Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neoliberal mothers

I am what I am?-An integrative review of understandings of 'health identity' and 'illness identity' in scientific literature

Health and illness identities have been presented as important for the experience of health and illness, and they are a widespread research interest. However, these identities are conceptualised in many different ways. This conceptual diversity calls for us to take stock of existing understandings of health and illness identities to provide conceptual clarity and reliability. The study performs an integrative review of these understandings in scientific articles identified through the databases PsychInfo, Pubmed and Scopus. The final sample consists of 64 articles, on which a thematic analysis has been performed. Health and illness identities are regarded as constructed and can be understood in terms of being, acting and judging, answering the questions 'Who are you, with regard to health/illness?', 'How do you deal with health/illness?' and 'How are people judged by their health/illness?', respectively. The terms health identity and illness identity are understood in varied, not necessarily compatible ways, and need to be applied carefully. Health identity concepts appear to be less well established and based upon a more varied theoretical background, while illness identity concepts appear to be more well established and usually relate to a (bio-)medical context. A potential understanding of health identity for medical sociology is suggested.

Experiencing birth trauma: Individualism and isolation in postpartum

Approximately 25-35% of individuals report experiencing a traumatic birth in the United States. Birth trauma has commonly been focused on the experience of labor and delivery itself, with definitions frequently pointing to specific clinical interventions, interactions with providers, and individual expectations during labor and delivery. These definitions however remain too limited, assuming that birth trauma has a discrete temporality-emerging in childbirth-and largely underestimate the social and structural factors that drive trauma. Drawing from interviews conducted between November 2021 and April 2023 with thirty cisgender women who have given birth at least once in the United States, I reveal how the postpartum period is a particularly vulnerable time for trauma emergence, even when absent of difficult delivery experiences. I reveal how social and structural factors in the postpartum period trigger trauma that remains largely invisible, leaving individuals isolated. I situate these women's experiences within the sociological scholarship on trauma, (bio)medicalization, neoliberalism, and risk, to reveal a critical need to expand definitions of, and approaches to, birth trauma.

Paradoxes in the cultural doula concept for migrant women: Implications for gender-inclusive care versus migrant-friendly maternity care

OBJECTIVE

Swedish healthcare policies promote gender equality, shared parenting and cultural diversity. In response to the risk of adverse outcomes for migrant women, cultural doulas were introduced as support for migrant women during pregnancy and/or labour. The aim is to investigate potential tensions in the cultural doula concept in relation to policies of gender equality and diversity.

DESIGN

An interview study was designed to analyse perceptions of the cultural doula concept among healthcare providers in Swedish sexual and reproductive healthcare. Through the framework of Bacchi's approach 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?' and Hochschild's concept of 'global care chains', we analyzed whether the introduction of the cultural doula concept is in line with the policies of gender equality and culturally sensitive care by exploring paradoxes, unintended consequences and what was not reflected upon.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Semi-structured interviews (n = 18) with midwives and obstetricians at hospitals in two Swedish counties during 2022.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

The interviews were analyzed through thematic analysis. Cultural doulas were perceived as multi-tasking resources for facilitating integration and providing healthcare information and psychosocial support. Respondents did not identify doula support as a cultural practice in migrants' origin countries. Despite awareness of cultural differences in gender norms, many respondents stated that doula support included male partners.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

The cultural doula concept includes paradoxes in relation to gender equality and diversity. Rather than empowering migrant women, the cultural doula concept is related to gendered patterns of low-educated, underpaid care work. Labour support interventions including migrant women's social network and intensified partner involvement would be more in line with Swedish policies of gender equality, shared parenting and cultural sensitivity when needed. However, doulas may be an imperfect solution for women lacking partners or social networks, for example, newly arrived migrant women, if no support is to be found within the perinatal care system.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Midwives and obstetricians need reflexivity about what the problem is represented to be when it comes to gender equality and cultural sensitivity in their collaboration with cultural doulas, boundaries between roles, how they handle confidentiality, and why cultural doulas are needed in relation to migrant women's integration.

Toward better births? Political discourses of maternity care in birth practices in Denmark and France

Internationally, politicians and practitioners have focused strongly on humanization of births, to enable fewer medicalized birth care procedures. In this paper, we explore policy efforts to support better births in order to comprehend developments in maternity care in Denmark and France, two countries previously identified as having different birth cultures. Our analysis has been fueled by the question of how birth policies have developed in both countries in an era in which medicalization of birth has been problematized internationally. Using discourse analysis, we examine the political constructions of specific problems in central policy documents. The analysis shows which problematizations around maternity care are discursively constructed, what solutions are discursively presented and on what assumptions the problematizations are based. The article supports the conclusion of other scholars that a pervading risk discourse on birth and birthing bodies constitutes how maternity care can be experienced and practiced.

Cooperation between midwives and doulas in the context of perinatal care - a integrative review of qualitative and quantitative studies

BACKGROUND

A doula is a person who provides support to women in the perinatal period without providing medical services. During childbirth, the doula becomes a member of the interdisciplinary team. This integrative review aims to analyse the nature of the cooperation between doulas and midwives, its efficiency and challenges and ways of strengthening this cooperation.

METHODS

A structured integrative review of empirical and theoretical studies written in English was conducted. The literature search included MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, ProQuest, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Embase Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition databases. The analysis included papers published in 1995-2020. Dedicated documents were searched for different combinations of terms and standard logical operators. A manual search of the studies was included for additional references.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles from 75 full-text records were analysed. Three main themes emerged. (1) doulas are needed to prop up the system (2) barriers in collaboration between midwives and doulas; and (3) how cooperation between midwives and doulas can be strengthened. None of the articles referred directly to the impact of collaboration between midwives and doulas on the quality of perinatal care.

CONCLUSION

This is the first review to analyse the impact of collaboration between midwives and doulas on the quality of perinatal care. Ensuring adequate collaboration between doulas and midwives requires effort from both of these professional groups and the health care system. However, such collaboration is supportive for birthing women and the perinatal care system. Further research in terms of the impact of this collaboration on the quality of perinatal care is needed.

The (After)life of a Trial: Biocommunicability of an At-Risk Pregnancy

The publication of A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE), conducted in the United States in 2018, heralded a paradigm shift within the obstetrical management of term pregnancy among people who have not previously given birth. ARRIVE finds its home among other canonical - and controversial - randomized controlled trials (RCTs) within obstetrics. We argue that RCTs have their own (after)life, both creating new subjects for biomedical intervention and recalibrating who reproductive health practitioners consider to be at risk of adverse health outcomes. These data have important consequences for medical social scientific engagement with RCTs to further interrogate the questions of risk and intervention within reproductive health.

"Restoring the Sacred Part of Birth": Doula Care and Cesarean Birth in Switzerland

At 32.3%, Switzerland ranks among countries with the highest rates of cesarean deliveries in Europe. Because cesareans generally negatively influence the birth experience, parents turn to holistic therapists to heal somatic and emotional disorders not addressed by standard biomedical follow-ups. Doula care is still emerging in Switzerland. Although doulas are not allowed in the operation rooms, they support parents before birth and during the postpartum period. They aim at improving the birth experience by restoring intimate, "sacred" elements of birth through symbolic and spiritual practices. Based on interviews with doulas, I explore their experiences and practices regarding surgical birth.

Emotional labour as a vehicle of organisational change in maternity care: The case of Russian doulas' institutional work

Sociological scholars of healthcare professions are becoming increasingly aware of the organisational dimension of professionalism, including how professionals as institutional actors are exposed to and influence organisational transformation. By tracing the ground-level professional efforts of Russian doulas-a caring profession that has been plunged into a reforming health system-in this article I explore how meaning-making activities and professionals' emotional labour build into and advance institutional changes in post-socialist maternity care. Drawing on qualitative research materials, I define three ways through which doulas' institutional efforts engage with emotions in clinical settings: (1) redefining emotional labour as a compound of maternity care; (2) grounding emotional labour in the context of reforming institutions; (3) using emotional labour to bridge discrepancies within organisational arrangements in healthcare. My research findings provide new insights into how marketisation influences professional care, as well as about caring professionalism in post-socialist maternity care. Attention to doulas' professional efforts allows for the affective transformation and inequality in the context of healthcare reforms to be analytically grasped. In particular, I trace how doulas' institutional agency embodied in emotional labour constructs the neo-liberal patient's identity.

"Whatsapping" the continuity of postpartum care in Switzerland: A socio-anthropological study

BACKGROUND

Digital media such as Apps, Internet and social networks have become integral parts of the maternity experience for more than a decade. These media can support or undermine women's experiences as has been shown in digital sociology research. Using Immediate Messaging Applications to provide information and support to women during the perinatal period is an emerging practice.

AIM

This article analyses how health and social care professionals - with a focus on community midwives - and women communicate between postpartum home visits through Immediate Message Applications in Switzerland.

METHODS

A socio-anthropological study that relied on qualitative methods including semi-directed interviews with midwives and health and social care professionals (n = 30) and immigrant women (n = 20).

FINDINGS

Since the introduction of Immediate Messaging Applications, women and their carer converse more regularly between post-partum home visits. Women send questions, pictures and videos to them, often allowing swift responses to their concerns. Midwives encounter difficulties answering women's questions when they cannot be solved through quick communication (e.g. infant crying). To them, texting frequency forms a clinical clue to women's mental health. Not all women contact their carer through digital messages; immigrant women are less likely to know and use this service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Immediate Messaging Applications form a promising communication tool, complementary to home visits, and contribute to woman-centered care and continuity of care. As an emergent practice, it has not been framed by a guideline yet. Policy makers and practitioners should ensure that its use does not contribute to unequal access to care.

Cutting out the surrogate: Caesarean sections in the Mexican surrogacy industry

Childbirth practices shed light on cultural values, ideologies of gender and motherhood, and social inequalities. Transnational, commercial surrogacy presents a useful lens through which to view the social dynamics that shape childbirth experiences. Surrogacy challenges dominant views on the naturalness and inevitability of maternal-fetal bonds because it involves the separation of gestation from motherhood. What ideologies inform childbirth practices in the consumer-driven context of surrogacy in which the woman giving birth is neither the consumer nor the "mother"? Based on multi-sited ethnographic research between 2014 and 2017 and in-depth interviews with 120 participants in the Mexican surrogacy industry, I argue that doctors draw on normative ideologies of kinship, gender, and maternal-child bonding to justify and normalize the use of Caesarean sections among surrogates. The ideology espoused by these doctors reinforces the notion that maternal-fetal bonding is natural and inevitable, constructs women as irrational and driven by hormones, and presumes that bonding between surrogate mothers and the children they gestate is detrimental to the surrogacy process. Furthermore, the proffered justifications for the Caesarean sections reproduces stereotypes about poor Mexican women as risky patients, contributes to the "disposability" of their labor, and reinforces a hierarchy in which the perceived interests of intended parents and children are elevated above those of surrogate mothers. This article contributes to social science studies of medicine by demonstrating how classist and racist stereotypes, and folk notions of kinship, gender, and maternal-child bonding are biologized in medical practice.