1
|
Urwin S, Gillibrand S, Davies JC, Crosbie EJ. Factors associated with cervical screening coverage: a longitudinal analysis of English general practices from 2013 to 2022. J Public Health (Oxf) 2024; 46:e43-e50. [PMID: 38148290 PMCID: PMC10939411 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer remains an important global public health concern. Understanding the factors contributing to a decline in screening uptake in high-income countries is fundamental to improving screening rates. We aimed to identify general practice and patient characteristics related to cervical screening coverage in England between 2013 and 2022. METHODS We analyzed a panel of 59 271 General Practice (GP)-years from 7881 GP practices. We applied correlated random effects regression to examine the association between cervical screening uptake and a rich set of GP practice workforce, size, quality and patient characteristics. RESULTS Our results show a decline in overall screening rates from 2013/14 to 2021/22 from 77% to 72%. We find GP workforce and list size characteristics are strongly related to screening rates. An increase in 1 FTE Nurse per 1000 patients is related to a 1.94 percentage point increase in cervical screening rates. GP practices located in more deprived areas have lower screening rates. CONCLUSIONS GP workforce and patient characteristics need to be considered by decision-makers to increase screening rates. The implementation of self-sampling screening methods could help address some of the current barriers to screening, including lack of healthcare staff and facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Urwin
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Stephanie Gillibrand
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jennifer C Davies
- Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kovacevic L, Naik R, Lugo-Palacios DG, Ashrafian H, Mossialos E, Darzi A. The impact of collaborative organisational models and general practice size on patient safety and quality of care in the English National Health Service: A systematic review. Health Policy 2023; 138:104940. [PMID: 37976620 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Collaborative primary care has become an increasingly popular strategy to manage existing pressures on general practice. In England, the recent changes taking place in the primary care sector have included the formation of collaborative organisational models and a steady increase in practice size. The aim of this review was to summarise the available evidence on the impact of collaborative models and general practice size on patient safety and quality of care in England. We searched for quantitative and qualitative studies on the topic published between January 2010 and July 2023. The quality of articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. We screened 6533 abstracts, with full-text screening performed on 76 records. A total of 29 articles were included in the review. 19 met the inclusion criteria following full-text screening, with seven identified through reverse citation searching and three through expert consultation. All studies were found to be of moderate or high quality. A predominantly positive impact on service delivery measures and patient-level outcomes was identified. Meanwhile, the evidence on the effect on pay-for-performance outcomes and hospital admissions is mixed, with continuity of care and access identified as a concern. While this review is limited to evidence from England, the findings provide insights for all health systems undergoing a transition towards collaborative primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Kovacevic
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Wing, St Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Road, W2 1NY, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, W2 1NY, London, UK.
| | - Ravi Naik
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Faculty Building, South Kensington Campus, Kensington, SW7 2AZ, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, W2 1NY, London, UK
| | - David G Lugo-Palacios
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Faculty Building, South Kensington Campus, Kensington, SW7 2AZ, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Faculty Building, South Kensington Campus, Kensington, SW7 2AZ, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, W2 1NY, London, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Faculty Building, South Kensington Campus, Kensington, SW7 2AZ, London, UK; Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, London, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Faculty Building, South Kensington Campus, Kensington, SW7 2AZ, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, W2 1NY, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|