Simultaneous laparoscopic type III paraesophageal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Use of small intestinal submucosal and acellular dermal matrix grafts in giant omphaloceles in neonates and a rabbit abdominal wall defect model

BACKGROUND

The described surgical strategies for the management of omphalocele include primary closure, staged closure, and delayed closure. A primary repair is not suitable for all giant omphaloceles. We implanted two grafts, small intestinal submucosal (SIS) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) onto abdominal wall defects in neonates to study the safety and efficacy of SIS and ADM graft techniques for initial closure of giant omphaloceles in infants, and we also implanted these grafts onto abdominal wall defects in an animal model.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with giant omphaloceles were divided into two groups (ADM group, 12 patients; SIS group, 12 patients). The operative time, skin healing time postoperatively, and the incidence of skin infections, and abdominal wall hernias were observed. In the rabbit animal model, bilateral full-thickness incisions were made through the rabbit rectus abdominus muscles and a 2×4cm longitudinal whole layer defect was created on either the left or right lateral anterior abdominal wall. A four-layered variant of the SIS graft was used to repair the right abdominal defect; ADM was used to repair the left. Tensile strength was measured using an Instron tensiometer. Electron scanning and light microscopy were used to evaluate neovascularization, collagen deposition, and muscle fibers at 2, 4, 8, and 16weeks postimplantation.

RESULTS

In the neonatal patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to operative time, skin healing time postoperatively, the incidence of skin infections, or abdominal wall hernias. In the SIS group, only one patient developed a skin infection, which led to skin necrosis and sloughing. In the ADM group, four patients developed skin infection postoperatively, and the patch was gradually removed. In the animal study, there was no significant difference between the mean breaking strength of ADM versus SIS repairs. Scanning electron and light microscopy showed collagen deposition, increased vascularization, fibroblasts, and muscular regeneration in both SIS and ADM repairs. SEM showed that the SIS graft was absorbed, while ADM was not. Light microscopy showed foreign body macrophages in ADM, but not in the SIS repairs.

CONCLUSION

SIS and ADM grafts adequately enhance healing with a low complication rate. Compared with ADM grafts, SIS is absorbable, induces less inflammation, and is more biocompatible, and therefore might be more useful and suitable for closure of abdominal wall defects.

Concurrent Large Para-oesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Results from 5-year Follow Up

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to identify the efficacy and safety of combining laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with repair of large para-oesophageal hernias.

BACKGROUND

Para-oesophageal hernias are more common in the obese with higher recurrence rates following repair. The effect and safety of combining para-oesophageal hernia repair with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is unknown.

METHODS

One-hundred fourteen consecutive patients undergoing primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with concurrent repair of a large para-oesophageal hernia were prospectively identified and matched to a control group undergoing primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding only. Weight loss and complication data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database, and a standardised bariatric outcome questionnaire was used to assess post-operative symptoms, satisfaction with surgery and satiety scores.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 4.9 ± 2.1 years, total weight loss was 16.4 ± 9.9% in the hernia repair group and 17.6 ± 12.6% in the control group (p = 0.949), with 17 vs. 11% loss to follow up rates (p = 0.246). No statistically significant difference in revisional surgery rate and symptomatic recurrence of hiatal hernia was documented in four patients in the hernia repair group (3.5%). No statistically significant difference in mean reflux (9.9 vs. 10.3, p = 0.821), dysphagia (20.7 vs. 20.1, p = 0.630) or satiety scores was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent repair of large para-oesophageal hiatal hernia and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding placement is safe and effective both in terms of symptom control and weight loss over the intermediate term. In obese patients with large hiatal hernias, consideration should be given to combining repair of the hernia with a bariatric procedure.