1
|
He S, Sillah M, Cole AR, Uboveja A, Aird KM, Chen YC, Gong YN. D-MAINS: A Deep-Learning Model for the Label-Free Detection of Mitosis, Apoptosis, Interphase, Necrosis, and Senescence in Cancer Cells. Cells 2024; 13:1004. [PMID: 38920634 PMCID: PMC11205186 DOI: 10.3390/cells13121004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying cells engaged in fundamental cellular processes, such as proliferation or living/death statuses, is pivotal across numerous research fields. However, prevailing methods relying on molecular biomarkers are constrained by high costs, limited specificity, protracted sample preparation, and reliance on fluorescence imaging. METHODS Based on cellular morphology in phase contrast images, we developed a deep-learning model named Detector of Mitosis, Apoptosis, Interphase, Necrosis, and Senescence (D-MAINS). RESULTS D-MAINS utilizes machine learning and image processing techniques, enabling swift and label-free categorization of cell death, division, and senescence at a single-cell resolution. Impressively, D-MAINS achieved an accuracy of 96.4 ± 0.5% and was validated with established molecular biomarkers. D-MAINS underwent rigorous testing under varied conditions not initially present in the training dataset. It demonstrated proficiency across diverse scenarios, encompassing additional cell lines, drug treatments, and distinct microscopes with different objective lenses and magnifications, affirming the robustness and adaptability of D-MAINS across multiple experimental setups. CONCLUSIONS D-MAINS is an example showcasing the feasibility of a low-cost, rapid, and label-free methodology for distinguishing various cellular states. Its versatility makes it a promising tool applicable across a broad spectrum of biomedical research contexts, particularly in cell death and oncology studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah He
- Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA;
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
| | - Muhammed Sillah
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Aidan R. Cole
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Apoorva Uboveja
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Katherine M. Aird
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Yu-Chih Chen
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
- CMU-Pitt Ph.D. Program in Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Yi-Nan Gong
- Hillman Cancer Center, UPMC, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (M.S.); (A.U.)
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3420 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sinha K, Ghosh N, Sil PC. A Review on the Recent Applications of Deep Learning in Predictive Drug Toxicological Studies. Chem Res Toxicol 2023; 36:1174-1205. [PMID: 37561655 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Drug toxicity prediction is an important step in ensuring patient safety during drug design studies. While traditional preclinical studies have historically relied on animal models to evaluate toxicity, recent advances in deep-learning approaches have shown great promise in advancing drug safety science and reducing animal use in preclinical studies. However, deep-learning-based approaches also face challenges in handling large biological data sets, model interpretability, and regulatory acceptance. In this review, we provide an overview of recent developments in deep-learning-based approaches for predicting drug toxicity, highlighting their potential advantages over traditional methods and the need to address their limitations. Deep-learning models have demonstrated excellent performance in predicting toxicity outcomes from various data sources such as chemical structures, genomic data, and high-throughput screening assays. The potential of deep learning for automated feature engineering is also discussed. This review emphasizes the need to address ethical concerns related to the use of deep learning in drug toxicity studies, including the reduction of animal use and ensuring regulatory acceptance. Furthermore, emerging applications of deep learning in drug toxicity prediction, such as predicting drug-drug interactions and toxicity in rare subpopulations, are highlighted. The integration of deep-learning-based approaches with traditional methods is discussed as a way to develop more reliable and efficient predictive models for drug safety assessment, paving the way for safer and more effective drug discovery and development. Overall, this review highlights the critical role of deep learning in predictive toxicology and drug safety evaluation, emphasizing the need for continued research and development in this rapidly evolving field. By addressing the limitations of traditional methods, leveraging the potential of deep learning for automated feature engineering, and addressing ethical concerns, deep-learning-based approaches have the potential to revolutionize drug toxicity prediction and improve patient safety in drug discovery and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnendu Sinha
- Department of Zoology, Jhargram Raj College, Jhargram 721507, West Bengal, India
| | - Nabanita Ghosh
- Department of Zoology, Maulana Azad College, Kolkata 700013, West Bengal, India
| | - Parames C Sil
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, Kolkata 700054, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pognan F, Beilmann M, Boonen HCM, Czich A, Dear G, Hewitt P, Mow T, Oinonen T, Roth A, Steger-Hartmann T, Valentin JP, Van Goethem F, Weaver RJ, Newham P. The evolving role of investigative toxicology in the pharmaceutical industry. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2023; 22:317-335. [PMID: 36781957 PMCID: PMC9924869 DOI: 10.1038/s41573-022-00633-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
For decades, preclinical toxicology was essentially a descriptive discipline in which treatment-related effects were carefully reported and used as a basis to calculate safety margins for drug candidates. In recent years, however, technological advances have increasingly enabled researchers to gain insights into toxicity mechanisms, supporting greater understanding of species relevance and translatability to humans, prediction of safety events, mitigation of side effects and development of safety biomarkers. Consequently, investigative (or mechanistic) toxicology has been gaining momentum and is now a key capability in the pharmaceutical industry. Here, we provide an overview of the current status of the field using case studies and discuss the potential impact of ongoing technological developments, based on a survey of investigative toxicologists from 14 European-based medium-sized to large pharmaceutical companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Pognan
- Discovery and Investigative Safety, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Mario Beilmann
- Nonclinical Drug Safety Germany, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany
| | - Harrie C M Boonen
- Drug Safety, Dept of Exploratory Toxicology, Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark
| | | | - Gordon Dear
- In Vitro In Vivo Translation, GlaxoSmithKline David Jack Centre for Research, Ware, UK
| | - Philip Hewitt
- Chemical and Preclinical Safety, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Tomas Mow
- Safety Pharmacology and Early Toxicology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark
| | - Teija Oinonen
- Preclinical Safety, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland
| | - Adrian Roth
- Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Freddy Van Goethem
- Predictive, Investigative & Translational Toxicology, Nonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Richard J Weaver
- Innovation Life Cycle Management, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France
| | - Peter Newham
- Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, AstraZeneca R&D, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Artificial neural networks in contemporary toxicology research. Chem Biol Interact 2023; 369:110269. [PMID: 36402212 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have a huge potential in toxicology research. They may be used to predict toxicity of various chemical compounds or classify the compounds based on their toxic effects. Today, numerous ANN models have been developed, some of which may be used to detect and possibly explain complex chemico-biological interactions. Fully connected multilayer perceptrons may in some circumstances have high classification accuracy and discriminatory power in separating damaged from intact cells after exposure to a toxic substance. Regularized and not fully connected convolutional neural networks can detect and identify discrete changes in patterns of two-dimensional data associated with toxicity. Bayesian neural networks with weight marginalization sometimes may have better prediction performance when compared to traditional approaches. With the further development of artificial intelligence, it is expected that ANNs will in the future become important parts of various accurate and affordable biosensors for detection of various toxic substances and evaluation of their biochemical properties. In this concise review article, we discuss the recent research focused on the scientific value of ANNs in evaluation and prediction of toxicity of chemical compounds.
Collapse
|