What is clinically significant RLS and who decides about its treatment?

An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial of a 12-Week Yoga Versus Educational Film Program for the Management of Restless Legs Syndrome: Feasibility and Acceptability

Objectives: The primary objectives of this pilot trial were to assess the study feasibility and acceptability of the 12-week yoga and educational film programs for the management of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in preparation for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT). Materials and Methods: This pilot, parallel-arm, randomized feasibility trial was conducted at two sites, Morgantown, WV and Columbus, OH. Yoga group participants attended 75-min Iyengar yoga classes, twice weekly for 4 weeks, then once a week for 8 weeks (16 total classes), and completed a 30-min homework routine on nonclass days. Educational film group participants attended once weekly, 75-min classes (12 total classes), which included information on RLS and other sleep disorders, RLS management including sleep hygiene practices, and complementary therapies. Feasibility and acceptability outcomes included program satisfaction and recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. In addition, participants were asked their preferences regarding three yoga class schedule scenarios for a future study. Attendance, yoga, and treatment logs were collected weekly. Program evaluation and yoga scheduling questionnaires were collected at week 12. Results: Forty-one adults with moderate to severe RLS were randomized to a 12-week yoga (n = 19) or educational film (n = 22) program. Thirty participants (73%) completed the program. Yoga and education group participants attended an average of 13.0 ± 0.84 (81%) and 10.3 ± 0.3 classes (85%), respectively. Participants from both groups indicated satisfaction with the study. All yoga group respondents to the program evaluation reported they would likely (n = 6) or very likely (n = 7) continue yoga practice; 86.7% of education group respondents (13 of 15) indicated that they were likely (n = 7) or very likely (n = 6) to make lasting changes based on what they had learned. The preferred schedule for a future study was a 16-week study with once-weekly yoga classes. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that a larger RCT comparing yoga with an educational film group for the management of RLS is feasible. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03570515; 02/01/2017.

Acceptability and feasibility of a 12-week yoga vs. educational film program for the management of restless legs syndrome (RLS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common and burdensome sleep disorder associated with profound impairment of health, well-being, and quality of life. Unfortunately, the medications used for RLS management carry risk of serious side effects, including augmentation of symptoms. Yoga, an ancient mind-body discipline designed to promote physical, emotional, and mental well-being, may offer a viable, low-risk new treatment. The primary objectives of this pilot, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT) are to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a 12-week yoga vs. educational film program for the management of RLS.

Methods

Forty-four adults with confirmed moderate to severe RLS will be recruited and randomized to a 12-week yoga (n = 22) or standardized educational film program (N = 22). Yoga group participants will attend two 75-min Iyengar yoga classes per week for the first 4 weeks, then one 75-min class per week for the remaining 8 weeks, and will complete a 30-min homework routine on non-class days. Educational film group participants will attend one 75-min class per week for 12 weeks and complete a daily RLS treatment log; classes will include information on: RLS management, including sleep hygiene practices; other sleep disorders; and complementary therapies likely to be of interest to those participating in a yoga and sleep education study.

Yoga and treatment logs will be collected weekly. Feasibility outcomes will include recruitment, enrollment, and randomization rates, retention, adherence, and program satisfaction. Program evaluation and yoga-dosing questionnaires will be collected at week 12; data on exploratory outcomes (e.g., RLS symptom severity (IRLS), sleep quality (PSQI), mood (POMS, PSS), and health-related quality of life (SF-36)) will be gathered at baseline and week 12.

Discussion

This study will lay the essential groundwork for a planned larger RCT to determine the efficacy of a yoga program for reducing symptoms and associated burden of RLS. If the findings of the current trial and the subsequent larger RCTs are positive, this study will also help support a new approach to clinical treatment of this challenging disorder, help foster improved understanding of RLS etiology, and ultimately contribute to reducing the individual, societal, and economic burden associated with this condition.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03570515. Retrospectively registered on 1 February 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3217-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Treatment response to sleep, pain, and mood disturbance and their correlation with sleep disturbance in adult patients with moderate-to-severe primary restless legs syndrome: Pooled analyses from 3 trials of gabapentin enacarbil

INTRODUCTION

This pooled analysis investigated the effects of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) on clinical correlates of sleep disturbance in adults with moderate-to-severe primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) and no-to-moderate or severe-to-very severe baseline sleep disturbance.

METHODS

Co-primary end-points were mean change from baseline to week 12 in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total score and proportion of responders ('much'/'very much' improved) on the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale (week 12). Pain, mood, individual IRLS items, and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

The modified intent-to-treat population was 671 adults randomized to GEn 600 mg (n = 161), GEn 1200 mg (n = 266), or placebo (n = 244). GEn significantly improved least squares mean change in IRLS total score from baseline versus placebo for no-to-moderate (GEn 600 mg,- 12.3; 1200 mg, - 11.3; placebo, - 7.7) and severe-to-very severe (- 16.6; - 17.0; - 12.7) groups (all P < 0.01). Significantly more GEn-treated patients (both doses) were CGI-I responders (week 12) versus placebo in both sleep subgroups (all P < 0.01). GEn substantially improved mood and pain scores for both sleep subgroups versus placebo. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence and dizziness.

CONCLUSION

GEn (600 mg and 1200 mg) was effective and well tolerated in adults with moderate-to-severe primary RLS regardless of baseline sleep disturbance level.