Emil Kraepelin's concepts of the phenomenology and physiology of sleep: The first systematic description of chronotypes

When early and late risers were left to their own devices: six distinct chronotypes under "lockdown" remained dissimilar on their sleep and health problems

Under national "lockdown," the habitual late risers need not wake up early, and, similarly to the early risers, they don't lose much sleep on weekdays. We tested whether, despite a decrease in weekday sleep loss, the difference between distinct chronotypes in health and sleep problems persisted during "lockdown." Two online surveys were conducted from 10th to 20th of May, 2020 and 2021, one of them after 6 non-working weeks and another after 14 working weeks (during and after "lockdown," respectively). Participants were students of the same grade at the same university department (572 and 773, respectively). The self-assessments included the Single-Item Chronotyping (SIC) designed for self-choosing chronotype among several their short descriptions and several questions about general health, mood state, outdoors and physical activity, and sleep concerns. The results suggested that the responses to each of the questions were not randomly distributed over 6 distinct chronotypes. Such a nonrandomness was identified within each of three pairs of these chronotypes, evening vs. morning types (with a rising throughout the day vs. a falling level of alertness, respectively), afternoon vs. napping types (with a peak vs. a dip of alertness in the afternoon, respectively), and vigilant vs. lethargic types (with the levels of alertness being permanently high vs. low, respectively). Morning, afternoon, and vigilant types reported healthier sleep/mood/behavior/habits than three other types. The most and the least healthy sleep/mood/behavior/habits were reported by morning and evening types, respectively. These relationships with health and sleep problems and the frequencies of 6 chronotypes remained unchanged after "lockdown." Such results, in particular, suggested that the association of evening types with poorer health and sleep might not be attributed to a big amount of weekday sleep loss. The accounting for this association might help in designing interventions purposed on reduction of sleep and health problems.

Associations of depression and seasonality with morning-evening preference: Comparison of contributions of its morning and evening components

Despite predominance of positive findings on associations of morning-evening preference with seasonality and depression, it remains to be clarified whether morning and evening components of this preference equally contribute to these associations and whether these associations persist after accounting for confounding variables. Data on retrospectively reported seasonal changes in well-being, mood, and behaviors were collected from 2398 residents of West Siberia, South and North Yakutia, Chukotka, Alaska, and Turkmenistan. Other self-reports included mental and physical health, sleep duration, and adaptabilities of the sleep-wake cycle. Depression was found to be linked to morning rather than evening component of morning-evening preference, i.e., morning lateness. Morning lateness was also linked to retrospectively reported degree of seasonal changes rather than to severity of problems associated with such changes. Variation in morning-evening preference explained not more than 2% and 4% of the total variation in depression and seasonality, respectively. The associations became even weaker but remained significant after accounting for other differences between respondents, such as their gender, age, physical health, and adaptability of their sleep-wake cycle. These results have practical relevance for understanding of the roles playing by morning earliness and insensitivity to seasonal changes in the environment to protection against different mood disorders.

State- and trait-like variation in morning and evening components of morningness-eveningness in winter depression

PURPOSE

Evening preference (eveningness) can be a risk factor for depression and a shift toward morning preference (morningness) can occur in response to treatment. A study of winter depression provides possibility to longitudinally evaluate state- and trait-like variation in morningness-eveningness during treatment in winter and remission in summer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Female patients with winter depression and controls without a psychiatric history (n = 54 and 32 with mean age ± standard deviation of 34.4 ± 11.0 and 35.7 ± 9.5 years, respectively) were treated with two-hour bright light for a week during winter period. Some of them (n = 40 and 19, respectively) were then restudied in summer. Measures obtained during the winter period from patients before and after treatment were compared to those obtained from controls and from the same patients in the summer period. Among compared measures, there were self-assessments of state- and trait-like differences in morning and evening components of morningness-eveningness.

RESULTS

The groups of depressed patients and controls differed in self-assessments of morning but not evening component of morningness-eveningness. The difference in state-like variation in morning component became non-significant after treatment and in summer. On the other hand, trait-like variation in this component demonstrated adequate test-retest (winter-summer) reliability, i.e. a shift toward trait-like eveningness persisted in patients in the summer.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed normalization of state-like variation in morning component of morning-evening preference can be mainly explained by the disappearance of such depressive symptoms as lack of energy, social withdrawal, loss of interest in once enjoyable activities, etc.

Owls, larks, swifts, woodcocks and they are not alone: A historical review of methodology for multidimensional self-assessment of individual differences in sleep-wake pattern

Differences between the so-called larks and owls representing the opposite poles of morningness-eveningness dimension are widely known. However, scientific consensus has not yet been reached on the methodology for ranking and typing people along other dimensions of individual variation in their sleep-wake pattern. This review focused on the history and state-of-the-art of the methodology for self-assessment of individual differences in more than one trait or adaptability of the human sleep-wake cycle. The differences between this and other methodologies for the self-assessment of trait- and state-like variation in the perceived characteristics of daily rhythms were discussed and the critical issues that remained to be addressed in future studies were highlighted. These issues include a) a failure to develop a unidimensional scale for scoring chronotypological differences, b) the inconclusive results of the long-lasting search for objective markers of chronotype, c) a disagreement on both number and content of scales required for multidimensional self-assessment of chronobiological differences, d) a lack of evidence for the reliability and/or external validity of most of the proposed scales and e) an insufficient development of conceptualizations, models and model-based quantitative simulations linking the differences between people in their sleep-wake pattern with the differences in the basic parameters of underlying chronoregulatory processes. It seems that, in the nearest future, the wide implementation of portable actigraphic and somnographic devices might lead to the development of objective methodologies for multidimensional assessment and classification of sleep-wake traits and adaptabilities.