|
1
|
Wang Z, Chen Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Zhou H, Lu X, Zhao L, Yuan Q, Shi Y, Zhao J, Dong Z, Jiang Y, Liu K. Tegaserod Maleate Suppresses the Growth of Gastric Cancer In Vivo and In Vitro by Targeting MEK1/2. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153592. [PMID: 35892850 PMCID: PMC9332868 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in global incidence and fourth in mortality. The current treatments for GC include surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although treatment strategies for GC have been improved over the last decade, the overall five-year survival rate remains less than 30%. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find novel therapeutic or preventive strategies to increase GC patient survival rates. In the current study, we found that tegaserod maleate, an FDA-approved drug, inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells, bound to MEK1/2 and suppressed MEK1/2 kinase activity. Moreover, tegaserod maleate inhibited the progress of gastric cancer by depending on MEK1/2. Notably, we found that tegaserod maleate suppressed tumor growth in the patient-derived gastric xenograft (PDX) model. We further compared the effect between tegaserod maleate and trametinib, which is a clinical MEK1/2 inhibitor, and confirmed that tegaserod maleate has the same effect as trametinib in inhibiting the growth of GC. Our findings suggest that tegaserod maleate inhibited GC proliferation by targeting MEK1/2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zitong Wang
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
| | - Yingying Chen
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
| | - Xiaoyu Li
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Xiaokun Zhao
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Hao Zhou
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
| | - Xuebo Lu
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Lili Zhao
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
| | - Qiang Yuan
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Yunshu Shi
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Jimin Zhao
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Basic Medicine Research Center, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Ziming Dong
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Basic Medicine Research Center, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Yanan Jiang
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Basic Medicine Research Center, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Correspondence: (Y.J.); (K.L.)
| | - Kangdong Liu
- Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; (Z.W.); (Y.C.); (X.L.); (Y.Z.); (X.Z.); (H.Z.); (X.L.); (L.Z.); (Q.Y.); (Y.S.); (J.Z.); (Z.D.)
- China-US (Henan) Hormel Cancer Institute, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Basic Medicine Research Center, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Provincial Cooperative Innovation Center for Cancer Chemoprevention, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Cancer Chemoprevention International Collaboration Laboratory, Zhengzhou 450001, China
- Correspondence: (Y.J.); (K.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Is there a role for surgery with adequate nodal evaluation alone in gastric adenocarcinoma? J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:238-46; discussion 246-7. [PMID: 22089951 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1756-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2011] [Accepted: 10/13/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The extent of lymphadenectomy and protocol design in gastric cancer trials limits interpretation of survival benefit of adjuvant therapy after surgery with adequate lymphadenectomy. We examined the impact of surgery with adequate nodal evaluation alone on gastric cancer survival. METHODS Using 2001-2008 California Cancer Registry, we identified 2,229 patients who underwent gastrectomy with adequate nodal evaluation (≥15 lymph nodes) for American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I-IV M0 gastric adenocarcinoma. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the impact of surgery alone on survival. RESULTS Nearly 70% of our cohort had T1/2 tumors and 29% had N0 disease. Forty-nine percent of the cohort underwent surgery alone. These patients were more likely to be older, Medicare-insured, with T1 and N0 disease. On unadjusted analyses, persons who underwent surgery alone for stage I or N0 disease experienced 1- and 3-year overall and cancer-specific survival comparable to those who received adjuvant therapy. On multivariate analyses for stage I or N0 disease, surgery alone predicted superior survival outcomes than when combined with adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSION Surgery alone with adequate nodal evaluation may have a role in low-risk gastric cancer. To corroborate these findings, surgery with adequate lymphadenectomy alone (as treatment arm) deserves consideration in the design of gastric cancer trials to provide effective yet resource-conserving, rather than maximally tolerated, treatments.
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Karanicolas PJ, Bickenbach K, Jayaraman S, Pusic AL, Coit DG, Guyatt GH, Brennan MF. Measurement and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes in surgery: an opportunity for improvement. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:682-9. [PMID: 21246410 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1421-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2010] [Accepted: 01/05/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery may have a profound effect on patients' health-related quality of life (QOL). To be optimally useful, trials that seek to guide clinical decision making should measure outcomes that are important to patients and report the results in a clinically meaningful way. We sought to explore how researchers currently measure and interpret QOL in surgical trials, using gastric cancer as a case study. METHOD We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of gastric cancer surgery published between 1966 and 2009 that included at least one patient-reported outcome (PRO). Investigators assessed trial eligibility and extracted data in duplicate using standardized forms, then resolved disagreements by consensus. RESULTS Our search identified 87 RCTs of gastric cancer surgery, of which 11 (13%) included at least one PRO. Ten RCTs measured one or more validated PROs, although six also included ad hoc measures. All manuscripts presented the results as raw scores and nine of the 11 trials identified a statistical difference between groups. All 11 manuscripts prominently reported the PRO results in the abstracts and conclusions, but only one discussed the clinical significance of the differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS Most RCTs of gastric cancer surgery do not include measures of QOL and those that do suffer from important limitations. RCTs would be more useful to surgeons and patients if authors measured PROs and utilized existing approaches to present the results of PROs in ways that provide an intuitive sense of the magnitude of effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Karanicolas
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|