Diurnal and nocturnal cardiovascular variability and heart rate arousal response in idiopathic hypersomnia

Autonomic cardiovascular control is unaffected in children referred for assessment of excessive daytime sleepiness

There is conflicting evidence for impaired autonomic control of heart rate (HR) in adults with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnolence (IH). Despite these chronic hypersomnia conditions primarily being diagnosed around the age of puberty, there are limited studies in children. The present study investigated cardiovascular control using heart rate variability (HRV) and the extent of nocturnal HR dipping during sleep in children and adolescents with narcolepsy and IH. Children having an overnight polysomnographic study followed by a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for investigation of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) between May 2010 to December 2023 were included: 28 children diagnosed with narcolepsy, 11 with IH, and 26 subjectively sleepy children who did not meet the diagnostic criteria for either narcolepsy or IH. Each clinically referred child was matched for age and sex with a control. Time domain and frequency domain HRV were calculated from ECG recorded at 512 Hz. There were no differences in either time domain or spectral analysis of HRV between clinical groups or between clinical groups and their control group. The expected sleep state differences in HRV were observed in all groups. There was also no difference in HR nocturnal dipping between groups. Despite evidence for abnormal autonomic function in adults with narcolepsy and IH, our study did not identify any abnormalities in HR, HR control, or nocturnal dipping of HR in children referred for assessment of EDS. This suggests that autonomic dysfunction may be a feature of these conditions that develops in later life.

Sleep architecture in idiopathic hypersomnia: the influence of age, sex, and body mass index

This study aimed to progress the understanding of idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) by assessing the moderating influence of individual characteristics, such as age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) on sleep architecture. In this retrospective study, 76 IH participants (38.1 ± 11.3 years; 40 women) underwent a clinical interview, an in-laboratory polysomnography with a maximal 9-h time in bed and a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). They were compared to 106 healthy controls (38.1 ± 14.1 years; 60 women). Multiple regressions were used to assess moderating influence of age, sex, and BMI on sleep variables. We used correlations to assess whether sleep variables were associated with Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores and mean sleep onset latency on the MSLT in IH participants. Compared to controls, IH participants had shorter sleep latency (p = 0.002), longer total sleep time (p < 0.001), more time spent in N2 sleep (p = 0.008), and showed trends for a higher sleep efficiency (p = 0.023) and more time spent in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (p = 0.022). No significant moderating influence of age, sex, or BMI was found. More severe self-reported sleepiness in IH patients was correlated with shorter REM sleep latency and less N1 sleep in terms of proportion and duration (ps < 0.01). This study shows that, when compared to healthy controls, patients with IH had no anomalies in their sleep architecture that can explain their excessive daytime sleepiness. Moreover, there is no moderating influence of age, sex, and BMI, suggesting that the absence of major group differences is relatively robust.

Brain fog in central disorders of hypersomnolence: a review

Brain fog is an undefined term describing a cluster of symptoms related to fatigue and impaired memory, attention, and concentration. Brain fog or brain fog-like symptoms have been reported in central disorders of hypersomnolence and in a range of seemingly unrelated disorders, including coronavirus disease 2019, major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and celiac disease. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and proposes a consensus definition for brain fog. Brain fog is prevalent in narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia, with more than three-quarters of patients with either disorder reporting this symptom in a registry study; it has also been reported as particularly difficult to treat in idiopathic hypersomnia. Studies directly evaluating brain fog are rare; tools for evaluating this symptom cluster typically are patient reports, with few objective measures validated in any disorder. Evaluating brain fog is further complicated by confounding symptoms, such as excessive daytime sleepiness, which is a hallmark of hypersomnolence disorders. No treatments specifically address brain fog. The paucity of literature, assessment tools, and medications for brain fog highlights the need for research leading to better disambiguation and treatment. Until a clear consensus definition is established, we propose brain fog in hypersomnia disorders be defined as a cognitive dysfunction that may or may not be linked with excessive sleepiness, related to an underlying neuronal dysfunction, which reduces concentration and impairs information processing, leading to a complaint of lack of clarity of mental thinking and awareness.

CITATION

Rosenberg R, Thorpy MJ, Doghramji K, Morse AM. Brain fog in central disorders of hypersomnolence: a review. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(4):643-651.

Distinction between epileptic and non-epileptic arousal by heart rate change

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the difference in heart rate (HR) change between epileptic and non-epileptic arousals in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

This is a case-control study conducted at the University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center. Inclusion criteria are (1) adult (≥18 years old) PWE who had arousal related to a focal aware or impaired awareness automatism seizure with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure during an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) admission between January 2009 and January 2021 or (2) adult PWE who had a non-epileptic arousal during an EMU admission between July 2020 and January 2021. Outcomes are (1) a percent change in baseline HR within 60 s after arousal and (2) the highest percent change in baseline HR within a 10-s sliding time window within 60 s after arousal.

RESULTS

We included 20 non-epileptic arousals from 20 adult PWE and 29 epileptic arousals with seizures from 29 adult PWE. Within 60 s after arousal, HR increased by a median of 86.7% (interquartile range (IQR), 52.7%-121.3%) in the epileptic arousal group compared to a median of 26.1% (12.9%-43.3%) in the non-epileptic arousal group (p < 0.001). The cut-off value was 48.7%. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.85, 0.79, and 0.80, respectively. More than 70.1% was only in the epileptic arousals, with 100% specificity. Within 10 s of the greatest change, HR increased by 36.5 (18.7%-48.4%) in the epileptic arousal group compared to 17.7 (10.9%-23.7%) in the non-epileptic arousal group (p < 0.001). The cut-off value was 36.5%. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.79, 0.52, and 0.95, respectively. More than 48.1% was only in the epileptic arousals, with 100% specificity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Tachycardia during epileptic arousals was significantly higher and more robust compared to tachycardia during non-epileptic arousals.

Pupillometry to differentiate idiopathic hypersomnia from narcolepsy type 1

Idiopathic hypersomnia is poorly diagnosed in the absence of biomarkers to distinguish it from other central hypersomnia subtypes. Given that light plays a main role in the regulation of sleep and wake, we explored the retinal melanopsin-based pupil response in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia and narcolepsy type 1, and healthy subjects. Twenty-seven patients with narcolepsy type 1 (women 59%, 36 ± 11.5 years old), 36 patients with idiopathic hypersomnia (women 83%, 27.2 ± 7.2 years old) with long total sleep time (> 11/24 hr), and 43 controls (women 58%, 30.6 ± 9.3 years old) were included in this study. All underwent a pupillometry protocol to assess pupil diameter, and the relative post-illumination pupil response to assess melanopsin-driven pupil responses in the light non-visual input pathway. Differences between groups were assessed using logistic regressions adjusted on age and sex. We found that patients with narcolepsy type 1 had a smaller baseline pupil diameter as compared with idiopathic hypersomnia and controls (p < 0.05). In addition, both narcolepsy type 1 and idiopathic hypersomnia groups had a smaller relative post-illumination pupil response (respectively, 31.6 ± 13.9% and 33.2 ± 9.9%) as compared with controls (38.7 ± 9.7%), suggesting a reduced melanopsin-mediated pupil response in both types of central hypersomnia (p < 0.01). Both narcolepsy type 1 and idiopathic hypersomnia showed a smaller melanopsin-mediated pupil response, and narcolepsy type 1, unlike idiopathic hypersomnia, also displayed a smaller basal pupil diameter. Importantly, we found that the basal pupil size permitted to well discriminate idiopathic hypersomnia from narcolepsy type 1 with a specificity = 66.67% and a sensitivity = 72.22%. Pupillometry may aid to multi-feature differentiation of central hypersomnia subtypes.

Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this article are to describe the clinical approach to and management of patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence, and to understand and differentiate available diagnostic tools.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Updated clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of central disorders of hypersomnolence and narcolepsy specifically highlight new treatment options. Approval for a lower-sodium oxybate formulation that contains 92% less sodium than the standard sodium oxybate for the treatment of narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia adds to the number of medications available for these disorders, allowing for a more tailored management of symptoms.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Central disorders of hypersomnolence are characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness that impacts daily functions. These disorders can be differentiated by obtaining a detailed clinical sleep history and by a thoughtful interpretation of sleep diagnostic testing. Tailoring treatment approaches to meet the needs of individuals and accounting for medical and psychiatric comorbidities may improve quality of life.

Narcolepsy and Idiopathic Hypersomnia

Narcolepsy types 1 and 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia are primary Central Nervous System (CNS) disorders of hypersomnolence characterized by profound daytime sleepiness and/or excessive sleep need. Onset of symptoms begins typically in childhood or adolescence, and children can have unique presentations compared with adults. Narcolepsy type 1 is likely caused by immune-mediated loss of orexin (hypocretin) neurons in the hypothalamus; however, the causes of narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia are unknown. Existing treatments improve daytime sleepiness and cataplexy but there is no cure for these disorders.

Cardiorespiratory changes associated with micro-arousals during naps

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the central nervous system (CNS) interplay during sleep, particularly during phasic events such as micro-arousals, has been the subject of several studies. The underlying mechanisms of such relationship which remain unclear, specifically during daytime sleep, were partly investigated in this study. Napping polysomnography was performed on two occasions at least one week apart in 15 healthy subjects. The following cardiorespiratory variables were extracted from the recordings: tachogram, pulse transit time (PTT), pulse wave amplitude, respiratory cycle amplitude, and frequency. Two experts first detected micro-arousal events, then, cardiorespiratory variables were averaged by 30-s epochs over 2 min centered on the onset of the micro-arousals. We found that in the 30 s preceding the arousal events as detected on the electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings, there was a decrease in tachogram, pulse wave amplitude, and PTT values while the respiratory amplitude increased. These changes were more prominent in stage N2 and N3 sleep than in stage N1. The present findings provide new insights into the autonomic changes during the pre-arousal period in daytime naps, as all the variables investigated suggest a sympathetic physiological origin for the changes.

The melanopsin-mediated pupil response is reduced in idiopathic hypersomnia with long sleep time

Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), characterized by an excessive day-time sleepiness, a prolonged total sleep time on 24 h and/or a reduced sleep latency, affects 1 in 2000 individuals from the general population. However, IH remains underdiagnosed and inaccurately treated despite colossal social, professional and personal impacts. The pathogenesis of IH is poorly known, but recent works have suggested possible alterations of phototransduction. In this context, to identify biomarkers of IH, we studied the Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR) using a specific pupillometry protocol reflecting the melanopsin-mediated pupil response in IH patients with prolonged total sleep time (TST > 660 min) and in healthy subjects. Twenty-eight patients with IH (women 86%, 25.4 year-old ± 4.9) and 29 controls (women 52%, 27.1 year-old ± 3.9) were included. After correction on baseline pupil diameter, the PIPR was compared between groups and correlated to sociodemographic and sleep parameters. We found that patients with IH had a lower relative PIPR compared to controls (32.6 ± 9.9% vs 38.5 ± 10.2%, p = 0.037) suggesting a reduced melanopsin response. In addition, the PIPR was not correlated to age, chronotype, TST, nor depressive symptoms. The melanopsin-specific PIPR may be an innovative trait marker of IH and the pupillometry might be a promising tool to better characterize hypersomnia.

Sleep disordered breathing in patients with Prader willi syndrome: Impact of underlying genetic mechanism

INTRODUCTION

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in children with PWS. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the severity of SDB in patients with PWS using polysomnography (PSG), and assess the effect of the underlying genetic mechanism on PSG parameters.

METHODS

Children with PWS, referred to our sleep laboratory between March 2016 and January 2020 were enrolled. PSG parameters, demographic data, body mass index (BMI), and symptoms related to SDB were recorded. The effect of non-invasive ventilation strategies and the outcome of therapy on PSG parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

In our study, 64.5% of the patients had severe sleep apnea syndrome (total apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥10 events/hour). 22.6% had significantly high (>5 events/hour) central sleep apnea. Patients with a deletion had significantly lower initial and mean SaO₂, longer sleep time SaO₂ under 90%, oxygen desaturation % and total AHI when compared to those with uniparental disomy. PSG parameters were similar between patients who did or didn't receive growth hormone treatment.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the PWS patients had severe sleep apnea syndrome characterized mainly by hypopneas which were accompanied by central apneas. There was a more severe impact on oxygen parameters and total AHI in patients with deletions.

Idiopathic Hypersomnia and Other Hypersomnia Syndromes

There are numerous disorders of known or presumed neurologic origin that result in excessive daytime sleepiness, collectively known as the central disorders of hypersomnolence. These include narcolepsy types 1 and 2, idiopathic hypersomnia, Kleine-Levin syndrome, and hypersomnia due to or associated with medical disease, neurologic disease, psychiatric disease, medications or substances, and insufficient sleep durations. This chapter focuses on the treatment of nonnarcoleptic hypersomnia syndromes, from those that are commonly encountered in neurologic practice, such as hypersomnia due to Parkinson's disease, to those that are exceedingly rare but present with dramatic manifestations, such as Kleine-Levin syndrome. The level of evidence for the treatment of sleepiness in these disorders is generally lower than in the well-characterized syndrome of narcolepsy, but available clinical and randomized, controlled trial data can provide guidance for the management of each of these disorders. Treatments vary by diagnosis but may include modafinil/armodafinil, traditional psychostimulants, solriamfetol, pitolisant, clarithromycin, flumazenil, sodium oxybate, melatonin, methylprednisolone, and lithium.

Disease symptomatology and response to treatment in people with idiopathic hypersomnia: initial data from the Hypersomnia Foundation registry

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Knowledge of idiopathic hypersomnia symptomatology derives from clinical case series. Web-based registries provide complementary information by allowing larger sample sizes, with greater geographic and social diversity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Data were obtained from the Hypersomnia Foundation's online registry. Common clinical features of idiopathic hypersomnia and other central disorders of hypersomnolence were queried, for the last thirty days and when symptoms were most severe. Symptoms were compared between idiopathic hypersomnia participants with and without long sleep durations and between participants with idiopathic hypersomnia and those with either form of narcolepsy. Frequency of medication use and residual symptoms on medication were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five-hundred sixty-three registry respondents were included, with idiopathic hypersomnia (n = 468), narcolepsy type 2 (n = 44), and narcolepsy type 1 (n = 51). "Brain fog," poor memory, and sleep drunkenness were all present in most idiopathic hypersomnia respondents, with brain fog and sleep drunkenness more commonly endorsed by those with long sleep durations. Eighty-two percent of participants with idiopathic hypersomnia were currently treated with medication, most commonly traditional psychostimulants such as amphetamine salts. Among treated patients, symptoms improved while on medication, but substantial residual hypersomnia symptoms remained. Participants with narcolepsy type 1 were more likely than those with idiopathic hypersomnia to endorse intentional and unintentional daytime naps and automatic behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of idiopathic hypersomnia extend well beyond excessive daytime sleepiness, and these symptoms frequently persist despite treatment. These findings highlight the importance of online registries in identifying gaps in the use and effectiveness of current treatments.

Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the central disorders of hypersomnolence, a group of disorders resulting in pathologic daytime sleepiness, particularly narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2, idiopathic hypersomnia, and Kleine-Levin syndrome. Disease features, diagnostic testing, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence implicates autoimmunity in narcolepsy type 1, including a strong association with human leukocyte antigen-DQB1*06:02, association with a polymorphism in the T-cell receptor alpha locus in genome-wide association, and the identification of autoreactive T cells in patients with this type of narcolepsy. In contrast, the cause or causes of narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia are unknown. Multiple treatment options exist, including two medications approved for the treatment of narcolepsy by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019. These include solriamfetol, a dopamine- and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor, and pitolisant, an H3-inverse agonist/antagonist that increases histaminergic neurotransmission.

SUMMARY

The central disorders of hypersomnolence all cause severe sleepiness but can be differentiated based on ancillary symptoms, diagnostic testing, and pathophysiology. It is important that these disorders are identified because multiple treatments are available to improve functioning and quality of life.

Frequency and severity of autonomic symptoms in idiopathic hypersomnia

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We aimed to quantify the symptoms of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in a large online cohort of patients with idiopathic hypersomnia, and to determine how the severity of these symptoms interacts with sleepiness, fatigue, and quality of life.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-eight patients with idiopathic hypersomnia and 81 age- and sex-matched controls were recruited through the website of the Hypersomnia Foundation, a US-based patient advocacy group. Twenty-four patients with confirmed idiopathic hypersomnia were selected by the study investigators as a comparison group. All participants completed a battery of online sleep, autonomic, and quality of life questionnaires including the composite autonomic symptom score-31 (COMPASS-31).

RESULTS

Online and confirmed patients reported significantly higher COMPASS-31 scores (median [interquartile range]) (43.6 [33.6-52.7] and 32.9 [21.7-46.8] vs 17.6 [11.7-27.9], P < .001), with the greatest symptom burden in the orthostatic and vasomotor domains. Online and confirmed patients reported more sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale), whereas only online patients reported more fatigue (Chalder fatigue scale). Both the Epworth sleepiness scale and Chalder fatigue scale positively correlated with COMPASS-31 scores. Patients reported lower quality of life as reflected by lower scores across all domains of the RAND 36-item health survey, which was negatively correlated with COMPASS-31 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of autonomic nervous system dysfunction are common in idiopathic hypersomnia. In addition, autonomic nervous system symptom burden was positively correlated with sleepiness and negatively correlated with quality of life.

Is Idiopathic Hypersomnia a Circadian Rhythm Disorder?

Purpose of review

The pathophysiology of idiopathic hypersomnia remains unclear, but some of its clinical features suggest the possibility of circadian dysfunction. This review will provide an overview of recent studies of circadian biology that have begun to elucidate the potential role of circadian rhythm dysfunction in idiopathic hypersomnia.

Recent findings

Clinically, people with idiopathic hypersomnia tend to have both a late chronotype and prominent sleep inertia or sleep drunkenness. Melatonin and cortisol profiles in people with IH confirm this tendency toward phase delay. More recently, it has been suggested that the night phase as defined by melatonin profile or period length as defined by BMA1 in dermal fibroblasts may also be prolonged in people with IH. Additionally, amplitude of melatonin rhythm and circadian gene expression, particularly BMAL1, PER1, and PER2, may be impaired in this disease.

Summary

Clinical features, melatonin profiles, and circadian gene expression all suggest abnormalities of the circadian system may be a contributor to the pathogenesis of IH.

Nocturnal sleep architecture in idiopathic hypersomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current sleep medicine nosology places increased importance on nocturnal polysomnographic sleep recordings in the diagnosis of central nervous system disorders of hypersomnolence, particularly idiopathic hypersomnia (IH).

OBJECTIVE

Determine what differences in sleep staging and architecture exist between IH and healthy controls using meta-analysis.

METHODS

Systematic review identified relevant studies that included nocturnal polysomnography data for IH and healthy control groups. Meta-analysis compared standardized mean differences (Hedge's g) for total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep efficiency (SE), rapid eye movement (REM) sleep percentage, slow wave sleep (SWS) percentage, and REM latency (REML). Moderator analyses were also conducted for variables with significant heterogeneity among studies.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 10 studies. Relative to controls, IH demonstrated increased TST (pooled g = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.38, p < 0.0001) and REM percentage (pooled g = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.64, p = 0.01), decreased SOL (pooled g = -0.46; 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.12, p = 0.009) and SWS percentage (pooled g = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.07, p = 0.01), without significant differences in SE (pooled g = 0.03; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.38, p = 0.86) or REML (pooled g = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.49, p = 0.42). Moderator analysis demonstrated a significant effect of sex on SE, with a higher proportion of women to men significantly predicting lower SE between in IH and controls (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

IH is associated with several changes in sleep staging and architecture relative to healthy persons, including alterations in REM and SWS not currently delineated in nosological constructs. Further research is indicated to clarify how these findings are related the pathophysiology of IH and related disorders.

Idiopathic Hypersomnia

Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a chronic neurologic disorder of daytime sleepiness, accompanied by long sleep times, unrefreshing sleep, difficulty in awakening, cognitive dysfunction, and autonomic symptoms. The cause is unknown; a genetic predisposition is suggested. Autonomic, inflammatory, or immune dysfunction has been proposed. Diagnosis involves a clinical history and objective testing. There are no approved treatments for IH, but modafinil is typically considered first-line. A substantial fraction of patients with IH are refractory or intolerant to standard treatments, and different treatment strategies using novel therapeutics are necessary. Even with current treatment options, quality of life and safety may remain impaired.