The effects of meiotic stage on viability and developmental capability of goat oocytes vitrified by the Cryoloop method

The Assessment of Various Factors Affecting the Postwarming Viability and Developmental Capability of Goat Metaphase II Oocytes Vitrified by Cryotop

The effects of the equilibration time, the vitrification procedure, and the warming procedure on the quality of goat oocytes vitrified by Cryotop were assessed. In the first part of the study, oocytes were exposed to 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 10% ethylene glycol (EG) for 1, 3, 5, or 10 minutes, respectively, followed by vitrification. In the second part, after equilibration in 7.5% DMSO +7.5% EG for 3 minutes, 10% DMSO +10% EG for 3 minutes, or 4% EG for 10 minutes, oocytes were equilibrated in 15% DMSO +15% EG, 20% DMSO +20% EG, or 35% EG for 30 seconds before vitrification. The vitrification procedures were designated as first vitrification procedure (VPI), second vitrification procedure (VPII), and third vitrification procedure (VPIII), respectively. In the third part, oocytes vitrified using VPIII were warmed by the three procedures (first warming procedure [TPI], second warming procedure [TPII], or third warming procedure [TPIII]) containing different concentrations of trehalose. The results showed that after equilibration for 1 or 3 minutes in 10% DMSO and 10% EG, the viability and developmental capability of vitrified oocytes were significantly superior to the groups after equilibration for over 5 minutes (p < 0.05). With the VPIII procedure, the frequencies with normal morphology, cleavage, and blastocyst formation of vitrified oocytes were 91.87% ± 4.14%, 76.51% ± 4.37%, and 39.84% ± 2.91%, respectively, demonstrating a significant increase compared to the VPI or VPII group (p < 0.05). The rates of vitrified oocytes with normal morphology and cleavage in the TPI group were higher than the TPII or TPIII group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, equilibration in 10% DMSO and 10% EG for <3 minutes benefits the viability of vitrified oocytes. EG may be more efficient for vitrification of goat oocytes compared to DMSO. Higher concentrations (more than 1 M) of trehalose enhance cryosurvival of goat oocytes when warming.

The presence of synthetic polymers in the maturation medium affects the cryotolerance and developmental capacity after parthenogenic activation of vitrified goat oocytes

The purpose of this present study is to assess if addition of the synthetic polymers in maturation medium can influence cryotolerance and subsequently embryonic development of mammalian oocytes. We examined the roles of two polymers, including polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), on in vitro maturation (IVM), embryonic developmental capacity, and cryotolerance of goat oocytes. The present study includes two parts. At first, goat cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were matured in a medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 3 mg/ml PVP, or 1 mg/ml PVA, respectively. Data of oocyte with first polar body, cleavage, and blastocyst following parthenogenetic activation (PA) were recorded. Secondly, after maturation in the above medium, oocytes were vitrified using the Cryotop technique and then the morphology, cleavage and blastocyst formation of vitrified oocytes have been checked. The results demonstrated that the adding of PVP or PVA in maturation medium can't affect IVM of goat oocytes in comparison with FBS, as concern cumulus cell expansion, first polar body formation, and embryonic development. Additionally, without plunging into liquid nitrogen, only exposure to the vitrification and warming solutions cannot also influence the quality of oocytes, in terms of morphology, cleavage, and blastocyst formation. However, after IVM with synthetic polymers and vitrification, the ratio of oocytes with standard morphology in PVP or PVA group was only 59.47% ± 3.56% or 54.86% ± 5.19%, respectively, and was significantly less than that in the FBS group (89.37% ± 4.52%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the cleavage ratio of oocytes in PVP or PVA group was 37.41% ± 4.17% or 27.71% ± 3.91% and was considerably less than that in the FBS group (64.97% ± 4.69%, P < 0.05). In addition, the cleavage ratio in PVP group was statistically higher than that in PVA group (P < 0.05). In terms of blastocyst development, a significant difference was observed between the synthetic polymer group and the FBS group (24.96% ± 3.62%, P < 0.05). However, the blastocyst ratio in the PVA group (7.51% ± 1.68%) was statistically less than the PVP groups (13.20% ± 4.59%, P < 0.05) and the FBS group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, two potential serum replacements, either PVP or PVA, can support IVM and embryonic development of goat oocytes at the concentration used in this study. But IVM with synthetic polymers supplemented to maturation medium may reduce the cryotolerance of oocytes. Additionally, the supportive function of PVP on embryonic development of vitrified oocytes might be better than that of PVA.

A comparison of different vitrification devices and the effect of blastocoele collapse on the cryosurvival of in vitro produced porcine embryos

The aim of this study was to determine the optimum conditions for vitrifying in vitro produced day 7 porcine embryos using different vitrification devices and blastocoele collapse methods. Firstly embryos were collapsed by micro-pipetting, needle puncture and sucrose with and without conducting vitrification. In the next experiment, non-collapsed embryos were vitrified in an open device using either superfine open-pulled straws (SOPS) or the CryoLoop^TM system, or vitrified in a closed device using either the CryoTip^TM or Cryo Bio^TM’s high security vitrification system (HSV). The post-thaw survival of embryos vitrified in the open devices did not differ significantly (SOPS: 37.3%; CryoLoop^TM: 37.3%) nor did the post-thaw survival of embryos vitrified in the closed devices (CryoTip™: 38.5%; HSV: 42.5%). The re-expansion rate of embryos that were collapsed via micro-pipetting (76.0%) did not differ from those that were punctured (75.0%) or collapsed via sucrose (79.6%) when vitrification was not performed. However, embryos collapsed via sucrose solutions (24.5%) and needle puncture (16.0%) prior to vitrification were significantly less likely to survive vitrification than the control (non-collapsed) embryos (53.6%, P < 0.05). The findings show that both open and closed vitrification devices were equally effective for the vitrification of porcine blastocysts. Collapsing blastocysts prior to vitrification did not improve survival, which is inconsistent with the findings of studies in other species. This may be due to the extremely sensitive nature of porcine embryos, and/or the invasiveness of the collapsing procedures.