B cells in clinical transplantation tolerance

The liver-resident immune cell repertoire - A boon or a bane during machine perfusion?

The liver has been proposed as an important “immune organ” of the body, as it is critically involved in a variety of specific and unique immune tasks. It contains a huge resident immune cell repertoire, which determines the balance between tolerance and inflammation in the hepatic microenvironment. Liver-resident immune cells, populating the sinusoids and the space of Disse, include professional antigen-presenting cells, myeloid cells, as well as innate and adaptive lymphoid cell populations. Machine perfusion (MP) has emerged as an innovative technology to preserve organs ex vivo while testing for organ quality and function prior to transplantation. As for the liver, hypothermic and normothermic MP techniques have successfully been implemented in clinically routine, especially for the use of marginal donor livers. Although there is evidence that ischemia reperfusion injury-associated inflammation is reduced in machine-perfused livers, little is known whether MP impacts the quantity, activation state and function of the hepatic immune-cell repertoire, and how this affects the inflammatory milieu during MP. At this point, it remains even speculative if liver-resident immune cells primarily exert a pro-inflammatory and hence destructive effect on machine-perfused organs, or in part may be essential to induce liver regeneration and counteract liver damage. This review discusses the role of hepatic immune cell subtypes during inflammatory conditions and ischemia reperfusion injury in the context of liver transplantation. We further highlight the possible impact of MP on the modification of the immune cell repertoire and its potential for future applications and immune modulation of the liver.

Regulatory B lymphocytes: development and modulation of the host immune response during disease

The role of B lymphocytes (B cells) in immunogenic responses has become increasingly important over the past decade, focusing on a new B-cell subtype: regulatory B-cells (Bregs). These Bregs have been shown to possess potent immunosuppressive activities and have identified as key players in disease control and immune tolerance. In this review, the occurrence of Breg type in various conditions, along with evidence supporting discovered functions and proposed purposes will be explored. An example of such regulatory functions includes the induction or suppression of various T lymphocyte phenotypes in response to a particular stimulus. Should Bregs prove effective in mediating immune responses, and correlate with favorable disease outcome, they may serve as a novel therapeutic to combat disease and prevent infection. However, the induction, function and stability of these cells remain unclear and further investigation is needed to better understand their role and therapeutic efficacy.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rituximab in HLA Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

HLA-sensitized patients are penalized both in the access to kidney transplantation (KT) and, once transplanted, in the incidence of rejections and long-term allograft survival despite aggressive induction and maintenance therapy.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluates the impact of combining T- and B-cell-depleting agents and intravenous immunoglobulin for induction therapy in 45 highly sensitized KT patients (anti-panel reactive antibodies >60%, positive flow cytometry crossmatch or donor specific antibodies at the time of transplantation). The outcome data included the occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, new-onset proteinuria, development of leukopenia, incidence of poliomavirus infection (BK or JC virus), fungal or bacterial infection after KT, de novo neoplasia, graft function, graft loss, or death with functioning KT.

RESULTS

The average panel reactive antibody was 62.5%; 41 patients (91.1%) had ≥3 HLA mismatches with the donor and 91.1% of patients had class I or II anti-HLA antibodies. Fourteen patients (31.1%) presented pre-KT donor-specific antibodies and 6 patients (13.3%) had a positive flow cytometry cross-match at the time of transplantation. The incidence of acute rejection in the first 6 months was 24.4% and the cumulative incidence was 37.8%. Two patients were diagnosed with leukopenia in the first 6 months after KT. Two patients (4.5%) had cytomegalovirus disease, 17 patients (37.8%) were diagnosed with bacterial infections. Cutaneous neoplasms were identified in 5 patients (11.1%) and solid tumors in 4 (8.9%). The death-censored graft survival was 100% in the first 6 months and 93.5% at the last evaluation. Patient survival in the same periods was 97.8% and 93.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab is effective; outcomes demonstrate an excellent patient and allograft survival and allograft function over the follow-up period.

A Paradigm Shift on the Question of B Cells in Transplantation? Recent Insights on Regulating the Alloresponse

B lymphocytes contribute to acute and chronic allograft rejection through their production of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). In addition, B cells present allopeptides bound to self-MHC class II molecules and provide costimulation signals to T cells, which are essential to their activation and differentiation into memory T cells. On the other hand, both in laboratory rodents and patients, the concept of effector T cell regulation by B cells is gaining traction in the field of transplantation. Specifically, clinical trials using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies to deplete B cells and reverse DSA had a deleterious effect on rates of acute cellular rejection; a peculiar finding that calls into question a central paradigm in transplantation. Additional work in humans has characterized IL-10-producing B cells (IgM memory and transitional B cells), which suppress the proliferation and inflammatory cytokine productions of effector T cells in vitro. Understanding the mechanisms of regulating the alloresponse is critical if we are to achieve operational tolerance across transplantation. This review will focus on recent evidence in murine and human transplantation with respect to non-traditional roles for B cells in determining clinical outcomes.

Fingerprints of transplant tolerance suggest opportunities for immunosuppression minimization

HLA incompatible organ transplant tolerance is the holy grail of transplantation. Stable engraftment of an HLA mismatched allograft and life-long tolerance induction, though feasible in highly selected cohorts with depletional protocols, is not ready for generalized application to the entire transplant recipient pool. It has thus been important to harness biomarkers that can uncover mechanisms and tools for monitoring HLA mismatched recipients that develop a state of operational tolerance, during accidental immunosuppression withdrawal secondary to problems of over-immunosuppression (infection or malignancy) or toxicity (mostly cosmetic or cardiovascular). A restricted and unpredictable group of patients can demonstrate a clinical state of operational tolerance, manifested by state of stable graft function of a graft with HLA mismatches between recipient and donor, intact immune responses to third party antigens and no measurable immunosuppression. These patients have served as the basis for the discovery of clinically correlative biomarkers, in distal biofluids (mainly blood), that can define the existing state of operational clinical tolerance. Operationally tolerant patients are rare, as withdrawal of immunosuppression most often results in rejection and graft loss. Nevertheless, operationally tolerant kidney, liver and heart allograft recipients have been reported. The presence of similar biomarker signature profiles in HLA mismatched transplant recipients on immunosuppression, suggests the feasibility of utilizing these biomarkers for educated immunosuppression minimization with a view to retaining immunological quiescence, while reducing the maintenance immunosuppression burden to a "safe" alloimmune threshold. Though clinical operational tolerance is rare, as immunosuppression cessation most often results in increased alloimmunity and rejection, the biomarker profile studies that have harnessed whole genome profiling suggest that the frequency of this state may be ~8% in kidney allograft recipients, and even more frequent in pediatric recipients and in liver transplantation: 25% in adult liver allograft recipients and ~60% in pediatric liver allograft recipients. In this review we discuss putative molecular mechanisms, cellular players and correlative biomarkers that have been developed through clinically associative studies of tolerant and non-tolerant patients. Through mechanisms of carefully constructed and monitored randomized, prospective clinical trials, the transplant community stands at the cusp of improved quality of recipient life through educated immunosuppression minimization.

Combined induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin and rituximab in highly sensitized renal recipients

Compared to non-sensitized renal transplant recipients, patients with preformed alloantibodies are at greater risk of cellular and humoral rejection and premature graft failure. We explored the effects of adding B-cell depleting agent (rituximab) to standard rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction regimen for patients with panel reactive antibody levels >50%. Following induction therapy, 14 recipients were given two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) within the first month post-transplantation. Their long-term outcomes were compared to a historical control group of 23 recipients who received rATG alone. Graft survival at 5 years was superior with combination therapy compared to induction therapy alone (92.9 versus 48.3%, respectively, p = 0.02). While 30% of the rATG alone group experienced cellular rejection and 26% humoral rejection, none of rituximab plus rATG renal transplant recipients group had rejection. Thus, addition of rituximab to rATG provided superior outcomes to rATG alone. This combination induction therapy should be considered for a high-risk population.

Relevance of regulatory T cell promotion of donor-specific tolerance in solid organ transplantation

Current clinical strategies to control the alloimmune response after transplantation do not fully prevent induction of the immunological processes which lead to acute and chronic immune-mediated graft rejection, and as such the survival of a solid organ allograft is limited. Experimental research on naturally occurring CD4⁺CD25^highFoxP3⁺ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) has indicated their potential to establish stable long-term graft acceptance, with the promise of providing a more effective therapy for transplant recipients. Current approaches for clinical use are based on the infusion of freshly isolated or ex vivo polyclonally expanded Tregs into graft recipients with an aim to redress the in vivo balance of T effector cells to Tregs. However mounting evidence suggests that regulation of donor-specific immunity may be central to achieving immunological tolerance. Therefore, the next stages in optimizing translation of Tregs to organ transplantation will be through the refinement and development of donor alloantigen-specific Treg therapy. The altering kinetics and intensity of alloantigen presentation pathways and alloimmune priming following transplantation may indeed influence the specificity of the Treg required and the timing or frequency at which it needs to be administered. Here we review and discuss the relevance of antigen-specific regulation of alloreactivity by Tregs in experimental and clinical studies of tolerance and explore the concept of delivering an optimal Treg for the induction and maintenance phases of achieving transplantation tolerance.