Efficacy and safety of pramipexole in Japanese patients with primary restless legs syndrome: A polysomnographic randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Large muscle group movements during sleep in restless leg syndrome: neurophysiological and clinical implications

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recently, criteria have been drawn up for large muscle group movements during sleep (LMM), defined as movements lasting for 3-45 seconds in adults, which are often accompanied by changes in sleep stage, arousals, and increases in heart rate. The aim of this study was to characterize LMM in restless legs syndrome (RLS) in order to better evaluate their impact on the neurophysiology of the disorder and, therefore, the possible clinical implications.

METHODS

Consecutive, drug-free patients diagnosed with RLS and controls, aged 18 years or more, were retrospectively enrolled. Leg movement activity-short-interval (SILMS), periodic (PLMS), and isolated (ISOLMS) leg movements during sleep-and LMM were detected and scored.

RESULTS

In total, 100 patients and 67 controls were recruited. All movement measures were significantly higher in RLS. A significant positive correlation was found between LMM and ISOLMS index but not PLMS index in both groups. LMM index showed a significant negative correlation with total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and percentage of sleep stages N3 and R, as well as a significant positive correlation with the number of awakenings, and percentage of sleep stages N1 and N2 only in patients with RLS. No significant correlation was found between either LMM or PLMS index and RLS severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Different types of movements, including SILMS, ISOLMS, and LMM, play somewhat distinct roles in sleep neurophysiology in RLS. Notably, LMM, a newly recognized category of movements, demonstrates associations with sleep architecture instability and fragmentation, arousals, and awakenings, suggesting potential clinical implications.

Dopamine agonists in restless leg syndrome treatment and their effects on sleep parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dopamine agonists (DAs) constitute the standard therapeutic scheme for restless leg syndrome (RLS) because they have been proven to be effective. However, DAs may change sleep parameters, thus having adverse effects on patient condition. This meta-analysis clarified the effects of DAs used in RLS treatment on the sleep architecture.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized control trials (RCT) (up to October 2023) that discussed the effects of DAs on sleep architecture in patients with RLS. A meta-analysis employing a random-effects model was conducted. The patients were divided into subgroups according to individual DAs and treatment duration (1 day or ≥4 weeks).

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible randomized placebo-controlled trials were included in the assessment. The effects of three DAs (i.e., pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine) on rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, slow-wave sleep (SWS), and sleep efficiency (SE) were analyzed. Overall, pramipexole significantly improved SE but decreased the percentage of REM sleep among treated patients. Ropinirole also enhanced SE compared with the placebo group. Rotigotine did not affect SE and REM sleep. Subgroup analysis found that pramipexole used for 1 day and ≥4 weeks significantly diminished the percentage of REM sleep. Ropinirole used for 1 day showed similar REM sleep patterns. Finally, none of the three DAs affected SWS.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that DAs significantly affect sleep parameters.

Pharmacological responsiveness of periodic limb movements in patients with restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Periodic limb movements during sleep (PLMS) are a frequent finding in restless legs syndrome, but their impact on sleep is still debated, as well the indication for treatment. We systematically reviewed the available literature to describe which drug categories are effective in suppressing PLMS, assessing their efficacy through a meta-analysis, when this was possible.

METHODS

The review protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42021175848), and the systematic search was conducted on and EMBASE (last searched on March 2020). We included original human studies, which assessed PLMS modification on drug treatment with a full-night polysomnography, through surface electrodes on each tibialis anterior muscle. When at least 4 studies were available on the same drug or drug category, we performed a random-effect model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Dopamine agonists like pramipexole and ropinirole resulted the most effective, followed by l-dopa and other dopamine agonists. Alpha2delta ligands are moderately effective as well opioids, despite available data on these drugs are much more limited than those on dopaminergic agents. Valproate and carbamazepine did not show a significant effect on PLMS. Clonazepam showed contradictory results. Perampanel and dypiridamole showed promising but still insufficient data. The same applies to iron supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dopaminergic agents are the most powerful suppressors of PLMS. However, most therapeutic trials in restless legs syndrome do not report objective polysomnographic findings, there is a lack of uniformity in presenting results on PLMS. Longitudinal polysomnographic interventional studies, using well-defined and unanimous scoring criteria and endpoints on PLMS are needed.

CITATION

Riccardi S, Ferri R, Garbazza C, Miano S, Manconi M. Pharmacological responsiveness of periodic limb movements in patients with restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(4):811-822.

[Slow-wave sleep and the possibilities of modern insomnia therapy]

Effective therapy of insomnia, especially chronic insomnia, is one of the most pressing neuropsychiatric problems. Unfortunately, at present in the Russian Federation, as in most other countries of the world, there are no officially approved drugs for long-term treatment of insomnia. In this regard, the use of medical sedation agents that do not have restrictions on the duration of use is of considerable interest. This review considers drugs of various psychopharmacological classes, one way or another used in practice for the correction of sleep disorders, especially in patients with underlying comorbid pathology.

Restless legs syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sensorimotor disorder characterized by an urge to move that appears during rest or is exacerbated by rest, that occurs in the evening or night and that disappears during movement or is improved by movement. Symptoms vary considerably in age at onset, frequency and severity, with severe forms affecting sleep, quality of life and mood. Patients with RLS often display periodic leg movements during sleep or resting wakefulness. RLS is considered to be a complex condition in which predisposing genetic factors, environmental factors and comorbidities contribute to the expression of the disorder. RLS occurs alone or with comorbidities, for example, iron deficiency and kidney disease, but also with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and neurological, rheumatological and respiratory disorders. The pathophysiology is still unclear, with the involvement of brain iron deficiency, dysfunction in the dopaminergic and nociceptive systems and altered adenosine and glutamatergic pathways as hypotheses being investigated. RLS is poorly recognized by physicians and it is accordingly often incorrectly diagnosed and managed. Treatment guidelines recommend initiation of therapy with low doses of dopamine agonists or α₂δ ligands in severe forms. Although dopaminergic treatment is initially highly effective, its long-term use can result in a serious worsening of symptoms known as augmentation. Other treatments include opioids and iron preparations.

The Long-Term Psychiatric and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality of Restless Legs Syndrome and Periodic Limb Movements of Sleep

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensory-motor neurological disorder that is associated with high levels of distress and sleep disturbance. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence suggests that individuals suffering from RLS may be at an increased risk of certain psychiatric illnesses and cardiovascular diseases. There also is evidence for increased mortality rates in RLS patients, although contrasting results do exist. Periodic limb movements of sleep (PLMS), repetitive leg movement observed in most RLS patients, and sleep disturbance may mediate the relationship between RLS and long-term morbidity. This article summarizes the literature investigating the potential consequences of both RLS and PLMS.

Quantitative Comparison of the Efficacies of 5 First-Line Drugs for Primary Restless Leg Syndrome

Comparative analyses of the efficacies of dopaminergic agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine patch) and α-2-δ ligands (gabapentin enacarbil and pregabalin) for treatment of primary restless leg syndrome (RLS) are lacking because of the few head-to-head clinical trials. A model-based meta-analysis approach was employed to quantitatively compare the efficacies of these 5 first-line RLS drugs. Longitudinal efficacy data of RLS drugs were collected from published eligible literature. Mean changes in both the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group (IRLS) rating scale and Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale response rate were analyzed. A study-level population pharmacodynamic model was used to fit the dose-effect relationship and to describe the therapeutic effect over time for RLS drugs and placebo, and the typical efficacies of these drugs were compared. The onset of action was rapid for RLS drugs. In the placebo group, typical maximum IRLS reduction (E_max,IRLS ) and CGI-I response rate (E_max,CGI-I ) were -9.34 points and 48.2%, respectively. After deducting placebo effects, we found that the baseline IRLS score was significantly correlated with the E_max,IRLS of dopaminergic agonists. Typical E_max,IRLS of dopaminergic agonists was expressed as - 7.7 - 0.682 × ( baseline IRLS score - 24 ) points. Typical E_max,IRLS values of pregabalin and gabapentin enacarbil were -5.95 points and -4.00 points, respectively. The therapeutic effect of dopaminergic agonists was found to be associated with baseline symptom severity. In RLS patients with more severe symptoms, the therapeutic effect of dopaminergic agonists tended to be better than that of α-2-δ ligands.

The neurophysiology of hyperarousal in restless legs syndrome: Hints for a role of glutamate/GABA

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sensory-motor circadian disorder, whose basic components include urge to move the legs, unpleasant sensory experience, and periodic leg movements during sleep, all associated with an enhancement of the individual's arousal state. Brain iron deficiency (BID) is considered to be a key initial pathobiological factor, based on alterations of iron acquisition by the brain, also moderated by genetic factors. In addition to the well-known dopaminergic involvement in RLS, previous studies pointed out that BID brings also a hyperglutamatergic state that influences a dysfunctional cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuit in genetically vulnerable individuals. However, the enhancement of arousal mechanisms in RLS may also be explained by functional changes of the ascending arousal systems and by deficitary GABA-mediated inhibitory control. Very recently, it was also suggested that BID induces a hypoadenosinergic state in RLS, thus possibly providing a link for a putative unified pathophysiological mechanism accounting for both hyperarousal and sensory-motor signs. Consequently, RLS might be viewed as a multitransmitter neurochemical disorder, globally resulting in enhanced excitability and decreased inhibition. In this framework, understanding the complex interaction of different neuronal circuits in generating the symptoms of RLS is mandatory both for a better diagnostic refinement and for an innovative therapeutic support. Notably, multiple neurotransmission dysfunction, either primary or triggered by BID, may also bridge the gap between RLS and other chronic pain disorders. This chapter summarizes the current experimental and clinical findings into a heuristic model of the electrophysiology and neurochemistry underlying RLS.

New Insights into the Neurobiology of Restless Legs Syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sensorimotor disorder, whose basic components include a sensory experience, akathisia, and a sleep-related motor sign, periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS), both associated with an enhancement of the individual's arousal state. The present review attempts to integrate the major clinical and experimental neurobiological findings into a heuristic pathogenetic model. The model also integrates the recent findings on RLS genetics indicating that RLS has aspects of a genetically moderated neurodevelopmental disorder involving mainly the cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuits. Brain iron deficiency (BID) remains the key initial pathobiological factor and relates to alterations of iron acquisition by the brain, also moderated by genetic factors. Experimental evidence indicates that BID leads to a hyperdopaminergic and hyperglutamatergic states that determine the dysfunction of cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuits in genetically vulnerable individuals. However, the enhanced arousal mechanisms critical to RLS are better explained by functional changes of the ascending arousal systems. Recent experimental and clinical studies suggest that a BID-induced hypoadenosinergic state provides the link for a putative unified pathophysiological mechanism for sensorimotor signs of RLS and the enhanced arousal state.

Achievements, challenges, and future perspectives of epidemiologic research in restless legs syndrome (RLS)

In the 20 years since the initial consensus on a common definition for restless legs syndrome (RLS), over 600 scientific reports on epidemiological aspects of RLS have been published. Most are descriptive and address important issues such as prevalence, familial patterns, comorbidities, and quality of life. While the establishment of prospective cohort studies and the use of secondary data sources are rather new to RLS research, both options significantly broaden the possibilities for analysis of disease risk factors. These two options, as well as the inclusion of a broader phenotyping of individual patients, have great potential to elucidate etiologic factors for RLS and expand knowledge about this common disorder. This article summarizes achievements in the area of RLS epidemiology, describes current challenges, and highlights future perspectives in the field.

Efficacy of Pramipexole for the Treatment of Primary Restless Leg Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of pramipexole for the treatment of primary moderate-to-severe restless leg syndrome (RLS).

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, OVID, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the Wiley Online Library, ArticleFirst, CALIS, Study, CNKI, and WanFang were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pramipexole for the treatment of primary moderate-to-severe RLS. A meta-analysis was then conducted to pool results.

FINDINGS

Twelve RCTs involving 3286 participants were included in this study. The mean (SD) treatment duration was 11.12 (5.72) weeks/person. The meta-analysis found that the post-treatment change in the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score of the pramipexole group was significantly superior to that of the placebo group (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -4.64; 95% CI, -5.95 to -3.33; n = 8). More patients in the pramipexole group reported at least a 50% reduction in the IRLS score after treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.73; n = 8). In terms of the scores for the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.66; n = 11) and the Patient Global Impression scale (RR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.81; n = 9), treatment outcomes of the pramipexole group were significantly superior to those of the placebo group. In terms of the change in quality of life (WMD = 5.39; 95% CI, 2.28 to 8.50; n = 4), the change in daytime tiredness (WMD = -0.61; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.01; n = 4), the change in the number of periodic limb movements per hour of sleep (WMD = -35.95; 95% CI, -56.42 to -15.48; n = 3), and the change in the quality of sleep (WMD = 3.60; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.50; n = 6), the treatment outcomes of the pramipexole group were significantly superior to those of the placebo group.

IMPLICATIONS

This meta-analysis study indicated that pramipexole could effectively improve the symptoms of patients with primary moderate-to-severe RLS, although the quality of evidence was relatively low. Future clinical trials focusing on the medium-term and long-term treatment outcomes and using mainly objective indicators for evaluation are warranted. It is also necessary to pay close attention to augmentation during medication.

The Role of Periodic Limb Movements During Sleep in Restless Legs Syndrome: A Selective Update

Periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS) are a highly active research topic and accumulating recent evidence has led to reevaluation of key aspects on the role of PLMS in restless legs syndrome (RLS). This article summarizes the recent developments in 3 areas: the relationship of PLMS to cortical arousals in patients with RLS, the differential effect of dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic treatment on PLMS, and the possible emergence of PLMS as a sleep-related cardiovascular risk factor.

Restless legs syndrome-current therapies and management of augmentation

Idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) can severely affect quality of life and disturb sleep, so that pharmacological treatment is necessary, especially for elderly patients. Treatment guidelines recommend initiation of therapy with dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole or the rotigotine transdermal patch, all approved in most countries) or α-2-δ ligands (gabapentin enacarbil, approved in the USA and Japan), depending on the country and availability. Where approved, opioids (prolonged release oxycodone-naloxone, approved in Europe) are also recommended as a second-line therapy for severe RLS. Several iron formulations can be effective but are not yet approved for RLS therapy, whereas benzodiazepines and other anticonvulsants are not recommended or approved. Less is known about effective management of RLS that is associated with other conditions, such as uraemia or pregnancy. Furthermore, very little data are available on the management of RLS when first-line treatment fails or patients experience augmentation. In this Review, we summarize state-of-the-art therapies for RLS in the context of the diagnostic criteria and available guidelines, based on knowledge ranging from Class I evidence for the treatment of idiopathic RLS to Class IV evidence for the treatment of complications such as augmentation. We consider therapies, including combination therapies, that are used in clinical practice for long-term management of RLS, despite a lack of trials and approval, and highlight the need for practical long-term evaluation of current trials.

Pramipexole for Chinese people with primary restless legs syndrome: a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) often responds to agents that enhance dopamine neurotransmission. The present 12-week study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of pramipexole (PPX) for the treatment of adult, Chinese people with primary RLS.

METHODS

A total of 204 Chinese people with RLS were randomly assigned to receive either the placebo or PPX (flexibly titrated from 0.25 mg to 0.75 mg), 2 h to 3 h before bedtime for 12 weeks. The primary measuring outcomes were the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. The secondary outcome was adverse events.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety participants completed the study. At 12 weeks, the adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline was greater for PPX (vs placebo) for the IRLS score (-13.2 ± 0.7 vs -9.4 ± 0.6; p <0.01), and (-12.1 ± 0.6 vs -8.3 ± 0.6; p <0.01) at the end of one month follow-up after treatment. The CGI-I rating of "very much improved" or "much improved" in the percentage of participants (61.8% vs 34.3%; p <0.01), and (51.0% vs 26.5%; p <0.01) after week 12, and one month follow-up of treatment, respectively. The proportion of adverse events was 60.8% in the PPX group and 45.1% in the placebo group. No deaths related to PPX treatment were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the present study showed that PPX is efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese people with primary RLS.

A mixed treatment comparison of gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine in moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE

A mixed treatment comparison (MTC) was performed to investigate the relative efficacy and safety of licensed pharmaceuticals for moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome (RLS).

METHODS

RLS trials published over the past 10 years were identified via systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and manufacturers' websites. MTC was performed with WinBUGS software using a Bayesian approach. Identified primary outcomes: change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) at week 12 and end of maintenance (EoM).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

IRLS and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) responders, RLS-6 items and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight clinical trials were identified. Fifteen were included in the primary analysis. Indirect comparisons were established among gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine and placebo. Overall, the four active treatments showed similar efficacies as assessed by changes in IRLS scores, IRLS responders, CGI-I responders, and RLS-6 scores. The sole exception was change in IRLS at week 12, for which rotigotine was likely more efficacious than ropinirole (mean difference: -2.52 [95% CrI: -4.74, -0.40]). Indirect comparisons on safety endpoints indicated ropinirole was associated with a higher risk of nausea than the other agents, and was more likely to result in discontinuations due to lack of efficacy than pramipexole. Nausea was likely more frequent with pramipexole than gabapentin enacarbil, and rotigotine was more likely to result in discontinuation due to AEs than ropinirole and pramipexole.

CONCLUSIONS

This MTC confirmed the superiority of gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine above placebo in alleviating RLS symptoms. Compared to ropinirole, rotigotine showed some additional benefit in terms of change in IRLS at Week 12. Choice of RLS drugs requires careful evaluation of effectiveness and safety profiles in clinical practice. Due to lack of head-to-head trials, inconsistency could not be assessed in our analysis. Head-to-head trials on a more homogeneous population are needed to validate the MTC results.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale for restless legs syndrome in a clinical trial setting

AIM

This study was conducted to verify the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale for restless legs syndrome (J-IRLS) as a sub-study of a clinical trial of pramipexole against restless legs syndrome.

METHODS

After evaluating the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and construct validity were analyzed. The responsiveness of J-IRLS was confirmed by evaluating the correlations between the changes in J-IRLS total score after treatment, Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I), and Patient Global Impression.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability of J-IRLS was good (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.877; 95% confidence interval, 0.802-0.925). The correlation coefficient of J-IRLS total score and CGI-S score for the first and second visit was 0.804 and 0.796, respectively (both P < 0.0001). Factor analysis of J-IRLS itemsalone identified a two-factor structure. Exploratory analysis on 10 items of J-IRLS together with the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index revealed that several items on the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index appeared as the third factor. The correlations of CGI-I and Patient Global Impression with change in J-IRLS total score after treatment were highly significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of J-IRLS were considered adequate. The scale is highly applicable both for evaluating the severity of restless legs syndrome and for assessing drug efficacy.

Efficacy and tolerability of pramipexole for the treatment of primary restless leg syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

Primary restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a common sensory-motor disorder that is characterized by an irresistible urge to move the limbs and unpleasant sensations in the legs, which affects 1.9%-4.6% adults. Pramipexole, a potent dopamine D2/3 agonist, is recommended as "effective" in the short-term and "possibly effective" in the long-term treatment of primary RLS in the European guidelines on management of RLS. In this meta-analysis, we summarized the efficacy and tolerability of pramipexole in treatment for primary RLS. Results of this meta-analysis showed a favorable effect of pramipexole versus placebo on RLS symptoms (mean change on International RLS Study Group Rating Scale [IRLS] score: mean difference [MD] = -5.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.79 to -4.41, P < 0.00001) and sleep quality (pooled standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.35, P < 0.00001). Nausea (relative risk [RR] = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.82 to 3.95, P < 0.001) and fatigue (RR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.93, P = 0.013) were the most common adverse events, but, by and large, pramipexole was well-tolerated in patients with primary RLS. Nevertheless, long-term studies and more evidence of head-to-head comparisons of pramipexole with other dopamine agonists, anticonvulsants, and levodopa are needed.

The treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder in adults--an update for 2012: practice parameters with an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analyses: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline

A systematic literature review and meta-analyses (where appropriate) were performed to update the previous AASM practice parameters on the treatments, both dopaminergic and other, of RLS and PLMD. A considerable amount of literature has been published since these previous reviews were performed, necessitating an update of the corresponding practice parameters. Therapies with a STANDARD level of recommendation include pramipexole and ropinirole. Therapies with a GUIDELINE level of recommendation include levodopa with dopa decarboxylase inhibitor, opioids, gabapentin enacarbil, and cabergoline (which has additional caveats for use). Therapies with an OPTION level of recommendation include carbamazepine, gabapentin, pregabalin, clonidine, and for patients with low ferritin levels, iron supplementation. The committee recommends a STANDARD AGAINST the use of pergolide because of the risks of heart valve damage. Therapies for RLS secondary to ESRD, neuropathy, and superficial venous insufficiency are discussed. Lastly, therapies for PLMD are reviewed. However, it should be mentioned that because PLMD therapy typically mimics RLS therapy, the primary focus of this review is therapy for idiopathic RLS.

Dopamine agonists for restless legs syndrome

BACKGROUND

According to clinical guidelines, dopamine agonists are the first-line treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists for RLS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL, from January 1985 to December 2008, plus reference lists of articles. We contacted pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of dopamine agonist treatment versus placebo or other treatment for a period of at least seven days in patients with RLS (≥ 18 years). Outcomes included the International RLS Severity Rating Scale (IRLS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI-I), polysomnography and self rated sleep quality, quality of life, daytime functioning, and safety parameters.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data separately; assessed risk of bias; and contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors for additional information. We collected dropout rates due to adverse events and experience of adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 35 placebo controlled and three active controlled RCTs (N = 7365). The mean reduction on the IRLS was -5.7 points lower in dopamine agonist treatment compared to placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) -6.7 to -4.7). Periodic limb movements in sleep per hour of sleep (PLMS-Index; PLMSI) were -22.4/h lower than in placebo (95% CI -27.8 to -16.9). Self rated quality of sleep and disease specific quality of life were improved by a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.40 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.47) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.44), respectively. Patients were more likely to drop out (odds ratio (OR) 1.82, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.45) and experienced more adverse events under dopamine agonist treatment than with placebo (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.08). Visual inspection of forest plots showed the highest efficacy in three studies investigating cabergoline and pergolide (N = 3). Active controlled trials investigated effects of cabergoline, pergolide, and pramipexole in a number of outcomes. The IRLS score was lower with cabergoline and pramipexole compared to levodopa (MD -5.3, 95% CI -8.4 to -2.1). Only four studies investigated treatment efficacy up to seven months. The most severe side effect, augmentation, was not assessed reliably.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analyses show the superiority of dopamine agonists over placebo in RCTs up to seven months. Cabergoline and pramipexole showed larger efficacy compared to levodopa in some but not all outcomes.