Obstructive sleep apnea, sleep duration and chronic kidney disease in patients with coronary artery disease

Non-pharmacological interventions for improving sleep outcomes among patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep outcomes among patients with coronary artery disease and recognize pertinent characteristics that potentially affect the effectiveness of such interventions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Relevant studies conducted before 27 April 2022 were identified through four core electronic databases using terms related to coronary artery disease, sleep outcomes, and randomized controlled trials. Two authors independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analysis, sub-group analysis, publication bias analysis, and sensitivity analysis were conducted using R version 4.2.2. Of the 4755 retrieved articles, 42 studies were selected for systematic review and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The findings of this study revealed that non-pharmacological interventions significantly improved self-reported sleep quality (standardized mean difference = -0.85, 95% confidence interval -1.08, -0.63), but had no effects on objectively measured sleep efficiency and duration. Regarding the types of interventions involved, environmental control was the most effective in improving self-reported sleep quality, followed by relaxation, self-care behaviour management, and relaxation and cognitive/psychological complex interventions. Through subgroup analysis, we did not find any covariates that were significantly related to self-reported sleep quality.

CONCLUSION

Non-pharmacological interventions have been shown to play beneficial roles in improving self-reported sleep quality among patients with coronary artery disease. Additional studies are required to elucidate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on objectively measured sleep outcomes and to characterize their optimal frequencies and durations.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022366851.

Sleep, circadian rhythm characteristics, and melatonin levels in later life adults with and without coronary artery disease

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of sleep and circadian rhythms in individuals with and without coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Participants were 32 individuals, mean age = 70.9, female 46.9%, 19 with CAD, and 13 without CAD. We assessed sleep quality and 24-hour rest-activity rhythms for 14 days using wrist actigraphy and self-report measures, and circadian rhythm using dim light melatonin onset.

RESULTS

Melatonin levels prior to habitual bedtime were significantly lower in individuals with CAD than in those without CAD (median area under the curve = 12.88 vs 26.33 pg/ml × h, P = .049). The median circadian timing measured by dim light melatonin onset was the same for the 2 groups with 20:26 [hours:minutes] for individuals with CAD and 19:53 for the control group (P = .64, r = .14). Compared to the control group, the CAD group had significantly lower amplitude (P = .03, r =-.48), and lower overall rhythmicity (pseudo-F-statistic P = .004, r = -.65) in their 24-hour rest-activity rhythms.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first studies to comprehensively assess both sleep and circadian rhythm in individuals with CAD. Compared to non-CAD controls, individuals with CAD had lower levels of melatonin prior to habitual bedtime and a lower 24-hour rest-activity rhythm amplitude and overall rhythmicity. Future studies using larger sample sizes should further investigate the possibility of suppressed circadian rhythmicity in individuals with CAD.

CITATION

Moon C, Benson CJ, Albashayreh A, Perkhounkova Y, Burgess HJ. Sleep, circadian rhythm characteristics, and melatonin levels in later life adults with and without coronary artery disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(2):283-292.

Duração do sono autorrelatada e objetiva em pacientes com DRC: contam a mesma história?

Resumo Introdução: Há discordância entre os dados sobre duração do sono obtidos a partir de questionários e medições objetivas. Não se sabe se isto também é verdade para indivíduos com DRC. Aqui comparamos a duração do sono autorrelatada com a duração do sono obtida por meio de actigrafia. Métodos: Este estudo prospectivo incluiu indivíduos adultos com DRC estadio 3 recrutados entre Setembro/2016 e Fevereiro/2019. Avaliamos a duração subjetiva do sono, fazendo a seguinte questão: “Quantas horas de sono real você teve à noite?” Resultados: Os pacientes (N=34) eram relativamente jovens (51 ± 13 anos). A duração do sono autorrelatada e mensurada foi de 7,1 ± 1,7 e 6,9 ± 1,6 horas, respectivamente, sem correlação entre elas (p=0,165). Embora a diferença média entre as medições tenha sido de 0,21 h, os limites de concordância variaram de -3,7 a 4,1 h. Conclusão: Pacientes com DRC que não estão em diálise apresentam uma percepção equivocada do sono. Dados sobre a duração do sono devem ser obtidos preferencialmente a partir de medições objetivas em pacientes com DRC.

Self-reported and objective sleep duration in patients with CKD: are they telling the same story?

Abstract Introduction: There is disagreement between data on sleep duration obtained from questionnaires and objective measurements. Whether this is also true for individuals with CKD is unknown. Here we compared self-reported sleep duration with sleep duration obtained by actigraphy. Methods: This prospective study included adult individuals with stage 3 CKD recruited between September/2016 and February/2019. We evaluated subjective sleep duration by asking the following question: “How many hours of actual sleep did you get at night?” Results: Patients (N=34) were relatively young (51 ± 13 years). Self-reported and measured sleep duration were 7.1 ± 1.7 and 6.9 ± 1.6 hours, respectively, with no correlation between them (p=0.165). Although the mean difference between measurements was 0.21 h, the limits of agreement ranged from -3.7 to 4.1 h. Conclusion: Patients with CKD who are not on dialysis have an erroneous sleep perception. Data on sleep duration should be preferentially obtained from objective measurements in patients with CKD.