1
|
Portable evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev 2023; 68:101743. [PMID: 36657366 DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a significant healthcare burden affecting approximately one billion people worldwide. The prevalence of OSA is rising with the ongoing obesity epidemic, a key risk factor for its development. While in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA, it has significant drawbacks that prevent widespread use. Portable devices with different levels of monitoring are available to allow remote assessment for OSA. To better inform clinical practice and research, this comprehensive systematic review evaluated diagnostic performances, study cost and patients' experience of different levels of portable sleep studies (type 2, 3, and 4), as well as wearable devices and non-contact systems, in adults. Despite varying study designs and devices used, portable diagnostic tests are found to be sufficient for initial screening of patients at risk of OSA. Future studies are needed to evaluate cost effectiveness with the incorporation of portable diagnostic tests into the diagnostic pathway for OSA, as well as their application in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and other comorbidities that may affect test performance.
Collapse
|
2
|
Serrano Alarcón Á, Martínez Madrid N, Seepold R. A Minimum Set of Physiological Parameters to Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Using Non-Invasive Portable Monitors. A Systematic Review. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:1249. [PMID: 34833126 PMCID: PMC8623368 DOI: 10.3390/life11111249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Despite its high accuracy, polysomnography (PSG) has several drawbacks for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Consequently, multiple portable monitors (PMs) have been proposed. Objective. This systematic review aims to investigate the current literature to analyze the sets of physiological parameters captured by a PM to select the minimum number of such physiological signals while maintaining accurate results in OSA detection. Methods. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of publications were established prior to the search. The evaluation of the publications was made based on one central question and several specific questions. Results. The abilities to detect hypopneas, sleep time, or awakenings were some of the features studied to investigate the full functionality of the PMs to select the most relevant set of physiological signals. Based on the physiological parameters collected (one to six), the PMs were classified into sets according to the level of evidence. The advantages and the disadvantages of each possible set of signals were explained by answering the research questions proposed in the methods. Conclusions. The minimum number of physiological signals detected by PMs for the detection of OSA depends mainly on the purpose and context of the sleep study. The set of three physiological signals showed the best results in the detection of OSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángel Serrano Alarcón
- School of Informatics, Reutlingen University, Alteburgstr. 150, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany;
| | - Natividad Martínez Madrid
- School of Informatics, Reutlingen University, Alteburgstr. 150, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany;
- Institute of Digital Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation;
| | - Ralf Seepold
- Institute of Digital Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation;
- HTWG Konstanz, Department of Computer Science, Alfred-Wachtel-Str. 8, 78462 Konstanz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perez-Lloret S, van de Warrenburg B, Rossi M, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, Zesiewicz T, Saute JAM, Durr A, Nishizawa M, Martinez-Martin P, Stebbins GT, Schrag A, Skorvanek M. Assessment of Ataxia Rating Scales and Cerebellar Functional Tests: Critique and Recommendations. Mov Disord 2020; 36:283-297. [PMID: 33022077 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the clinimetric properties of ataxia rating scales and functional tests, and made recommendations regarding their use. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted to identify the instruments used to rate ataxia symptoms. The identified rating scales and functional ability tests were reviewed and ranked by the panel as "recommended," "suggested," or "listed" for the assessment of patients with discrete cerebellar disorders, using previously established criteria. RESULTS We reviewed 14 instruments (9 rating scales and 5 functional tests). "Recommended" rating scales for the assessment of symptoms severity were: for Friedreich's ataxia, the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale, the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS), and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA); for spinocerebellar ataxias, ICARS and SARA; for ataxia telangiectasia: ICARS and SARA; for brain tumors, SARA; for congenital disorder of glycosylation-phosphomannomutase-2 deficiency, ICARS; for cerebellar symptoms in multiple sclerosis, ICARS; for cerebellar symptoms in multiple system atrophy: Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale and ICARS; and for fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome, ICARS. "Recommended" functional tests were: for Friedreich's ataxia, Ataxia Functional Composite Score and Composite Cerebellar Functional Severity Score; and for spinocerebellar ataxias, Ataxia Functional Composite Score, Composite Cerebellar Functional Severity Score, and SCA Functional Index. CONCLUSIONS We identified some "recommended" scales and functional tests for the assessment of patients with major hereditary ataxias and other cerebellar disorders. The main limitations of these instruments include the limited assessment of patients in the more severe end of the spectrum and children. Further research in these populations is warranted. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Perez-Lloret
- National Research Council (CAECIHS-UAI, CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Bart van de Warrenburg
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Malco Rossi
- Movement Disorders Section, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Theresa Zesiewicz
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jonas A M Saute
- Medical Genetics Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Neurology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Medicine: Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Alexandra Durr
- Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute (ICM), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Pablo Martinez-Martin
- Center for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Glenn T Stebbins
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anette Schrag
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matej Skorvanek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, P. J. Safarik University, Kosice, Slovak Republic.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital L. Pasteur, Kosice, Slovak Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adler D, Janssens JP. Estimating the probability of OSA in the spinal cord injury population: specific tools are still needed. Thorax 2018; 73:803-805. [PMID: 29921701 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Adler
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Janssens
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flabeau O, Ghorayeb I, Perez P, Maillard A, Taillard J, Philip P, Foubert-Samier A, Tison F, Meissner WG. Impact of sleep apnea syndrome on survival in patients with multiple system atrophy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 35:92-95. [PMID: 28011164 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sleep apnea is very frequent in multiple system atrophy (MSA) and may contribute to the poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the relation between sleep apnea and survival in 30 consecutive MSA patients recruited at the French Reference Center for MSA. METHODS Patients with "probable" MSA according to current consensus diagnosis criteria were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. All patients received full polysomnography at baseline and were then followed for up to 4.5 years. The prognostic role of sleep apnea was assessed by a Cox model in an univariate analysis and then adjusted on other potential factors. RESULTS Analyzable polysomnographic recordings were available for 28 patients. Sleep apnea was found in 11 patients. During follow-up, 15 patients died, including 9 with baseline sleep apnea. In an univariate analysis, sleep apnea, Unified MSA Rating Scale I + II score at baseline and at year one, and disease duration were associated with mortality. However, when adjusting for disease duration and baseline Unified MSA Rating Scale score, the association between sleep apnea and mortality was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS Sleep apnea was not an independent factor associated with mortality in this prospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Flabeau
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Imad Ghorayeb
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital Bordeaux, France; CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, CNRS UMR 5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Perez
- CHU de Bordeaux, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique (USMR), Pôle de santé publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Aline Maillard
- CHU de Bordeaux, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique (USMR), Pôle de santé publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jacques Taillard
- Univ. Bordeaux, Sommeil, Attention et Neuropsychiatrie, USR 3413, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CNRS, Sommeil, Attention et Neuropsychiatrie, USR 3413, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Philip
- Univ. Bordeaux, Sommeil, Attention et Neuropsychiatrie, USR 3413, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CNRS, Sommeil, Attention et Neuropsychiatrie, USR 3413, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Alexandra Foubert-Samier
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France; Univ. de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence atrophie multisystématisée, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - François Tison
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France; Univ. de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence atrophie multisystématisée, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Wassilios G Meissner
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France; Univ. de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence atrophie multisystématisée, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|