Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea associated with non-positive airway pressure therapies in obstructive sleep apnea patients: A systematic review

The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) describes the appearance or persistence of central sleep apnea while undergoing treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. TECSA is well studied in continuous positive airway pressure therapy with an estimated prevalence of 8%. Based on a few case reports, mandibular advancement devices (MAD) may also provoke TECSA. This study aims to gain insight into the prevalence of TECSA with MAD therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes a total of 129 patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea who were treated with a custom-made titratable MAD. Baseline and follow-up sleep studies were compared to identify patients with TECSA. Since different diagnostic criteria to define TECSA are used in literature, prevalence was calculated according to three definitions (TECSA-1, -2, and -3). Demographics, MAD treatment variables, and findings of the diagnostic polysomnography were compared between TECSA and non-TECSA patients to identify possible predictors.

RESULTS

Depending on the definition used, TECSA was found in 3.1%-7.8% of patients undergoing MAD therapy. TECSA patients had a higher apnea index (9.2 vs 2.0 events/h, P = .042), central apnea-hypopnea index (4.1 vs 0.2 events/h, P = .045) and oxygen desaturation index (23.9 vs 16.3 events/h, P = .018) at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients. No differences were found in demographics and treatment variables.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that TECSA also occurs in patients starting MAD treatment. Patients with TECSA had a higher apnea index, central apnea-hypopnea index, and oxygen desaturation index at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients.

CITATION

Hellemans S, Van de Perck E, Braem MJ, Verbraecken J, Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM. The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2035-2041.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to be a safe alternative in the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A recent meta-analysis of 12 studies by Costantino et al. indicated the surgical success rates at 55-75%, a reduction of the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 18 events/h, and a reduction of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) of 2.9-5.3. After animal studies in the 1970s, the first trial on humans to decrease upper airway resistance by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the genioglossus was reported in 1989. A separate stimulation of protruding and retracting muscles was realized in 1995 by fine-wire electrodes that were placed into the tongue transoral. Over the next years, several companies developed implantable devices for hypoglossal stimulation in OSA. Initially, devices were developed that used unilateral stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. In 2014, a device for unilateral respiratory frequency-controlled hypoglossal stimulation finally received FDA approval after a successful phase III trial. In recent years, a device for bilateral breath rate-independent stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has been added to these approaches as a new development. Accordingly, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, on the one hand, is now an established tool for patients with OSA when standard treatments are not satisfactory. Beyond that, hypoglossal stimulation is undergoing a continuous and impressive development like hardly any other field of surgical therapy for OSA.

[Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea - Detection and Treatment]

Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea - Detection and Treatment Abstract. In treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA), affected patients with obstructive sleep apnea newly develop central sleep apnea (AHI central ≥5/h) under therapy with positive pressure ventilation which cannot be explained by other causes. The pathophysiology of TECSA is incompletely understood. PaCO2 and the associated apnea threshold seem to play a central role. The incidence of TECSA varies (1.8-20%), and in about 2/3 of cases it is self-limiting in the course of the therapy. If persistence or new onset occurs later in the course of positive pressure therapy, a further evaluation (e.g., echocardiography, neurologic examination, medication history) is indicated. Effective treatment options include a change in ventilation therapy (adaptive servoventilation or bilevel ventilation with back-up frequency) or additional nocturnal oxygen supplementation; these options should be decided case by case.