1
|
Ozsen M, Polatkan SAV, Yalcınkaya U, Tolunay S, Gokgoz MS. Differential diagnosis of primary mesenchymal neoplasms of the breast. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03544-y. [PMID: 38902492 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03544-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While the majority of breast neoplasms originate from epithelial cells, a rare part of them originate from mesenchymal breast tissue. This study aims to present the histomorphological and clinicoradiological features of our series of primary mesenchymal breast tumors and to discuss the features of these tumors in light of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cases diagnosed as primary mesenchymal breast tumor in breast resection materials evaluated in our center between 2010 and 2023 were included. RESULTS Of the 26 tumors included, 57.7% were diagnosed as benign and 42.3% as malignant mesenchymal tumor. Cases diagnosed as benign mesenchymal tumor were hemangioma, lipoma, extra-abdominal fibromatosis, leiomyoma, angiofibroma, lipomatosis, benign fibrous histiocytoma and granular cell tumor. Histopathological study results were compatible with angiosarcoma in 5 (45.4%), undifferentiated sarcoma in 3 (27.3%), myxofibrosarcoma in 2 (18.2%) cases and rhabdomyosarcoma in 1 (9.1%) case. CONCLUSION Primary breast sarcomas are rarely seen compared to benign mesenchymal tumors and constitute less than 0.1% of all malignant breast tumors. When histomorphological findings suggestive of a mesenchymal tumor are observed in breast specimens, sufficient sampling should be performed to exclude a possible phyllodes tumor, and clinicoradiological findings should be examined to exclude the possibility of a metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mine Ozsen
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
| | | | - Ulviye Yalcınkaya
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Sahsine Tolunay
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Atarbashi-Moghadam S, Atarbashi-Moghadam F, Niazmand M, Shahrabi-Farahani S. Metastatic sarcomas of the oral cavity: A systematic review. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2024; 125:101656. [PMID: 38738551 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Oral metastatic sarcomas (OMSs) occur only occasionally, and information about their characteristics is based on the restricted number of cases reported in the literature. This study aims to systematically review the English literature to recognize the clinicopathologic characteristics of OMSs. An electronic search was performed in PubMed Central and Scopus databases. The search included all the published articles (human case reports and case series) up till April 2023, with no time restrictions. OMSs were slightly more prevalent in males in their fifth to seventh decades of life. However, a high percentage of OMSs has been reported in the second decade of life. Lower extremities, breasts and uterus are the most common primary origin of metastatic sarcoma. Gingiva and mandible were common locations in the oral cavity for metastatic deposits. Generally, they demonstrated widespread affliction. The mean time interval between primary tumor detection and diagnosis of the oral metastasis was about 33.54 ± 36.19 months. Death was reported in 83 patients (67.48 %) with a mean survival rate of 7.98 ± 10.30 months. The most common microscopic tumor types were leiomyosarcoma (n = 21, 17 %), followed by angiosarcoma (n = 20, 16.26 %) and osteosarcoma (n = 18, 14.63 %). In conclusion, while oral metastases of sarcomas are not common, those should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the oral lesions. Although OMSs show a high occurrence in the 7th decade of the life, the average age of patients with oral involvement is lower than the overall metastatic lesions. OMSs may present as widespread disease with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saede Atarbashi-Moghadam
- Department of Oral Pathology, Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, College of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fazele Atarbashi-Moghadam
- Department of Periodontics, Associate Professor of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maral Niazmand
- Research Center, General Dentist, Dental School Shahid Beheshti, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shokoufeh Shahrabi-Farahani
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Associate Professor and Director of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breast Sarcoma Incidence Rate: A National Study in Iran. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm-120247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Breast sarcomas are a group of rare and non-epithelial malignancies that account for less than 1% of breast cancers. There are few epidemiologic studies on this type of cancer due to its rarity. Methods: In this study, the database of the Iran National Cancer Registry (INCR) from March 2009 to March 2014 was used to calculate the age-specific incidence rate for breast sarcoma in Iran. Moreover, age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) for pathologic subtypes, pathologic grades, and different regions of the country were determined. Results: Totally, 258 breast sarcoma patients were included in this study in Iran. The ASR of breast sarcoma was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.02, .32) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.67) per million person-years for women and the total population, respectively. ASR was 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01, 0.06) per million person-years for male patients. The highest age-specific incidence rate for malignant phyllodes was observed among patients aged 55 to 59 years (1.0; 95% CI: 0.5, 1.5), and for other sarcomas, it was found among those aged 70 to 74 years (0.9; 95% CI: 0.2, 1.6). The most prevalent pathologic grade of sarcoma was grade 3 with an ASR of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.46) per million person-years. Conclusions: Compared to western countries, Iran has a lower incidence of breast sarcoma in women, a higher incidence rate in men, and older onset age. As in other countries, malignant phyllodes tumors and angiosarcomas are the most common subtypes. In addition, breast sarcoma incidence rates in different grades are similar across countries.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gutnik L, Ren Y, Thomas SM, Plichta JK, Greenup RA, Fayanju OM, Hwang ES, Rosenberger LH. Malignant phyllodes tumor and primary breast sarcoma; distinct rare tumors of the breast. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:947-957. [PMID: 35179788 PMCID: PMC8995353 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant phyllodes (MP) and primary breast sarcomas (PBS) are rare neoplasms with overlapping histopathologic features. We compared overall survival (OS) and estimated the association of surgery and therapies with OS. METHODS We utilized the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Patients without surgery, unknown surgery, or margins, or Stage IV disease were excluded. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted OS, respectively. RESULTS A total of 3209 (59.5%) MP, and 2185 (40.5%) PBS were identified. Despite a larger median tumor size in MP (46 vs. 40 mm PBS, p < 0.001), lumpectomy rate was higher for MP (52.9% vs. 27.0% PBS, p < 0.001). Compared to MP, PBS patients more frequently received radiation (28.9% vs. 24%), and chemotherapy (28.1% vs. 4%), both p < 0.001. Unadjusted OS was lower for PBS (57% vs. 85% MP, log-rank p < 0.001). PBS (vs. MP) had persistently worse survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69-2.31) after adjustment. Receipt of adjuvant therapies was not associated with OS (either neoplasm); however, lumpectomy was associated with improved OS (vs. mastectomy) for both PBS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50-0.75) and MP (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.81). Positive margins had no association with OS for MP (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.75-1.60), but was associated with worse survival for PBS (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.82-3.02). DISCUSSION We found significant survival differences between MP and PBS, with PBS having a consistently worse OS. Our findings support surgery as the mainstay of treatment for both tumor types and suggest that lumpectomy may be a reasonable option for select patients without compromising outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Gutnik
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al
| | - Yi Ren
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Samantha M. Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Jennifer K. Plichta
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Rachel A. Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine in the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Laura H. Rosenberger
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Novel Body Composition Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Preliminary Study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2020; 44:605-609. [DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
6
|
Abstract
Sarcoma of the breast is extremely rare and differs from epithelial breast carcinomas in staging and treatment. Diagnostic workup includes breast imaging and core biopsy as in breast epithelial carcinoma. Surgical management is often wide local excision in the form of breast conservation if possible for primary breast sarcoma or total mastectomy. Radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas often require total mastectomy with radical excision of skin. Breast sarcomas have a hematogenous spread so lymph node evaluation is not a part of treatment or staging. Local recurrence rates are high; prognosis remains poor despite on-going advances in the treatment of epithelial breast carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory A Duncan
- Department of General Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7737, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Meeghan A Lautner
- Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, C317, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gervais MK, Burtenshaw SM, Maxwell J, Dickson BC, Catton CN, Blackstein M, McCready D, Escallon J, Gladdy RA. Clinical outcomes in breast angiosarcoma patients: A rare tumor with unique challenges. J Surg Oncol 2017; 116:1056-1061. [PMID: 29205355 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast angiosarcoma (AS) accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers. The goal of this study was to determine patient outcomes in radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAAS) and sporadic AS. We evaluated patterns of recurrence and predictors of breast AS survival. METHODS Patients with pathologically confirmed AS from 1994 to 2014 referred to Mount Sinai Hospital/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre were included. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), clinicopathologic characteristics, patterns of recurrence and factors predictive of survival. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for OS and DFS. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were included: 6 with sporadic AS and 20 with RAAS. Median follow-up was 24 months. Five-year OS for RAAS and sporadic subgroups were 44% and 40%, respectively (P = ns). Five-year DFS for RAAS and sporadic subgroups were 23% and 20%, respectively (P = ns). Overall recurrence rate was 67% with median time to recurrence of 11 months. Age, tumor depth, margin status, and tumor size were not statistically significant predictive factors for OS and DFS. DISCUSSION Breast AS is associated with poor survival and high recurrence rates. Prognosis may be mainly determined by its aggressive biology. Referral to tertiary care centers for multimodality treatment is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai-Kim Gervais
- Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sally M Burtenshaw
- Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jessica Maxwell
- Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brendan C Dickson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Charles N Catton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Martin Blackstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David McCready
- Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaime Escallon
- Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rebecca A Gladdy
- Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|