Optimal Follow-Up to Curative Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: How and for How Long?

Utilization of diffusion-weighted derived mathematical models to predict prognostic factors of resectable rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study explored models of monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), stretched exponential (SEM), fractional-order calculus (FROC), and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) as diagnostic tools for assessing pathological prognostic factors in patients with resectable rectal cancer (RRC).

METHODS

RRC patients who underwent radical surgery were included. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusion (MD) from the DKI model, the distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and α from the SEM model, D, β and u from the FROC model, and D, α and β from the CTRW model were assessed.

RESULTS

There were a total of 181 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of CTRW-α for predicting histology type was significantly higher than that of FROC-u (0.780 vs. 0.671, p = 0.043). The AUC of CTRW-α for predicting pT stage was significantly higher than that of FROC-u and ADC (0.786 vs.0.683, p = 0.043; 0.786 vs. 0.682, p = 0.030), the difference in predictive efficacy of FROC-u between ADC and MK was not statistically significant [0.683 vs. 0.682, p = 0.981; 0.683 vs. 0.703, p = 0.720]; the difference between the predictive efficacy of MK and ADC was not statistically significant (p = 0.696). The AUC of CTRW (α + β) (0.781) was significantly higher than that of FROC-u (0.781 vs. 0.625, p = 0.003) in predicting pN stage but not significantly different from that of MK (p = 0.108).

CONCLUSION

The CTRW and DKI models may serve as imaging biomarkers to predict pathological prognostic factors in RRC patients before surgery.

High-resolution integrated dynamic shimming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the assessment of rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of high-resolution integrated dynamic shimming echo planar imaging (iEPI) applied to rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of seventy-eight patients with non-mucinous rectum adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. Using a prototype high-resolution iEPI sequence, high-resolution single-shot EPI (sEPI) sequence, and sEPI sequence, subjective and objective assessment and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were measured for comparison. The spearman rank correlation analysis test and the receiver operating characteristic curve were performed to evaluate correlation between tumor ADC values, corresponding T stage, and differentiation degree of rectal cancer.

RESULTS

The subjective assessment of the image quality (IQ) of high-resolution iEPI was rated superior to high-resolution sEPI and sEPI by both readers (p < 0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise, and signal-intensity ratio were significantly higher in high-resolution iEPI than the other two sequences (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference of tumor ADC values among three EPI sequences in the group of low- to well-differentiated rectal cancer. An inverse correlation was noted between ADC values on three DWI sequences and pathological T stage of rectal cancer (r =  - 0.693, - 0.689, - 0.640, p < 0.001). The AUC values of high-resolution iEPI, high-resolution sEPI, and sEPI in predicting well-differentiated rectal cancer were 0.910, 0.761, and 0.725 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the high-resolution iEPI provided significantly higher IQ and stable ADC compared to another two sequences. High-resolution iEPI has the highest efficacy among three examined sequences in differentiation of rectal cancer with different degrees of differentiation.

KEY POINTS

• High-resolution iEPI provided a significantly better IQ than high-resolution sEPI and sEPI when assessing rectal cancer. • The AUC of high-resolution sEPI was the highest among three EPI sequences in predicting well-differentiated rectal cancer.

Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations

Different follow-up strategies are available for patients with rectal cancer following curative treatment. A combination of biochemical testing and imaging investigation, associated with physical examination are commonly used. However, there is currently no consensus about the types of tests to perform, the timing of the testing, and even the need for follow-up at all has been questioned. The aim of this study was to review the evidence of the impact of different follow-up tests and programs in patients with non-metastatic disease after definitive treatment of the primary. A literature review was performed of studies published on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to November 2022. Current published guidelines from the most authoritative specialty societies were also reviewed. According to the follow-up strategies available, the office visit is not efficient but represents the only way to maintain direct contact with the patient and is recommended by all authoritative specialty societies. In colorectal cancer surveillance, carcinoembryonic antigen represents the only established tumor marker. Abdominal and chest computed tomography scan is recommended considering that the liver and lungs are the most common sites of recurrence. Since local relapse in rectal cancer is higher than in colon cancer, endoscopic surveillance is mandatory. Different follow-up regimens have been published but randomized comparisons and meta-analyses do not allow to determine whether intensive or less intensive follow-up had any significant influence on survival and recurrence detection rate. The available data do not allow the drawing of final conclusions on the ideal surveillance methods and the frequency with which they should be applied. It is very useful and urgent for clinicians to identify a cost-effective strategy that allows early identification of recurrence with a special focus for high-risk patients and patients undergoing a “watch and wait” approach.

Feasibility of Simultaneous Multislice Acceleration Technique in Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Assessing Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) with simultaneous multislice (SMS) technology has been successfully applied to tumor research in many organs, but no feasibility study in rectal cancer has been reported, and the optimal acceleration of SMS with rs-EPI in rectal cancer has not been well determined yet.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of SMS rs-EPI of rectal cancer with different acceleration factors (AF_s) and its influence on image quality, acquisition time and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC_s) in comparison to conventional sequences.

METHODS

All patients underwent rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI with AF_s of 2 and 3 (2 × SMS rs-EPI and 3 × SMS rs-EPI, respectively) using a 3T scanner. Acquisition times of the three rs-EPI sequences were measured. Image qualitative parameters (5-point Likert scale), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), geometric distortion, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the three sequences were compared.

RESULTS

A total of eighty-three patients were enrolled in our study. rs-EPI and 2 × SMS rs-EPI offered equivalently high overall image quality with a scan time reduction to nearly half (rs-EPI: 137 s, 2 × SM rs-EPI: 60 s). 3 × SMS rs-EPI showed significantly poorer image quality (p < 0.05). ADC values were significantly lower in 3 × SMS rs-EPI compared to rs-EPI in rectal tumors and normal tissue (tumor tissue: rs-EPI 1.19 ± 0.21 × 10^-3 mm²/s, 3 × SMS rs-EPI 1.10 ± 0.26 × 10^-3 mm²/s, p < 0.001; normal tissue: rs-EPI 1.68 ± 0.13 × 10^-3 mm²/s, 3 × SMS rs-EPI 1.54 ± 0.20 × 10^-3 mm²/s, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SMS rs-EPI using an AF of 2 is feasible for rectal MRI resulting in substantial reductions in acquisition time while maintaining diagnostic image quality and similar ADC values to those of rs-EPI when the slice distance and number of shots are the same among three rs-EPI sequences.

Value of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess the added value of gadolinium-enhanced and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with suspected pelvic recurrence from CRC underwent pelvic MRI with T2-weighted ("T2"), gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted ("gadolinium") and DWI MR sequences. Three readers (senior radiologist: R1, two residents: R2, R3) scored the likelihood of recurrence on "T2," "T2 + DWI," and "T2 + Gadolinium."

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients had 42 sites of pelvic recurrence. On "T2," R1 achieved AUC of .95, sensitivity 88.4%, specificity 95.2%. For R2, these figures were .89, 81.4%, 90.5%, for R3 .90, 83.7%, 76%. Both Gadolinium injection and DWI significantly improved AUCs for residents but not for the senior radiologist: up to .988 (R2, P = 0.006) and to .98 (R3, P = 0.01) with DWI and to .96 (R2, P = 0.04), .98 (R3, P = 0.01) after gadolinium. All readers achieved slightly better AUCs with "T2 + DWI" than with "T2+Gadolinium" but not significantly (P = 0.68, P = 0.11, P = 0.3; respectively).

CONCLUSION

For diagnosis of pelvic recurrence from CRC, both DWI and gadolinium-enhanced MRI significantly increase diagnostic performances compared with "T2" MRI for residents. DWI may be helpful in patients with contra-indications to intravenous administration of gadolinium.

Usefulness of CEA concentration measurement and classic colonoscopy in follow-up after radical treatment of colorectal cancer

There is always a certain rate of recurrence after radical treatment for cancer and to get on it an early detection of disease set back is crucial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical data of patients operated on for primarily detected colorectal cancer in years 1993-2002 was retrospectively reviewed. Usefulness of follow-up means such as physical examination, or CEA and endoscopic surveillance was analyzed. All mentioned above were applied to scheduled follow-up (in 3, 6 and 12 month intervals following an operation and annually after that by the year 5).

RESULTS

Complete and reliable data was obtained from 340 out of 502 follow-up intended subjects (67.7%). Elevated CEA was the most frequent predictor of recurrence within non-symptomatic subjects meeting follow-up appointments (60%). The cancer set back diagnosed by means of either physical or endoscopic examinations was the case only in one out of five patients (20.75% and 18.87% respectively). Clinical onset of recurrence making patients meet an unscheduled appointment was found increasing relative risk of nothing-but-palliative option either for them with local set back, or meta-static spread. Relative risk of onset of meta-chronous colonic cancer was significantly higher in patients being affected by synchronous advanced adenoma at time of surgery compared to those with one-fold changes.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA scheduled follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer CRC seems adequate to provide a good outcome of treatment for recurrent tumors. CRC patients presenting with synchronous advanced adenomas at time of surgery are probably to be under more intensive endoscopic surveillance.