1
|
Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Cohen RV, de Luca M, Faria SL, Goodpaster KPS, Haddad A, Himpens JM, Kow L, Kurian M, Loi K, Mahawar K, Nimeri A, O'Kane M, Papasavas PK, Ponce J, Pratt JSA, Rogers AM, Steele KE, Suter M, Kothari SN. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2023; 33:3-14. [PMID: 36336720 PMCID: PMC9834364 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 136.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
MAJOR UPDATES TO 1991 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH GUIDELINES FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is recommended for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2, regardless of presence, absence, or severity of co-morbidities.MBS should be considered for individuals with metabolic disease and BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2.BMI thresholds should be adjusted in the Asian population such that a BMI >25 kg/m2 suggests clinical obesity, and individuals with BMI >27.5 kg/m2 should be offered MBS.Long-term results of MBS consistently demonstrate safety and efficacy.Appropriately selected children and adolescents should be considered for MBS.(Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013 ) © 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Eisenberg
- Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue, GS 112, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Scott A Shikora
- Department of Surgery, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edo Aarts
- WeightWorks Clinics and Allurion Clinics, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Aminian
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Luigi Angrisani
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ricardo V Cohen
- Center for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paolo, Brazil
| | | | - Silvia L Faria
- Gastrocirurgia de Brasilia, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil
| | | | - Ashraf Haddad
- Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center, Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Lilian Kow
- Adelaide Bariatric Centre, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Marina Kurian
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ken Loi
- St. George Hospital and Sutherland Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Department of General Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
| | - Abdelrahman Nimeri
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Mary O'Kane
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Pavlos K Papasavas
- Division of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Jaime Ponce
- Bariatric Surgery Program, CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - Janey S A Pratt
- Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue, GS 112, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Ann M Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kimberley E Steele
- NIDDK Metabolic and Obesity Research Unit, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michel Suter
- Department of Surgery, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Rennaz, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shanu N Kothari
- Prisma Health, Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Romero-Velez G, Pechman DM, Muñoz Flores F, Moran-Atkin E, Choi J, Camacho DR. Bariatric surgery in the super-super morbidly obese: outcome analysis of patients with BMI >70 using the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:894-899. [PMID: 32371037 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery offers patients short- and long-term benefits to their health and quality of life. Currently, we see more patients with superior body mass index (BMI) looking for these benefits. Evidence-based medicine is integral in the evaluation of risks versus benefit; however, data are lacking in this high-risk population. OBJECTIVES To assess the morbidity and mortality of patients with BMI ≥70 undergoing bariatric surgery. SETTING University Hospital, Bronx, New York, United States using national database. METHODS Using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database for years 2005 to 2016, we identified patients who underwent primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients with BMI ≥70 were assigned to the BMI >70 (BMI70+) cohort and less obese patients were assigned to the BMI <70 (U70) cohort. Length of stay and 30-day morbidity and mortality were compared. RESULTS A total of 163,413 patients underwent non-revisional bariatric surgery. Of those, 2322 had a BMI ≥70. BMI70+ was associated with increased mortality (.4% versus .1%, P = .0001), deep vein thrombosis (.6% versus .3%, P = .007), pulmonary (1.9% versus .5%, P = .0001), renal (.9% versus .2%, P = .0001), and infectious complications (1.1% versus .4%, P = .0001). BMI70+ patients had longer mean length of stay (2.6 versus 2.1 d, P = .0001) and operative time (126.1 versus 114.5 min, P = .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of myocardial infarctions (.1% versus .1%, P = .319), pulmonary embolisms (.3% versus .2%, P = .596), and transfusion requirements (.1% versus .1%, P = .105) between groups. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of risk and benefit is performed on a case-by-case basis, but evidence-based medicine is critical in empowering surgeons and patients to make informed decisions. The overall rate of morbidity and mortality for BMI70+ patients undergoing bariatric surgery was increased over U70 patients but was still relatively low. Our study will allow surgeons to incorporate objective data into their assessment of risk for super-obese patients pursuing bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jenny Choi
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. METHODS We searched MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another. RESULTS Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications. CONCLUSIONS The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.
Collapse
|