Phenotypic relationships of breech cover, wrinkle and wool coverage scores with key production traits and their implications for Australian Merino sheep management to reduce flystrike

Control of sheep flystrike: what's been tried in the past and where to from here

Flystrike remains a serious financial and animal welfare issue for the sheep industry in Australia despite many years of research into control methods. The present paper provides an extensive review of past research on flystrike, and highlights areas that hold promise for providing long-term control options. We describe areas where the application of modern scientific advances may provide increased impetus to some novel, as well as some previously explored, control methods. We provide recommendations for research activities: insecticide resistance management, novel delivery methods for therapeutics, improved breeding indices for flystrike-related traits, mechanism of nematode-induced scouring in mature animals. We also identify areas where advances can be made in flystrike control through the greater adoption of well-recognised existing management approaches: optimal insecticide-use patterns, increased use of flystrike-related Australian Sheep Breeding Values, and management practices to prevent scouring in young sheep. We indicate that breeding efforts should be primarily focussed on the adoption and improvement of currently available breeding tools and towards the future integration of genomic selection methods. We describe factors that will impact on the ongoing availability of insecticides for flystrike control and on the feasibility of vaccination. We also describe areas where the blowfly genome may be useful in providing impetus to some flystrike control strategies, such as area-wide approaches that seek to directly suppress or eradicate sheep blowfly populations. However, we also highlight the fact that commercial and feasibility considerations will act to temper the potential for the genome to act as the basis for providing some control options.

Substantial genetic gains in reducing breech flystrike and in improving productivity traits are achievable in Merino sheep by using index selection

Context The availability of effective indirect rather than direct selection criteria for genetically reducing breech flystrike is crucial for the Australian wool industry, as expression of breech flystrike is routinely suppressed by management interventions to minimise the risks to sheep health, welfare and productivity. Understanding how much genetic gain can be made in reducing breech strike, while also selecting for other key traits is important in choosing breeding objectives, particularly for Merino genetic improvement programs. Aims We predicted genetic gains from within-flock selection to reduce breech flystrike incidence (FS) and improve productivity under a range of scenarios that all used indirect selection criteria in the genetic evaluation of FS. Methods Three breeding objectives were modelled, by adding FS as a trait to the breeding objective for the Dual Purpose Plus (DP+), Fibre Production Plus (FP+) and Merino Production Plus (MP+) indexes available from MERINOSELECT. A large range of economic values were examined for FS, from 0 to –$240/strike.sheep per year in $20 increments. For all scenarios, full records of productivity traits and pedigree information were assumed to be available for use as selection criteria, as well as records of breech wrinkle, dag and breech cover scores. Predictions were conducted for scenarios assuming (a) moderate heritability for FS (b) low heritability for FS, and (c) low heritability for FS, but higher heritability for dag score than assumed for scenarios (a) and (b). Key results After 10 years of selection, under assumption (a) predicted genetic gains in FS ranged from 0, up to maximum reductions of 0.19, 0.21, and 0.20/strike.sheep per year from use of the FP+FS, MP+FS and DP+FS indexes, respectively. Under assumption (b) predictions of genetic gain for FS were considerably lower and ranged from 0 to maximum reductions of 0.04, 0.06 and 0.06/strike.sheep per year based on use of FP+FS, MP+FS and DP+FS indexes, respectively. Under assumption (c), predicted genetic gains in FS were very similar to those under assumption (b). When 70% of the maximum gains in FS studied were targeted, from 70% to 93% of genetic gains in the overall index (excluding FS) were predicted to be retained when FS had moderate heritability, and from 85% to 95% when FS had low heritability. Conclusions and implications There is a practical range of economic values for FS (from –$60 to –$80/strike.sheep per year for MP+FS and DP+FS indexes and –$60 to –$140/strike.sheep per year for a FP+FS index when the heritability of FS is moderate and –$100 to –$200/strike.sheep per year for a MP+FS index and –$140 to –$240/strike.sheep per year for FP+FS and DP+FS indexes when the heritability of FS is low), that could be used in breeding programs to genetically reduce FS, while retaining competitive levels of genetic gains for other important traits. Reduction of FS is achievable to low levels, after 10–20 years of index selection, similar to levels achieved by mulesing (0.01/strike.sheep per year in average seasonal conditions).