Placebo response in objective and subjective measures of hypersomnia in randomized clinical trials on obstructive sleep apnea. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Pitolisant for Residual Sleepiness Due to OSA

BACKGROUND

In people with OSA, excessive daytime sleepiness is a prominent symptom and can persist despite adherence to CPAP, the first-line therapy for OSA. Pitolisant was effective in reducing daytime sleepiness in two 12-week randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one in patients adherent to CPAP (BF2.649 in Patients With OSA and Treated by CPAP But Still Complaining of EDS [HAROSA 1]) and the other in patients refusing or not tolerating CPAP (BF2.649 in Patients With OSA, Still Complaining of EDS and Refusing to be Treated by CPAP [HAROSA 2]).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the efficacy and safety of pitolisant persist when these patients take it long-term?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

All adults included in the HAROSA 1 and HAROSA 2 RCTs (both pitolisant and placebo arms) were offered pitolisant (up to 20 mg/d) after completion of the short-term double-anonymized phase (ie, from week 13) in an open-label cohort study. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score between baseline and week 52. Safety outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse event(s) (TEAE[s]), serious TEAEs, and special interest TEAEs.

RESULTS

Out of 512 adults included in the two RCTs, 376 completed the 1-year follow-up. The pooled mean difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline to 1 year for the intention-to-treat sample was -8.0 (95% CI, -8.3 to -7.5). The overall proportions of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest were 35.1%, 2.0%, and 11.1%, respectively, without any significant difference between patients in the initial pitolisant and placebo arms. No cardiovascular safety issues were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Pitolisant is effective in reducing daytime sleepiness over 1 year in adults with OSA, with or without CPAP treatment. Taken for 1 year, it has a good safety profile (including cardiovascular).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; Nos.: NCT01071876 and NCT01072968; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).