches Presenting to Emergency Department

Introduction:

Headache is a common reason for visiting emergency departments, and pain control is a major therapeutic goal in patients with headaches.

Objective:

The present study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the concurrent intravenous administration of dexamethasone and metoclopramide in pain control in patients presenting to emergency departments with complaints of primary headache.

Methods:

This quasi-experimental study examined patients with moderate to severe headache attacks presenting to emergency departments. An 8-mg dose of dexamethasone and a 10-mg dose of metoclopramide were intravenously administered to the patients. The degree of headache was measured and recorded using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) upon admission and one hour and two hours after the injection.

Results:

A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 38.3±10.5 years participated in the study. The patients’ mean pain score was 8.4±1.3 upon admission and reduced to 6.2±2.3 one hour after the administration of the medication and to 3.1±2.9 two hours after the administration, suggesting significant reductions on both occasions (P<0.05). The therapeutic success was 39.2% one hour after the administration of the medication and 84.3% two hours after the administration.

Conclusion:

Based on these findings, the concurrent administration of dexamethasone and metoclopramide appears to affect the control of headache intensity in patients with primary headaches presenting to emergency departments.