PET and PET/CT for pancreatic malignancies

Development of [18F]AlF-NOTA-NT as PET Agents of Neurotensin Receptor-1 Positive Pancreatic Cancer

Several studies have suggested that neurotensin receptors (NTRs) and neurotensin (NT) greatly affect the growth and survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Developing NTR-targeted PET probes could therefore be important for the management of a pancreatic cancer patient by providing key information on the NTR expression profile noninvasively. Despite the initial success on the synthesis of ¹⁸F-labeled NT PET probes, the labeling procedure generally requires lengthy steps including azeotropic drying of ¹⁸F. Using a straightforward chelation method, here we report the simple preparation of aluminum-¹⁸F-NOTA-NT starting from aqueous ¹⁸F. The cell binding test demonstrated that [¹⁹F]AlF-NOTA-NT maintained high receptor-binding affinity to NTR1. This probe was then further evaluated in NTR1 positive pancreatic tumor models (AsPC-1 and PANC-1). After the administration of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-NT, small animal PET studies showed a high contrast between tumor and background in both models at 1 and 4 h time points. A blocking experiment was performed to demonstrate the receptor specificity: the tumor uptake in AsPC1 without and with blocking agent was 1.0 ± 0.2 and 0.1 ± 0.0%ID/g, respectively, at 4 h post injection. In summary, a NTR specific PET agent, [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-NT, was prepared through the simple chelation method. This NTR-targeted PET probe may not only be used to detect NTR1 positive pancreatic tumors (diagnosis), but also it may be fully integrated to NTR target therapy leading to personalized medicine (theranostic).

Absence of a Periampullary Mass on Cross-sectional Imaging Delays Diagnosis and Time to Pancreatoduodenectomy But Does Not Impair Outcome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess whether the lack of a radiological mass in patients with periampullary malignancies led to protracted diagnosis, delayed resection, and an inferior outcome.

METHODS

The departmental database was interrogated to identify all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy during the period 2000-2014. The absence of a mass on cross-sectional and endoscopic ultrasound was noted. The interval between imaging and surgery was evaluated and related to the absence of a mass. The relationship between mass/no mass and the pathological profile was also assessed.

RESULTS

Among 490 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies, masses were detected in 299 patients. Patients with undetected mass on either endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a longer median interval from initial imaging to resection than detected mass with no difference in survival (66 vs. 41 days, p = 0.001). The absence of a mass was more common in cholangiocarcinomas (p < 0.001). The absence of a mass on imaging was associated with smaller size on final histopathology (2.4 vs. 2.8 cm; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of a mass with all modalities in patients with a periampullary malignancy leads to a delayed diagnosis without a significant effect on survival.

Combining in Vitro Diagnostics with in Vivo Imaging for Earlier Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Challenges and Solutions

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and is associated with a dismal prognosis, particularly when diagnosed at an advanced stage. Overall survival is significantly improved if PDAC is detected at an early stage prior to the onset of symptoms. At present, there is no suitable screening strategy for the general population. Available diagnostic serum markers are not sensitive or specific enough, and clinically available imaging modalities are inadequate for visualizing early-stage lesions. In this article, the role of currently available blood biomarkers and imaging tests for the early detection of PDAC will be reviewed. Also, the emerging biomarkers and molecularly targeted imaging agents being developed to improve the specificity of current imaging modalities for PDAC will be discussed. A strategy incorporating blood biomarkers and molecularly targeted imaging agents could lead to improved screening and earlier detection of PDAC in the future. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Pilot study: Evaluation of dual-energy computed tomography measurement strategies for positron emission tomography correlation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

We sought to determine whether dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) measurements correlate with positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake values (SUVs) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and to determine the optimal DECT imaging variables and modeling strategy to produce the highest correlation with maximum SUV (SUVmax). We reviewed 25 patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma seen at Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, who had PET-computed tomography (PET/CT) and enhanced DECT performed the same week between March 25, 2010 and December 9, 2011. For each examination, DECT measurements were taken using one of three methods: (1) average values of three tumor regions of interest (ROIs) (method 1); (2) one ROI in the area of highest subjective DECT enhancement (method 2); and (3) one ROI in the area corresponding to PET SUVmax (method 3). There were 133 DECT variables using method 1, and 89 using the other methods. Univariate and multivariate analysis regression models were used to identify important correlations between DECT variables and PET SUVmax. Both R2 and adjusted R2 were calculated for the multivariate model to compensate for the increased number of predictors. The average SUVmax was 5 (range, 1.8-12.0). Multivariate analysis of DECT imaging variables outperformed univariate analysis (r = 0.91; R2 = 0.82; adjusted R2 = 0.75 vs. r < 0.58; adjusted R2 < 0.34). Method 3 had the highest correlation with PET SUVmax (R2 = 0.82), followed by method 1 (R2 = 0.79) and method 2 R2 = 0.57). DECT thus has clinical potential as a surrogate for, or as a complement to, PET in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Role of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gastrointestinal cancers

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a routine imaging modality for many malignancies and its use is currently increasing. In the present review article, we will summarize the evidence for FDG-PET/CT use in digestive cancers (excluding neuroendocrine tumours), and review the existing recommendations. While PET/CT is nowadays considered to be an important tool in the initial workup of oesophageal and anal cancers, new data are emerging regarding its use in assessing therapeutic efficacy, radiotherapy treatment planning, and detection of recurrence in case of isolated tumour marker elevation. Moreover, PET/CT may help decision making by detecting distant metastatic sites especially in potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, in localized gastric and pancreatic cancers. Finally, incidental focal colonic FDG uptakes require exploration by colonoscopy, as they are often associated with premalignant or malignant lesions.

Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the characterization of pancreatic lesions: does it offer prognostic information?

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of dual-phase F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose PET/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) in the characterization of pancreatic masses. The secondary aim was to assess whether delayed imaging revealed any prognostic information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with periampullary or pancreatic masses on conventional imaging were included in this study. Early and delayed PET/CT was performed, followed by pathological examination in all patients. PET/CT parameters including uptake pattern, SUVearly, SUVdelayed, lesion to background ratio (L/B), and retention index (RI) were assessed for their ability to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Patients with malignant lesions were followed up for a median duration of 26 months. The association of 11 variables with survival was analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients had malignant lesions and 19 had benign lesions. The mean SUVearly, L/B, SUVdelayed, and RI between the malignant and benign lesions were statistically significant. The F-FDG uptake pattern of the lesions had higher sensitivity (93.5%) and specificity (100%) compared with RI (cutoff 25.7%) (84 and 37%, respectively) for diagnosing malignancy (P<0.05). In univariate analysis both RI (>18.7%) and tumor size (>2.6 cm) predicted significantly poor survival, whereas in multivariate analysis RI (P=0.04) was the only predictor of poor survival.

CONCLUSION

Dual-phase F-FDG PET/CT is not useful in characterizing pancreatic masses as it cannot differentiate benign from malignant lesions, and focal uptake on early PET imaging is the best indicator of malignancy. A possible benefit in performing a delayed scan is that a high RI (>18.7) can predict poor survival and hence may be useful in treatment planning.

The anti-tumor efficacy of 2-deoxyglucose and D-allose are enhanced with p38 inhibition in pancreatic and ovarian cell lines

PURPOSE

The anti-tumor activity of glucose analogs 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG) and D-allose was investigated alone or in combination with p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor SB202190 or platinum analogs as a strategy to pharmacologically target glycolytic tumor phenotypes.

METHODS

Hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) protein accumulation in pancreatic cell lines treated with SB202190 alone and in combination with glucose analogs was analyzed by Western blot. HIF-1α transcriptional activity was measured in MIA PaCa-2 cells stably transfected with a hypoxia response element luciferase reporter following treatment with glucose analogs alone, and in combination with SB202190. Induction of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) was measured by Western blot in the MIA PaCa-2 cells. In vitro anti-proliferative activity of 2-DG and D-allose alone, or in combination with oxaliplatin (pancreatic cell lines), cisplatin (ovarian cell lines), or with SB202190 were investigated using the MTT assay.

RESULTS

SB202190 decreased HIF-1α protein accumulation and transcriptional activity. 2-DG demonstrated greater anti-proliferative activity than D-allose. Pre-treatment with SB202190 enhanced activity of both 2-DG and D-allose in MIA PaCa-2, BxPC-3, ASPC-1, and SK-OV-3 cells. The combination of D-allose and platinum agents was additive to moderately synergistic in all but the OVCAR-3 and HEY cells. SB202190 pre-treatment further enhanced activity of D-allose and 2-DG with platinum agents in most cell lines investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

SB202190 induced sensitization of tumor cells to 2-DG and D-allose may be partially mediated by inhibition of HIF-1α activity. Combining glucose analogs and p38 MAPK inhibitors with chemotherapy may be an effective approach to target glycolytic tumor phenotypes.

Treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma represents a subset of localized cancers that are at high risk for a margin-positive resection and early treatment failure when resected de novo. Although several different anatomic definitions for this disease stage exist, there is agreement that some degree of reconstructible mesenteric vessel involvement by the tumor is the critical anatomic feature that positions borderline resectable between anatomically resectable and unresectable (locally advanced) tumors in the spectrum of localized disease. Consensus also exists that such cancers should be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation before resection; although the optimal algorithm is unknown, systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is a rational approach. Although gemcitabine-based systemic chemotherapy with either 5-FU or gemcitabine-based chemoradiation regimens has been used to date, newer regimens, including FOLFIRINOX, should be evaluated on protocol. Delivery of neoadjuvant therapy necessitates durable biliary decompression for as many as 6 months in many patients with cancers of the pancreatic head. Patients with no evidence of metastatic disease following neoadjuvant therapy should be brought to the operating room for pancreatectomy, at which time resection of the superior mesenteric/portal vein and/or hepatic artery should be performed when necessary to achieve a margin-negative resection. Following completion of multimodality therapy, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer can expect a duration of survival as favorable as that of patients who initially present with resectable tumors. Coordination among a multidisciplinary team of physicians is necessary to maximize these complex patients' short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.

FDG-PET/CT-based restaging may alter initial management decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma planned to undergo chemoradiotherapy

The impact of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) restaging on management decisions and outcomes in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) scheduled for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is examined. Seventy-one consecutive patients with conventionally staged LAPC were restaged with PET/CT before CRT, and were categorized into non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic (M1) groups. M0 patients received 50.4 Gy CRT with 5-fluorouracil followed by maintenance gemcitabine, whereas M1 patients received chemotherapy immediately or after palliative radiotherapy. In 19 patients (26.8%), PET/CT restaging showed distant metastases not detected by conventional staging. PET/CT restaging of M0 patients showed additional regional lymph nodes in 3 patients and tumors larger than CT-defined borders in 4. PET/CT therefore altered or revised initial management decisions in 26 (36.6%) patients. At median follow-up times of 11.3, 14.5, and 6.2 months for the entire cohort and the M0 and M1 cohorts, respectively, median overall survival was 16.1, 11.4, and 6.2 months, respectively; median locoregional progression-free survival was 9.9, 7.8, and 3.4 months, respectively; and median progression-free survival was 7.4, 5.1, and 2.5 months, respectively (P < 0.05 each). These findings suggest that PET/CT-based restaging may help select patients suitable for CRT, sparing those with metastases from futile radical protocols, and increasing the accuracy of estimated survival.

Imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update on staging/resectability

Because of the evolution of treatment strategies staging criteria for pancreatic cancer now emphasize arterial involvement for determining unresectable disease. Preoperative therapy may improve the likelihood of margin negative resections of borderline resectable tumors. Cross-sectional imaging is crucial for correctly staging patients. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) are probably comparable, with MR imaging probably offering an advantage for identifying liver metastases. Positron emission tomography/CT and endoscopic ultrasound may be helpful for problem solving. Clear and concise reporting of imaging findings is important. Several national organizations are developing templates to standardize the reporting of imaging findings.

Discovery of diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer in immunodepleted serum by SELDI-TOF MS

MOTIVATION

Reports of serum pancreatic cancer (PC) biomarkers using SELDI-TOF MS have been inconsistent because different chip surfaces and interference with high-abundant proteins. This study examines the influence of these factors on the detection of discriminating diagnostic biomarkers.

METHODS

Serum from fourteen from patients with PC, disease controls (DC, n = 14) and healthy volunteers (HV, n = 14) were evaluated by SELDI using H50, IMAC, Q10 and CM10 chips. A further evaluation was undertaken after depletion of seven high-abundant proteins using spin cartridges.

RESULTS

More protein peaks were detected in whole serum than in depleted serum for IMAC, H50 and Q10 chips: 60 vs 39, 56 vs 48 and 69 vs 65, respectively, while the CM10 found less peaks in serum (27 vs 47 peaks). However, there were more differentially expressed peaks in the depleted serum samples for PC vs DC and PC vs HV samples using the H50, Q10 and CM10 ProteinChip arrays, whereas for IMAC arrays, more discriminating peaks were seen in non-depleted serum. The highly significant peaks observed on Q10, CM10 and H50 are consistent with the previous finding of ApoA-I (m/z 27,910-28000) and ApoA-II (m/z 8758 and 17,240). In addition, a number of new discriminating protein peaks were found on different ProteinChip arrays, notably peaks at m/z 4280 and 7763 on IMAC arrays.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the diagnostic value of ApoA-I&II and identifies further potential diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer when multiple chip surfaces are used with depletion of the most highly-abundant proteins.

Value of contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) associated with computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used for the detection and the staging of pancreatic cancer, but data regarding its clinical added value in pre-surgical planning is still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of FDG PET associated with contrast-enhanced CT in detection of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated FDG PET/CT studies obtained in patients with suspicion of operable pancreatic cancer between May 2006 and January 2008. Staging was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed in all patients by surgical resection or biopsy examination.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with a median age of 69 (range 22-82) were included in this study. Thirty-six had malignant tumors and nine had benign lesions (20%). The sensitivity of enhanced versus unenhanced PET/CT in the detection of pancreatic cancer was 96% versus 72% (P=0.076), the specificity 66.6% versus 33.3% (P=0.52), the positive predictive value 92.3% versus 80% (P=0.3), the negative predictive value 80% versus 25% (P=0.2), and the accuracy 90.3% versus 64% (P=0.085).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data obtained in a limited number of patients shows that contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT offers good sensitivity in the detection and assessment of pancreatic cancer, but at the price of a relatively low specificity. Enhanced PET/CT seems to be superior to unenhanced PET/CT. Further larger prospective studies are needed to establish its value for pre-surgical diagnosis and staging in pancreatic cancer.