1
|
Anbari AB, Sandheinrich T, Hulett J, Salerno E. Understanding advanced practice registered nurse perspectives on providing care to people with a history of breast cancer. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2023; 35:804-812. [PMID: 37560998 DOI: 10.1097/jxx.0000000000000929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with a history of breast cancer (PHBC) face a lifelong risk of treatment-related sequelae affecting their quality of life. Stakeholders advocate for improving breast cancer survivorship outcomes by increasing clinicians' knowledge of cancer survivorship issues. In Missouri, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in nononcology settings provide routine survivorship care to PHBC; however, little is known about how they approach survivorship care planning for PHBC. PURPOSE Examine perspectives of Missouri APRNs practicing in nononcology settings about providing survivorship care to PHBC. METHODS A combination of grounded theory and thematic analysis techniques was used for focus groups and semistructured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using grounded theory coding methods. RESULTS Nineteen nononcology Missouri-based APRNs (18 NPs, 1 CNS/DNP) shared their perspectives about managing care for PHBC. We identified four major themes. Our participants (1) attuned their baseline assessment techniques to a history of breast cancer; (2) were prepared to order additional evaluations; (3) were willing to proactively figure out next best steps for PHBC beyond theneed for breast cancer recurrence surveillance; and (4) suggest that streamlining cancer survivorship care resources would benefit both clinicians and PHBC. CONCLUSIONS Our findings shed light on how APRNs approach care planning for PHBC and the needs of nononcology APRNs for managing PHBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Advanced practice registered nurses are well-positioned to improve cancer survivorship care. Increasing knowledge of cancer survivorship care guidelines could improve long-term health outcomes of PHBC. Access to cancer survivorship resources or experts via telehealth/technology for both APRNs and patients could improve survivorship care and overall health of PHBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison B Anbari
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | | | - Jennifer Hulett
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Elizabeth Salerno
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith AL, Boyle F, Lewis S. Potential inequities in availability of care from breast care nurses: a qualitative study reporting the experiences and perspectives of women with metastatic breast cancer in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:942. [PMID: 35869552 PMCID: PMC9308323 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08269-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background International consensus guidelines recommend patients with metastatic breast cancer have access to a nurse experienced in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This study aimed to explore women’s experiences of supportive care from breast care nurses, including their perspectives on the role breast care nurses currently play in providing support to people with metastatic breast cancer. Methods Multiple semi-structured qualitative interviews with 38 women with metastatic breast cancer in Australia. Data relating to nursing care were extracted and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three themes were identified: (1) feeling that supportive care needs are unrecognised; (2) confusion about role and relevance of breast care nurse to those with metastatic breast cancer; (3) care from metastatic breast care nurses (when available) was appreciated, valued and beneficial. Participants’ experiences differed in relation to ease of access to, amount of contact with, and level of care provided by breast care nurses. Contact and care ranged from little or none to comprehensive and ongoing. A key system-level challenge was that the diversity of diagnostic and treatment pathways for metastatic breast cancer meant that no systematic means existed to support routine or regular contact between breast care nurses and participants. Participants who did report having access to a specialised metastatic breast care nurse placed considerable value on the care received. For these participants, care from the breast care nurse extended and complemented care from the oncologist and included much needed psychosocial and practical support. For these participants, the breast care nurse assumed the role of key contact and care coordinator and was valued for their availability, accessibility and responsiveness. High levels of trust developed between patient and breast care nurse. Conclusions Findings indicate that there may be gaps and inequities in supportive care in Australia for people diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, a finding that supports earlier reports of limited access to breast care nurses for people with metastatic breast cancer in Australia. The specialised metastatic breast care nurse could potentially play a key role in addressing the high level of unmet supportive care needs and improve continuity of care for these patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Slaghmuylder Y, Pype P, Van Hecke A, Lauwerier E. Exploring healthcare providers’ perceptions regarding the prevention and treatment of chronic pain in breast cancer survivors: A qualitative analysis among different disciplines. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273576. [PMID: 36006950 PMCID: PMC9409579 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevention and treatment of chronic pain problems in breast cancer follow-up care require an adequate response from healthcare providers. Generally, this involves the uptake of evidence-based principles regarding pain management in everyday practice. However, despite the extensive literature on effective pain interventions, systematic and coordinated follow-up care is lacking for breast cancer survivors with pain problems in Flanders, Belgium. Objective This study aimed to gather insight into healthcare providers’ perceptions of pain prevention and treatment in breast cancer follow-up care, particularly with attention to the multilevel influences on pain follow-up. Methods We conducted four online focus groups with twenty-two healthcare providers from different disciplines such as oncologists, pharmacists, nurses, physiotherapists, and psychologists. Data analysis was guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. This guide is inspired by the constant comparison method, based on Grounded Theory. Results The identified influencing factors were thematically grouped into four levels: at the level of the individual healthcare provider, in interaction with the patient, in interaction with colleagues, and at the context level. At each level, we distinguished factors related to healthcare providers’ perceptions such as awareness, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, experiences, and intentions. For example, because of a lack of knowledge and certain beliefs among healthcare providers, referral to other disciplines often does not happen in the context of pain. Conclusion This study points out the need to explore the prevention and treatment of chronic pain after breast cancer from a multidimensional point of view. This involves not only the characteristics of individual healthcare providers but is also inherently interactional and system-like in nature. This analysis provides opportunities for the development of interventions that target the influencing factors of prevention and treatment of chronic pain in breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaël Slaghmuylder
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, InterProfessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium
- * E-mail:
| | - Peter Pype
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, InterProfessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, InterProfessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium
- Nursing Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Emelien Lauwerier
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, InterProfessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geramita EM, Parker IR, Brufsky JW, Diergaarde B, van Londen GJ. Primary Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Their Preparedness to Provide Cancer Survivorship Care. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:1219-1226. [PMID: 31388974 PMCID: PMC8266289 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01585-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Recent cancer care delivery models and clinical practice guidelines have expanded the role of primary care providers (PCPs) in routine follow-up of cancer survivors. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of PCPs affiliated with a large healthcare system to (1) examine practices, attitudes, and beliefs regarding preparedness to provide survivorship care and (2) explore predictors of confidence managing cancer survivors. We distributed a self-administered online survey to 1069 clinical affiliates providing primary care services within the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center system. Associations between PCPs' professional characteristics and attitudes and preparedness were evaluated. Multiple logistic regression explored predictors of confidence monitoring common cancer treatment-related symptoms. One hundred twenty-seven eligible PCPs responded. The sample was split between academic and community practice (48.0% vs. 52.0%, respectively), predominantly comprised of physicians (81.8%), and 64.6% had > 15 years direct patient care experience. The majority agreed that PCPs play a valuable role in surveillance and adverse event monitoring in survivors, though less than 25% felt their professional training prepared them to perform each of these domains. Physicians were significantly more likely than advanced practice providers to be among the 65% of PCPs who were confident monitoring ≥ 1 symptom in each of the 5 evaluated symptom clusters (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.8). PCPs appear willing to assume an enhanced role in cancer survivorship care but feel unprepared to do so. Enhanced training and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines are needed to facilitate effective implementation of PCP-delivered survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Geramita
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Magee Womens' Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Room 3526, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | | | - Jill W Brufsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brenda Diergaarde
- Graduate School of Public Health, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - G J van Londen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
In the health care setting, and especially in cancer patients nearing the end of life, administrators, medical staff, patients, and families face challenges of a social, legal, religious, and cultural nature in the process of care. The present study aimed to perform a metasynthesis of qualitative studies conducted on providing end-of-life care for cancer patients. The present metasynthesis was conducted using Sandelowski and Barroso's method. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases, from the inception to date, and a total of 21 articles were identified as eligible for inclusion in the study. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) criteria were used for assessing the articles, and data were analyzed by the subject review. Six themes were extracted for end-of-life care including psychological support, palliative support, educational-counseling support, spiritual support, preferential support, and supportive interactions, each comprising a number of categories. The most frequently mentioned categories were high-value care (67%) and adaptive acceptance (57%). The findings of this metasynthesis support the view that nurses are moral agents who are deeply invested in the moral integrity of end-of-life care involving assisted death. The present study showed that providing high-value care and facilitating adaptive acceptance are important constituents of a holistic strategy for providing end-of-life care to cancer patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fitch MI, Nicoll I, Lockwood G. Cancer survivor's perspectives on the major challenge in the transition to survivorship. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2361-2367. [PMID: 32376142 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand cancer survivors' perspectives regarding the major challenge in transitioning from cancer treatment to follow-up care. Identification of major issues should inform survivorship care and help reduce suffering. METHODS A national survey was conducted to identify experiences with follow-up for cancer survivors one to three years post-treatment. The survey included open-ended questions for respondents to add topics of importance and details that offer deeper insight into their experiences. This publication presents analysis of the open-ended question about the major challenge faced by adult cancer population. RESULTS Of 13,534 unique adult survey respondents, 8706 respondents identified major challenges. Of those reporting challenges, 4727 (54.3 %) named a single challenge but 3979 (45.7 %) identified more than one. In total, 15,351 challenges were identified. Responses to open-ended questions are summarized under significant themes: major concerns are often more than singular issues; recovery and fear of recurrence; and information needs. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Results indicate significant numbers of adult survivors have multiple concerns about physical, emotional, and practical issues but are not receiving assistance and/or appropriate information to help manage these concerns. It is important to determine how health care can be proactive in identifying and addressing needs of survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 207 Chisholm Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M4C 4V9, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thakkar P, Greenwald BD, Patel P. Rehabilitation of Adult Patients with Primary Brain Tumors: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci 2020; 10:brainsci10080492. [PMID: 32751074 PMCID: PMC7464729 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10080492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rehabilitative measures have been shown to benefit patients with primary brain tumors (PBT). To provide a high quality of care, clinicians should be aware of common challenges in this population including a variety of medical complications, symptoms, and impairments, such as headaches, seizures, cognitive deficits, fatigue, and mood changes. By taking communication and family training into consideration, clinicians can provide integrated and patient-centered care to this population. This article looks to review the current literature in outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation options for adult patients with PBTs as well as explore the role of the interdisciplinary team in providing survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parth Thakkar
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; (P.T.); (P.P.)
| | - Brian D. Greenwald
- JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, Edison, NJ 08820, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Palak Patel
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; (P.T.); (P.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The purpose was to review the perspectives of cancer survivors about what they perceive constitutes positive cancer experiences. A national survey was conducted in collaboration with 10 Canadian provinces to identify experiences and unmet needs for cancer survivors between 1 and 3 years of posttreatment. The survey included open-ended questions designed to allow the respondents to add topics and details of importance. This publication presents the analysis of quantitative data and open-ended questions regarding cancer survivors’ perspectives about positive experiences and gaps in care during their cancer journey. Of the 13 534 unique adult survey respondents, 7794 (57.6%) responded to the positive experiences question and 6434 (47.5%) to the question about gaps in care. Elements of positive experiences included the compassionate health care workers, maintaining a positive outlook and the support of family and friends. Gaps in care included a lack of access to services, information, and support. Respondents were able to identify positive aspects of their cancer experiences and where improvements were needed. These findings assist in determining how health care professionals can address the needs of cancer patients based on what survivors have identified as helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Phillips S, Villalobos AVK, Pratt-Chapman M. Evaluating an Online Training Course to Develop and Sustain Cancer Navigation and Survivorship Programs. Oncol Nurs Forum 2019; 46:E171-E179. [PMID: 31424457 DOI: 10.1188/19.onf.e171-e179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of the Executive Training on Navigation and Survivorship (Executive Training) online training course, designed by the George Washington University Cancer Center, on nurses and other healthcare professionals. SAMPLE & SETTING A volunteer sample of 499 healthcare professionals, including nurses and patient navigators, were recruited through multiple Internet-based channels. METHODS & VARIABLES Participants completed questionnaires before and after each module and at the end of the training. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and paired t tests were used to assess pre- and post-test learning confidence gains for each module. Qualitative feedback from participants was also summarized. RESULTS From pre- to post-test, each group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in confidence (p < 0.05) for all seven training modules. Confidence gains were statistically significant for 19 of 20 learning objectives (p < 0.05). Overall rating scores and qualitative feedback were positive. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING The Executive Training course prepares healthcare professionals from diverse backgrounds to establish navigation and survivorship programs. In addition, the training content addresses gaps in nursing education on planning and budgeting that can improve success.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nahm ES, Miller K, McQuaige M, Corbitt N, Jaidar N, Rosenblatt P, Zhu S, Son H, Hertsenberg L, Wickersham K, La I, Yoon J, Powell K. Testing the Impact of a Cancer Survivorship Patient Engagement Toolkit on Selected Health Outcomes. Oncol Nurs Forum 2019; 46:572-584. [DOI: 10.1188/19.onf.572-584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
11
|
Alfano CM, Jefford M, Maher J, Birken SA, Mayer DK. Building Personalized Cancer Follow-up Care Pathways in the United States: Lessons Learned From Implementation in England, Northern Ireland, and Australia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:625-639. [PMID: 31099658 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_238267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
There is a global need to transform cancer follow-up care to address the needs of cancer survivors while efficiently using the health care system to limit the effects of provider shortages, gaps in provider knowledge, and already overburdened clinics; improve the mental health of clinicians; and limit costs to health care systems and patients. England, Northern Ireland, and Australia are implementing an approach that triages patients to personalized follow-up care pathways depending on the types and levels of resources needed for patients' long-term care that has been shown to meet patients' needs, more efficiently use the health care system, and reduce costs. This article discusses lessons learned from these implementation efforts, identifying the necessary components of these care models and barriers and facilitators to implementation of this care. Specifically, the United States and other countries looking to transform follow-up care should consider how to develop six key principles of this care: algorithms to triage patients to pathways; methods to assess patient issues to guide care; remote monitoring systems; methods to support patients in self-management; ways to coordinate care and information exchange between oncology, primary care, specialists, and patients; and methods to engage all stakeholders and secure their ongoing buy-in. Next steps to advance this work in the United States are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Jefford
- 2 The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Maher
- 3 Macmillan Cancer Support, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah A Birken
- 4 Gillings School of Global Public Health & Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Deborah K Mayer
- 5 School of Nursing and Linegerger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC and National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The transition from primary cancer treatment to posttreatment follow-up care is seen as critical to the long-term health of survivors. However, relatively little attention has been paid to understanding this pivotal period. This review will offer a brief outline of the significant work surrounding this pivotal time published in the past year. RECENT FINDINGS The growing number of cancer survivors has stimulated an emphasis on finding new models of care, whereby responsibility for survivorship follow-up is transitioned to primary care providers. A variety of models and tools have emerged for follow-up care. Survivorship care plans are heralded as a key component of survivorship care and a vehicle for supporting transition. Uptake of survivorship care plans and implementation of evidence-based models of survivorship care has been slow, hindered by a range of barriers. SUMMARY Evaluation is needed regarding survivorship models in terms of feasibility, survivor friendliness, cost effectiveness, and achievement of sustainable outcomes. How, and when, to introduce plans for transition to the patient and determine transition readiness are important considerations but need to be informed by evidence. Additional study is needed to identify best practice for the introduction and application of survivorship care plans.
Collapse
|
13
|
Marazzi F, Masiello V, Marchesano D, Boldrini L, Luzi S, Ferrara PE, Amabile E, Piccari D, Landi F, Moschella F, Franceschini G, Masetti R, Mantini G, Valentini V, Smaniotto D. Shoulder girdle impairment in breast cancer survivors: the role of range of motion as predictive factor for dose distribution and clinical outcome. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 105:319-330. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891619839287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background:Pain and functional impairment of the ipsilateral shoulder girdle in patients who underwent surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC) is a late complication reported in the literature. We analyze a correlation with dosimetric parameters and propose an algorithm for sparing strategies.Methods:A total of 111 patients treated for BC were included in this observational analysis during follow-up protocol visits. Exclusion criteria were the presence of moderate or severe arthrosis history and/or rheumatologic diseases. All the patients had complete physical and multidimensional examinations during joint (physiatrist and radiotherapy oncology) follow-up visits. A scapula–humeral articulation (SHA) standardized contouring was performed retrospectively on Eclipse® treatment plans. A possible correlation between patients’ characteristics, radiotherapy, and dosimetry analysis and functional impairment was investigated at statistical analysis. Results of analysis were summarized into a proposal of algorithm for sparing SHA.Results:A total of 111 patients were selected during follow-up visits. Mean age of patients was 60 years (range 41–85 years). A total of 103 patients (93%) underwent conservative surgery, with 110 patients (99%) undergoing axilla surgery as well. Fifty-two patients (46.8%) presented a reduction of range of motion (ROM) abduction on the treated side at the observational analysis. Mean ROM abduction reduction was 13°06’ (range 0°–100°). Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score results were excellent in 79 patients (71.2%), discrete in 15 patients (13.5%), good in 15 patients (13.5%), and sufficient in 2 patients (1.8%). Median EQD2Dmaxat SHA was 18 Gy (range 0.22–51.9 Gy) and median EQD2mean dose at SHA was 2 Gy (range 0.04–24.32 Gy). Univariate analysis showed a linear correlation between DASH score and ROM of abduction of treated side (ρ=−0.7), ROM of abduction and ROM of flexion in ipsilateral arm (ρ=0.8), or ROM of abduction and ROM of flexion in contralateral arm (ρ=0.8). A statistically significant difference in ROM abduction between the 2 arms was found at χ2test ( P<0.05 at χ2confidence interval = 95%). Cox linear regression analysis showed ROM abduction on treated arm as a predictive factor of DASH score ( P<0.0001). Age ( P<0.05), DASH score ( P=0.006), and ROM abduction on treated arm ( P=0.005) were found as independent predictive factors of mean dose at multivariate analysis. A mean dose higher than 7 Gy and ROM abduction reduction more than 30° were related to DASH score level reduction.Conclusions:This hypothesis-generating study introduces an algorithm to be validated for management of sparing SHA and improving quality of survivorship. ROM evaluation after surgery, early physiotherapy, standard contouring, and planning adaptation represent possible indications to preserve shoulder impairment. Further prospective studies are needed to discriminate impairment of surgery and radiotherapy in order to personalized therapeutic plan programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Marazzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Domenico Marchesano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Stefano Luzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Paola E. Ferrara
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Riabilitazione e Medicina Fisica, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, neurologiche, ortopediche e della testa-collo, Roma, Italia
| | - Eugenia Amabile
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Riabilitazione e Medicina Fisica, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, neurologiche, ortopediche e della testa-collo, Roma, Italia
| | - Danila Piccari
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Francesco Landi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Riabilitazione e Medicina Fisica, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, neurologiche, ortopediche e della testa-collo, Roma, Italia
| | - Francesca Moschella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia
| | - Giovanna Mantini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
| | - Daniela Smaniotto
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fitch M, Zomer S, Lockwood G, Louzado C, Shaw Moxam R, Rahal R, Green E. Experiences of adult cancer survivors in transitions. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:2977-2986. [PMID: 30588549 PMCID: PMC6597588 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4605-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To understand the experiences of adult cancer survivors as they transition from the end of cancer treatment to follow-up care as a basis for developing actionable recommendations to integrate cancer care delivery and survivorship care. Methods A national survey was conducted in collaboration with ten Canadian provinces to identify unmet needs and experiences with follow-up for cancer survivors between 1 and 3 years post-treatment. Surveys were available in English and French and completed either on paper or on-line. Samples were drawn from provincial cancer registries and packages distributed by mail. Results A total of 40,790 survey packages were mailed out across the ten provinces and 12,929 surveys were completed by adults (age 30+ years), and 329 surveys were completed by adolescents and young adults (age 18 to 29 years) giving an overall response rate of 33.3%. For the purposes of this publication, the focus will be on the adult sample. In the adult cohort (age 30+ years), 51% of the sample were females, 60% were 65 years of age or older, and 77% had not experienced metastatic spread. Three-quarters reported their health as good/very good and 82% that their quality of life was good/very good. Overall, 87% experienced at least one physical concern, 78% experienced at least one emotional concern, and 44% experienced at least one practical concern. The average number of concerns reported for each domain ranged from 2.0 to 3.8. For those who sought help, a third experienced difficulty obtaining assistance or did not receive it. The most frequently cited reasons for not seeking help was that someone had told them what they were experiencing was normal. Conclusions The results indicate that many adult survivors have concerns about physical, emotional, and practical issues but are not receiving help to reduce their suffering. It is imperative we take action to correct this current reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah Zomer
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gina Lockwood
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Rami Rahal
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Canada
| | - Esther Green
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To discuss the role of survivorship care and survivorship care plans, including a recently developed neuro-oncology-specific plan care (https://www.soc-neuro-onc.org/SNO/Resources/Survivorship_Care_Plan.aspx) for adult patients diagnosed with primary glial neoplasms and the necessary educational needs of oncology nurses. DATA SOURCES Published peer-reviewed literature and resources from cancer and neuro-oncology professional organizations and patient advocacy organizations. CONCLUSION The current Commission on Cancer mandates adult cancer patients treated with curative intent each receive an individualized survivorship care plan. Patients with glioma are likely to benefit from receiving survivorship care, including survivorship care plans aimed at addressing the complex and evolving needs of this unique patient population throughout their illness trajectory. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurse professionals are critical to the development and implementation of cancer survivorship care. This growing leadership role presents oncology nurses with specific and new educational needs regarding survivorship care.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Survivorship has become a significant topic within oncologic care. The tools and means by which the provision of survivorship care can be implemented and delivered are in development and are the focus of significant research oncology-wide. These tools and methods include innovations of survivorship care delivery, survivorship care plans, and improving communication among all stakeholders in an individual patient's care as the means to elevate health-related quality of life. The merits of these survivorship care provisions in the field of neuro-oncology and its patients' exigent need for more patient-centric care focused on living with their illness are discussed. Since 2014 there has been a mandate within the United States for adult cancer patients treated with curative intent to receive survivorship care plans, comprising a treatment summary and a follow-up plan, intended to facilitate patients' care after initial diagnosis and upfront treatment. Several cancer-specific survivorship care plans have been developed and endorsed by health care professional organizations and patient advocacy groups. A survivorship care plan specific for neuro-oncology has been collaboratively developed by a multidisciplinary and interprofessional committee; it is endorsed by the Society for Neuro-Oncology Guidelines Committee. It is available as open access for download from the Society for Neuro-Oncology website under "Resources": https://www.soc-neuro-onc.org/SNO/Resources/Survivorship_Care_Plan.aspx. Survivorship care offers an opportunity to begin directly addressing the range of issues patients navigate throughout their illness trajectory, an oncology initiative to which neuro-oncology patients both need and deserve equitable access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Leeper
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Kathrin Milbury
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|