Developing, integrating, and perpetuating new ways of applying sociology to health, medicine, policy, and everyday life

Spotlight on Age: An Overlooked Construct in Medical Sociology

Medical sociology gives limited attention to age-a surprising observation given the aging of the population and the fact that age is among the strongest determinants of health. We examine this issue through an analysis of articles published in Journal of Health and Social Behavior (JHSB) and Sociology of Health & Illness (SHI) between 2000 and 2019. One in 10 articles focused on age or aging, with attention increasing over the period. However, the journals differed. More JHSB than SHI articles addressed it, but fewer focused on the latest life stages when frailty often appears. We discuss three dimensions of age that would enrich medical sociology: as a dimension of inequality akin to race and gender with similar health effects, as an institution interacting with the medical one, and as an identity-again, akin to race and gender-through which people process their experiences in ways that affect health.

Research that Guides Practice: Outcome Research in Swedish PhD Theses Across Seven Disciplines 1997-2012

The core of evidence-based practice (EBP) as advocated for within the practice arms of the health and social sciences is to promote the routine incorporation of the best available research evidence into practice efforts. This requires discipline-specific education that is not only grounded in professional practice but also prepares would-be scientists in the application of the sophisticated techniques that characterize today's high research standards. Doctoral-level education is an important primer for future scientific endeavors across disciplines. This study examined 2334 theses published across Sweden in public health, criminology, nursing, psychiatry, psychology, social work, and sociology during the period 1997-2012. Of the theses reviewed, 13% aimed to investigate the effects of interventions. The highest percentage of effectiveness studies was found in nursing, public health, and psychology. The percentage of outcome research increased during the period. Controlled studies (with comparison group and pre- and post-test) occurred primarily within public health, nursing, psychiatry, and psychology. Of the 296 theses that included an intervention effectiveness study, 131 (44%), or 5.6% of all theses reviewed, met all four assessment criteria for quality. PhD education across seven disciplines in Sweden may be producing a professional core of scientists that is ill prepared to produce the type of research that is necessary to inform practice of the effects of its interventions as exposure to the rigors of quality effectiveness research is all but non-existent. This has implications for the advancement of an evidence-based practice and intervention science more broadly.

Intra-professional dynamics in translational health research: the perspective of social scientists

In contrast to previous studies, which focus upon the professional dynamics of translational health research between clinician scientists and social scientists (inter-professional contestation), we focus upon contestation within social science (intra-professional contestation). Drawing on the empirical context of Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs) in England, we highlight that although social scientists accept subordination to clinician scientists, health services researchers attempt to enhance their position in translational health research vis-à-vis organisation scientists, whom they perceive as relative newcomers to the research domain. Health services researchers do so through privileging the practical impact of their research, compared to organisation scientists' orientation towards development of theory, which health services researchers argue is decoupled from any concern with healthcare improvement. The concern of health services researchers lies with maintaining existing patterns of resource allocation to support their research endeavours, working alongside clinician scientists, in translational health research. The response of organisation scientists is one that might be considered ambivalent, since, unlike health services researchers, they do not rely upon a close relationship with clinician scientists to carry out research, or more generally, garner resource.

Content analysis of patient complaints

OBJECTIVE

To develop a standard taxonomy for inpatient complaints that could be adopted in a wide array of health service institutions.

DESIGN

A taxonomy was developed by merging the coding schemes from eight prior studies of patient complaints, and then by revising the received coding scheme in light of the codes and clarifications that emerged from a content analysis of patient complaints.

SETTING

Two Boston area hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Stratified random sample of 1216 complaints from patients in 2004.

INTERVENTION

s) None. Main outcome measure(s) Patient complaints codes, provider codes and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

A taxonomy comprising 22 patient complaint codes and five provider codes was developed. Inter-rater agreement for complaint codes was good (median Kappa statistic 0.66, interquartile range 0.55-0.80). Four codes were each used in more than 10% of the patient complaints filed: unprofessional conduct (19%); poor provider-patient communication (17%); treatment and care of patient (16%); and, having to wait for care (11%). Of the coding for the profession of the person complained about, 47% of the patient complaints were about staff in general or did not specify a particular profession; 22% identified a physician or dentist; 12% nursing staff; 11% administrative or support staff and 8% allied clinical health professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized coding of patient complaint data may provide an opportunity for quality improvement, patient satisfaction and changes in patient care.

Mapping the field of medical sociology: a comparative analysis of journals

A comparative keyword analysis of the content of nine leading journals is used to suggest potential new directions for medical sociology. The major British and American journals in sociology and medical sociology tend to publish authors based in their own countries, contrasting with the internationalism of other social science disciplines relevant to health, although Sociology of Health and Illness is an exception to this. Medical sociology journals on both sides of the Atlantic focus on individual experience more than general sociology journals, which focus more on social systems levels of analysis. While journal contents reveal British medical sociology to be relatively atheoretical when compared with British general sociology journals, American medical sociology appears relatively apolitical on the same comparison with American general journals. American journals of sociology publish more quantitative studies than their British equivalents, more studies concerning race and other social divisions in American society, and less work drawing on social constructionist perspectives or that is engaged with social theory. Analysis of health and health care at societal and global levels and a deeper engagement with the political and public issues that concern non-sociologists represents a possible future for a medical sociology that is internationally relevant and outward looking.

Sociologia médica, sociologia da saúde ou medicina social? Um escorço comparativo entre França e Brasil

O objetivo deste trabalho é esboçar um estudo comparativo da sociologia médica na França e no Brasil, aproveitando a ocasião proporcionada pelas trocas e a discussão entre sociólogos brasileiros e franceses, que partilham um interesse mútuo sobre os estudos de sociologia da medicina de um lado e, por outro, a abordagem sociológica construída por Pierre Bourdieu. Ele contém uma reflexão sobre o status da sociologia dentro do campo da saúde, baseada em uma revisão da literatura científica francesa, norte-americana, inglesa e brasileira. Por meio dos trabalhos publicados sobre a área médica, procuraremos esclarecer os modos específicos de abordar a saúde, a doença e a medicina em cada um dos países, discernir suas particularidades históricas e delinear as relações entre a sociologia da saúde e a sociologia em sentido largo. Percebemos uma confluência de fatores como o núcleo da formação da sociologia médica no Brasil: um projeto social de reforma por parte dos médicos higienistas, um projeto de institucionalização da disciplina pelos professores de Ciências Sociais nas faculdades de Medicina e uma reforma conservadora do ensino no momento de governos autoritários.

Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research

The growing interest in interdisciplinary research within the Canadian health sciences sector has been manifested by initiatives aimed at increasing the involvement of the social sciences in this sector. Drawing on Bourdieu's concept of field and Knorr-Cetina's concept of epistemic culture, this study explores the extent to which it is possible for the social sciences to integrate into, and thrive in, a field in which the experimental paradigm occupies a hegemonic position. Thirty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore biomedical scientists' receptiveness toward the social sciences in general and to qualitative research in particular. We found that these respondents exhibited a predominantly negative posture toward the social sciences; however, we also found considerable variation in their judgments and explanations. Eight biomedical scientists tended to be receptive to the social sciences, 7 ambivalent, and 16 unreceptive. The main rationale expressed by receptive respondents is that the legitimacy of a method depends on its capacity to adequately respond to a research question and not on its conformity to the experimental canon. Unreceptive respondents maintained that the social sciences cannot generate valid and reliable results because they are not conducive to the experimental design as a methodological approach. Ambivalent respondents were characterized by their cautiously accepting posture toward the social sciences and, especially, by their reservations about qualitative methods. Based on the biomedical scientists' limited receptiveness, we can anticipate that the growth of the social sciences will continue to meet obstacles within the health research field in the near future in Canada.