Trends in Risk Factors for Readmission after Bariatric Surgery 2015-2018

Propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic revisional and conversional sleeve gastrectomy with concurrent hiatal hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes associated with concurrent hiatal hernia repair (CHHR) when performing a conversional or revisional vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG). CHHR is often necessary during VSG due to potential gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) development or obstructive symptoms.

METHODS

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (MBSAQIP) participant use file was assessed for the years 2015-2020 for revisional/conversional VSG procedures. The presence of CHHR was used to create two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with E-analysis.

RESULTS

There were 33,909 patients available, with 5986 undergoing the VSG procedure with CHHR. In the unmatched analysis, there was an increased frequency of patients being female (85.72 vs 83.30%; p < 0.001), having a history of GERD (38.01 vs 31.25%; p < 0.001), and being of older age (49.59 ± 10.97 vs 48.70 ± 10.83; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing VSG with CHHR experienced decreased sleep apnea (25.00 vs 28.84%; p < 0.001) and diabetes (14.27 vs 17.80%; p < 0.001). PSM yielded 5986 patient pairs. Matched patients with CHHR experienced increased operative time (115 min ± 53 vs 103 min ± 51; p < 0.001), increased risk of postoperative pneumonia (0.45 vs 0.15%; p = 0.005) and readmission (4.69 vs 3.58%; p = 0.002) within thirty days. However, patients undergoing CHHR with revisional or conversional VSG did not experience increased risk of death, postoperative bleeding, postoperative leak, or reoperations.

CONCLUSION

Despite a small association with increased postoperative pneumonia, the rate of complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic revisional/conversional VSG and CHHR are low. CHHR is a safe option when combined with the laparoscopic revisional/conversional VSG procedure in the early postoperative period.

Difference in 30-Day Readmission Rates After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Propensity Score Matched Study Using ACS NSQIP Data (2015-2019)

PURPOSE

There are very few studies that have compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Among short-term outcomes, hospital readmission after these procedures is an area for quality enhancement and cost reduction. In this study, we compared 30-day readmission rates after LSG and LRYGB through analyzing a nationalized dataset. In addition, we identified the reasons of readmission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study was a retrospective analysis of data from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) All adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age and who had LSG or LRYGB during 2014 to 2019 were included. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify the procedures. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to calculate propensity score adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for all cause 30-day re-admissions.

RESULTS

There were 109,900 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgeries (67.5% LSG and 32.5% LRYGB). Readmissions were reported in 4168 (3.8%) of the patients and were more common among RYGB recipients compared to LSG (5.6% versus 2.9%, P < 0.001). The odds of 30-day readmissions were significantly higher among LRYGB group compared to LSG group (AOR, 2.20; 95% CI; 1.83, 2.64). In addition, variables such as age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, bleeding disorders, blood urea nitrogen, SGOT, alkaline phosphatase, hematocrit, and operation time were significantly predicting readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission rates were significantly higher among those receiving LRYGB, compared to LSG. Readmission was also affected by many patient factors. The factors could help patients and providers to make informed decisions for selecting appropriate procedures.